Israel attacks Iran UPDATE: Trump claims a cease fire among all countries

[RLLD 4,194]

2 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

So, what is everyone upset about today?

Pretty happy across the board.  Still a little peeved that there was not more cost cutting in that budget, but I also understand there is not a silver bullet for our problems.

[Strike 5,414]

6 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

So, what is everyone upset about today?

Nothing really.  Market is up, oil is down, Trump continues rounding up @The Real timschochet's employees.  Life is good.

[Sandy Loam 42]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Your attempts to wipe away the crimes of your masters wont work, not any more.  We wont accept the "what difference does it make now anyway" defense of your criminal cult leaders.

 

Have you accepted Trump's 34 felony convictions related to him paying hush money to a porn star who let him wet his cheetoh while his wife was home pregnant?

[Hawkeye21 2,393]

Just now, Sandy Loam said:

Have you accepted Trump's 34 felony convictions related to him paying hush money to a porn star who let him wet his cheetoh while his wife was home pregnant?

We all know Trump is a terrible person, move on.

[Gepetto 1,352]

I just scroll right down past any Sandy Loam posts.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,257]

4 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

I just scroll right down past any Sandy Loam posts.

Gutterboy has surpassed him as the most likely to OD on TDS 

[Strike 5,414]

3 minutes ago, Gepetto said:

I just scroll right down past any Sandy Loam posts.

You spelled suspended Rusty wrong.

[jerryskids 6,719]

25 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

Have you accepted Trump's 34 felony convictions related to him paying hush money to a porn star who let him wet his cheetoh while his wife was home pregnant?

The Left:  NY gerry rigged together several old misdemeanors past their statute of limitations to manufacture a novel felony combo so they could prosecute the Republican candidate for POTUS:  Genius$#@!

Also the Left:  Biden's Politburo figured out a way to end-around the SCOTUS ruling against forgiving student loans:  Brilliant$#@!

Also the Left:  Trump legally deployed the National Guard in LA to protect federal assets and people:  Fascist$#@!

[RLLD 4,194]

30 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

Have you accepted Trump's 34 felony convictions related to him paying hush money to a porn star who let him wet his cheetoh while his wife was home pregnant?

I accept that he paid a pro star to hide his infidelity, and I could not care less.   It is that you pretend this is important that your party has useless leadership

[HellToupee 1,709]

1 hour ago, BrahmaBulls said:

 

Full tilt every day.  Go see a counselor

he seriously needs help

[HellToupee 1,709]

33 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Gutterboy has surpassed him as the most likely to OD on TDS 

He’s become more insufferable than lady squissy 

[HellToupee 1,709]

46 minutes ago, Strike said:

Nothing really.  Market is up, oil is down, Trump continues rounding up @The Real timschochet's employees.  Life is good.

Stories like this bring a smile to my face

 

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

garbage person

[Sandy Loam 42]

32 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I accept that he paid a pro star to hide his infidelity, and I could not care less.   It is that you pretend this is important that your party has useless leadership

So you believe Biden committed criminal acts despite there being no charges and convictions and then won't accept that Trump was tried, convicted and sentenced on 34 felonies.

[Sandy Loam 42]

37 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

The Left:  NY gerry rigged together several old misdemeanors past their statute of limitations to manufacture a novel felony combo so they could prosecute the Republican candidate for POTUS:  Genius$#@!

Also the Left:  Biden's Politburo figured out a way to end-around the SCOTUS ruling against forgiving student loans:  Brilliant$#@!

Also the Left:  Trump legally deployed the National Guard in LA to protect federal assets and people:  Fascist$#@!

A hat-trick whatabout!

Woot!

[Hardcore troubadour 15,257]

On 6/22/2025 at 3:03 PM, Ron_Artest said:

Iran closing straight of Hormuz.

Awesome job trump.

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

The US military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of the country’s nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, according to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by three people briefed on it.

The assessment, which has not been previously reported, was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence arm. It is based on a battle damage assessment conducted by US Central Command in the aftermath of the US strikes, one of the sources said.

The analysis of the damage to the sites and the impact of the strikes on Iran’s nuclear ambitions is ongoing, and could change as more intelligence becomes available. But the early findings are at odds with President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the strikes “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also said on Sunday that Iran’s nuclear ambitions “have been obliterated.”

Two of the people familiar with the assessment said Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed. One of the people said the centrifuges are largely “intact.”

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites

So what now?

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

Iran claims to have smuggled almost all of the country’s highly enriched uranium to a secret location before the US launched strikes on its nuclear bases.

