Jump to content
Frozenbeernuts

Israel attacks Iran UPDATE: Trump claims a cease fire among all countries

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

It's 100% Ok for people to say they don't agree with the bombings.  That's all well and good. But to sit there and actually celebrate any news about something not going right?   Amazes me.  It really does.  I even get the hatred for Trump...TDS is real.  But now it is becoming a hate Trump so much that misses in something of this significance are actually celebrated? I just can't with that.   Such a shame.

I mean what kind of person reports on the cease fire being broken and follows that up with a smiley face?   Who the fock does that?

some have their current existence tied up with hating Trump and looking for anything and everything that will confirm their hate.  their existence also tied into wins & losses with their posting on Trump.  A sad way to live but here we are.   IMHO

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, HellToupee said:

👍 Donald is telling it like it is.  Israel better correct itself in fast order 

 

Reporter: “If Iran violated the peace agreement, the ceasefire agreement, do you believe that Iran is [inaudible]?” Trump: “Yeah, I do. They violated, but Israel violated it, too. Reporter: “Are you questioning if Israel is committed —" Trump: “Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs the likes of which I had never seen before, the biggest load that we have seen :lol:. I’m not happy with Israel. You know, when I say, okay, now you have 12 hours, you don’t go out in the first hour and just drop everything you have on them. So I’m not happy with them. I’m not happy with Iran, either. But I’m really unhappy if Israel is going out this morning because the one rocket that didn’t land, that was shot, perhaps by mistake, that didn’t land I’m not happy about that.” [Shouting questions] Trump: "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard, that they don’t know what the they are doing. Do you understand that?"

He's like a child playing poker at the WSOP.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, shadrap said:

some have their current existence tied up with hating Trump and looking for anything and everything that will confirm their hate.  their existence also tied into wins & losses with their posting on Trump.  A sad way to live but here we are.   IMHO

Those same people would rather see the violence continue in the middle East, and our economy to fully collapse, just because they hate Trump. And it's a fact. Liberals are literally sick people. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

 

I heard on the radio about the 1500, but what I heard them say was that about half were released into the US.

 

First link on Google.

(you know this was a liberal website, because they rounded down... mathematically, in this case, they're right.)

Not surprisingly, Tim has lost interest.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Sandy Loam said:

 

The cabal!

🤣

Quote

Tapper says one source described a president that was being propped up by aides: "One person told us that the presidency was, at best, a five-person board with Joe Biden as chairman of the board."

https://www.npr.org/2025/05/20/nx-s1-5398050/joe-bidens-decline-jake-tapper-original-sin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least Trump TACO'ed on the regime change he called for on Sunday.  He went from calling for regime change, to watching our bases get bombed, to a ceasefire and saying God Bless Iran in 24 hours :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was hoping for a few more weeks of pummeling. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I was hoping for a few more weeks of pummeling. 

How many more dead Iranians were you hoping for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

He had my full support until here:

“Although I believe electing Kamala Harris would have been better for our democracy, society, and economy, as well as for helping the most vulnerable people in the United States and around the world” 😆 

Sure but the point is he recognizes how well this was handled and is willing to give Trump credit, and he's not the only lib doing so. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

Sure but the point is he recognizes how well this was handled and is willing to give Trump credit, and he's not the only lib doing so. 

Yep. Fully appreciate him acknowledging that, but it’s almost as he felt the need to add the last part so he didn’t get the sh!t beat out of him online by the crazy liberals. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

 

I heard on the radio about the 1500, but what I heard them say was that about half were released into the US.

 

First link on Google.

(you know this was a liberal website, because they rounded down... mathematically, in this case, they're right.)

Thank you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Following Trump’s attacks on Iran, an admin official tells Rolling Stone, “The intelligence assessments have not really changed”

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-iran-attack-no-intel-nuclear-1235369641/

Just months ago, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to Congress, in her opening statement, that the U.S. intel community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon” and had not reauthorized its nuclear weapons program.

“There is no intel,” says one of the officials, who were granted anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “Nothing new, that I’m aware of… The president is protecting the United States and our interests, [but] the intelligence assessments have not really changed from what they were before.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Sandy Loam said:

So now presidential advisors, which have been around for as we have had presidents, are a cabal. 

🤣

All the rusty's who have been around whining on this site since it was created are liberal cult members. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

He had my full support until here:

“Although I believe electing Kamala Harris would have been better for our democracy, society, and economy, as well as for helping the most vulnerable people in the United States and around the world” 😆 

He had MY full support until he wrote that Kamala would not have had the courage or fortitude to attack Iran. I don’t believe that. 
But I agree with him on the rest. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Following Trump’s attacks on Iran, an admin official tells Rolling Stone, “The intelligence assessments have not really changed”

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-iran-attack-no-intel-nuclear-1235369641/

Just months ago, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to Congress, in her opening statement, that the U.S. intel community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon” and had not reauthorized its nuclear weapons program.

“There is no intel,” says one of the officials, who were granted anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “Nothing new, that I’m aware of… The president is protecting the United States and our interests, [but] the intelligence assessments have not really changed from what they were before.”

This is how it goes in Trump's cabal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

Following Trump’s attacks on Iran, an admin official tells Rolling Stone, “The intelligence assessments have not really changed”

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-iran-attack-no-intel-nuclear-1235369641/

Just months ago, Trump’s Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified to Congress, in her opening statement, that the U.S. intel community “continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon” and had not reauthorized its nuclear weapons program.

