Joey Gladstone 33 Posted January 12, 2009 Nice reach assmaster.League MVP Shaun Alexander carried that one-year-wonder team. But you do have a lot to be excited about. A top 5 pick in the next 4 drafts will be really fun. Oh, and thanks for that tax money and the new building. It's very nice. This proves what everybody already knows, you know nothing about the NFL beyond your delusions on the Eagles. The Seattle offensive line, the best line in the league for several seasons up to that point, carried that team. And as far as the playoffs go, Hass and McNabb are pretty close, though you have to give Matt the edge for never vomitting on national television. McNabb has never had a chance to talk sh!t during a coin toss because his sphincter is so tight and his head is swimming with the burden of being a black QB in the NFL. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,592 Posted January 12, 2009 Either I've become smarter, or the mange bored has got dumber over the past couple years. Not sure which one. Both Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted January 12, 2009 Can't you see how that is a fundamental contradiction? And can't you see how marching up the field only to miss a FG, turn the ball over or get 3 pts on 1 out of every 3 drives is a fundamental "fail" in the asskicking department??? It's not just about offensive stats, and the eagles special teams did it's job (with Akers) and their defense more than did their job (stopping critical drives, generating turnovers and forcing mistakes). So, in a nutshell: Eagles Offense > Giants Offense (Eagles score 23, Giants score 11) Eagles Defense > Giants Defense (Eagles hold Giants to 11, Giants give up 23) Eagles Special Teams > Giants Special Teams (Akers >>> Carney) Seems like the Eagles were superior in all 3 phases of the game. If this game was 42 - 20 Eagles and yet the Giants had more yrds would you still cling to the inane idea that the Giants didn't get their ass kicked??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted January 12, 2009 Both Highly doubtful, have you seen the other thread he started??? The board may have definitely dumbed down, but KSB2424 isn't ruining any bell curves, believe me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted January 12, 2009 Elway actually had the same reputation that Mcnabb has, at one point. Everyone knew he was a great quarterback, but until he won the Super Bowl, he was considered a choker. As if all those big games he won getting to the playoffs, championship games, and Super Bowls weren't big games. A true 'choker' is a guy like Romo, who presses and plays horribly as soon as the playoffs get within site. A quarterback who gets to teh playoffs like clockwork, and wins twice as many games as he loses (against other playoff teams, by the way) is in no way, shape, or form a choker. Sometimes, you're simply not the best team on the field. Every championship and Super Bowl game ever played had a losing quarterback in it. Not every one of those quarterbacks was a choker. Agreed. The morons who did that "he just can't win the big game" thing drove me insane with their stupidity. Look, a great QB can get an average team further than they belong. But eventually, it takes more than that to win it all. Once Elway got a frickin running game, he was golden. Think Sammy Winder's gonna make the HOF anytime soon? The three amigos? Romo thus far has proved indeed he doesn't have the maturity to keep it together all season long - especially at crunch time. He's got the talent around him, just not the stones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,790 Posted January 12, 2009 Highly doubtful, have you seen the other thread he started??? The board may have definitely dumbed down, but KSB2424 isn't ruining any bell curves, believe me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted January 12, 2009 I would like to express my thanks to all who contributed to this thread and stood there and took the beating from me. I wish you all good health in healing up from the pummeling. It has been proven that a lion can kill at least 42 midgets. We are just now beginning to learn how many mental midgets can be beaten down by a phillybear. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted January 12, 2009 I would like to express my thanks to all who contributed to this thread and stood there and took the beating from me. I wish you all good health in healing up from the pummeling. It has been proven that a lion can kill at least 42 midgets. We are just now beginning to learn how many mental midgets can be beaten down by a phillybear. Can someone please let phillybear's doctor know that he's off his meds again? I'd hate for us to have to explain to the police (again) that whole "is he a danger to himself or others?" thing again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 12, 2009 And as far as the playoffs go, Hass and McNabb are pretty close, Please let me know what you're basing this on. Hasselbeck has lost more playoff games than he's won. The two are not even close. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted January 13, 2009 Please let me know what you're basing this on. Hasselbeck has lost more playoff games than he's won. The two are not even close. What I've seen watching both of them in the playoffs. A lot of Donovan's wins have come courtesy of his defense. Granted he did play well yesterday. Donovan takes more sh!t then he has deserved throughout his career, but he's been far from a great playoff QB. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 13, 2009 This may be all true, but don't forget what we all learned from Phillybear.We need to hold onto our FF teams dreams of a SB, and remember DW's and SS....Turner and Rhody White. Because even though the Birds beat the #1 seeded, defending Champs twice, IN THEIR HOUSE.....they're not better than the Falcons, or the Panthers Pluse, they handily beat Atlanta this year (13 points, I believe) before Philly was even playing that well. I hate to pile on, but this may be phillybear's Waterloo. He's getting focking annihalated. Wow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 13, 2009 What I've seen watching both of them in the playoffs. A lot of Donovan's wins have come courtesy of his defense. Granted he did play well yesterday. Donovan takes more sh!t then he has deserved throughout his career, but he's been far from a great playoff QB. Ahhhh. I see. Eagles win because of their defense and lose because of McNabb. That's funny sh!t right there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted January 13, 2009 Ahhhh. I see. Eagles win because of their defense and lose because of McNabb. That's funny sh!t right there. When did I say that? McNabb has had a LOT of help from his defense throughout his career. He also gets unfairly dumped on for some of his team's shortcomings. He's a good to very good QB, not the great QB you and your fellow Eagles fans keep trumpeting in these ridiculous knob-slobbing threads. