Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MDC

Two Dem lawmakers shot, one dead in MN

Recommended Posts

43 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

He was a Liberal, obviously, and did work under Walz. 

Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Only an idiot troll finds enjoyment in triggering others. People like you are the reason we're discussing political assassinations in the US. The hate and lies just never stop pouring out of your keyboard, which is likely caked with hundreds of layers of spunk from years of seeking out pedos and trannies to highlight and beat your flaccid, tiny member to. I'd love to see results of you taking a professional personality or IQ test. It would be a terrifying, yet hilarious read.

You should really just storm out of the closet you're locked in and accept yourself for being the way you are. Maybe then you could dial back your grotesque vitriol so fellow geeks wouldn't be exposed to your willful ignorance and gaslighting. It's not too late for you, Maxiepad League Champion!

Oh oh oh

Now do me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, squistion said:

No, it was reportedly in front of other men, not women, to show them that he was what we would now call an "alpha male" (that MAGA approves of, see Trump's comments about Arnold Palmer). 

Oh okay.  Then that makes it okay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, nobody said:

Oh okay.  Then that makes it okay

No, Straw Man, I didn't say or suggest that it was OK. 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, squistion said:

 I did say or suggest that it was OK. 😁

Freudian slip?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

Freudian slip?

Typo corrected. Thanks. 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MDC said:

and went to campaign rallies for President Donald Trump.

This is why cults are dangerous. Sure, 95% of MAGA is just a bunch of gullible fools being played by a con man. But that 5% psychopath category of lunatics who will kill for their cult leader is real. Don't worship another person folks.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

Oh oh oh

Now do me

No issues with you, other than some political differences of opinion. I'm generally pretty respectful to other posters, but there are a few that are total ass holes, liars, and instigators and/or never add anything of value to a discussion. From what I've read of your posts you don't fall into that bucket. Frankly there's only a handful that do, but they make up for small numbers with massive posting volume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Fnord said:

No issues with you, other than some political differences of opinion. I'm generally pretty respectful to other posters, but there are a few that are total ass holes, liars, and instigators and/or never add anything of value to a discussion. From what I've read of your posts you don't fall into that bucket. Frankly there's only a handful that do, but they make up for small numbers with massive posting volume.

Awe man, I like a good roasting

Oh well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Fnord said:

. I'm generally pretty respectful to other posters.


😆

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, squistion said:

No, Straw Man, I didn't say or suggest that it was OK. 😁

you either don't know what a straw man is or have no understanding of context whatsoever...

Gutter suggested Trump was the least presidential person to hold the office ever.  I offered other contenders namely a guy who would whip his junk out in front of what I said was women.  You corrected that it was only men he whipped his junk out for (which I'm sure you googled).

Now in the context here where we are talking about candidates for least presidential, I offered up the guy who whipped his junk out in front of people. You started your post with "No" and corrected.  

Now, see if you can follow me here... In the context of the discussion, you making your statement can easily be construed as saying whipping your junk out for males only what?  Makes it more presidential than if he included females?  

Now at this point you say that to question is a straw man.  But it follows perfectly in the context of the conversation before.  Therefore I must conclude, you either don't understand how to look at something in context or you don't understand what a strawman is.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh wait.  I just realized it's both.  You struggle seeing things in context and you also don't know what a strawman is.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, nobody said:

you either don't know what a straw man is or have no understanding of context whatsoever...

Gutter suggested Trump was the least presidential person to hold the office ever.  I offered other contenders namely a guy who would whip his junk out in front of what I said was women.  You corrected that it was only men he whipped his junk out for (which I'm sure you googled).

Now in the context here where we are talking about candidates for least presidential, I offered up the guy who whipped his junk out in front of people. You started your post with "No" and corrected.  

Now, see if you can follow me here... In the context of the discussion, you making your statement can easily be construed as saying whipping your junk out for males only what?  Makes it more presidential than if he included females?  

Now at this point you say that to question is a straw man.  But it follows perfectly in the context of the conversation before.  Therefore I must conclude, you either don't understand how to look at something in context or you don't understand what a strawman is.

You mischaracterized what I said and argued against that (aka Straw Man). I never said or suggested what LBJ did was acceptable or more acceptable because it was done in front of men and not women.

And, no I didn't Google that, someone had repeated that information on the PSF some years back (and it is not something one forgets). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Fnord said:

Only an idiot troll finds enjoyment in triggering others. People like you are the reason we're discussing political assassinations in the US. The hate and lies just never stop pouring out of your keyboard, which is likely caked with hundreds of layers of spunk from years of seeking out pedos and trannies to highlight and beat your flaccid, tiny member to. I'd love to see results of you taking a professional personality or IQ test. It would be a terrifying, yet hilarious read.

You should really just storm out of the closet you're locked in and accept yourself for being the way you are. Maybe then you could dial back your grotesque vitriol so fellow geeks wouldn't be exposed to your willful ignorance and gaslighting. It's not too late for you, Maxiepad League Champion!

He's a bad banana with a greasy black peeeeel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, squistion said:

You mischaracterized what I said and argued against that (aka Straw Man). I never said or suggested what LBJ did was acceptable or more acceptable because it was done in front of men and not women.

