Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
HellToupee

Illegal Alien Iowa DEI School Superintendent Arrested by ICE -How Deep Does This Go?

Recommended Posts

Thus proving having qualifications or a track record of success is unnecessary.  As long as people like you. And what you look like. Liberals pulling us down wit the weight of their stupidity. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An all liberal, all female school board virtue signal their way to an illegal superintendent?  Talk about water being wet🤣🤣🤣

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

An all liberal, all female school board virtue signal their way to an illegal superintendent?  Talk about water being wet🤣🤣🤣

Two different ones?  C’mon, Occam’s razor tells us he was probably legal at least at the time he was hired, unless it was an elaborate fraud scheme

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If a conservative rose this far with an on line degree cucks would go nuts. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

If a conservative rose this far with an on line degree cucks would go nuts. 

I believe only one of his at least 3 degrees were from an online school 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m gonna read a little more about the lawsuits from the PA district.  At first glance suing  for not getting hired for a job feels like cuck behavior when they should have pulled themselves up by their bootstraps instead 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Two different ones?  C’mon, Occam’s razor tells us he was probably legal at least at the time he was hired, unless it was an elaborate fraud scheme

You can see exactly how this went down in PA from the link you posted that has the schoolboard minutes. The FBI and degree verification check did not get processed. They hired him anyway. 

This guy plays the race card like it is nothing. Easy to see how liberal white women wouldnt press the issue if he threw that back at them. Especially once he was hired. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

You can see exactly how this went down in PA from the link you posted that has the schoolboard minutes. The FBI and degree verification check did not get processed. They hired him anyway. 

I believe she added additional info after I posted it here, but that’s not quite what it says.   She says they planned to do it within 90 days of his hire and she couldn’t find record of them revisiting it, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.  The document clearly calls out that the law requires it, so Occam’s razor would tell us that they probably did revisit it (especially since he then also passed a background check at a different district).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I believe she added additional info after I posted it here, but that’s not quite what it says.   She says they planned to do it within 90 days of his hire and she couldn’t find record of them revisiting it, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.  The document clearly calls out that the law requires it, so Occam’s razor would tell us that they probably did revisit it.

"occams razor" is always brought up when this guy wants to pretend something he says is true. 😆

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s some info about some of the lawsuits against the PA district:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/another-settlement-millcreek-schools-pay-085708275.html
 

Two of the plaintiffs were men that got demoted from administrator positions making over $100k a year, where Roberts stated he wanted to reduce the number of administrators.  If Roberts were a Republican doing this GC righties here would celebrate him for removing unnecessary bloat.

One of the plaintiffs declared bankruptcy and one got a job at an insurance company instead (reminder, they were both offered teaching jobs within the district). So color me a bit skeptical about some of their claims. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, seafoam1 said:

"occams razor" is always brought up when this guy wants to pretend something he says is true. 😆

I think he brings up Occam's Razor because it's been used properly to debunk many of the fantasies he posts here.  I also think he doesn't know WTF Occam's Razor means because most of the times he brings it up it isn't applicable, as is the case here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Strike said:

I think he brings up Occam's Razor because it's been used properly to debunk many of the fantasies he posts here.  I also think he doesn't know WTF Occam's Razor means because most of the times he brings it up it isn't applicable, as is the case here.

I know what Occam’s razor means.  The simplest explanation is usually the best one.  You don’t think the simplest explanation for him getting hired by two school districts isn’t that he passed both background checks?

And do you still think I hadn’t posted any primary sources when you replied earlier?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I believe she added additional info after I posted it here, but that’s not quite what it says.   She says they planned to do it within 90 days of his hire and she couldn’t find record of them revisiting it, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.  The document clearly calls out that the law requires it, so Occam’s razor would tell us that they probably did revisit it (especially since he then also passed a background check at a different district).

Occam's razor would tell us that he didnt pass or didnt complete it since his visa expired over 20 years ago. 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The superintendent of a school district should be well known to the community. A background check should only be a formality. How do you not know if your incoming superintendent is a citizen or not? Dumbasses 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Grace Under Pressure said:

The superintendent of a school district should be well known to the community. A background check should only be a formality. How do you not know if your incoming superintendent is a citizen or not? Dumbasses 

It's a liberal run city. Which means it's a city full of libtards. They love illegals. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Occam's razor would tell us that he didnt pass or didnt complete it since his visa expired over 20 years ago. 

 

 

 

I think you fell for ICE’s misleading wording.   They never said he overstayed his student visa, just that that’s when he first entered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I think you fell for ICE’s misleading wording.   They never said he overstayed his student visa, just that that’s when he first entered.

He entered in 1999. His I20 would have been for 2005 at the latest. He is still here, so obviously he overstayed it. I said 20 not 25 years for this reason. 

I mean occams razor would Occam's razor the occams razor and show that occam said that his razor was sharp and that a guy that came here with a student visa and is getting deported has overstayed that student visa making this the most occamy of razors. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jonnyutah said:

He entered in 1999. His I20 would have been for 2005 at the latest. He is still here, so obviously he overstayed it. I said 20 not 25 years for this reason. 

I mean occams razor would Occam's razor the occams razor and show that occam said that his razor was sharp and that a guy that came here with a student visa and is getting deported has overstayed that student visa making this the most occamy of razors. 

They never said he didn’t get another type of visa or citizenship later though.  He worked for like 5 different public school systems after 2005, I find it hard to believe he was illegal that whole time (edit: again, unless it was an elaborate fraud scheme)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

22 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

They never said he didn’t get another type of visa or citizenship later though.  He worked for like 5 different public school systems after 2005, I find it hard to believe he was illegal that whole time (edit: again, unless it was an elaborate fraud scheme)

The Iowa people's story is that he presented documents that appeared legit for his I-9 form.  Why wouldn't he have done similarly at previous jobs?  The variety of crimes this individual seems willing and to have committed is quite varied, yet you continue to support him and don't seem to have an issue with such a morally questionable person being in charge of the education of large numbers of our youth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

 

The Iowa people's story is that he presented documents that appeared legit for his I-9 form.  Why wouldn't he have done similarly at previous jobs?  

So you think it was an elaborate fraud scheme?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TimHauck said:

So you think it was an elaborate fraud scheme?  

WTF are you talking about?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

WTF are you talking about?

You said he “presented documents that appeared legit.”  Are you suggesting they were not actually legit?  Or do you think that he was legal at the time the documents were submitted?    Pretty much has to be one of those 2 options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

You said he “presented documents that appeared legit.”  Are you suggesting they were not actually legit?  Or do you think that he was legal at the time the documents were submitted?    Pretty much has to be one of those 2 options.

I don't know.  That"s what the Iowa school district said.  Ask them.  It sounds like they're not sure since they aren't saying the docs he presented ARE Legit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Strike said:

WTF are you talking about?

"occams razer!!!" Or something like that. The guy never stops with his BS. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Strike said:

I don't know.  That"s what the Iowa school district said.  Ask them.  It sounds like they're not sure since they aren't saying the docs he presented ARE Legit.

No they’re not sure, no one should be.  But you seemed to be implying they were not legit by talking about his crimes.  I do agree with you about “why wouldn’t he have done similarly at other jobs” - he probably did, so either he was legal during his time at the other jobs, or he committed fraud.

16 minutes ago, Strike said:

 

The Iowa people's story is that he presented documents that appeared legit for his I-9 form.  Why wouldn't he have done similarly at previous jobs?  The variety of crimes this individual seems willing and to have committed is quite varied, yet you continue to support him and don't seem to have an issue with such a morally questionable person being in charge of the education of large numbers of our youth.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

No they’re not sure, no one should be.  But you seemed to be implying they were not legit by talking about his crimes.  I do agree with you about “why wouldn’t he have done similarly at other jobs” - he probably did, so either he was legal during his time at the other jobs, or he committed fraud.

 

On his application to get licensed in Iowa, under penalty of perjury, he asserted he was a U.S. citizen.  That is clearly false.  Yet you continue to support such a morally questionable individual being in charge of the education of a large number of our youth 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Strike said:

On his application to get licensed in Iowa, under penalty of perjury, he asserted he was a U.S. citizen.  That is clearly false.  Yet you continue to support such a morally questionable individual being in charge of the education of a large number of our youth 

I wouldn’t say it was “clearly false.”  He was married to a citizen, so he could have gotten citizenship through that.  But it’s possible his marriage was considered fraudulent and they revoked it, triggering the deportation order.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I wouldn’t say it was “clearly false.”  He was married to a citizen, so he could have gotten citizenship through that.  But it’s possible his marriage was considered fraudulent and they revoked it, triggering the deportation order.  

Link to him being married to a U.S. citizen?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, TimHauck said:

This guy found it, but only posted part of it.  

He did seem to have a lot of experience though.  I feel like the main actual red flag is the lawsuits.  He was definitely a DEI guy, but I don’t think that proves he was a “criminal illegal alien.”   The school board has now stated they thought he was a citizen.  

He seemed to have a good reputation particularly in Iowa, but it’s certainly possible he was a fraudster.   This thread has some more information I hadn’t seen elsewhere.  Interestingly he appears to have been married to an American - so I’d be surprised if he didn’t apply for citizenship through that.

 

 

And people are calling him Dr. because he conducted a survey.  😂 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, supermike80 said:

Not really interested in reading this whole thread..but is Tim defending this??

Of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Not really interested in reading this whole thread..but is Tim defending this??

If you’re referring to me I haven’t weighed in. I don’t know the specifics about this gentleman, I don’t know his history or what he’s done wrong with regard to crime. 

I think you know that, as a general rule, I don’t think ICE should be detaining and deporting anyone who is not a violent criminal, regardless of their legal status. I think it’s morally wrong and hurts our nation to pursue that. Violent criminals are fair game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, The Real timschochet said:

If you’re referring to me I haven’t weighed in. I don’t know the specifics about this gentleman, I don’t know his history or what he’s done wrong with regard to crime. 

I think you know that, as a general rule, I don’t think ICE should be detaining and deporting anyone who is not a violent criminal, regardless of their legal status. I think it’s morally wrong and hurts our nation to pursue that. Violent criminals are fair game. 

Nope. Other Tim.  But understandable youd think it was you.  You kids are very similar in postings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

In the x thread linked earlier

 

 

I told you before I don't do Twitter.  I've read at least 20 different articles over the last 3 days about this guy and not one of them has ever mentioned a marriage or even a relationship.  And if a marriage resulted in him being legal in this country I'm sure someone would have mentioned it.  You're going to have to do better than Biilys Twitter account to prove this one.  Occams Razor says that if your only source is Billy's Twitter it's probably not true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×