Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

Federal prosecutor in Adam Schiff mortgage fraud investigation thinks case insufficient to move forward

Recommended Posts

He did it, but.  Shame. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Well that person is getting shitcanned.

That is for sure. What is the over/under on how many days she lasts? 4?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Many would rather see him charged for the Standard Hotel affair or treason.  

I prefer he gets cancer and is forced to look back on all the stuff that turned him into the POS he is today. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, squistion said:

That is for sure. What is the over/under on how many days she lasts? 4?

Trump is president. You lost. ;) 

Enjoy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oops.  Turns out the pigeon focker fell for fake news again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Ah too bad, now he’ll be fired.

What got fixed? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Schiff Isn't Going to Like This: Todd Blanche Pours Cold Water Over New Report About DOJ Case

 Summarize

 
The opinions expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of RedState.com.
e22b611a-c664-49f1-8008-9e6638bc8a52-1052x615.png AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

As we reported back in July, a criminal referral was made from the Federal Housing Finance Agency to the Department of Justice on Sen. Adam Schiff (D-CA). The referral raised questions of alleged mortgage fraud. 

Schiff freaked out over that. In a video almost five minutes long made after the referral, Schiff ranted, claiming he was being targeted by President Donald Trump. 


READ MORE: Hoo Boy: Schiff Mortgage Story Heats Up Big Time With Report of Criminal Referral

Watch: Adam Schiff Meltdown Video After Criminal Referral, Ducks Questions From Reporters


So what's happening with the case?

MSNBC's Ken Dilanian spread a report about Schiff on Thursday, and it didn't sound good. 

He claimed: 

The federal prosecutor in charge of investigating whether Sen. Adam Schiff should be charged with mortgage fraud recently told her bosses in Washington she did not think the case was strong enough to move forward, two sources familiar with the matter told MSNBC.

A third person familiar with the matter said the case is continuing to be investigated.

Kelly Hayes, the U.S. Attorney in Maryland, met in recent days with Todd Blanche, the deputy Attorney General, to update him on the Schiff case, the three people said.

Hayes, an experienced federal prosecutor, told Blanche she did not think the case against Schiff was strong, two people said. The two said Ed Martin, a controversial senior Justice Department official, is pressing to keep the case alive.

That, of course, went everywhere on the left, because that fits their narrative. 

Dilanian later clarified that MSNBC split with NBC, and cited "former colleagues" at NBC on the report.

Dilanian also spread this statement from Schiff's lawyer and former U.S. Attorney, Preet Bharara:

“It seems pretty clear that a team of career prosecutors have thoroughly reviewed the politically-motivated allegations against Senator Schiff and found they are unsupported by any evidence and are baseless. The transparently vindictive effort to pursue the Senator has no merit, and if there is any justice left in the Justice Department, this should be the end of the matter.”

But there was a small problem with this story, according to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The meeting "never happened," he said. He completely obliterated the story. 

"Can you ask your two 'sources' for more info?" Blanche clapped back. "I’m genuinely curious. Excited to hear more about this made-up meeting! Also, unequivocally: U.S. Attorney Hayes has told me no such thing."

Whoops, so much for that story. And even in the NBC story, they note the case is ongoing, according to their sources. 

So if the left thought they had something here and Schiff thought he could use it, Blanche squashed that, but good. 

 

🤔

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Schiff's lawyer and former U.S. Attorney, Preet Bharara

Former SDNY US Attorney (under Trump btw) represents Schiff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

Nick Arama

Ah yes, THE Nick Arama, Red State blogger and author of such fondly recalled pieces as “Watch: Dems Are Already Panicking About JD Vance Becoming 48 - It's Glorious!”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

according to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche

Fun the way the government works now - Blanche *was Trump’s personal criminal defense lawyer but then he was appointed Deputy AG but then also he *still represents Trump in his numerous appeals. He both represents Trump as a convicted felon AND he works for the DOJ and runs cover for stories about people Trump feverishly fears to be his enemies. Great, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

The federal prosecutor in charge of investigating whether Sen. Adam Schiff should be charged with mortgage fraud recently told her bosses in Washington she did not think the case was strong enough to move forward, two sources familiar with the matter told MSNBC.

LoL, mortgage fraud. They must think this is a real winner. Until the loan officer doesn’t cooperate. And the bank doesn’t cooperate. And until they learn the borrower honestly reported their intention in writing. Etc. Sounds like another stinker. By USA Kelly Hayes who just indicted Bolton. Whoof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

I prefer he gets cancer and is forced to look back on all stuff that turned into the POS he is today. 

What a terrible thing to say, shefoam.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said:

What a terrible thing to say, shefoam.

 

Sorry, princess rusty, but it's true. What are you going to do about it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump just pardoned a man who was the driver behind $4.3 BILLION in fraud, his operation took money from Al Qaeda, Hamas & ‘Palestinian Islamic Jihad’ aka PIJ (hint, they ain’t nice). The acts included multiple mass ransomware attacks, transactions of sale of child abuse materials & narcotics, blackmail, & fraud.

