GettnHuge 2 Posted August 10, 2006 I think it's about time the President gets the credit he deserves. Since 9-11, how many terror plots have been successful here? And how many terror plots have been stopped because of our supposed privacy invading rights violating unconstitutional liberal hating security measures? plenty that we know of and even more that we don't. Nothing like the previous 8 years where time after time we were attacked and never responded. approval rating: 100% Bush in 08 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dick Cheney 1 Posted August 10, 2006 I think it's about time the President gets the credit he deserves. Since 9-11, how many terror plotshave been successful here? And how many terror plots have been stopped because of our supposed privacy invading rights violating unconstitutional liberal hating security measures? plenty that we know of and even more that we don't. Nothing like the previous 8 years where time after time we were attacked and never responded. approval rating: 100% Bush in 08 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Franknbeans 46 Posted August 10, 2006 9/11 was a pretty big one though Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,797 Posted August 10, 2006 Pretty much a win-win for GWB. 1) No terrorists attacks: "We're winning the war on terror!" 2) More terrorists attacks: "See? I TOLD you we were at war with terror!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D'ohmer Simpson 0 Posted August 10, 2006 I'll give the military and gubment credit for making it harder for any attacks to occur and for breaking up some potential attacks, but it's prolly more because it takes a while to plan these things and we've seen over and over that we're probably not really any safer than we were before, what with all the holes in border security, at the ports etc. etc. And the worst terrorist attack happened under his nose, so major demerits for that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Isotopes 1 Posted August 10, 2006 I shudder when I think back to how we all had to live in fear before Bush took office. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pingpong 0 Posted August 10, 2006 I'll give the military and gubment credit for making it harder for any attacks to occur and for breaking up some potential attacks, but it's prolly more because it takes a while to plan these things and we've seen over and over that we're probably not really any safer than we were before, what with all the holes in border security, at the ports etc. etc. And the worst terrorist attack happened under his nose, so major demerits for that. By this logic, Bush is no longer to blame for any terrorist attack if it happens the day after he leaves office? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,797 Posted August 10, 2006 And the worst terrorist attack happened under his nose, . They blew up his lips?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D'ohmer Simpson 0 Posted August 10, 2006 the day after he leaves office? The day after Bush leaves office the country will be rejoicing. They blew up his lips?? Must be why he can't speak worth a lick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GettnHuge 2 Posted August 10, 2006 The day after Bush leaves office the country will be rejoicing the election of Jeb Bush. hth Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D'ohmer Simpson 0 Posted August 10, 2006 hth That's good, I needed a laugh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GettnHuge 2 Posted August 10, 2006 I'll give the military and gubment credit for making it harder for any attacks to occur and for breaking up some potential attacks, President Bush is looking out for the people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red White and Blue 81 Posted August 10, 2006 By this logic, Bush is no longer to blame for any terrorist attack if it happens the day after he leaves office? Why would I blame Bush for terrorist attacks that happen after he leaves office? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Isotopes 1 Posted August 10, 2006 President Bush is looking out for the people. and by the people you mean his oil buddies and rich friends? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted August 10, 2006 which actual terror plots did Bush's administration break up again? There have been several arrests, but which of them pointed to serious plots as opposed to misfits with big mouths? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Davaco Posted August 10, 2006 I think it's about time the President gets the credit he deserves. Since 9-11, how many terror plotshave been successful here? And how many terror plots have been stopped because of our supposed privacy invading rights violating unconstitutional liberal hating security measures? plenty that we know of and even more that we don't. Nothing like the previous 8 years where time after time we were attacked and never responded. approval rating: 100% Bush in 08 how many were successful on 9/11? oops. plus, the alleged plots are a joke. Jose Padilla, the dirty bomber, was never charged with what was alleged, but with unrealted charges to save face. the terror cell in Lacakawanna NY, was a joke, watch the PBS special. the "plot" to flood the holland tunnel? is the equivalent of me saying i will blowup earth and you putting me under citizens arrest and then boasting "i saved the world" And this had noting to do with america as these planes would have been blown up before getting here. Let me guess, the bombings in the london subway system weret bush's fault, but he will take the credit for these arrests Bush is a joke Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted August 10, 2006 Our soldiers are getting blown up by terrorists every focking day. Hth. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GettnHuge 2 Posted August 10, 2006 I haven't heard much from Slick Willy lately...has he been busy looking for the real killers of those who died on the USS Cole? The 1993 world trade center bombers? The Riyadh bombing? The Khobar Towers? The embassy bombings? Which one was it where he said that we need to do something about those terrorists? oh, lol all of them. But what did he do? well according to D|ck Morris: he didn't do anything, he just hoped it would disappear. Even Libya stuck it to us over Lockerbie...that was until this President Bush took charge. Then they admitted guilt, agreed to compensation and disarmed. Bush in 08 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,797 Posted August 10, 2006 Our soldiers are getting blown up by terrorists every focking day. Hth. No see, that's all about context. For example: When you want to justify the war in Iraq, you say: "But we're fighting TERRORISTS over there! I'd rather fight them THERE than HERE." But: When you're talking about successful terrorist attacks on Americans since GWB took office, - The 20,000+ dead and wounded (plus the various and sundry 'Daniel Pearl' type things) don't count. - Fuzzy math, but math nonetheless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaWeffa 0 Posted August 10, 2006 plenty that we knowof and even more that we don't. name 3.... Bush in 08 cant run again... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
D'ohmer Simpson 0 Posted August 10, 2006 The Riyadh bombing? The Khobar Towers? The embassy bombings?Which one was it where he said that we need to do something about those terrorists? oh, lol all of them. But what did he do? Same thing Bush did when bombings happened out of the country. HTH! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,433 Posted August 10, 2006 When I read the title of the thread, I thought that Bush resigned. That was the only plausible reason to thank him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,797 Posted August 10, 2006 Same thing Bush did when bombings happened out of the country. HTH! Same (no) thing that Reagan did in Lebanon. 300 killed or wounded Marines. No focking response. Why? We had a Hizbollah bunker all lined up, the planes in the air - and his buddy Kap Wienberger cancelled it - because he was afraid of what the arabs might think of us. A few months later, we slunk out of Lebanon with our tail between our legs. - And OBL quoted that example specifically after 9/11 as his basis for believing a big attack would cripple the American resolve. - Still pixxes me off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DaWeffa 0 Posted August 10, 2006 When I read the title of the thread, I thought that Bush resigned. That was the only plausible reason to thank him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red White and Blue 81 Posted August 10, 2006 Same (no) thing that Reagan did in Lebanon. 300 killed or wounded Marines. No focking response. Why? We had a Hizbollah bunker all lined up, the planes in the air - and his buddy Kap Wienberger cancelled it - because he was afraid of what the arabs might think of us. A few months later, we slunk out of Lebanon with our tail between our legs. - And OBL quoted that example specifically after 9/11 as his basis for believing a big attack would cripple the American resolve. - Still pixxes me off. I also love how the "conservatives" here rip Clinton for doing nothing about the attempted '93 bombing of the WTC, but it's totally OK that al Qaida blew up the towers and killed 3,000 on Bush's watch and our fearless President says he doesn't care much where bin Laden is. Great job Bush, you really showed them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted August 10, 2006 I also love how the "conservatives" here rip Clinton for doing nothing about the attempted '93 bombing of the WTC, but it's totally OK that al Qaida blew up the towers and killed 3,000 on Bush's watch and our fearless President says he doesn't care much where bin Laden is. Great job Bush, you really showed them. It's not even true that he did nothing. The people responsible were tried and convicted. And let's not forget that Bush did nothing about the Cole bombing, which was passed on to him with full reports on who had carried it out--al Qaeda. The attack was in October, Bush won in November, the brief was prepared in December and given to the President-elect's team, and it was summarily ignored. "Not our problem," was the response. At the ABSOLUTE minimum, it should have snapped Bush to attention when chatter skyrocketed the following summer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Davaco Posted August 10, 2006 Our soldiers are getting blown up by terrorists every focking day. Hth. there were no terrosits in Iraq until we invaded. Saddam had no WMD and was isolated. a saddam Iraq is better than today's Iraq. Just imagine if those soliders were embreyos. they would all be saved Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
