Snapchat Hack: 200,000 'Self-Destruct' Nude Images Set to Leak in 'The Snappening'

[edjr 5,564]

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/snapchat-hack-200000-self-destruct-nude-images-set-leak-snappening-1469418

 

 

 

Hackers have warned that thousands of nude images sent via the mobile-messaging service Snapchat, many of which users believed self-destructed after being sent, are to be released online in a searchable database.

Messaging boards on the notorious website 4chan have been filling up with news of the imminent leak, already being referred to as "The Snappening".

It comes just weeks after hundreds of celebrity nudes were leaked online through the same site, following a hack of Apple's iCloud that has come to be referred to as the Fappening.

Earlier this week an anonymous 4chan user claimed to have hacked into Snapsave, an image-saving service that allows users of Snapchat to store pictures received before they self-destruct.

By way of proof, the poster provided pictures allegedly from Snapsave.

 

 

 

 

[crackattack 513]

HA! God love the internet.

[NorthernVike 2,080]

Are people really this stupid? Take a nude digital photo and it will 'self destruct'.

 

 

[edjr 5,564]

Are people really this stupid? Take a nude digital photo and it will 'self destruct'.

 

 

 

 

Snapchat turned down a 3 billion dollar offer from Facebook

[Frank M 181]

The only trouble with this is you run the risk of looking at nudies from girls who may not be of age.

 

I won't be checking these out.

[Giants Fan 85]

The only trouble with this is you run the risk of looking at nudies from girls who may not be of age.

 

I won't be checking these out.

Mmm hmmm. Go on.

[Giants Fan 85]

So, you are saying ... as long as what I am looking at is not obviously a child .... could be a flat chested short girl who is 18. That's fine. If she's 17 ... i'm a pedo.

 

But then what if I am some 19 year old dumbass and I snapchat a girl who is 17, send her nip slip pic to my friends.... and I get arrested for dismenitaing child pron? Is that fair?

 

There is a larger conversation ... but I can understand how most ppl want to avoid it.

[wiffleball 4,640]

I know a couple girls who just live for snapchat. We've become a nation of massive narcisists.

[Giants Fan 85]

What if I'm an artist? What if I need naked underage girls for my art?

 

That's actually a valid argument, in the eyes of the law.

[NorthernVike 2,080]

The only trouble with this is you run the risk of looking at nudies from girls who may not be of age.

 

I won't be checking these out.

Good point.

[Giants Fan 85]

I know a couple girls who just live for snapchat. We've become a nation of massive narcisists.

And there will be something else ... something too cool for the old people when they turn 25. Young people will feel old faster than they expected. Some things never change.

[Giants Fan 85]

Good point. :heart:

[NorthernVike 2,080]

If you're gonna quote manip, get it right dumb ass.

[IGotWorms 3,315]

So, you are saying ... as long as what I am looking at is not obviously a child .... could be a flat chested short girl who is 18. That's fine. If she's 17 ... i'm a pedo.

 

But then what if I am some 19 year old dumbass and I snapchat a girl who is 17, send her nip slip pic to my friends.... and I get arrested for dismenitaing child pron? Is that fair?

 

There is a larger conversation ... but I can understand how most ppl want to avoid it.

Yes, you're a pedo. That's what we're saying.

[tanatastic 2,061]

The only trouble with this is you run the risk of looking at nudies from girls who may not be of age.

 

I won't be checking these out.

Oh no!! What will you ever do if you see a hot naked 17 year old!

 

Quick lesson on this topic. We all like to think of 18 as the legal age for consent. Ready for a blown mind? the legal age of consent in the US is 16 in more states than it is 18. Let it sink in, go do research if you want to. Fact is, the only reason anyone is "disgusted" bu underage girls is because the media and our society has taught us that its atboo. what if the culture was different (it was for hundreds if not thousands of years and no one thought anything of it.) and 13 was considered perfectly legal and not sick? No one would have a problem with it. Im not advocating underage porn but cmon people dont be sheep. If theres a hot 16 or 17yr old girl naked, your going to look so stop lying to us and yourselves. Once again for your mind blowing pleasure...16 is the legal age of consent in more states than 18 is!