Three of Tehran’s most critical enrichment facilities, including its underground facility at Fordow, were pummelled by B-2 stealth bombers and a barrage of submarine-launched missiles early on Sunday morning.

But officials believe that most of the material at Fordow and Iran’s other facilities had been moved elsewhere before the strikes.

Iran has vowed to continue enriching uranium in defiance of Donald Trump, raising further concerns over its nuclear programme.

Takht Ravanchi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, rejected claims that Tehran would abandon its nuclear programme, telling the Germany broadcaster ARD: “No one can tell us what we should and should not do.”

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/06/23/iranians-moved-enriched-uranium-before-us-strikes/

Alrighty then!

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

On 6/22/2025 at 4:09 PM, Ron_Artest said:

Mission accomplished?

[jerryskids 6,719]

1 hour ago, Sandy Loam said:

A hat-trick whatabout!

Woot!

You mentioned the felonies, dummy.  34 of them$#@!  

Center-right Rusty!    

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

Strike Set Back Iran’s Nuclear Program by Only a Few Months, U.S. Report Says

Classified findings indicate that the attack sealed off the entrances to two facilities but did not collapse their underground buildings.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/24/us/politics/iran-nuclear-sites.html

[jerryskids 6,719]

28 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

The US military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of the country’s nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, according to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by three people briefed on it.

The assessment, which has not been previously reported, was produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s intelligence arm. It is based on a battle damage assessment conducted by US Central Command in the aftermath of the US strikes, one of the sources said.

The analysis of the damage to the sites and the impact of the strikes on Iran’s nuclear ambitions is ongoing, and could change as more intelligence becomes available. But the early findings are at odds with President Donald Trump’s repeated claims that the strikes “completely and totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also said on Sunday that Iran’s nuclear ambitions “have been obliterated.”

Two of the people familiar with the assessment said Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not destroyed. One of the people said the centrifuges are largely “intact.”

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites

So what now?

First, I'd like to say that you are doing yeoman's work here rooting against our country and its military actions.   

To answer your question, a pile of uranium isn't much use to them unless they build a new enrichment facility.  Which we and Israel will quickly learn about, well before 300 yards of concrete.  And we decide then.  My prediction is that we'll give Iran "up to" some period of time, call it two weeks, to stop.  They'll tell us to pound sand.  We, likely Israel, will go destroy it.  HTH.

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

Just now, jerryskids said:

First, I'd like to say that you are doing yeoman's work here rooting against our country and its military actions.   

To answer your question, a pile of uranium isn't much use to them unless they build a new enrichment facility.  Which we and Israel will quickly learn about, well before 300 yards of concrete.  And we decide then.  My prediction is that we'll give Iran "up to" some period of time, call it two weeks, to stop.  They'll tell us to pound sand.  We, likely Israel, will go destroy it.  HTH.

First, reporting the truth is not rooting against our country and its military actions.  Is it more patriotic to repeat the lie that the nuclear program is totally dismantled?

I ask what now because we have already claimed mission accomplished and said we have a forever cease fire.  Yet we know both aren't true.  Do we admit that we were wrong or ignore and let Iran actually complete this nuke?  Will be interesting to see how this plays out.

But please spare me on the "rooting against our country" BS.  I thought you were better than this.

[jerryskids 6,719]

8 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

First, reporting the truth is not rooting against our country and its military actions.  Is it more patriotic to repeat the lie that the nuclear program is totally dismantled?

I ask what now because we have already claimed mission accomplished and said we have a forever cease fire.  Yet we know both aren't true.  Do we admit that we were wrong or ignore and let Iran actually complete this nuke?  Will be interesting to see how this plays out.

But please spare me on the "rooting against our country" BS.  I thought you were better than this.

We say Iran reneged, time for Plan B.  This isn't rocket surgery.

Also, I'll spare you if you can show me a single post of yours which is at least neutral, or preferably positive, on America's actions with Iran.   

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

7 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

We say Iran reneged, time for Plan B.  This isn't rocket surgery.

Also, I'll spare you if you can show me a single post of yours which is at least neutral, or preferably positive, on America's actions with Iran.   

I don't support our actions against Iran in 2025, so no, you won't find it.  That doesn't mean I'm rooting against our country.  If we actually did destroy the Iran nuclear program and got a ceasefire with no further US action, I would 100% applaud Trump on his actions.  But it didn't happen, so no there has been nothing positive about what he has done so far.

Also Iran did not reneg.  That would be another lie on top of all the other lies.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,030]

20 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

First, I'd like to say that you are doing yeoman's work here rooting against our country and its military actions.   

