Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Joey Gladstone

Seahawks fans

Recommended Posts

:rolleyes: All you girls are so funny..........that doesn't change that fact you have 0 Super Bowl wins.....IT'S SO EXCITING.......keep your lame jokes coming.........THEY'RE MAKING ME EXCITED :doublethumbsup:

 

I can't speak for anybody else, but I wasn't really bashing the Steelers. There is no way I can argue the Pittsburgh Steelers dont have the more successful franchise.

 

I was making fun of you and your lame-ass attempt to make fun of the Seahawks. Might as well have copy-pasted old Notre Dame jokes like your partner in gayness, Fantasy Queen. Uber-Pwnage bro! :thumbsup: :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't speak for anybody else, but I wasn't really bashing the Steelers. There is no way I can argue the Pittsburgh Steelers dont have the more successful franchise.

 

I was making fun of you and your lame-ass attempt to make fun of the Seahawks. Might as well have copy-pasted old Notre Dame jokes like your partner in gayness, Fantasy Queen. Uber-Pwnage bro! :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

:doublethumbsup: Yeah he's not the brightest bulb...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go Steelers:

 

During the first interview, she said she repeatedly told Roethlisberger, ``I really don't think this is OK,'' but couldn't stop him from having sex with her in the bathroom of a bar.

 

``I don't know what I can ... do,'' she said. ``I'm a little girl and he's a big boy.''

 

The victim told police she is 5-foot-4 and weighs 145 pounds. Roethlisberger is listed at 6-5 and 241 pounds.

 

Lopez asked the woman if she knew of any reason why Roethlisberger would feel ``it was OK to do this to you.''

 

While the accuser acknowledged wearing an explicit name tag, which was left over from a friend's birthday party earlier in the night, she denied leading him on.

 

``I wasn't forward in any way,'' she said. ``I wasn't like, 'Oh my gosh, have sex with me because you're an NFL superstar.' I really don't know why (it happened).''

 

The next afternoon, the woman went to the police station for a follow-up interview that was videotaped. She was calm and matter-of-fact when discussing the previous night, struggling to remember a few details but adamant that she had been raped by Roethlisberger.

 

In the video, the woman's face was blurred. She was wearing a navy blue T-shirt and jeans had her blond hair pulled back. She told police she didn't think trying to fight Roethlisberger would stop the assault.

 

``I figured it wouldn't help anything,'' she said. ``I didn't want, obviously, him to hurt me any more than he was going to.''

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here you go Steelers:

 

During the first interview, she said she repeatedly told Roethlisberger, ``I really don't think this is OK,'' but couldn't stop him from having sex with her in the bathroom of a bar.

 

``I don't know what I can ... do,'' she said. ``I'm a little girl and he's a big boy.''

 

The victim told police she is 5-foot-4 and weighs 145 pounds. Roethlisberger is listed at 6-5 and 241 pounds.

 

Lopez asked the woman if she knew of any reason why Roethlisberger would feel ``it was OK to do this to you.''

 

While the accuser acknowledged wearing an explicit name tag, which was left over from a friend's birthday party earlier in the night, she denied leading him on.

 

``I wasn't forward in any way,'' she said. ``I wasn't like, 'Oh my gosh, have sex with me because you're an NFL superstar.' I really don't know why (it happened).''

 

The next afternoon, the woman went to the police station for a follow-up interview that was videotaped. She was calm and matter-of-fact when discussing the previous night, struggling to remember a few details but adamant that she had been raped by Roethlisberger.

 

In the video, the woman's face was blurred. She was wearing a navy blue T-shirt and jeans had her blond hair pulled back. She told police she didn't think trying to fight Roethlisberger would stop the assault.

 

``I figured it wouldn't help anything,'' she said. ``I didn't want, obviously, him to hurt me any more than he was going to.''

 

Doesn't change the fact the Seahawks have 0 Superbowl rings! :doublethumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
:pointstosky: the Pete Carroll thread was deleted. Focking Steelers fans. :pointstosky:

lol. It was kinda funny though as goofy was taking jabs with the Steelers in the bandwagon thread.

