U.S. Military Boat Strikes and Venezuela Thread

[TimHauck 3,296]

Just now, Maximum Overkill said:

Do you know what conditions are like in Venezuela due to Maduro? It would be a blessing for the people of Venezuela if we killed him. 

They want him dead more than anyone. 

So you understand why many law-abiding Venezuelans would want to flee there and come here, correct?

But we were told they were emptying their prisons and sending their criminals here.

 

[SaintsInDome2006 620]

Hegseth: “Typical Trump. All bluster, very low substance… he’s an armchair tough guy. This is a guy who said that John McCain is not a war hero yet he sought his own five military deferments.”

[Maximum Overkill 2,414]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

So you understand why many law-abiding Venezuelans would want to flee there and come here, correct?

But we were told they were emptying their prisons and sending their criminals here.

 

YES, MAN VENEZUELANS ARE CRIMINALS, NOT ALL OF COURSE. 

But what does that have to do with anything? 

We have borders, we have legal avenues for Immigration. If you came here illegally your a criminal. They can file on the grounds of Political assylum, like many others did. 

You just want THEM HERE ILLEGALLY. 

WORRY ABOUT THIS COUNTRY FOR ONCE. 

[Ron_Artest 2,170]

8 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Do you know what conditions are like in Venezuela due to Maduro? It would be a blessing for the people of Venezuela if we killed him. 

They want him dead more than anyone. 

You can say the same thing about trump

[TimHauck 3,296]

1 minute ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Hegseth: “Typical Trump. All bluster, very low substance… he’s an armchair tough guy. This is a guy who said that John McCain is not a war hero yet he sought his own five military deferments.”

Bahaha at this reply

 

 

[TimHauck 3,296]

@Voltaire, shall we use this as what would constitute “war”?  Polymarket says war = “military engagement”

 

[Maximum Overkill 2,414]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

@Voltaire, shall we use this as what would constitute “war”?  Polymarket says war = “military engagement”

 

More Liberal propaganda. We ARE NOT GOING TO WAR WITH VENEZUELA. 

YOU SAID THE SAME THING AGOUT CHINA, CANADA AND MEXICO.  

[TimHauck 3,296]

9 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

More Liberal propaganda. We ARE NOT GOING TO WAR WITH VENEZUELA. 

YOU SAID THE SAME THING AGOUT CHINA, CANADA AND MEXICO.  

Would you agree to calling it war if “Yes” wins Polymarket’s bet of “US x Venezuela military engagement”?  I’m just trying to set some parameters here

[HellToupee 2,178]

1 hour ago, Ron_Artest said:

You can say the same thing about trump

What a sicko

[TimHauck 3,296]

4 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Would you agree to calling it war if “Yes” wins Polymarket’s bet of “US x Venezuela military engagement”?  I’m just trying to set some parameters here

Interestingly, apparently Polymarket says killing Maduro would not be a winning bet for Yes.  Not sure I’d agree with that, but I’d be willing to agree to how Polymarket defines it.  I know @Meglamaniac won’t of course because he thinks we haven’t been in a war since WWII

[Meglamaniac 784]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Interestingly, apparently Polymarket says killing Maduro would not be a winning bet for Yes.  Not sure I’d agree with that, but I’d be willing to agree to how Polymarket defines it.  I know @Meglamaniac won’t of course because he thinks we haven’t been in a war since WWII

No matter how many times you post the lie it still will be a lie

Carry on you POS

[TimHauck 3,296]

1 minute ago, Meglamaniac said:

No matter how many times you post the lie it still will be a lie

Carry on you POS

Either:

1) It can be war with Venezuela without an official declaration of war

or

2) You don’t think the US has been in a war since WWII

 

You can’t have it both ways, make up your mind.  This is not a gotcha attempt according to your own words.

[Meglamaniac 784]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Either:

1) It can be war with Venezuela without an official declaration of war

or

2) You don’t think the US has been in a war since WWII

 

You can’t have it both ways, make up your mind.  This is not a gotcha attempt according to your own words.

Are we at war with Venezuela yet?

BOOK MARK IT

[TimHauck 3,296]

7 minutes ago, Meglamaniac said:

No matter how many times you post the lie it still will be a lie

Carry on you POS

Prove it.  When was the last time the US was in a war?

[squistion 2,492]

 

[Maximum Overkill 2,414]

Kill em all. 

They are killing American citizens 

[seafoam1 3,405]

Liberals prefer that instead of protecting our border and keeping illegal drugs out of this country, that we burn our cities down, loot, kill, and assault. 

 

[MDC 7,850]

Got to give Rand Paul credit: Unlike GC MAGAs, he has principles.

