jerryskids

My understanding is that they are discussing splitting it into 3 shots, but that's all I've heard. It's 8PM on a weeknight, football is about to start, and you are digging through a thread for year old attempted gotchas. Maybe hang with the family, or find a quick protest against Trump somewhere?

You married a cat lady and pretend to be a trans woman on a low-rent fantasy football chat board, and you feel the need to jump to Gutter's defense and question my manhood?

His absolute certainty that Ross murdered Good will prove wrong. Just today he predicted that someone in Trump's sphere must have shorted bank stocks before his announcement about CC cap, another unsubstantiated TDS rant. If I cared enough, I'd keep track of his mistakes, but I might break Excel doing it.

I just don't understand what he was doing the second time. Why approach a guy who has already punched you, and just stand there with no attempt to prepare for a fight whatsoever?

Hey look, Gutter found something from before Trump was president, in a thread I started to discuss valid concerns about Trump, where I was wrong. That means he's always right! Logic, meet Gutter. Gutter, logic.

That guy is the worst fighter in the history of ever.

It's actually an interesting discussion, IMO. One can make a solid argument that the people racking up debt on these high-interest cards would benefit from the tough love of removing them altogether. That of course would have another unintended consequence of lowering our GDP, because who is going to buy those $300 sneakers? My point was that the belief that you can come in and tell the financial industry to just NOT charge high interest rates, and believe that it won't have massive unintended consequences, is Leftist-level lack of reality.

You were wrong about me pushing the tariffs as a good thing, which was the point of this discussion, dummy.

The article says "Such a cap would likely require authorization by Congress. It is unclear what moves the president could make to bypass this." So... no, but Financial stocks took a dive today.

Now do local officials not assisting and often directly impeding DHS officials in their attempt to enforce US immigration law.

There is no way English is this guy's first language.

Bad idea. Banks will simply not provide CCs to the high-risk people, who are the ones Trump wants to help. They'll then have to go to payday advance / "checks cashed here" places which will gorge them even more. This is the kind of silly thing Lefties would do, once again paving their road to Hell with good intentions. To the extent that Trump listens to anyone: between this and the tariffs, he gets some pretty crappy advice on the economy. He needs a change in that circle. https://www.businessinsider.com/ackman-trump-call-cap-credit-card-interest-mistake-affordability-2026-1

You're about a year old? Apparently you aren't old enough to actually remember what I've repeatedly said: There are more. Presuming you are too lazy to read the ones above, I've been consistent in my hope, but not insistence, that the tariffs were some combination of punitive (China) and/or Art of the Deal, but that I disagreed with him if he unilaterally applied them. Thanks for helping to show that I can objectively disagree with Trump. In fact I'm about to start a thread where I'll disagree with Trump's plan to cap CC interest. Meanwhile, you have never acknowledged a single good thing that Trump has done, but you think you are Mr. Objectivity like most pseud Lefties, and while telling me how I follow whatever Daddy says.

Well Rusty, if Russia and China would not just sit around while we over Greenland, then a smart person might ask themselves why that is. It's comical how these discussions go. Whenever I provide an alternative hypothesis to whatever comes out of your Trump-sucks-omatic werd generator, and/or in this case show that your post is a shotgun blast of pablum (nation building, still waiting to hear on that one ), you guys respond with some version of me listening to Daddy Trump, with zero self-awareness that you completely follow your TDS religious tenets.

Cool! Also, 1.1 Brooks Koepka$#@!