Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
TimHauck

NYC Mayor Race

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

WHATABOUT.  lol if you think these are all mistakes.

 

I don't.  The article clearly says Biden targeted this man.  That was no accident.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was watching TV and they were showing this musical festival in France in 1994 and then today. Holeee Fock. Thats the direction liberals have in mind for our country. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

lol, yeah that's why they are biased.  

I've always supported military action as needed to support our interests.

Still waiting for your response to what Israel should have done or be doing instead.  But you can't use a version of "not that$#@!"

Dropsite was started by Ryan Grim.  He’s a lib, but is one of the four main hosts of Breaking Points, one of the few shows that actually showcases opinions from the left and right fairly equally.  His stuff is well-sourced.

They shouldn’t be intentionally targeting journalists, for one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Dropsite was started by Ryan Grim.  He’s a lib, but is one of the four main hosts of Breaking Points, one of the few shows that actually showcases opinions from the left and right fairly equally.  His stuff is well-sourced.

They shouldn’t be intentionally targeting journalists, for one.

Quote

But you can't use a version of "not that$#@!"

FFS.  :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also for @TimHauck

Israel says he was a sniper.  The Hamas Information Minister says "oh noes he wasn't!"  I'll believe the country that has gone out of its way to limit civilian casualties.  You can believe Hamas.  :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Also for @TimHauck

Israel says he was a sniper.  The Hamas Information Minister says "oh noes he wasn't!"  I'll believe the country that has gone out of its way to limit civilian casualties.  You can believe Hamas.  :thumbsup: 

Ok sheep.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s a journalist that was killed after receiving threats to stop being a journalist.  I guess he was a sniper too? He never had any militant links according to Grok

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/palestinian-journalist-killed-israeli-bombing-after-receiving-threats-end-gaza-coverage

https://x.com/grok/status/1937546225903108533

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Here’s a journalist that was killed after receiving threats to stop being a journalist.  I guess he was a sniper too? He never had any militant links according to Grok

https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/palestinian-journalist-killed-israeli-bombing-after-receiving-threats-end-gaza-coverage

https://x.com/grok/status/1937546225903108533

 

 

lol please stop:

https://www.middleeasteye.net/

What should I read next:  "Why not an Islamic bomb?" or the latest entry in the "Gaza Extermination" category?  :lol: 

Seriously, please stop.  Every post since your "FFS I'm not saying there is moral equivalence" has been an attempt to show equivalence, using versions of Hamas Harry (Baghdad Bob) as your source.

Also, you never answered the question I've asked several times, but I'll stop now because you never will answer it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Many people are saying Zoltar’s first action will be putting a burka on the Statue of Liberty?  Any truth to this?

Also many are saying he’s banning yarmulkes from sunrise to sundown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Our political system is so broken. How are those the options for Mayor of our largest city? This is sad.

I think the system works.

I think people have become so poorly educated over time that we now have multiple generations who consume excrement and find it appetizing. They vote like idiots, install idiots and then scramble away when their locality becomes a hell hole. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RLLD said:

I think the system works.

I think people have become so poorly educated over time that we now have multiple generations who consume excrement and find it appetizing. They vote like idiots, install idiots and then scramble away when their locality becomes a hell hole. 

I'm sure it's part of it. It's also part Soros backed candidates that should never hold office for anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

lol please stop:

https://www.middleeasteye.net/

What should I read next:  "Why not an Islamic bomb?" or the latest entry in the "Gaza Extermination" category?  :lol: 

Seriously, please stop.  Every post since your "FFS I'm not saying there is moral equivalence" has been an attempt to show equivalence, using versions of Hamas Harry (Baghdad Bob) as your source.

Also, you never answered the question I've asked several times, but I'll stop now because you never will answer it.

It’s not an attempt to show equivalence, you asked for examples of war crimes and I provided some.  Not my fault you believe everything Israel says and will say either “it was an accident” or “they were a terrorist” to every single one.

I don’t know what they should do.   But a lot of what they’re doing certainly isn’t helping gain favorability amongst outsiders, to get back on topic, including people like Jews in NYC,  or normally non-partisan folks like Theo Von.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Many people are saying Zoltar’s first action will be putting a burka on the Statue of Liberty?  Any truth to this?

Somewhat unfortunately, liberals don’t spend all their time trying to troll conservatives the way conservatives do liberals. But how hilarious and awesome this would be if it was actually true. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Somewhat unfortunately, liberals don’t spend all their time trying to troll conservatives the way conservatives do liberals. But how hilarious and awesome this would be if it was actually true. 

Well here’s his wife.  Doesn’t look like she adheres to the traditional Muslim attire.  But maybe that just means she’s in a sleeper cell!

https://x.com/CommonSentiment/status/1935905291608244482
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

It’s not an attempt to show equivalence, you asked for examples of war crimes and I provided some.  Not my fault you believe everything Israel says and will say either “it was an accident” or “they were a terrorist” to every single one.

I don’t know what they should do.   But a lot of what they’re doing certainly isn’t helping gain favorability amongst outsiders, to get back on topic, including people like Jews in NYC,  or normally non-partisan folks like Theo Von.

Well, my evidence for believing Israel is the fact that they haven't tried to turn Gaza into glass for going on 2 years, and they aren't trying to do it to Tehran now, even though they easily could do both.  Nobody, yourself included, seems to have an answer to this conundrum wrapped in an enigma.

And even if their intel was wrong about the reporter being a sniper, that's not a war crime, that's incorrect intel.  Mistakes are made in wars.

What would Occam's Razor say?  Israel had bad intel in a select few situations mixed in with their overwhelming attempt to isolate innocents, or a murdering raping POS terrorist organization is lying to rile up Lefties in the west? 

I've already given my opinion of the Jews in NY who voted for him.  I highly doubt that he got a single vote from any Jew who has faced adversity in life to practice their religion, and/or any who came from Israel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Well, my evidence for believing Israel is the fact that they haven't tried to turn Gaza into glass for going on 2 years, and they aren't trying to do it to Tehran now, even though they easily could do both.  Nobody, yourself included, seems to have an answer to this conundrum wrapped in an enigma.

And even if their intel was wrong about the reporter being a sniper, that's not a war crime, that's incorrect intel.  Mistakes are made in wars.

What would Occam's Razor say?  Israel had bad intel in a select few situations mixed in with their overwhelming attempt to isolate innocents, or a murdering raping POS terrorist organization is lying to rile up Lefties in the west? 

I've already given my opinion of the Jews in NY who voted for him.  I highly doubt that he got a single vote from any Jew who has faced adversity in life to practice their religion, and/or any who came from Israel.

I answered earlier that I think they believe what they’re doing is for the greater good, even if others might disagree.

It’s not a “select few situations,” there are dozens of similar stories, @The Real timschochet I’d be curious to see what other examples you have as well.  So it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s “wrong intel,” they could have just, you know, lied. Occam’s razor would tell you that they may be targeting journalists (most sources put it at over 200 that have been killed) because they want to limit the true stories of what’s happening to get out.  I’m sure some of the journalists they intentionally killed might have been Hamas, but not all.  Some of them they even injured in an initial attack and then killed them while they were recovering in the hospital.

I disagree with your last paragraph.  A true Jewish American would understand that Muslim Americans have actually faced similar (probably worse, TBH) adversity as Jews, particularly following 9/11.  Charlie Kirk and his ilk equating Zohran to 9/11 is gross.

And again, this guy’s policies seem sh1tty.  But the Islamaphobia towards him is disgusting.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I laughed at this, and all the people that thought he was being serious

https://x.com/Timodc/status/1937904602461987291

 

 

Why do you think he wasn't serious?

Quote
Host of The Bulwark Podcast | MSNBC analyst | Author “Why We Did It” | Jokic обожавалац | Weak and Gay | Never Trump

Also, his response after someone posted the DDL gif from Gangs of New York

Quote
 
 
would be an honor to gang with him

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I answered earlier that I think they believe what they’re doing is for the greater good, even if others might disagree.

It’s not a “select few situations,” there are dozens of similar stories, @The Real timschochet I’d be curious to see what other examples you have as well.  So it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s “wrong intel,” they could have just, you know, lied. Occam’s razor would tell you that they may be targeting journalists (most sources put it at over 200 that have been killed) because they want to limit the true stories of what’s happening to get out.  I’m sure some of the journalists they intentionally killed might have been Hamas, but not all.  Some of them they even injured in an initial attack and then killed them while they were recovering in the hospital.

I disagree with your last paragraph.  A true Jewish American would understand that Muslim Americans have actually faced similar (probably worse, TBH) adversity as Jews, particularly following 9/11.  Charlie Kirk and his ilk equating Zohran to 9/11 is gross.

And again, this guy’s policies seem sh1tty.  But the Islamaphobia towards him is disgusting.

I get frustrated arguing about this with @jerryskids. He is a likable guy, a good guy, and I wish the best for him and his health situation especially. But he, and a few others here, have what I regard as blinders when it comes to Islam (and also with regard to transgender people for every different reasons.) There is a collectivized attitude which I find wholly at odds with traditional conservatism. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Why do you think he wasn't serious?

Also, his response after someone posted the DDL gif from Gangs of New York

 

Please don’t tell me you’re offended by his post 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Last night’s result is huge news for the country and it should make everyone reading this realize two things: 

1. Whoever is the Democratic nominee for President in 2028 is very likely to be the next President. Let’s put it at 65-70%. 
 