[Voltaire 5,470]

On 10/25/2025 at 7:07 AM, TimHauck said:

@Voltaire, shall we use this as what would constitute “war”?  Polymarket says war = “military engagement”

 

Trump may make targeted strikes like with Iran and Syria, but I strongly doubt he'll risk US lives in this and he has no intention of getting bogged down in as his best moments in the 2016 debates was slamming Jeb! for his Bushtarded brother's millitary adventurism. He may be willing to make some efforts to topple Maduro but he's not looking for any war.

[Gepetto 1,451]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

Got to give Rand Paul credit: Unlike GC MAGAs, he has principles.

Nope, not all. I agree these killings are not allowed as carried out (per the US Constitution) and not right. I agree with Rand Paul.

[MDC 7,850]

1 minute ago, Gepetto said:

Nope, not all. I agree these killings are not allowed as carried out (per the US Constitution) and not right. I agree with Rand Paul.

Good for you.  

[Gepetto 1,451]

google AI shows the following (when searching for: extrajudicial killings us constitution) - 

The U.S. Constitution, through its Due Process and Fourth Amendment clauses, generally prohibits extrajudicial killings, which are deprivations of life outside of the legal process. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," a standard that extrajudicial killings are seen to violate. However, the application of this principle is debated, particularly concerning targeted killings of suspected terrorists abroad, with arguments centering on the definitions of "imminent threat" and the scope of executive authority in counterterrorism operations. 

[edjr 6,890]

 

[supermike80 2,076]

20 hours ago, Gepetto said:

google AI shows the following (when searching for: extrajudicial killings us constitution) - 

The U.S. Constitution, through its Due Process and Fourth Amendment clauses, generally prohibits extrajudicial killings, which are deprivations of life outside of the legal process. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee that no person shall be "deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," a standard that extrajudicial killings are seen to violate. However, the application of this principle is debated, particularly concerning targeted killings of suspected terrorists abroad, with arguments centering on the definitions of "imminent threat" and the scope of executive authority in counterterrorism operations. 

Yeah pretty sure the US constitution only covers US Citizens.  Doubt they made it to blanket the world

[edjr 6,890]

23 hours ago, MDC said:

Got to give Rand Paul credit: Unlike GC MAGAs, he has principles.

Would be an outstanding POTUS

[Fnord 2,500]

12 minutes ago, edjr said:

Would be an outstanding POTUS

That might be an overstatement, but I'd definitely take him over what we've got.

[edjr 6,890]

Just now, Fnord said:

That might be an overstatement, but I'd definitely take him over what we've got.

You'd take Harris over what we got. Your opinion is as useless as the Tims

[Fnord 2,500]

Just now, edjr said:

You'd take Harris over what we got. Your opinion is as useless as the Tims

I'd take a pile of horse excrement over what we have now. I'd take YOU over what we have now.

Though the decision between you and a pile of horseshit may give me pause. 

[edjr 6,890]

Just now, Fnord said:

I'd take a pile of horse excrement over what we have now. I'd take YOU over what we have now.

Though the decision between you and a pile of horseshit may give me pause. 

They can't afford me. Imaging having to deal with Liberals and MAGA? Shoot me

[TimHauck 3,296]

2 hours ago, edjr said:

 

Bunch of talk of fentanyl in this video.  Very little if any fentanyl is coming from Venezuela  

[Fnord 2,500]

33 minutes ago, edjr said:

They can't afford me. Imaging having to deal with Liberals and MAGA? Shoot me

Careful, you're inciting potential violence against a potential POTUS. I think they can lock you up for that now.

[edjr 6,890]

Just now, Fnord said:

Careful, you're inciting potential violence against a potential POTUS. I think they can lock you up for that now.

 

[seafoam1 3,405]

1 hour ago, Fnord said:

Careful, you're inciting potential violence against a potential POTUS. I think they can lock you up for that now.

 

[squistion 2,492]

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-hegseth-three-deadly-boat-strikes-pacific-9.6956503

U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats kill 14 people in Pacific waters, defence secretary says

A series of strikes conducted by the U.S. military on boats in the eastern Pacific Ocean killed 14 people and left one survivor, U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday, alleging those on board were drug traffickers.

In a post on X, Hegseth said Mexican authorities took over the search-and-rescue operation for the lone survivor from the three strikes, which took place on Monday.

"The four vessels were known by our intelligence apparatus, transiting along known narco-trafficking routes, and carrying narcotics," Hegseth said, without providing any evidence.

Hegseth posted a roughly 30-second video, which appeared to show two vessels close together in the water before exploding. Another part of the video shows a vessel moving in the water, which then explodes.