So what happened to get it removed? I take it the usual maturity!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lol. It was kinda funny though as goofy was taking jabs with the Steelers in the bandwagon thread.

So what happened to get it removed? I take it the usual maturity!

 

No clue why. The Carroll/USC thing is current news. It's too bad, I was looking forward to some back and forth bashing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No clue why. The Carroll/USC thing is current news. It's too bad, I was looking forward to some back and forth bashing.

Then let's gang up on the Bears! Except Forte is off limits...keeper.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So Reggie Bush accepted money and gifts while in college? BFD. Pete Carroll knew. BFD. To equate this with rape or even with cheating on the field (i.e. Belicheat and the Pats) is grasping at straws. Move on here folks. Nothing to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marshawn Lynch to Hawks Heating Up

 

If the price is right, do it! :thumbsup:

 

I have zero issue in Lynch coming aboard. The move makes a ton of sense for both teams.

 

Ah, but here is the sticky point. What is the price? For the same reason we could not acquire B Marshall, you cannot give up the 2nd rounder next year, because you don't have a third. So...will Buffalo settle for a 4th or 5th, or a pick the following year? If so, do it.

 

For argument sake, if Seattle foolishly deals the 2nd next year and overpays, do you prefer

Golden Doughnut Tate and Marshawn Lynch OR Brandon Marshall.

 

Discuss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have zero issue in Lynch coming aboard. The move makes a ton of sense for both teams.

 

Ah, but here is the sticky point. What is the price? For the same reason we could not acquire B Marshall, you cannot give up the 2nd rounder next year, because you don't have a third. So...will Buffalo settle for a 4th or 5th, or a pick the following year? If so, do it.

 

For argument sake, if Seattle foolishly deals the 2nd next year and overpays, do you prefer

Golden Doughnut Tate and Marshawn Lynch OR Brandon Marshall.

 

Discuss.

I am actually hoping the Hawks can some how deal Leroy Hill straight up. One trouble maker for the other. Or what about JJ straight up? If that isn't possible and it is indeed draft picks, I keep seeng that a 5th rounder is what the going price will ultimately be. If that is true, done deal! A second rounder? No way in hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What's wrong with Forsett?

Nothing's wrong with Forsett, but he is far from an every down back. He's fast but small and needs the open field. What Seattle needs to compliment him is a big bruiser to plow it into the end zone and 3rd and one kind of situations. Lendale White fit the bill; his attitude got in the way of what would have been a good situation for him, evidently.

Marshawn Lynch also fits the need, generally. The question is: how much do the Bills want for him?

Personally, I don't think he is worth a second rounder. Anything a little less than that will work though.

 

Tate and Lynch or Marshall? Hmm... that is a tough call. I guess I'd go with Tate and Lynch, since Marshall is obviously no longer possible, and I hate second-guessing what cannot be undone. It will not really be apparent until we see what kind of pro the Maple bar burglar turns into, and how much trouble Marshall makes in his new home.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nothing's wrong with Forsett, but he is far from an every down back. He's fast but small and needs the open field. What Seattle needs to compliment him is a big bruiser to plow it into the end zone and 3rd and one kind of situations. Lendale White fit the bill; his attitude got in the way of what would have been a good situation for him, evidently.

Marshawn Lynch also fits the need, generally. The question is: how much do the Bills want for him?

Personally, I don't think he is worth a second rounder. Anything a little less than that will work though.

 

Tate and Lynch or Marshall? Hmm... that is a tough call. I guess I'd go with Tate and Lynch, since Marshall is obviously no longer possible, and I hate second-guessing what cannot be undone. It will not really be apparent until we see what kind of pro the Maple bar burglar turns into, and how much trouble Marshall makes in his new home.

 

I don't know about Forsett's ability to score TDs and convert short yardage, but thinking you need a "bruiser" or "big back" to get short yardage and TDs is erroneous in my opinion. Emmitt, Marcus Allen, and LT were spectacular at getting TDs and all were short or thin. I'm sure there are other RBs who were short or thin that were good at scoring TDs that were not hall of famers too (can't think of 'em right now though).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know about Forsett's ability to score TDs and convert short yardage, but thinking you need a "bruiser" or "big back" to get short yardage and TDs is erroneous in my opinion. Emmitt, Marcus Allen, and LT were spectacular at getting TDs and all were short or thin. I'm sure there are other RBs who were short or thin that were good at scoring TDs that were not hall of famers too (can't think of 'em right now though).