2. There is a very good chance, at least 50-50, that the Democratic nominee for President is going to be a progressive leftist for the very first time. I know that’s news for some of you but no, Obama, Hillary, Biden and Kamala weren’t leftist; they were all part of the Democratic Establishment. The next one probably won’t be. 
 

This is almost entirely because of Trump. 

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Last night’s result is huge news for the country and it should make everyone reading this realize two things: 

1. Whoever is the Democratic nominee for President in 2028 is very likely to be the next President. Let’s put it at 65-70%. 
 

2. There is a very good chance, at least 50-50, that the Democratic nominee for President is going to be a progressive leftist for the very first time. I know that’s news for some of you but no, Obama, Hillary, Biden and Kamala weren’t leftist; they were all part of the Democratic Establishment. The next one probably won’t be. 
 

This is almost entirely because of Trump. 

 

Wait...wut?  You based all that on the NYC election for mayor?  One of the most liberal cities in America, if not THE most liberal?  :doh:  :lol:

More tim wish-casting gone wild.  :lol:

The only thing this solidifies is how crazy the left is as it alienates more and more of its base.  I think you got everything backward - this almost certainly will help Republicans in the mid-terms and in the next election.  It's literally an ad that writes itself.  How do you NOT see that?   :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Last night’s result is huge news for the country and it should make everyone reading this realize two things: 

1. Whoever is the Democratic nominee for President in 2028 is very likely to be the next President. Let’s put it at 65-70%. 
 

2. There is a very good chance, at least 50-50, that the Democratic nominee for President is going to be a progressive leftist for the very first time. I know that’s news for some of you but no, Obama, Hillary, Biden and Kamala weren’t leftist; they were all part of the Democratic Establishment. The next one probably won’t be. 
 

This is almost entirely because of Trump. 

 

I disagree that Zohran being nominated was because of Trump.

And the Dems would be stupid to nominate a progressive leftist in 2028.  If they nominate a moderate from a purple or red state like Shapiro, Beshear or Cooper they can probably win though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

 I posted the video above.  Maybe you missed it?

Does it say in there who Zohran hates?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Wait...not only did you conveniently miss the HUGE @SS video iframe in the post, you didn't even watch it AFTER I pointed it out?  :doh:

I’m asking you if it answered my question.  Because I’d rather not watch 15 minutes of something that has a racist POS like Charlie Kirk in it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I’m asking you if it answered my question.  Because I’d rather not watch 15 minutes of something that has a racist POS like Charlie Kirk in it 

It's funny how racists like to call other people racists. 

But that's how liberals roll. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I’m asking you if it answered my question.  Because I’d rather not watch 15 minutes of something that has a racist POS like Charlie Kirk in it 

He's the racist?  Not you?  :lol:

I think you need to stop suckling off of the far-left gloryhole propaganda c@ck and start challenging and thinking for yourself.  HTH.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

He's the racist?  Not you?  :lol:

I think you need to stop suckling off of the far-left gloryhole propaganda c@ck and start challenging and thinking for yourself.  HTH.  :thumbsup:

Kirk equated Zohran to 9/11.  Gross 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

He's the racist?  Not you?  :lol:

I think you need to stop suckling off of the far-left gloryhole propaganda c@ck and start challenging and thinking for yourself.  HTH.  :thumbsup:

EternalGloryHole:  why don’t you think for yourself?!?!?

Also EternalGloryHole:  did you watch this video from someone else that told me what to think?

lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Our political system is so broken. How are those the options for Mayor of our largest city? This is sad.

Its because the leftist elitists have indoctrinated enough sheep.  They live in their mostly white gated enclaves with armed security with brainwashed dopes doing their bidding. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Last night’s result is huge news for the country and it should make everyone reading this realize two things: 

1. Whoever is the Democratic nominee for President in 2028 is very likely to be the next President. Let’s put it at 65-70%. 
 

2. There is a very good chance, at least 50-50, that the Democratic nominee for President is going to be a progressive leftist for the very first time. I know that’s news for some of you but no, Obama, Hillary, Biden and Kamala weren’t leftist; they were all part of the Democratic Establishment. The next one probably won’t be. 
 

This is almost entirely because of Trump. 

 

Why do Democrat voters in New York indicate anything happening in the rest of the country?

There's a great dearth of criminals, communists, LGBTQ, and/or terrorist supporters in regions that aren't going down the tubes like radical leftoid big cities are. 

It seems to me that the most effective thing for the GOP nominee is to point at Chicago, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and soon New York and ask voters in the decent parts of the country "do you want that for where you live?"

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×