To answer your question, a pile of uranium isn't much use to them unless they build a new enrichment facility.  Which we and Israel will quickly learn about, well before 300 yards of concrete.  And we decide then.  My prediction is that we'll give Iran "up to" some period of time, call it two weeks, to stop.  They'll tell us to pound sand.  We, likely Israel, will go destroy it.  HTH.

Imagine being a grown man and calling yourself a male and using CNN as a source.  Oof. 

OF COURSE CNN is going to push forth "stories" and "sources close to" and "anonymous sources" as fact - because they know dipsh#ts and ret@rds like ghey_artest are easily led and love suckling off the propaganda c@ck.

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Imagine being a grown man and calling yourself a male and using CNN as a source.  Oof. 

OF COURSE CNN is going to push forth "stories" and "sources close to" and "anonymous sources" as fact - because they know dipsh#ts and ret@rds like ghey_artest are easily led and love suckling off the propaganda c@ck.

So you're going on record to say that CNN is lying about this?

[RLLD 4,194]

2 hours ago, Sandy Loam said:

So you believe Biden committed criminal acts despite there being no charges and convictions and then won't accept that Trump was tried, convicted and sentenced on 34 felonies.

I do believe Biden committed criminal acts, but even that does not matter.  Regardless of his criminal acts I want to know what he sold to our enemies for all that money.

[Strike 5,414]

15 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

So you're going on record to say that CNN is lying about this?

After Trump bombed Iran CNN reported that he had not notified any Dems before doing so.  They had "sources.".  Turns out their sources were 100% wrong.  They had to modify the article a day later to admit this.  The point is, they are not reliable.

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

16 minutes ago, Strike said:

After Trump bombed Iran CNN reported that he had not notified any Dems before doing so.  They had "sources.".  Turns out their sources were 100% wrong.  They had to modify the article a day later to admit this.  The point is, they are not reliable.

Not entirely true, but at least not a total lie per your usual.  It was just regarding Schumer.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/21/politics/republicans-democrats-iran-strikes-briefings

[shadrap 227]

33 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

So you're going on record to say that CNN is lying about this?

Who is the person telling CNN this?

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

1 minute ago, shadrap said:

Who is the person telling CNN this?

You can read the article I posted.

[Strike 5,414]

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Not entirely true, but at least not a total lie per your usual.  It was just regarding Schumer.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/21/politics/republicans-democrats-iran-strikes-briefings

That article has been modified.  The original article said no Dems had been notified.  Schumer isn't the only Dem they tried to notify either.  My post was 100% accurate and demonstrates why CNN is unreliable, especially when using anonymous sources.

[shadrap 227]

6 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

You can read the article I posted.

No names mentioned.  Anonymous as usual.

[Grace Under Pressure 94]

Bunch of babies from here whining in the FBG equivalent thread is peak MAGA snowflake behavior.

[Ron_Artest 1,330]

8 minutes ago, shadrap said:

No names mentioned.  Anonymous as usual.

Well the White House has acknowledged the report so it's not false, they just said the analysis is wrong, leaked by a low level loser, because everyone knows what happens when you drop 30k bombs on a target, total obliteration.

So it appears we're going to ignore the intel and pretend it worked, just like we ignored the intel which led to the bombing.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,030]

3 minutes ago, Grace Under Pressure said:

Bunch of babies from here whining in the FBG equivalent thread is peak MAGA snowflake behavior.

If you're whining about "whining snowflakes", what does that make you?  It makes you worse, you dumb m'fer.    

JHC, you're dumb as a box of rocks.  Maybe sit back and re-read your posts before hit "Submit Reply" and you'll realize how stupid you look and then won't post it.  Do us all a favor, and go whine somewhere else. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,030]

4 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Well the White House has acknowledged the report so it's not false, they just said the analysis is wrong, leaked by a low level loser, because everyone knows what happens when you drop 30k bombs on a target, total obliteration.

So it appears we're going to ignore the intel and pretend it worked, just like we ignored the intel which led to the bombing.

WTF?  Did a grown man actually post this? 

Everyone, take note of Ghey_Artests pretzel logic and regale it.  This is the logic of a liberal. 

"The report is true because the WH acknowledged someone made a report" 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,257]

Reports are there more damage than initial reports. 

[Sandy Loam 42]

1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

First, reporting the truth is not rooting against our country and its military actions.  Is it more patriotic to repeat the lie that the nuclear program is totally dismantled?

I ask what now because we have already claimed mission accomplished and said we have a forever cease fire.  Yet we know both aren't true.  Do we admit that we were wrong or ignore and let Iran actually complete this nuke?  Will be interesting to see how this plays out.

But please spare me on the "rooting against our country" BS.  I thought you were better than this.

He's not better than this.