jerryskids

I know right? Show me a link, but not one which shows that their parent organization is tied to Hamas funding: https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Letter-to-National-SJP-5.29.24.pdf Certainly not a quote from "The Written Resistance," the National SJP newsletter which started around October 7. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F55MYJNSoFgm-NKI7HM4Wch3-iGKHFrS/view Moderate Tim thinks it is unreasonable to think the National SJP supports Hamas. It's only chapters! He so readily believes anything that fits his Leftist worldview, and so fervently dismisses anything that doesn't.

First, I'll accept your tacit acknowledgment regarding your lack of understanding or caring of the context regarding Kirk's comments about the listed black women. Since you completely ignored that part and all. To the part you did comment on above: I keep saying "hit the right note" because that's exactly what TFP said, that you took issue with: Perhaps TFP didn't consider it "hitting the right note" for Omar to issue politically correct words, then soon after stomp on Kirk's grave with out-of-context statements intended to fool her leftist low-intelligence supporters? Or if you think it hit the right note, then perhaps you think Trump hit the right note by stating in the beginning of his TS post that it was sad that the Reiners were killed. I mean sure, shortly thereafter he went in another direction, but that first part of the statement, it hit the right note!

Wouldn't bet against it. With his distance and iron play, I'm surprised he hasn't won it yet.

I was between BHB and 5 pts on this one. Other than mine, of course.

I'm done engaging with you, tard. Sorry, moderate tard.

And here is another person who is making no attempt to understand what I am saying. Carry on.

Regarding the bolded, while they are not interchangeable, Islam suffers from the lack of a reformation, and also a lack of a leader who could steer the greater religion.

Well sure, and we should (and do) keep a close eye on the Branch Davidian types when they arise. But it's a matter of degrees. It seems like your entire argument is "there might be some whackjobs in any group, so we shouldn't treat any groups differently." I disagree with this approach as it is a crappy risk assessment strategy.

Sorry, I must have confused you with @dogcows

Again, not the religion, the culture in radicalized areas which is built on the religion.

Good one. Along this vein, the Star Spangled Banner Along THAT vein, some of the songs that they play incessantly at sporting events, like Seven Nation Army.

You can interpret it as "wherever there are a few Muslims," but that's disingenuous or intentionally trying to miss my point. I'm not talking about a couple of Muslim doctors who buy houses near each other. Nor am I talking about Dearborn, although I'm glad you brought that up. My wife grew up in Dearborn Heights, and speaks fondly of her Arabic friends from the 70s and 80s. In Dearborn we are looking at multiple generations of assimilation to get to where they are today. Now, you might argue that other groups, given multiple generations, might have similar results. They might, I guess. The difference, though, is that a lot of these folks came from places like Lebanon, which has been majority Christian in the past and still has a high Christian population, so there is a history of co-existence. Furthermore, they didn't come from radicalized places in the first place. So to be clear, by "concentrations of Muslims" I mean large groups from radicalized origins, largely recent. As evidence of my concern I present... pretty much anywhere in Europe which opened their borders to such folks. I'd rather that not happen here, but I guess that makes me a bigot. I apologize for not being clear, and appreciate the correction.

As expected, there is no context for these comments. For Joy Reid and Michelle Obama for instance, they were among black women who defended affirmative action, saying they wouldn't be where they were without it. To that, Kirk said: I'm not surprised that "search for truth!" Moderate Tim skips the context, since it fits his moderate worldview to defend Omar. But that's not really relevant. What is relevant is on the heels of her saying some words to check the box, she disparaged Kirk and his legacy. Moderate Tim thinks such behavior "hit the right note," so The Free Press is biased (because they are right of Mao, of course Moderate Tim leaps to that conclusion). A reminder that this all came from me agreeing with a Free Press editorial that basically called Trump an idiot for his comments, but that wasn't good enough for Moderate Tim, because they didn't acknowledge that behavior like Omar's "hit the mark." I see he's also defending her 9/11 comments. Moderates going to moderate.

That's a great idea, I will do that!

Lolol$#!!#$$#@ Dispute the facts in my post.