jerryskids

Strike doesn't need my help, but you look silly in this discussion.

I've had a beard for 5 years, ever since my hair grew back from chemo. My head hair has very little gray, but my beard is salt and pepper (getting saltier every day). Wife liked it when it grew in, and it is very little maintenance. I use a 5mm guard to keep it short -- interestingly, my wife doesn't like it too short because it is scratchy, so I'm thinking of going up to a 6mm or 7mm guard. I just take off the guard to do under the beard and cheeks, run it over my ears, and clip it away from my mouf. I use that foil attachment on my lips to make them smooth, which all of your wives appreciate when I go down on them. Whole thing takes 2 minutes, a few times a week.

Why are you wasting my time @-ing me on this same old tripe. There is nothing new here that we haven't discussed. More "coulds," more: Don't be TimHauck with the @s

Nah, "all illegal aliens all the time!" is a luxury belief. Gutter's kid will get his high-paying finance gig. It's the poorer Americans who will suffer.

Not really. It always strikes me as a troll phrase. Rather successful, it would seem. I don't think any of the grown men here actually look at Trump as a father figure.

no

My daddy?

It seems the topic isn't the removal of licenses, but the question of whether or not they should get free licenses if they are showing clear bias.

So, it wasn't in your link. Thanks for confirming. When did Trump say the above?

My order for international items would be Iran, Cuba, Panama Canal.

I'm happy to learn. Unfortunately, your link says nothing about removing licenses.

Imagine being this guy , constantly putting down another man's wife because of some combination of TDS DEFCON 1 and jealousy that she is more attractive than he is, with a bonus disparagement of gays in the process.

I hesitate to get into a tard fight with you since it is your home field, but... by definition they "considered" it. Gemini agrees: Here from a Reuters article referenced by Gemini: https://www.reuters.com/article/world/denmark-spurned-chinese-offer-for-greenland-base-over-security-sources-idUSKBN1782E1/#:~:text=Reuters Plus-,Denmark spurned Chinese offer for Greenland base over security - sources,handles defence and foreign policy. So they considered it, and decided to turn down. Now go get your shine box.

That's your big win? The point is that we had no authority over whether or not it went through. I was saying that if we added such authority, that would be a win for us. Shadrap is right, you are just a mindless TDS troll buffoon. Carry on.

I think he will eventually take the canal back. China is too influential there. It would be consistent with his efforts to kick the bad guys out of our neck of the woods. I have been fairly busy today and not following, but recall that I posted about how Denmark considering selling land on Greenland (in fact, a now defunct naval base) to China. I would expect a new deal to prohibit such sales, or perhaps give us a right of refusal on any sales. If so, that would make it different than the status quo.