And, no I didn't Google that, someone had repeated that information on the PSF some years back (and it is not something one forgets). 

I didn't even make an argument.  That's exactly why I knew you don't know what a strawman is.  

Can't really be a strawman if I'm not even arguing with you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nobody said:

I didn't even make an argument.  That's exactly why I knew you don't know what a strawman is.  

Can't really be a strawman if I'm not even arguing with you.

Yes, you did, you said (paraphrasing) that exposing himself before men instead of women made it "OK" or better.

 That isn't what I said or suggested and you were arguing that is what I said or was implying, which was a mischaracterization (aka Straw Man). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

This No Kings murder story really hit the back burner. Minnesota officials seem to be hiding something?

Nothing here to see folks

Quote

 

Suspect breaks into Rep. Melissa Hortman’s home in Brooklyn Park

 Summarize

Eric Chaloux and Kyle Brown KSTP
Updated: June 18, 2025 - 10:01 PM
Published: June 18, 2025 - 12:36 PM

A person broke into House Speaker Emerita Melissa Hortman’s home days after she and her husband, Mark, were assassinated there, Brooklyn Park police said on Wednesday.

The break-in happened overnight, but authorities weren’t alerted to the incident until around 8 a.m. Wednesday morning. 

According to the Brooklyn Park Police Department, the windows of the home were boarded up with plywood after investigators had processed the scene for evidence. Law enforcement turned the home back over to the family and stationed police cameras outside.

Authorities say the suspect pried off one of those plywood boards on the back side of the house facing Edinburgh Golf Course, broke a window, and went inside.

Credit: Eric Chaloux/KSTP-TV

Police say the house “appeared to have been searched,” but family members had removed items of value prior to the burglary. The family went back to the home on Wednesday and didn’t believe anything was missing.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Nothing here to see folks

 

Many people have said Walz is compromised deep state actor and was put in the role to prop up low IQ Kamala.  Nothing that goes on in Minnesota should surprise anyone.  The “list” is as less trustworthy than gas station sushi.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, squistion said:

Yes, you did, you said (paraphrasing) that exposing himself before men instead of women made it "OK" or better.

 That isn't what I said or suggested and you were arguing that is what I said or was implying, which was a mischaracterization (aka Straw Man). 

That's not an argument, lady.  You weren't clear on what you were trying to to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Many people have said Walz is compromised deep state actor and was put in the role to prop up low IQ Kamala.  Nothing that goes on in Minnesota should surprise anyone.  The “list” is as less trustworthy than gas station sushi.  

Walz went to China 19 times and an indigo girls concert 1x we know of. He didn’t pay for either one.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

an indigo girls concert 1x we know of

Didn’t him & his  whackadoodle take a HS student to the concert like they were groomers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Didn’t him & his  whackadoodle take a HS student to the concert like they were groomers

Yup. Him and that wife of his. She thought the smell of her city actually burning was a good thing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MAGA celebrating that they are effectively memory holing their murderer in favor of stories about trannies is peak MAGA behavior.

"Hey, notice how none of us are talking about the MAGA cult follower murderer guy anymore! Look at us!!" 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He had No Kings flyers in his car. Democrats are trying to memory hole that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, nobody said:

That's not an argument, lady.  You weren't clear on what you were trying to to say.

Said it was in front of men instead of women. Couldn't have been any more clear than that.

And don't call me lady.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good thing Boelter was stopped before he made it to any of those No Kings events that were advertised on the flyers in his car. 

I don’t think he was going to protest. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, squistion said:

Said it was in front of men instead of women. Couldn't have been any more clear than that.

And don't call me lady.

Sorry... Ma'am

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, MDC said:

Good thing Boelter was stopped before he made it to any of those No Kings events that were advertised on the flyers in his car. 

I don’t think he was going to protest. 

He needed 50 flyers to doublecheck he was going to the right place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, nobody said:

He needed 50 flyers to doublecheck he was going to the right place.

Did he need 50 to find the protest he was going to participate in, Inspector? 🔍 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, nobody said:

Sorry... Ma'am

I went through this crap with you before on the use of pronouns and this is getting tiresome.

You are now on ignore.

Bye Bye! :wave:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MDC said:

Did he need 50 to find the protest he was going to participate in, Inspector? 🔍 

Passing them out... Grass roots 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, nobody said:

Lefties are weird what can I say.

Relax.  I solved the case like 10 pages ago and called him out as maga.  

Tell your bud HT. He never made detective. :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gutterboy voted for Trump. And he’s a registered republican.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Boelter’s writings claim Tim Walz told him to kill Senator Amy Klobuchar, and the idiot righties like Libs of Tik Tok actually believe it lololol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone starting to get the filling TimHauck is actually Tim Walz himself?  Has to be.  Either that or a close relative.  No one goes this hard defending someone unless that's the case.  :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Anyone starting to get the filling TimHauck is actually Tim Walz himself?  Has to be.  Either that or a close relative.  No one goes this hard defending someone unless that's the case.  :lol:

Wait, you don’t actually believe Tim Walz told him to kill someone, do you?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×