After a series of strikes in the Caribbean beginning on Sept. 2, the U.S. government announced for the first time last week that its deadly operations had extended to Pacific waters.

Experts have questioned the legality of the strikes, which have killed at least 57 people. There has been no indication that other efforts were made to halt the shipments, and under normal circumstances, the U.S. Coast Guard is involved in drug interdiction.

[Strike 5,995]

21 minutes ago, squistion said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-hegseth-three-deadly-boat-strikes-pacific-9.6956503

U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats kill 14 people in Pacific waters, defence secretary says

A series of strikes conducted by the U.S. military on boats in the eastern Pacific Ocean killed 14 people and left one survivor, U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday, alleging those on board were drug traffickers.

In a post on X, Hegseth said Mexican authorities took over the search-and-rescue operation for the lone survivor from the three strikes, which took place on Monday.

"The four vessels were known by our intelligence apparatus, transiting along known narco-trafficking routes, and carrying narcotics," Hegseth said, without providing any evidence.

Hegseth posted a roughly 30-second video, which appeared to show two vessels close together in the water before exploding. Another part of the video shows a vessel moving in the water, which then explodes.

After a series of strikes in the Caribbean beginning on Sept. 2, the U.S. government announced for the first time last week that its deadly operations had extended to Pacific waters.

Experts have questioned the legality of the strikes, which have killed at least 57 people. There has been no indication that other efforts were made to halt the shipments, and under normal circumstances, the U.S. Coast Guard is involved in drug interdiction.

[Maximum Overkill 2,414]

27 minutes ago, squistion said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-hegseth-three-deadly-boat-strikes-pacific-9.6956503

U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats kill 14 people in Pacific waters, defence secretary says

A series of strikes conducted by the U.S. military on boats in the eastern Pacific Ocean killed 14 people and left one survivor, U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday, alleging those on board were drug traffickers.

In a post on X, Hegseth said Mexican authorities took over the search-and-rescue operation for the lone survivor from the three strikes, which took place on Monday.

"The four vessels were known by our intelligence apparatus, transiting along known narco-trafficking routes, and carrying narcotics," Hegseth said, without providing any evidence.

Hegseth posted a roughly 30-second video, which appeared to show two vessels close together in the water before exploding. Another part of the video shows a vessel moving in the water, which then explodes.

After a series of strikes in the Caribbean beginning on Sept. 2, the U.S. government announced for the first time last week that its deadly operations had extended to Pacific waters.

Experts have questioned the legality of the strikes, which have killed at least 57 people. There has been no indication that other efforts were made to halt the shipments, and under normal circumstances, the U.S. Coast Guard is involved in drug interdiction.

This is Amazing!!! 

Thank you Mr. Trump for saving our Children 

[Meglamaniac 784]

45 minutes ago, squistion said:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-hegseth-three-deadly-boat-strikes-pacific-9.6956503

U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats kill 14 people in Pacific waters, defence secretary says

A series of strikes conducted by the U.S. military on boats in the eastern Pacific Ocean killed 14 people and left one survivor, U.S. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said Tuesday, alleging those on board were drug traffickers.

In a post on X, Hegseth said Mexican authorities took over the search-and-rescue operation for the lone survivor from the three strikes, which took place on Monday.

"The four vessels were known by our intelligence apparatus, transiting along known narco-trafficking routes, and carrying narcotics," Hegseth said, without providing any evidence.

Hegseth posted a roughly 30-second video, which appeared to show two vessels close together in the water before exploding. Another part of the video shows a vessel moving in the water, which then explodes.

After a series of strikes in the Caribbean beginning on Sept. 2, the U.S. government announced for the first time last week that its deadly operations had extended to Pacific waters.

Experts have questioned the legality of the strikes, which have killed at least 57 people. There has been no indication that other efforts were made to halt the shipments, and under normal circumstances, the U.S. Coast Guard is involved in drug interdiction.

but but but I was told this was all about taking what Venezuela has and not about drugs

[TimHauck 3,296]

Just now, Meglamaniac said:

but but but I was told this was all about taking what Venezuela has and not about drugs

lol you fell for it.  This gives them plausible deniability that they’re not unfairly targeting Venezuela.

But no we’re not at war with Venezuela yet.

[Maximum Overkill 2,414]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

But no we’re not at war with Venezuela yet

You think we're at War? 

[Meglamaniac 784]

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

lol you fell for it.  This gives them plausible deniability that they’re not unfairly targeting Venezuela.

But no we’re not at war with Venezuela yet.

LOL

Sure thing Mr. Hack