Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Strike

Several SCOTUS decisions coming out today.....

Recommended Posts

It’s common sense that these Federal District judges should have zero authority over Father Trump.  They are a threat to democracy and have put us in a Constitutional Crisis.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

It’s common sense that these Federal District judges should have zero authority over Father Trump.  They are a threat to democracy and have put us in a Constitutional Crisis.   

Liberals don't know what the constitution is. They do know how to seek power though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the typical far left cultists haven’t changed during my absence. Didn’t expect them to. But I KNOW they’re crying now cause it’s one loss after another for them :lol: The fact that these lower courts really thought they’d be able to politically stop trumps actions forever without consequences was hilarious. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Liberals don't know what the constitution is. They do know how to seek power though. 

What’s funny is these liberals were literally telling us veterans & active duty military “remember your oath!” When they were rioting without actually knowing what our oath was :lol: Then when we said “foreign & DOMESTIC” they’d get silent 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Walker said:

What’s funny is these liberals were literally telling us veterans & active duty military “remember your oath!” When they were rioting without actually knowing what our oath was :lol: Then when we said “foreign & DOMESTIC” they’d get silent 

They block out their rioting violence. Even though it lasts for years. They think, out of mind out of reality. 

And their only oath, is to the liberal collective. We who know, hush them a lot. But they always come back for more for some reason. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Clarence Thomas was picked because of his color. He also happens to be qualified and intelligent. And he overcame a lot. KJB has had it great since birth. Pushed along for only one reason. 

He's also corrupt and crooked as a dog's hind leg. If any of the liberal justices had his track record of accepting "gifts" and refusal to recuse himself from cases in which he has a personal interest you'd be using the same racist tropes against him as you do against Jackson. Get yourself right, pud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

They block out their rioting violence. Even though it lasts for years. They think, out of mind out of reality. 

And their only oath, is to the liberal collective. We who know, hush them a lot. But they always come back for more for some reason. 

 

It’s not even a question about which side is more violent anymore. It’s CLEARLY them. Now there are some good ones on their side that will actually defend the cops & prevent them from trying to injure/kill the cops. There’s good ones on that side & they need to be protected. But VAST majority of them are not only crazy but literally admit to taking some type of anxiety/psych medication. We can see why they need it & why majority of them are on it :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

And that DEI dope Jackson actually asked why don’t the parents just send their kids to a different school. What an elitist twat.  

It was great seeing her get run tf over for being such a brainless judge. Typical of the left. Find a moron who will always rule extreme left for a position they couldn't do competently if they gave it their all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Doubling down on your bigotry. Keep it coming. 

Lighten up Karen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well sir I would argue that your defense of the ugly and racist term “DEI hire” is the focked up part, but hey that’s just me. 

You are racist and a bigot. It's always the ones who think they are above the fray that are the most guilty.

Jackson doesn't know what a woman is. Every single supreme court justice should know what a woman is. This isn't the McDonald's drive through. Amazing that liberals need their hands held so gingerly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop tax payers from paying for transgender surgeries. Another thing that shouldn't be celebrated because it's just common sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Fnord said:

He's also corrupt and crooked as a dog's hind leg. If any of the liberal justices had his track record of accepting "gifts" and refusal to recuse himself from cases in which he has a personal interest you'd be using the same racist tropes against him as you do against Jackson. Get yourself right, pud.

Uhhh, Jackson is raking it in as well. Nice work Bevis 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Walker said:

It’s not even a question about which side is more violent anymore. It’s CLEARLY them. Now there are some good ones on their side that will actually defend the cops & prevent them from trying to injure/kill the cops. There’s good ones on that side & they need to be protected. But VAST majority of them are not only crazy but literally admit to taking some type of anxiety/psych medication. We can see why they need it & why majority of them are on it :lol: 

Hello. Dont recognize you but you’re sure are spouting a whole bunch of nonsense, especially in light of Jan 6, 2021, and Trump’s subsequent pardoning of people who are responsible for the deaths of policemen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today appears to have been a terrible day for justice. But that’s OK. Eventually it will all be overturned. Birthright citizenship is not going away whatever that moron Trump thinks. 

In the meantime I just sent more money to the ACLU. They are fighting the good fight against these folks. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Today appears to have been a terrible day for justice. But that’s OK. Eventually it will all be overturned. Birthright citizenship is not going away whatever that moron Trump thinks. 

In the meantime I just sent more money to the ACLU. They are fighting the good fight against these folks. 

Does that mean your laborers took a pay cut?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Today appears to have been a terrible day for justice. But that’s OK. Eventually it will all be overturned. Birthright citizenship is not going away whatever that moron Trump thinks. 

In the meantime I just sent more money to the ACLU. They are fighting the good fight against these folks. 

How many of the opinions that came out today have you read?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

You mean the ones I use twice a year? Nope. And I pay them very well. 

nICE👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Strike said:

How many of the opinions that came out today have you read?

None. I read a summary of the main one and part of Jackson’s descent, and I listened to an ACLU lawyer on the radio. That’s when I decided to send them more money. Hey you can do the same! Google them it’s easy to send them money. It will make you feel better about yourself and the shame you must no doubt feel for your votes in the past. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Real timschochet said:

None. I read a summary of the main one and part of Jackson’s descent, and I listened to an ACLU lawyer on the radio. That’s when I decided to send them more money. Hey you can do the same! Google them it’s easy to send them money. It will make you feel better about yourself and the shame you must no doubt feel for your votes in the past. 

Set your money on fire there buddy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

None. I read a summary of the main one and part of Jackson’s descent, and I listened to an ACLU lawyer on the radio. That’s when I decided to send them more money. Hey you can do the same! Google them it’s easy to send them money. It will make you feel better about yourself and the shame you must no doubt feel for your votes in the past. 

descent????

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Hello. Dont recognize you but you’re sure are spouting a whole bunch of nonsense, especially in light of Jan 6, 2021, and Trump’s subsequent pardoning of people who are responsible for the deaths of policemen. 

No we went over this. Jan 6th wasn't an insurrection. The people involved were doing their patriot duty to protect this country those that would steal a presidential election.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Real timschochet said:

Freudian slip there. As in devolution, given the the conservative decision. 

You always have an excuse.   Can't just admit the word "dissent" isn't in your vocabulary.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

No we went over this. Jan 6th wasn't an insurrection. The people involved were doing their patriot duty to protect this country those that would steal a presidential election.

Sure. Patriotic duty that included defecating on the desks of Congresspeople and brutally attacking police officers which caused some of them to die. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Today appears to have been a terrible day for justice. But that’s OK. Eventually it will all be overturned. Birthright citizenship is not going away whatever that moron Trump thinks. 

In the meantime I just sent more money to the ACLU. They are fighting the good fight against these folks. 

Do you think ACB politely calling KBJ a moron is racist? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

You are racist and a bigot. It's always the ones who think they are above the fray that are the most guilty.

Jackson doesn't know what a woman is. Every single supreme court justice should know what a woman is. This isn't the McDonald's drive through. Amazing that liberals need their hands held so gingerly.

Of course she does, don't be silly. :lol: 

IIRC they were trying to get her with a gotcha, yes or no question, in which the answer was too nuanced to just say "yes" on "no" without it being misleading. She woudn't play their games. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, squistion said:

Of course she does, don't be silly. :lol: 

IIRC they were trying to get her with a gotcha, yes or no question, in which the answer was too nuanced to just say "yes" on "no" without it being misleading. She woudn't play their games. 

🤣🤣🤣 you are too easy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fnord said:

He's also corrupt and crooked as a dog's hind leg. If any of the liberal justices had his track record of accepting "gifts" and refusal to recuse himself from cases in which he has a personal interest you'd be using the same racist tropes against him as you do against Jackson. Get yourself right, pud.

I had never heard this expression before.  I am likely to steal it at some point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, squistion said:

Of course she does, don't be silly. :lol: 

IIRC they were trying to get her with a gotcha, yes or no question, in which the answer was too nuanced to just say "yes" on "no" without it being misleading. She woudn't play their games. 

She couldn't play the game, because she would have to admit that guys who cut their dikks off aren't women.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Sure. Patriotic duty that included defecating on the desks of Congresspeople and brutally attacking police officers which caused some of them to die. 

You deliberately conflate causation and correlation.  The Grateful Dead performance at Woodstock did not cause two babies to born during the festifval, it just so happened that they were born then.  Reading your post about defecation is not causing me to go take a sh1t, its just a coincidence...... or is it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

You deliberately conflate causation and correlation.  The Grateful Dead performance at Woodstock did not cause two babies to born during the festifval, it just so happened that they were born then.  Reading your post about defecation is not causing me to go take a sh1t, its just a coincidence...... or is it?

Well as to your last question I couldn’t say. But I dispute your claim that there was no causation. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the most impactful ruling for many will be the limitations on the universal injunction.  This was the primary weapon being used by Democrats through their activist judges....taking away lawfare in this manner might seem great on its face.....but then what?   We have already witnessed the depravities of the left in their willingness to implement violence.  This ruling leaves them only their violent inclinations as a weapon.

I submit we could see an increase in rioting....requiring the President to bring military resources to bear in greater amounts.  This could spiral....JMHO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I think the most impactful ruling for many will be the limitations on the universal injunction.  This was the primary weapon being used by Democrats through their activist judges....taking away lawfare in this manner might seem great on its face.....but then what?   We have already witnessed the depravities of the left in their willingness to implement violence.  This ruling leaves them only their violent inclinations as a weapon.

I submit we could see an increase in rioting....requiring the President to bring military resources to bear in greater amounts.  This could spiral....JMHO

The Supremes, at least two of them, have warned that district court judges ought not to abuse class certifications to get around this ruling.  They anticipate some district judgeds will cavalierly certify large classes of plaintiffs so that in effect their injunctions will remain just as sweeping.  That being dicta only, and not the holding in the case I anticipate some district court judges will ignore the caution and the direction and will in fact do so.  The lawfare here is not dead yet, just critically wounded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

Your use of the term “DEI Justice” to describe Jackson is racist. You deserve to be called out for this every time you do it. It’s ugly and stupid. 

She lives in a white neighborhood so that offsets things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, HellToupee said:

 

Blame Biden for making a DEI pick

 

 

Exactly.  He never made pretense that he was going to pick the person with the best qualifications.  He may have within the construct of only looking at black females.  Maybe one day we can just hire people based on merit.  I feel the same about immigration.  We can make it merit based.  That doesn't mean we don't need some percentage of folks willing to do "those jobs that others aren't".  But we need to revamp that whole system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Engorgeous George said:

The Supremes, at least two of them, have warned that district court judges ought not to abuse class certifications to get around this ruling.  They anticipate some district judgeds will cavalierly certify large classes of plaintiffs so that in effect their injunctions will remain just as sweeping.  That being dicta only, and not the holding in the case I anticipate some district court judges will ignore the caution and the direction and will in fact do so.  The lawfare here is not dead yet, just critically wounded.

The Supremes need to stop. In the name of love. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

The Supremes need to stop. In the name of love. 

And you wonder why people don't take you seriously. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×