 

Mid 20s Mark Sanchez was dating a 17yr old not long ago and it was perfectly fine. consent is 16 or 17 in NJ.

[posty 2,296]

Once again for your mind blowing pleasure...16 is the legal age of consent in more states than 18 is!

But a lot of those states has a "Close-in-age exemptions" which would nullify a huge majority here...

[edjr 5,564]

I somehow doubt that there are going to be photos of underage beav

[Giants Fan 85]

This does not count as child pornography:

 

 

Just FYI. Even in Texas.

[Frank M 181]

Oh no!! What will you ever do if you see a hot naked 17 year old!

 

Quick lesson on this topic. We all like to think of 18 as the legal age for consent. Ready for a blown mind? the legal age of consent in the US is 16 in more states than it is 18. Let it sink in, go do research if you want to. Fact is, the only reason anyone is "disgusted" bu underage girls is because the media and our society has taught us that its atboo. what if the culture was different (it was for hundreds if not thousands of years and no one thought anything of it.) and 13 was considered perfectly legal and not sick? No one would have a problem with it. Im not advocating underage porn but cmon people dont be sheep. If theres a hot 16 or 17yr old girl naked, your going to look so stop lying to us and yourselves. Once again for your mind blowing pleasure...16 is the legal age of consent in more states than 18 is!

 

Mid 20s Mark Sanchez was dating a 17yr old not long ago and it was perfectly fine. consent is 16 or 17 in NJ.

 

16 may be the age of consent in a lot of states, but 18 is the youngest age someone can be to be in nudity-oriented material in every state. Maybe you will look at naked 16 year olds. I won't be.

 

Enjoy, pervert.

[jerryskids 5,205]

I don't get the excitement; I can see random nekkid chicks on the Internet whenever I want.

 

Although, I will be sure to point out to my daughters that snapchat isn't as self-destruction as they might think.

[edjr 5,564]

I don't get the excitement; I can see random nekkid chicks on the Internet whenever I want.

 

Although, I will be sure to point out to my daughters that snapchat isn't as self-destruction as they might think.

 

GFIAFP has already explained that to them, in person.

[Frank M 181]

I don't get the excitement; I can see random nekkid chicks on the Internet whenever I want.

 

Although, I will be sure to point out to my daughters that snapchat isn't as self-destruction as they might think.

 

Hey, a known pedophile and a guy who freely admits that he sucks at life are telling you to look at these pictures.

 

So look, focker!

 

[jerryskids 5,205]

 

GFIAFP has already explained that to them, in person.

Bullshiot. GFIAFP would never discourage young girls from posting nekkid pics.

[edjr 5,564]

Bullshiot. GFIAFP would never discourage young girls from posting nekkid pics.

 

especially when he has already taken them himself

[jerryskids 5,205]

 

especially when he has already taken them himself

I hope my daughters have better taste in child molesters than GF.

[edjr 5,564]

I hope my daughters have better taste in child molesters than GF.

 

[tanatastic 2,061]

Maybe you will look at naked 16 year olds. I won't be.

 

Enjoy, pervert.

Bunch of bull. I could show you a pic of a mature looking sexy woman and you would say wow shes hot. Then I tell you shes only 16 and all of a sudden shes not hot anymore? Sorry thats not how it works. Pedos and such get off on the little girls that look like they are 8 years old. They are sickos because they like that little girl look.They arent into the mature looking womanly women. theres a difference. a beautiful female form is a beautiful female form. If she looks like she could be 20-25 but turns out to be 16, it doesnt change that shes sexy and desireable. Its just a formality that shes X days younger than what is deemed acceptable by the nations standards. some women mature faster than others and look older, thats just how it is.