“There is no intel,” says one of the officials, who were granted anonymity to discuss sensitive matters. “Nothing new, that I’m aware of… The president is protecting the United States and our interests, [but] the intelligence assessments have not really changed from what they were before.”

But they had changed the level of enrichment right? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

 

Quote

“Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I’ve never seen before, the biggest load that we’ve seen.

🤣

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

 

🤣

I guess he's never seen biden's daily diaper loads. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

How many more dead Iranians were you hoping for?

I wasn’t hoping for any dead. I just don’t care if they do. Also, neither do you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

He had my full support until here:

“Although I believe electing Kamala Harris would have been better for our democracy, society, and economy, as well as for helping the most vulnerable people in the United States and around the world” 😆 

Yeah. That right there disqualifies this guy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

But they had changed the level of enrichment right? 

She put out a clarification...

The Trump administration has since attempted to recast Gabbard’s comments before Congress, because, after she said Iran was “not building a nuclear weapon,” she had added: “Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.” 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

At least Trump TACO'ed on the regime change he called for on Sunday.  He went from calling for regime change, to watching our bases get bombed, to a ceasefire and saying God Bless Iran in 24 hours :lol:

 

26 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

How many more dead Iranians were you hoping for?

Full tilt every day.  Go see a counselor

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

He had MY full support until he wrote that Kamala would not have had the courage or fortitude to attack Iran. I don’t believe that. 
But I agree with him on the rest. 

I think his estimation of her is spot on. She lacked anything required for POTUS and we should all be grateful, we dodged a major bullet in not electing her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I think his estimation of her is spot on. She lacked anything required for POTUS and we should all be grateful, we dodged a major bullet in not electing her.

The question about Kamalatoe shouldn't be whether she has the balls to do something like this but whether she would give them as much or more money than Obama and Biden did to help them with their aspirations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Strike said:

The question about Kamalatoe shouldn't be whether she has the balls to do something like this but whether she would give them as much or more money than Obama and Biden did to help them with their aspirations.

I think she would not merely have continued the failed policies of the Biden admin, she would have doubled down.

Is there any notion that she would have stemmed the tide of illegal immigration? Of course not. Any notion she would remove criminals? Of course not.

She would have been weak, and continues policies that only harm us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Strike said:

The question about Kamalatoe shouldn't be whether she has the balls to do something like this but whether she would give them as much or more money than Obama and Biden did to help them with their aspirations.

How much money did Biden give to Iran and why?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I think she would not merely have continued the failed policies of the Biden admin, she would have doubled down.

Is there any notion that she would have stemmed the tide of illegal immigration? Of course not. Any notion she would remove criminals? Of course not.

She would have been weak, and continues policies that only harm us.

Spot on. I only hope the freaks in NYC who vote with their shitt for brains will smarten up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

So now presidential advisors, which have been around for as long as we have had presidents, are a cabal. 

🤣

Bless your heart, Rusty.  :( 

If you prefer, they also used the word "politburo."

Quote

Jake Tapper's and Alex Thompson's new book, "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," has enthralled Washington and much of the nation. They joined Jeffrey Goldberg to discuss the protective 'politburo' that they say hid Biden from his Cabinet, the press and the nation.

https://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/video/2025/05/protective-politburo-hid-bidens-decline-tapper-and-thompson-say

This is an example of a situation I think of when you say you are center-right.  And I laugh.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

He had MY full support until he wrote that Kamala would not have had the courage or fortitude to attack Iran. I don’t believe that. 
But I agree with him on the rest. 

You realize this guy knows Kamalatoe and worked with her, right?  This is like how you speak for all black people. 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Bless your heart, Rusty.  :( 

If you prefer, they also used the word "politburo."

https://www.pbs.org/weta/washingtonweek/video/2025/05/protective-politburo-hid-bidens-decline-tapper-and-thompson-say

This is an example of a situation I think of when you say you are center-right.  And I laugh.  

Biden!

Cabal!

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

You realize this guy knows Kamalatoe and worked with her, right?  This is like how you speak for all black people. 🤣

I don’t think that this is the sort of thing you can know about a leader until they’re in that position. So I don’t know for sure how Kamala would have handled it, but I believe she would have been fine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t think that this is the sort of thing you can know about a leader until they’re in that position. So I don’t know for sure how Kamala would have handled it, but I believe she would have been fine. 

Sure because she would have sat on her hands and done nothing like usual. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

Biden!

Cabal!

🤣

And this is a fair summary of liberal tactics.

Lie ,deceive, pursue criminal activities......and then later when caught.....call it old news.

Its been an effective way for liberals to be ruthlessly corrupt for a long time.  I hope we dont let it go now though. Lets drum up all the now "old" malfeasance....dont let them use this tactic any further.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

And this is a fair summary of liberal tactics.

Lie ,deceive, pursue criminal activities......and then later when caught.....call it old news.

Its been an effective way for liberals to be ruthlessly corrupt for a long time.  I hope we dont let it go now though. Lets drum up all the now "old" malfeasance....dont let them use this tactic any further.

Typical MAGA deflecting to ancient news when Orange Julius Caesar continues to embarrass himself and slide deeper into the approval-rating abyss.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Sandy Loam said:

Typical MAGA deflecting to ancient news when Orange Julius Caesar continues to embarrass himself and slide deeper into the approval-rating abyss.

🤣

Your attempts to wipe away the crimes of your masters wont work, not any more.  We wont accept the "what difference does it make now anyway" defense of your criminal cult leaders.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×