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted January 13, 2009 This proves what everybody already knows, you know nothing about the NFL beyond your delusions on the Eagles. The Seattle offensive line, the best line in the league for several seasons up to that point, carried that team. And as far as the playoffs go, Hass and McNabb are pretty close, though you have to give Matt the edge for never vomitting on national television. McNabb has never had a chance to talk sh!t during a coin toss because his sphincter is so tight and his head is swimming with the burden of being a black QB in the NFL. I don't remember the O-line getting league MVP. But since you bring it up. I guess Hass was only good because of an MVP Rb AND a tremendous Oline. Now that both are gone, he sucks. thanks for proving my point. Mcnabb>>>>Hasslehoff Thanks for playing......and getting your ass kicked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted January 13, 2009 I don't remember the O-line getting league MVP. But since you bring it up. I guess Hass was only good because of an MVP Rb AND a tremendous Oline. Now that both are gone, he sucks. thanks for proving my point. Mcnabb>>>>Hasslehoff Thanks for playing......and getting your ass kicked. Seriously, you're like 13 right? The point was that you know nothing about the NFL. I didn't have to prove it, as I'm sure it's pretty much common knowledge around here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 753 Posted January 13, 2009 WTF phillybear...you are a bigger hater than the Cowboys fans. McNabb absolutely played a good game against a VERY tough NYG defense in poor conditions (i.e. wind). He made some very nice stick throws and those 2 long passes (1 that was dropped by Curtis, the other caught by Jackson) were things of beauty. He led his team to a playoff win over the #1 team in the NFL. Your shtick is way old and flat-out wrong. I'm not gonna make judgement on the Career of McNabb until he retires. But I will say that a superbowl is the icing on the cake for any good career, and so far he does not have it. but I will say, he played a hell of a game against a very tough NYG defense as was mentioned by this guy earlier. Personally, I am surprised this team made it as far as they have this year. Not because of McNabb, but because of his supporting cast. If he carries this team on his back to the superbowl and wins it, I'll vow to forever stand by him and say he is a clutch QB because I dont believe this team has enough talent to win the super bowl. With that being said, he defeated the defending champs (for the second time this year) with that inferior team, so I'm watching with great interest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Walter34 3 Posted January 13, 2009 Hasselbeck is 3x the QB McNabb is when it comes to playoff times. Pass the splif over here bro. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted January 13, 2009 I'm not gonna make judgement on the Career of McNabb until he retires. But I will say that a superbowl is the icing on the cake for any good career, and so far he does not have it. but I will say, he played a hell of a game against a very tough NYG defense as was mentioned by this guy earlier. Personally, I am surprised this team made it as far as they have this year. Not because of McNabb, but because of his supporting cast. If he carries this team on his back to the superbowl and wins it, I'll vow to forever stand by him and say he is a clutch QB because I dont believe this team has enough talent to win the super bowl. With that being said, he defeated the defending champs (for the second time this year) with that inferior team, so I'm watching with great interest. There was nothing wrong with their team this season, they just underachieved and McNabb was part of that. They have a great defense, with one of the best d-coordinators in the league. Desean Jackson is an idiot, but he provided a nice deep threat. Westy is one of the best offensive weapons in the league and he had a relatively healthy season. Where does Donovan carrying anything come into play? Because he got benched he started playing better, allowing Philly to live up to their potential. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 753 Posted January 13, 2009 There was nothing wrong with their team this season, they just underachieved and McNabb was part of that. They have a great defense, with one of the best d-coordinators in the league. Desean Jackson is an idiot, but he provided a nice deep threat. Westy is one of the best offensive weapons in the league and he had a relatively healthy season. Where does Donovan carrying anything come into play? Because he got benched he started playing better, allowing Philly to live up to their potential. You're a bitter man. Perhaps you should start drinking some decaffinated coffee. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,799 Posted January 13, 2009 McNabb has never had a chance to talk sh!t during a coin toss because his sphincter is so tight and his head is swimming with the burden of being a black QB in the NFL. I disagree, at least for the regular season. There is no urgency in overtime, since it can't end in a tie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted January 13, 2009 Pluse, they handily beat Atlanta this year (13 points, I believe) before Philly was even playing that well. I hate to pile on, but this may be phillybear's Waterloo. He's getting focking annihalated. Wow. Since the Eagles beat Atlanta early in the season, they were clearly better than Atlanta at the end of the season. Therefore, the Giants beat the Eagles early in the season, the Giants ended up sweeping the Eagles in all 3 games. I'm just standing here, watching you punch yourself in the face over and over again. drobeski made for a more challenging debator. The FALEDOZER is running out of gas. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 13, 2009 Since the Eagles beat Atlanta early in the season, they were clearly better than Atlanta at the end of the season. Therefore, the Giants beat the Eagles early in the season, the Giants ended up sweeping the Eagles in all 3 games. drobeski made for a more challenging debator. Here's what's not up for debate..... The Eagles are one of two NFC teams remaining, and one of four in the entire NFL. Try spinning that any way you like, but it ain't changing. And what's better yet, is that it's driving you out of your mind!!!!! Bwahahahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagles Green 34 Posted January 13, 2009 Seriously, you're like 13 right? The point was that you know nothing about the NFL. I didn't have to prove it, as I'm sure it's pretty much common knowledge around here. Because I don't think Hass is as good as Mcnabb, I know nothing about the NFL? That makes sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted January 13, 2009 Here's what's not up for debate.....The Eagles are one of two NFC teams remaining, and one of four in the entire NFL. Try spinning that any way you like, but it ain't changing. And what's better yet, is that it's driving you out of your mind!!!!! Bwahahahaha I take that as a raising of the white flag. I've been dropping bunker busters on top of your head all day, but you've finally had enough. Good for you. Yes, the Eagles have reached the NFC championship game. No denying that. Congrats. But I'm in your head. I am so far inside that pudding mold of yours, you don't know whether to laugh or cry. Good move, cupcake. Good luck on Sunday. I will now go be alone with my thoughts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted January 13, 2009 5th NFC Conference Championship game in 8 years is ASTOUNDINGLY IMPRESSIVE, no matter how the haters want to colour it. Meh, impressive, but hardly ASTOUNDINGLY IMPRESSIVE. Now if they had say, won four of those five CCGs, instead of losing three and counting, and won three of the four SBs, instead of losing the one they made... I would call that ASTOUNDINGLY IMPRESSIVE! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
plasma george 62 Posted January 13, 2009 I will now go be alone with my thoughts. and holding your FF trophy while staring at your roster consisting of DW, SS, Turner and Rhoddy White. doosh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 13, 2009 Meh, impressive, but hardly ASTOUNDINGLY IMPRESSIVE. Now if they had say, won four of those five CCGs, instead of losing three and counting, and won three of the four SBs, instead of losing the one they made... I would call that ASTOUNDINGLY IMPRESSIVE! Winning 3 of 4 Super Bowls without cheating would be ASTOUNDINGLY IMPRESSIVE, or, at the very least, winning the one Super Bowl when you were supposedly leading the greatest team ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted January 13, 2009 Winning 3 of 4 Super Bowls without cheating would be ASTOUNDINGLY IMPRESSIVE, or, at the very least, winning the one Super Bowl when you were supposedly leading the greatest team ever. Yeah, that's why McNabb threw three picks and gave the game away, because the Patriots stole their defensive signals. Keep telling yourself that. Losing the SB last year was a disappointment, it was also equal to the best year the Eagles have ever had. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 13, 2009 Yeah, that's why McNabb threw three picks and gave the game away, because the Patriots stole their defensive signals. Keep telling yourself that. Losing the SB last year was a disappointment, it was also equal to the best year the Eagles have ever had. The Eagles only lost by a three to New England team that was cheating. The Patriots and Brady pulled off what may be teh biggest choke job in sports history. They went from being the greatest team ever to just another runner-up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted January 13, 2009 wasn't this a thread about clutch QB's??? When did we digress into Pats vs Eagles. One cheats, one sucks, end of story. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted January 13, 2009 wasn't this a thread about clutch QB's??? The thread title is misleading, it's not a thread about clutch QBs, it's about McNabb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 13, 2009 The thread title is misleading, it's not a thread about clutch QBs, it's about McNabb. I listed eleven QBs, sport. If McNabb happens to find a place on the list, so be it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted January 13, 2009 I listed eleven QBs, sport. If McNabb happens to find a place on the list, so be it. You bolded exactly one of those eleven, sparky. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 13, 2009 You bolded exactly one of those eleven, sparky. Musta been a typo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted January 14, 2009 Because I don't think Hass is as good as Mcnabb, I know nothing about the NFL? That makes sense. No genius, your argument for him being better was a bunch of >>>>>'s Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 14, 2009 No genius, your argument for him being better was a bunch of >>>>>'s JG, do you really think that Matt Hasselbeck is better than or even as good as, Donovan McNabb? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted January 14, 2009 JG, do you really think that Matt Hasselbeck is better than or even as good as, Donovan McNabb? I give McNabb the edge, but it's a lot closer then people think. McNabb is certainly more athletically gifted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 14, 2009 I give McNabb the edge, but it's a lot closer then people think. McNabb is certainly more athletically gifted. Oh, okay. I wasn't sure what you were saying. I agree though. Hass is also a very solid QB when healthy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jgcrawfish 232 Posted January 14, 2009 I give McNabb the edge, but it's a lot closer then people think. McNabb is certainly more athletically gifted. Refreshing there Joey. a reasonable Seahawks fan, who knew? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 14, 2009 Refreshing there Joey. a reasonable Seahawks fan, who knew? If phillybear or Faghawker sees this, they may not allow you in the "Exciting time to be a Seahawks fan"-thread anymore. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites