jonnyutah 276 Posted June 25 Lmao @ serious study. Lololololol There was a study that said the BLM riots were mostly peaceful. I just saw a study that said for every 1 dollar you spend on lawyers fighting evictions you get 12 dollars back. Hahahahaha Studies and experts have lost their ability to trick people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,207 Posted June 25 1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Anyone still have any doubt? It has become rather evident that fomenting social unrest to harm cities and citizens is now part and parcel of Democrat strategy. Which is why they were so angry when Trump stopped it with military intervention. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,159 Posted June 25 1 minute ago, RLLD said: It has become rather evident that fomenting social unrest to harm cities and citizens is now part and parcel of Democrat strategy. Which is why they were so angry when Trump stopped it with military intervention. That is a fiction. Trump didn't stop anything in L.A. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,207 Posted June 25 3 minutes ago, squistion said: That is a fiction. Trump didn't stop anything in L.A. Its fine for you to believe that of course, but based on recent history I think his action averted a repeat of liberals burning, looting and killing. And clearly their inability to achieve those outcomes this time really bothered them Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,159 Posted June 25 1 minute ago, RLLD said: Its fine for you to believe that of course, but based on recent history I think his action averted a repeat of liberals burning, looting and killing. And clearly their inability to achieve those outcomes this time really bothered them Liberals were bothered by not having burning, looting and killing and that is an outcome they wanted to achieve? Crazy thinking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,207 Posted June 25 42 minutes ago, squistion said: Liberals were bothered by not having burning, looting and killing and that is an outcome they wanted to achieve? Crazy thinking. Some likely were, I mean.... those who were impacted by the violence. But Democrat leadership less so. As demonstrated by their words. It might seem crazy, but this is what transpired. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 2,159 Posted June 25 3 minutes ago, RLLD said: Some likely were, I mean.... those who were impacted by the violence. But Democrat leadership less so. As demonstrated by their words. It might seem crazy, but this is what transpired. It did? Burning, looting and killing is what transpired? Well, yes, partially true and to a limited extent, but let's examine that claim. Yes, there was some looting, but it was restricted to a two block area in Downtown L.A. and ended when Karen Bass imposed a curfew. The burning was about a dozen vehicle fires, but no structures. And there were no killings connected with the protests. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,207 Posted June 25 25 minutes ago, squistion said: It did? Burning, looting and killing is what transpired? Well, yes, partially true and to a limited extent, but let's examine that claim. Yes, there was some looting, but it was restricted to a two block area in Downtown L.A. and ended when Karen Bass imposed a curfew. The burning was about a dozen vehicle fires, but no structures. And there were no killings connected with the protests. Agree. Gratefully Trump moved decisively to prevent what Democrats have allowed in the past. The good people in LA deserved protection from the bad. So we are all good..... the OUTCOME was positive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Real timschochet 6,695 Posted June 25 Just now, RLLD said: Agree. Gratefully Trump moved decisively to prevent what Democrats have allowed in the past. The good people in LA deserved protection from the bad. So we are all good..... the OUTCOME was positive. lol this is just total bullsh!t. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,207 Posted June 25 Just now, The Real timschochet said: lol this is just total bullsh!t. Except it happened, in stark contrast to the past, this time the outcome was far better. Democrats were denied their use of violence in this instance, and I marvel at their angst over not getting it this time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,960 Posted June 25 30 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said: lol this is just total bullsh!t. I'm guessing 2020 violence didn't happen either in your head. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,316 Posted June 25 So the rioters in LA weren’t breaking up the highway and throwing the rubble at police officers forcing them to retreat under an overpass? We didn’t see that ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,894 Posted June 25 5 hours ago, TimHauck said: @Cdub100 must be torn about what to think of this Miller situation since Miller is Jewish. What am I torn over? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,207 Posted June 25 16 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: So the rioters in LA weren’t breaking up the highway and throwing the rubble at police officers forcing them to retreat under an overpass? We didn’t see that ? I think the premise they are hoping to sell is that by doing nothing, it would have all gradually gone away on its own. This they believe, even though we have ample evidence in the past riots that it only got worse when not dealt with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