footballpowers 0 Posted August 10, 2006 GWB: Worst President EVAH! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 31 Posted August 10, 2006 I think it's about time the President gets the credit he deserves. Since 9-11, how many terror plotshave been successful here? And how many terror plots have been stopped because of our supposed privacy invading rights violating unconstitutional liberal hating security measures? plenty that we know of and even more that we don't. Nothing like the previous 8 years where time after time we were attacked and never responded. approval rating: 100% Bush in 08 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,996 Posted August 10, 2006 a saddam Iraq is better than today's Iraq. says who, you? Fifty-six percent say their lives are better now than before the war, compared with 19 percent who say things are worse (23 percent, the same). And the level of personal optimism is extraordinary: Seventy-one percent expect their lives to improve over the next year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted August 10, 2006 says who, you? Fifty-six percent say their lives are better now than before the war, compared with 19 percent who say things are worse (23 percent, the same). And the level of personal optimism is extraordinary: Seventy-one percent expect their lives to improve over the next year. 2004. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,433 Posted August 10, 2006 says who, you? Fifty-six percent say their lives are better now than before the war, compared with 19 percent who say things are worse (23 percent, the same). And the level of personal optimism is extraordinary: Seventy-one percent expect their lives to improve over the next year. I assume that poll did not include the people killed recently, right? J/K - Saying that things were better under Saddam is stupid. Things may have been more orderly, but not better. That order was achieved via oppression. However, I am not sure that the price that we have had to pay for their "freedom" is worth it, nor am I convinced that the "freedom" is permanent. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted August 10, 2006 and by the people you mean his oil buddies and rich friends? News flash: Politicians have rich friends... Who woulda thunk it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BMoney 0 Posted August 10, 2006 its pretty when some of you are secretly wishing that a HUGE plot would be pulled off and many lives lost, just to take a rip at the President... weak even if this was Kerry at the helm..someone who I didnt vote for, Id have given a big quit worrying about your own lil interests and give credit where its due... we didnt live in fear before 9-11..we were all caught napping..we had no fear..its a different world now.. true statements..this is the first ever conflict where a life was lost.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted August 10, 2006 how many were successful on 9/11? oops. plus, the alleged plots are a joke. Jose Padilla, the dirty bomber, was never charged with what was alleged, but with unrealted charges to save face. the terror cell in Lacakawanna NY, was a joke, watch the PBS special. the "plot" to flood the holland tunnel? is the equivalent of me saying i will blowup earth and you putting me under citizens arrest and then boasting "i saved the world" And this had noting to do with america as these planes would have been blown up before getting here. Let me guess, the bombings in the london subway system weret bush's fault, but he will take the credit for these arrests Bush is a joke PBS+Bill Moyers= Bush Hater. Yeah I'm sure PBS is a place I want to get the straight facts. I also love how the "conservatives" here rip Clinton for doing nothing about the attempted '93 bombing of the WTC, but it's totally OK that al Qaida blew up the towers and killed 3,000 on Bush's watch and our fearless President says he doesn't care much where bin Laden is. Great job Bush, you really showed them. Had slick Willy done his job instead of dropping pants maybe the towers would have not fallen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,433 Posted August 10, 2006 its pretty when some of you are secretly wishing that a HUGE plot would be pulled off and many lives lost, just to take a rip at the President...weak even if this was Kerry at the helm..someone who I didnt vote for, Id have given a big quit worrying about your own lil interests and give credit where its due... we didnt live in fear before 9-11..we were all caught napping..we had no fear..its a different world now.. true statements..this is the first ever conflict where a life was lost.. I agree. We should thank the British considering they were the ones that caught the terrorists. How Bush can get a thank you for this latest item, I have no idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
torridjoe 48 Posted August 10, 2006 I agree. We should thank the British considering they were the ones that caught the terrorists. How Bush can get a thank you for this latest item, I have no idea. Will we be bombing Britain soon? Since they apparently were living in England, we should fight them there so we don't have to fight them here, once they arrive on the Concorde. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 31 Posted August 10, 2006 I agree. We should thank the British considering they were the ones that caught the terrorists. How Bush can get a thank you for this latest item, I have no idea. because if the attack would have been successful he'd get blamed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites