Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Maximum Overkill

9th Circuit court rules on Trump's National Guard deployment in Portland

Recommended Posts

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday ruled that President Donald Trump can deploy Oregon National Guard troops into the city of Portland, delivering a significant victory to the Trump administration as it continues its effort to send federal forces into Democratic-led cities despite a string of recent setbacks in other district and appeals courts.

Judges on the three-member panel ruled 2-1 to authorize Trump's deployment. Judge Ryan Nelson and Judge Bridget Bade, both appointed by Trump, sided with the administration in the majority ruling, with the lone Clinton-appointed judge, Susan Graber, dissented.

"After considering the record at this preliminary stage, we conclude that it is likely that the President lawfully exercised his statutory authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406(3), which authorizes the federalization of the National Guard when ‘the President is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States,’" the majority said. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But so many people attended "No Kings" protests, didn't they effect change?  :( 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

But so many people attended "No Kings" protests, didn't they effect change?  :( 

Well, it would seem as though the 9th circuit, which is inevitably where the GOP runs when they need a favorable ruling, missed the point. To the surprise of nobody.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Well, it would seem as though the 9th circuit, which is inevitably where the GOP runs when they need a favorable ruling, missed the point. To the surprise of nobody.

Traditionally, the 9th Circuit is far and away the most progressive, law-ignoring appeals court.  Not surprisingly, they along with the Federal Court are the most overturned by SCOTUS.  This predates the current SCOTUS makeup.

My guess is that Trump lucked out to get two non-whackadoodle-progressives on this panel.  :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Traditionally, the 9th Circuit is far and away the most progressive, law-ignoring appeals court.  Not surprisingly, they along with the Federal Court are the most overturned by SCOTUS.  This predates the current SCOTUS makeup.

My guess is that Trump lucked out to get two non-whackadoodle-progressives on this panel.  :thumbsup: 

This is a huge victory for Trump. Portland is a mess right now. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not for trump, trump is the cause of the riots, he likes this violence, it’s a victory for the citizens of Portland. Trump doesn’t live in Portland, he lives up His . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fnord said:

Well, it would seem as though the 9th circuit, which is inevitably where the GOP runs when they need a favorable ruling, missed the point. To the surprise of nobody.

Are you off your gourd? The 9th has been by far the most leftwing circuit for your entire lifetime and its not close. Its inevitably where leftoids go judicial shopping. Trump goes to the fifth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Maybe you bltches will STFU about the protestors in one block in Portland now 😂

⬆️ Says the Low T, spun out last word Liberal who can't let it go. 😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, thegeneral said:

Maybe you bltches will STFU about the protestors in one block in Portland now 😂

Early bird supper must have been overcooked. The general is grumpy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully our brave military can crush the dancing inflatables threatening Portland and the very fabric of American society.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course he can. What if the US was invaded? The president of the US couldn't deploy the national guard to defend our land?

Which our land was invaded. This is simple stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Traditionally, the 9th Circuit is far and away the most progressive, law-ignoring appeals court.  Not surprisingly, they along with the Federal Court are the most overturned by SCOTUS.  This predates the current SCOTUS makeup.

My guess is that Trump lucked out to get two non-whackadoodle-progressives on this panel.  :thumbsup: 

 

14 hours ago, Voltaire said:

Are you off your gourd? The 9th has been by far the most leftwing circuit for your entire lifetime and its not close. Its inevitably where leftoids go judicial shopping. Trump goes to the fifth.

You're both right, I was thinking of the wrong number. My bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

It's going to be appealed to the entire 9th circuit, who will probably toss out the 3 judge appeal.  

Of course it will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Mike Honcho said:

And rightfully so-their isn't an insurrection taking place. 

I hadn't heard that an insurrection was required.  I thought the legal bar was the requirement on forces above and beyond what is normally available.  :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I hadn't heard that an insurrection was required.  I thought the legal bar was the requirement on forces above and beyond what is normally available.  :dunno: 

And is typically accompanied by a request from the governor of the state in question, based on recommendations from law enforcement. 

What's going on here is (D)ifferent. This isn't protection, it's provocation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Fnord said:

And is typically accompanied by a request from the governor of the state in question, based on recommendations from law enforcement. 

What's going on here is (D)ifferent. This isn't protection, it's provocation.

Ummm...im confused? 

Are you saying democrats are provoking this? 

Or do you not know what (D)ifferent means? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Ummm...im confused? 

Are you saying democrats are provoking this? 

Or do you not know what (D)ifferent means? 

 

He doesn't know. He's a liberal. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fnord said:

And is typically accompanied by a request from the governor of the state in question, based on recommendations from law enforcement. 

What's going on here is (D)ifferent. This isn't protection, it's provocation.

We weren't discussing "typical," Honcho and I were discussing the law behind it.

Your rationale is an example of why I said "of course they will," and why the 9th Circuit is the most overturned of the nine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Ummm...im confused? 

Are you saying democrats are provoking this? 

Or do you not know what (D)ifferent means? 

 

It's (D)ifferent because he's doing it exclusively in Democrat-run cities, predominantly in blue states, with Memphis the only exception. It's (D)ifferent because he's obviously targeting those that he perceives as "enemies" e.g. anyone that didn't vote for him. It's (D)ifferent because MAGA tinfoil hat types (which is most of them, it seems) would have been violently enraged if a Democratic POTUS ever would have done the same. It's (D)ifferent because this has never happened before, under any admin, and the party of "law and order" and "individual rights" and "patriots" has turned into the party of slavish sycophants that have completely inverted their purported beliefs for the sake of belonging to an ugly cult of personality.

Get it yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Fnord said:

It's (D)ifferent because he's doing it exclusively in Democrat-run cities, predominantly in blue states, with Memphis the only exception. 

Democrat run cities are the most violent, hence, they need the help. Tough love..

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Fnord said:

It's (D)ifferent because he's doing it exclusively in Democrat-run cities, predominantly in blue states, with Memphis the only exception. It's (D)ifferent because he's obviously targeting those that he perceives as "enemies" e.g. anyone that didn't vote for him. It's (D)ifferent because MAGA tinfoil hat types (which is most of them, it seems) would have been violently enraged if a Democratic POTUS ever would have done the same. It's (D)ifferent because this has never happened before, under any admin, and the party of "law and order" and "individual rights" and "patriots" has turned into the party of slavish sycophants that have completely inverted their purported beliefs for the sake of belonging to an ugly cult of personality.

Get it yet?

Ok, so you are confused. Got it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, jonnyutah said:

Ok, so you are confused. Got it. 

I am indeed. I am confused as to how millions of Americans can see our tub-a-goo billionaire nepobaby POTUS as anything other than what he presents to us in plain sight every day: An amoral, thieving, narcissistic septuagenarian acting like a toddler that DGAF about anything but himself. Somehow you've convinced yourselves that this guy is worthy of adoration and blind allegiance, to the detriment of all Earthlings.

This will NEVER compute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, jonnyutah said:

Ok, so you are confused. Got it. 

You are speaking directly with TDS at work. 

There is no cure for those who have it. It's basically stage 4 cancer of the liberal mind. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:
19 hours ago, jonnyutah said:

Ok, so you are confused. Got it. 

You are speaking directly with TDS at work. 

There is no cure for those who have it. It's basically stage 4 cancer of the liberal mind. 

Nah, he is just old and dumb. Thought he understood something and basically malapropped it. But he is prideful so he cant admit his error. So now he is on a tangent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jonnyutah said:

Nah, he is just old and dumb. Thought he understood something and basically malapropped it. But he is prideful so he cant admit his error. So now he is on a tangent. 

His last post is full of TDS. I've seen more than enough from that guy. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jonnyutah said:

Nah, he is just old and dumb. Thought he understood something and basically malapropped it. But he is prideful so he cant admit his error. So now he is on a tangent. 

Let me attempt to explain this in terms you may understand:

Yaknow how them darkies took that ni**er term and started using it toward each other? That's like what I did. I flipped a belittling word on its head. There are some associated terms for this: reappropriation, satire, artistic license among them.

Sorry you don't get it, but your narrow perceptions aren't my problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×