Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Maximum Overkill

Jimmy Kimmel fired

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:
34 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

 

Yes, thank you for confirming he didn’t say the shooter was MAGA.

Your presence is requested in the MN lawmaker murder thread BTW

Ksb has a stalker. It is weird. At least have the decency to be obsessed with him in private tim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

😆 I'm loving it. Eat it sucker. :banana:

Oh, and it ain't American culture it's cancelling. It's libtard culture that hopefully soon will be wiped completely from this society. 

You're not a very intelligent person.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, God Almighty said:

You're not a very intelligent person.

Oh, good one peanut. Another whiny liberal following orders like all the other liberal collective do. :cry:

I outclass you by at least 100 IQ points. ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Fnord said:

I remember them well enough.

Conservatives spent a lot of time hyperventilating about the Biden regime!!! and how awful it was. Then you turned around and decided to do all of the crap you claimed Biden did, but didn't actually do. Like muzzle talk show hosts they didn't like, take kickbacks and gifts from foreign actors, roll over for China and Russia, etc. And then gallingly defend those actions (which you screamed overandoverandover that you hated) by doing worse and justifying it like a kindergartner: "you meanies did it first!"

You won, we all lost.

Remember that time the Biden admin put Tulsi Gabbard on the terrorist watch list? Authoritarian! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, KSB2424 said:

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”

 

I think the most important takeaway is that Tim voted for this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Yes, thank you for confirming he didn’t say the shooter was MAGA.

Wut?  :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

Kimmel didn’t say a MAGA supporter killed Kirk

In a double negative way he did. If you knew how to interpret language, you'd know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Yes, thank you for confirming he didn’t say the shooter was MAGA.

Your presence is requested in the MN lawmaker murder thread BTW

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Wut?  :lol: 

@jerryskids  You should know by now that if they don't explicitly say something and then have that statement notarized the leftie didn't mean what they suggested, but anything a rightie says is construed in it's worst possible light, EVERY TIME.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Wut?  :lol: 

He implied it, he didn’t say it.

HTH

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

@jerryskids  You should know by now that if they don't explicitly say something and then have that statement notarized the leftie didn't mean what they suggested, but anything a rightie says is construed in it's worst possible light, EVERY TIME.

Which is exactly what you guys have been doing in regards to many of Kirk’s past statements…

And no, pointing out that Kirk made many divisive statements is not justifying his murder you lying POS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Which is exactly what you guys have been doing in regards to many of Kirk’s past statements…

And no, pointing out that Kirk made many divisive statements is not justifying his murder you lying POS

I can't speak for others but I have not done that.  I knew who Charlie Kirk was but don't know enough about him to really judge his statements.  I lean towards there not being anything wrong with most, if not all of his statements, because the little I have seen hasn't been problematic to me as a conservative.  Us conservatives know that if we push back even slightly on one of your lefty positions we are branded as racists or homophobic, etc.....And we know how you love to post stuff that is incomplete or out of context so I've pretty much ignored most of the posts that try to portray Charlie Kirk based on soundbites and snippets.  But you guys can keep spitting on an assassinated man's grave as much as you want.  I'll try to let the dude RIP.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Strike said:

I can't speak for others but I have not done that.  I knew who Charlie Kirk was but don't know enough about him to really judge his statements.  I lean towards there not being anything wrong with most, if not all of his statements, because the little I have seen hasn't been problematic to me as a conservative.  Us conservatives know that if we push back even slightly on one of your lefty positions we are branded as racists or homophobic, etc.....And we know how you love to post stuff that is incomplete or out of context so I've pretty much ignored most of the posts that try to portray Charlie Kirk based on soundbites and snippets.  But you guys can keep spitting on an assassinated man's grave as much as you want.  I'll try to let the dude RIP.

Didn’t you literally ask for examples of things that he said?  And then yelled at people for answering you?

It was horrible that he died, and it’s especially sad since he never advocated for violence, but some people are acting like he was MLK or something, he wasn’t.

Here’s a good example of a comment he made with an obvious implication (invoking 9/11 when talking about Mamdani), but I’m sure you’ll say “there’s nothing wrong with that, he was just stating 2 facts!!!”


 

And again I’m acknowledging that Kimmel “implied” the shooter was MAGA, but he didn’t say it.  And even if he did, I’d argue that’s not worth being cancelled over.  The cancellations should have been reserved for the people celebrating Kirk’s death which Kimmel clearly didn’t do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Didn’t you literally ask for examples of things that he said?  And then yelled at people for answering you?

It was horrible that he died, and it’s especially sad since he never advocated for violence, but some people are acting like he was MLK or something, he wasn’t.

Here’s a good example of a comment he made with an obvious implication (invoking 9/11 when talking about Mamdani), but I’m sure you’ll say “there’s nothing wrong with that, he was just stating 2 facts!!!”


 

And again I’m acknowledging that Kimmel “implied” the shooter was MAGA, but he didn’t say it.  And even if he did, I’d argue that’s not worth being cancelled over.  The cancellations should have been reserved for the people celebrating Kirk’s death which Kimmel clearly didn’t do.

What's great about it, is kimmel is canned and all your whining does nothing to affect it. :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Didn’t you literally ask for examples of things that he said?  And then yelled at people for answering you?

It was horrible that he died, and it’s especially sad since he never advocated for violence, but some people are acting like he was MLK or something, he wasn’t.

Here’s a good example of a comment he made with an obvious implication (invoking 9/11 when talking about Mamdani), but I’m sure you’ll say “there’s nothing wrong with that, he was just stating 2 facts!!!”


 

And again I’m acknowledging that Kimmel “implied” the shooter was MAGA, but he didn’t say it.  And even if he did, I’d argue that’s not worth being cancelled over.  The cancellations should have been reserved for the people celebrating Kirk’s death which Kimmel clearly didn’t do.

I don't know if I asked for things he said.  It's not like I'm opposed to being educated.  As long as the source isn't Billy from a chat room I'm usually open to it.  But I would want the entire thing, with context.  Which I can't get from a soundbite snippet like you just posted.  And it doesn't really matter.  Quit spitting on an assassinated man's grave.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Strike said:

I don't know if I asked for things he said.  It's not like I'm opposed to being educated.  As long as the source isn't Billy from a chat room I'm usually open to it.  But I would want the entire thing, with context.  Which I can't get from a soundbite snippet like you just posted.  And it doesn't really matter.  Quit spitting on an assassinated man's grave.

You did, and then you yelled at me for providing some.

An x post is a “sound bite snippet”?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gladiators said:

I think the most important takeaway is that Tim voted for this.

😂 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

He implied it, he didn’t say it.

HTH

How moderate of you. Thanks Squissy!  So saying "one of their own" in regards to MAGA is not calling him MAGA? :lol: 

 

27 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Didn’t you literally ask for examples of things that he said?  And then yelled at people for answering you?

It was horrible that he died, and it’s especially sad since he never advocated for violence, but some people are acting like he was MLK or something, he wasn’t.

Here’s a good example of a comment he made with an obvious implication (invoking 9/11 when talking about Mamdani), but I’m sure you’ll say “there’s nothing wrong with that, he was just stating 2 facts!!!”


 

And again I’m acknowledging that Kimmel “implied” the shooter was MAGA, but he didn’t say it.  And even if he did, I’d argue that’s not worth being cancelled over.  The cancellations should have been reserved for the people celebrating Kirk’s death which Kimmel clearly didn’t do.

I know why this was in your feed - several commenters blame Israel for 9/11!

Here, this might help you:

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

How moderate of you. Thanks Squissy!  So saying "one of their own" in regards to MAGA is not calling him MAGA? :lol: 

 

He's playing a semantic game.  If you parse out the words and ignore context and tone, Kimmel technically never said the shooter was maga.   Technically, he only said maga was trying to say the shooter wasn't maga (and score political points from that).

No one loves a good semantic argument more than HauckTuah.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just want to put out that if the supreme court ends up ruling on this situation I will abide by their expert opinions. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kimmel's statement was false, though, unlike HauckTuah claims.  It definitely is not a new low.  We've been fighting over which killers have which ideology for political points for awhile now.  It was only scraping lows we've already hit.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Kimmel had said, "the maga gang is keying on the fact that he wasn't one of them for political points," I think it would've been more accurate.  

Using the word trying implies that the maga gang wasn't accurate in classifying that the shooter wasn't maga.

It was a useless statement even as setup and clearly was just a jab at maga.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, nobody said:

Kimmel's statement was false, though, unlike HauckTuah claims.  It definitely is not a new low.  We've been fighting over which killers have which ideology for political points for awhile now.  It was only scraping lows we've already hit.

His statement was not false.  MAGA was desperately trying to paint the killer as not one of their own.  It’s looking like they are correct, but they were doing it before we even knew who the shooter was.  (And don’t do the “yeah because he shot Charlie Kirk!” thing, because conservatives were also quick to blame the MN lawmaker murder on libs on the most scant, and sometimes false, evidence.  And some are even still doing it despite all the evidence to the contrary).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

How moderate of you. Thanks Squissy!  So saying "one of their own" in regards to MAGA is not calling him MAGA? :lol: 

Correct.  MAGA was trying to paint him as anything other than one of their own.  Fact check: true.   Again, looks like they were correct, but they were doing it before there was any evidence.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

9 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

His statement was not false.  MAGA was desperately trying to paint the killer as not one of their own.  It’s looking like they are correct, but they were doing it before we even knew who the shooter was.  (And don’t do the “yeah because he shot Charlie Kirk!” thing, because conservatives were also quick to blame the MN lawmaker murder on libs on the most scant, and sometimes false, evidence.  And some are even still doing it despite all the evidence to the contrary).

He said it was a new low.  That is definitely false.  We've hit lower lows than that.  In fact people celebrating Kirk's death is a lower low.

Fūck it.  I'm switching sides.  Kick Kimmel off the air for lying since we're going to be intentionally stupid.  Thanks for voting for this!

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Strike said:

  I lean towards there not being anything wrong with most, if not all of his statements, because the little I have seen hasn't been problematic to me as a conservative. 

Just an embarrassing, ridiculous, and probably disingenuous statement. I say probably because I don’t believe you’re a bigot or a racist. That’s a compliment to you. But how to reconcile that with your amazing and absurd statement here?  Because OF COURSE there is everything wrong with Kirk’s statements: forget liberal or conservative, no moral person could read the stuff I quoted earlier (courtesy of the Guardian) and fail to find them problematic. I’m left with 3 alternatives: 

1. You’re simply ignorant of what he said (doubtful because at this point it’s been all over the news plus I’ve directly exposed you to it here.)
2. You’re simply trolling, trying to get a reaction. In your case this is always at least partly the case IMO. 

3. You are so invested in winning the partisan game between conservatives and liberals, so intent on being right, that you automatically defend voices on “your side” and can’t admit even to yourself that they might be in the wrong. 
 

I think it’s mostly #3. I think you’re being dishonest but mainly to yourself. 
 

And no I’m not going to engage in breaking down Kirk’s statements so that you can find legalistic or false context explanations (as you love to do.) I’m not interested in getting that deep into his ugliness. You want to believe it’s all OK and part of normal conservatism that’s your call. But it isn’t either. 
 

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, nobody said:

 

He said it was a new low.  That is s definitely false.  We've hit lower lows than that.  In fact people celebrating Kirk's death is a lower low.

Oh ok yes you are correct there 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of cuck doesn’t think that sounding the alarm about a socialist Muslim being mayor of our most important city is ok? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

What kind of cuck doesn’t think that sounding the alarm about a socialist Muslim being mayor of our most important city is ok? 

Foreign socialist muslim at that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jonnyutah said:

Foreign socialist muslim at that.

Good point

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Correct.  MAGA was trying to paint him as anything other than one of their own.  Fact check: true.   Again, looks like they were correct, but they were doing it before there was any evidence.

If you are going to play this idiotic semantic game, he said "desperately."  He had no way to know the level of desperation of the posters.  Fact check:  false.

I feel like I've lost brain cells engaging with your moderate self on this.  :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading what he said a few times, it has really hit me how unfunny, deceitful and disrespectful Kimmels comments were. Fock him. And Fock all the flunkies that worked there. Learn to coal mine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

He implied it, he didn’t say it.

HTH

Just so you know this is why we can’t have normal conversations.  Stop with trival word games.  It’s not only counterproductive but ghey. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, KSB2424 said:

Just so you know this is why we can’t have normal conversations.  Stop with trival word games.  It’s not only counterproductive but ghey. 

Sho's playbook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

After reading what he said a few times, it has really hit me how unfunny, deceitful and disrespectful Kimmels comments were. Fock him. And Fock all the flunkies that worked there. Learn to coal mine. 

Guess it would have been hilarious, honest and respectful if Kirk hadn't been shot and only had his head bashed in with a hammer.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, God Almighty said:

Guess it would have been hilarious, honest and respectful if Kirk hadn't been shot and only had his head bashed in with a hammer.

 

Hi Rusty. You’re sad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, God Almighty said:

Guess it would have been hilarious, honest and respectful if Kirk hadn't been shot and only had his head bashed in with a hammer.

 

Kirk didn’t drink so no cocktail and also didn’t have those rumors swirling around. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×