Pro-lifers…opinions here?

[TimHauck 3,273]

Parents refuse to abort baby whose organs were underdeveloped, baby lives for 2 hours.

I’m fine with the parents choosing to do this, but by saying “every child is worthy of life,” this x poster seems to be saying she wouldn’t be okay if the parents had chose to have an abortion instead.  GC pro-lifers, would you have been?

Speaking of this x poster, of course she’s the same one quoted in a previous thread here about a gay couple that wanted a surrogate baby aborted, and I’d bet completely made up a claim that “they ordered life saving care be withheld.”   Of course digby and probably some other GC righties fell for the fake news.

https://catholicvote.org/surrogacy-horror-two-men-kill-25-week-baby-they-owned/

[lickin_starfish 1,997]

Baby Charlie had a better childhood than these two boys...

 

 

[TimHauck 3,273]

19 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

Baby Charlie had a better childhood than these two boys...

 

 

Maybe baby Charlie died from the covid vax you ghoul 

[MDC 7,808]

Was Baby Charlie in pain throughout the pregnancy / birth? Seems like abortion would’ve been the kinder thing to do in this case.

[jerryskids 7,047]

It's a tough call unless you are avidly pro-life... or pro-abortion, I guess.

Obviously the live birth and several hours were extremely emotional, and changes the dynamics of things.  Charlie was officially alive, was named, parents got to hold him, to see him, to etch his face into their memories.  They can have a ceremony for his death where friends and family can offer their condolences and support.

I think I've convinced myself this was a good thing.   

[MDC 7,808]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

It's a tough call unless you are avidly pro-life... or pro-abortion, I guess.

Obviously the live birth and several hours were extremely emotional, and changes the dynamics of things.  Charlie was officially alive, was named, parents got to hold him, to see him, to etch his face into their memories.  They can have a ceremony for his death where friends and family can offer their condolences and support.

I think I've convinced myself this was a good thing.   

What if Charlie was in agony? Seems like the parents would have prolonged his pain and made him go through a traumatic childbirth for selfish reasons.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,520]

seems like the parents made the decision that was theirs to make

[jerryskids 7,047]

15 minutes ago, MDC said:

What if Charlie was in agony? Seems like the parents would have prolonged his pain and made him go through a traumatic childbirth for selfish reasons.

Like I said, it's a tough call.  And I do support euthanasia for people in pain with terminal illnesses. 

My counter to this though is that babies are in pain all the time, that's why they cry.  And nobody remembers that pain when they are old enough to remember things.

[GobbleDog 1,010]

Some are pro-life, some pro-choice.... I'm pro-abortion. It should be encouraged and subsidized. The vast majority of people getting abortions aren't valedictorians, but the scourge of society.  Pay a little now, or a whole lot more later in policing, court costs, prisons, welfare, etc. And the thing about scum - they exponentially multiply.  

I disagree with pro-lifers about the moral issue, "All life is precious!"  I disagree, but I can respect that argument. However, don't then tell me "Except in cases of rape or incest... then just abort the little bastard."  That's called hypocrisy. 

[Fnord 2,484]

10 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

seems like the parents made the decision that was theirs to make

This. Doesn't matter what any of us think.

[TimHauck 3,273]

7 minutes ago, Fnord said:

This. Doesn't matter what any of us think.

Agree.  But I’m confident the person who wrote the tweet would have a different opinion if they made a different choice.

[seafoam1 3,384]

2 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Parents refuse to abort baby whose organs were underdeveloped, baby lives for 2 hours.

I’m fine with the parents choosing to do this, but by saying “every child is worthy of life,” this x poster seems to be saying she wouldn’t be okay if the parents had chose to have an abortion instead.  GC pro-lifers, would you have been?

Speaking of this x poster, of course she’s the same one quoted in a previous thread here about a gay couple that wanted a surrogate baby aborted, and I’d bet completely made up a claim that “they ordered life saving care be withheld.”   Of course digby and probably some other GC righties fell for the fake news.

https://catholicvote.org/surrogacy-horror-two-men-kill-25-week-baby-they-owned/

Wish all kids dead all you want. Shows your character.

[Maximum Overkill 2,376]

PRO-MURDER 

Protecting ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS, KILLING BABIES 

 

 

[MDC 7,808]

57 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Like I said, it's a tough call.  And I do support euthanasia for people in pain with terminal illnesses. 

My counter to this though is that babies are in pain all the time, that's why they cry.  And nobody remembers that pain when they are old enough to remember things.

I don’t think babies are in pain all the time. They cry to express discomfort like hunger or tiredness because that’s the only way they can communicate.

Guess my take on this story is, Charlie may have been in pain all the time due to his physical defects. So it seems selfish to have him also go through the trauma of childbirth just so mom and dad can see his face for a few hours. 

[weepaws 3,302]

Murder is never right, abortion is taking a life, murder is never right.  

[Frozenbeernuts 2,330]

You don't understand a thing about life, so why would you even weigh in on this? Clueless poster asking questions about morality. LOL

[Frozenbeernuts 2,330]

Complete ignorance

[TimHauck 3,273]

9 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

You don't understand a thing about life, so why would you even weigh in on this? Clueless poster asking questions about morality. LOL

Who are you talking to?