[Frank M 181]

Bunch of bull. I could show you a pic of a mature looking sexy woman and you would say wow shes hot. Then I tell you shes only 16 and all of a sudden shes not hot anymore? Sorry thats not how it works. Pedos and such get off on the little girls that look like they are 8 years old. They are sickos because they like that little girl look.They arent into the mature looking womanly women. theres a difference. a beautiful female form is a beautiful female form. If she looks like she could be 20-25 but turns out to be 16, it doesnt change that shes sexy and desireable. Its just a formality that shes X days younger than what is deemed acceptable by the nations standards. some women mature faster than others and look older, thats just how it is.

 

If I know a pic is of someone who is younger than 18, I won't be looking at it. If I look at a picture and find out afterwards that it's an underage girl, I won't be looking at it again. If you know there's a chance that some of these hacked pics are going to be of underage girls, and you still look at them, you're focked up. You're even more focked up if you know a picture or video is of a girl under the age of 18 and you look at it.

 

You know who talks about age being a formality and focked up national standards? Sick pukes who get off on looking at underage girls.

[BunnysBastatrds 1,916]

I hope my daughters have better taste in child molesters than GF.

[Frank M 181]

I hope my daughters have better taste in child molesters than GF.

 

This tanatastic fellow sounds like the smooth molestor type.

[tanatastic 2,061]

 

If I know a pic is of someone who is younger than 18, I won't be looking at it. If I look at a picture and find out afterwards that it's an underage girl, I won't be looking at it again. If you know there's a chance that some of these hacked pics are going to be of underage girls, and you still look at them, you're focked up. You're even more focked up if you know a picture or video is of a girl under the age of 18 and you look at it.

 

You know who talks about age being a formality and focked up national standards? Sick pukes who get off on looking at underage girls.

So what if the country just up and decided that 18 was no longer the designated underage number for nudity? What if they just decided to change it to 16? Then its ok right? The sickos would be the ones looking at 15yr olds cuz thats 1 year younger. My point is that you only think the way you think because of the standards set by the culture around you. If society suddenly decided that wearing the color red was offensive, you would call someone a sicko for wearing red? Maybe not right away, but eventually everyone would since thats the society around them.

 

This isnt about me, im not into young girls, I prefer older women. So your predictable molester comments have no bearing. Im merely pointing out that your beliefs are not based on conviction, rather they are based on what society tells you to think. Wich is fine, law is the law, but I wont pretend that its how id think nomatter what.

[Frank M 181]

Sorry, you're wrong. A sixteen year old is a child. It has nothing to do witb society's rules.

[Cloaca du jour 2,064]

The only trouble with this is you run the risk of looking at nudies from girls who may not be of age.

 

I won't be checking these out.

Agreed. Not worth the risk.

[Frank M 181]

http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/10/technology/mobile/snapchat-not-private/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

 

One of those third-party services was supposedly hacked, according to Business Insider. Misfits on the image-sharing website 4chan.org claim they hacked into a third-party app and stole 100,000 photos and videos.

 

This collection, which might be published this weekend, is likely to include child pornography. Snapchat is popular as a tool for sending nude images. And half of its users are teenagers between the ages of 13 and 17.

 

 

 

No thanks.

[WhiteWonder 2,172]

im intrigued. i dont really want to see a bunch of random girls nudes but if its searchable there are 2 or 3 female friends/colleagues who claimed they didnt use snapchat for that whom i wouldnt mind busting.

[ZeroTolerance 582]

http://money.cnn.com/2014/10/10/technology/mobile/snapchat-not-private/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

 

 

No thanks.

 

Sounds like you should make sure you are looking at the pics on someone else's computer.

[wiffleball 4,640]

gotta say I agree with part of what tentastic is saying. When you see pedophile rings being taken down for kid pics and other things like that, the content isn't usually 17 year olds made up to look like they are 22. True sick pedos get off on the younger the better all the way down to toddler age.

 

I think there is a significant difference between seeing a 17 year old girl and noting that she's attractive versus seeing a prepubescent girl and getting wood.

[rholio 339]

Sorry, you're wrong. A sixteen year old is a child. It has nothing to do witb society's rules.

100yrs ago, a 16yr old that wasn't married might as well become a nun, no one else would want her.

 

16yrs old is the age of consent in my state. Is it too young? As an adult, yes. Was it too young when I was that age? Fock no.