Carry on.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Isn’t Todd Blanche the same dude that met with the Maxwell lady? 

Correct. The personal criminal lawyer for the president, who has also been implicated with Epstein, Blanche, who is simultaneously the Deputy Attorney General, went and met with Maxwell, and then later the DOJ granted Maxwell leniency by shifting her to a lower security prison. Same guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Trump just pardoned a man who was the driver behind $4.3 BILLION in fraud, his operation took money from Al Qaeda, Hamas & ‘Palestinian Islamic Jihad’ aka PIJ (hint, they ain’t nice). The acts included multiple mass ransomware attacks, transactions of sale of child abuse materials & narcotics, blackmail, & fraud.

Carry on.

 

Probably working for us now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Trump just pardoned a man who was the driver behind $4.3 BILLION in fraud, his operation took money from Al Qaeda, Hamas & ‘Palestinian Islamic Jihad’ aka PIJ (hint, they ain’t nice). The acts included multiple mass ransomware attacks, transactions of sale of child abuse materials & narcotics, blackmail, & fraud.

Carry on.

 

You vote for pedophiles.

 

Carry on.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Strike said:

Oops.  Turns out the pigeon focker fell for fake news again.

Oh hey it’s Strike believing anything the admin says again, lol.

Griffin’s post was a bit misleading also. Seems like the real truth is likely somewhere in the middle.   Here’s the full tweet from Dilanian which Blanche replied to:

Basically it’s just saying they don’t think there’s enough evidence “yet” but they’ll keep looking.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, squistion said:

 

The federal prosecutor in charge of investigating whether Sen. Adam Schiff should be charged with mortgage fraud recently told her bosses in Washington she did not think the case was strong enough to move forward, two sources familiar with the matter told MSNBC.

 

2 sources.  Who are they?  What are their names?  endless drivel from partisan hacks who make things up & squid posts it as truth.  Pure unadulterated junk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, shadrap said:

The federal prosecutor in charge of investigating whether Sen. Adam Schiff should be charged with mortgage fraud recently told her bosses in Washington she did not think the case was strong enough to move forward, two sources familiar with the matter told MSNBC.

 

2 sources.  Who are they?  What are their names?  endless drivel from partisan hacks who make things up & squid posts it as truth.  Pure unadulterated junk.

They are anonymous sources, so I didn't represent it as being the "truth" - so you can believe or disbelieve it, depending on the crediblity of who is reporting it. We will probably learn sometime in the future if the anonymous sources were accurate. 

Fun Fact: People who have government jobs often can't go on the record without losing their jobs, and this is particularly true with the Trump administration. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Probably working for us now?

Handling the sex trafficking & extortion rackets for the Trump family? Yeah that fits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, shadrap said:

2 sources Who are they?  What are their names?

Golly now why would people in the Trump DOJ want to keep their names concealed, why would they be concerned…???

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, squistion said:

They are anonymous sources, so I didn't represent it as being the "truth" - so you can believe or disbelieve it, depending on the crediblity of who is reporting it. We will probably learn sometime in the future if the anonymous sources were accurate. 

Fun Fact: People who have government jobs often can't go on the record without losing their jobs, and this is particularly true with the Trump administration. 

Well has Schiff been indicted yet? I think that’s a good sign they don’t have the evidence yet.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Golly now why would people in the Trump DOJ want to keep their names concealed, why would they be concerned…???

Golly, then how do you know its not a made up story?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, squistion said:

 

The fact it was ALMOST close enough is close enough for me.  He is a scumbag to even be close to “strong enough to move forward.”

something to be real proud of libs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Ron_Artest said:

Shocker.

Prosecuting your political enemies isn't as easy as it looks huh trumpedo.

Not quite strong enough.  Let that settle in a moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Well has Schiff been indicted yet? I think that’s a good sign they don’t have the evidence yet.  

Except that, when it comes to the current DOJ, actual evidence is an irrelevancy. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's funny that libtards forget that all they have been doing is going after Trump for the past 11 years. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Except that, when it comes to the current DOJ, actual evidence is an irrelevancy. 

Yup and they still haven’t done it for Schiff, so it must be even worse than the others 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Except that, when it comes to the current DOJ, actual evidence is an irrelevancy. 

Now do the dumbocrats going after Trump for the past decade. Start with RUSSIA and the election!!! 🍿

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, shadrap said:

Golly, then how do you know its not a made up story?

Because journalists are trained and bound to follow professional standards. I’m sure your boss doesn’t stand over you and watch every thing you do because you’re responsible & follow the standards of your trade.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Because journalists are trained and bound to follow professional standards. I’m sure your boss doesn’t stand over you and watch every thing you do because you’re responsible & follow the standards of your trade.

😆 "trained and bound to follow professional standards"

🤣

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×