It's just the way things are in the NFL. Teams like a two back system. Forsett and Lynch is a much better duo than Forsett and Jones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's just the way things are in the NFL. Teams like a two back system. Forsett and Lynch is a much better duo than Forsett and Jones.

 

I agree. However, isn't there a good chance he'll get cut eventually (I have no idea what his salary is or the cap ramifications of cutting him are)? Hopefully the front office is as cautious with Lynch as they were with Marshall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I agree. However, isn't there a good chance he'll get cut eventually (I have no idea what his salary is or the cap ramifications of cutting him are)? Hopefully the front office is as cautious with Lynch as they were with Marshall.

Do you mean Lynch get cut? If so, I'm not sure. I guess it depends on the cap hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Do you mean Lynch get cut? If so, I'm not sure. I guess it depends on the cap hit.

The NFL has a cap this year? Stick to bandwagon threads. itsatip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The NFL has a cap this year? Stick to bandwagon threads. itsatip

Stick to Steeler threads. Itsatip. Oh that's right. There aren't any :banana:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I'm not too surprised by this.

I believe the TE/WR #'s will look like this:

John Carlson

Chris Baker

Anthony McCoy

 

Housh

Branch

Tate

Butler

Mike Williams

 

Anything other than those 8 guys; barring an injury would be truely shocking imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Minicamp observations

Posted By Dave Boling on June 22, 2010 at 6:13 pm Share this

 

Okay, got the print story filed. Earlier posts covered most of the newsy stuff. Now ... some of what jumped out from the sidelines.

 

With Jones and Forsett absent (romance), Quinton Ganther kept getting more looks. The guy just really seems to make a lot of plays. He runs low and looks to have pretty good acceleration for a guy 5-9, 220. He could be a darkhorse back there.

 

Of the injured guys returning, I was most struck by how good Leon Washington seemed to be moving around. He spent early time taking handoffs and just getting his feet under him, but then was going through the steps for pitch plays, which required him to plant and cut up-field. He was doing it at what looked like pretty close to full speed. It seems that would be a real test for a guy coming off multiple leg fractures. Carroll said they'd be careful with him the first couple weeks of training camp, but then added that he thought all those guys -- Housh, Branch, Washington, Thurmond -- would be ready to at least be eased back into action when camp started.

 

Carroll's biggest surprise from the off-season has been Red Bryant, who was starting at DE opposite Chris Cleamons. He said that he thought Bryant's size and quickness gave him some special qualities. Don't scoff. Those of us who watched him in the past might wonder if this is over-estimating his potential. But he HAS looked different. He looks quicker and far more confident. It might be that it all just clicked in for him. But here's a fact: The guy is very big, very strong and pretty ornery, too.

 

Kelly Jennings was with the ones on defense, with Josh Wilson coming on in the nickel. The linebackers were Curry, Hawthorne and Herring, with Hill going with the twos.

 

Of our earlier discussion of Chris Spencer ... Carroll called him one of the stars of the off-season. I recall Jim Mora saying that last year. Will be interesting. Seemed like Okung made a couple rookie flinches when Hasselbeck went into his tricky cadence designed to draw the defensive offsides.

 

At quarterback, Whitehurst had a pretty nice series in a two-minute session, but he threw two picks in the Red Zone, too. For my money, and I think I've seen every OTA session that has been open to us, I think JP Losman is far closer to being a game-ready productive quarterback than Whitehurst. Losman really has a big-time arm on him, and an awful lot of experience.

 

I think one of the surprise guys on defense could be Kevin Vickerson, the guy they picked up from Tennessee. He is huge and he plays with a great deal of force. There's a "pop" in his punch.

 

Got no real answer to where Babineaux was other than some vague suggestions that it wasn't related to the signing of Kevin Ellison and it wasn't something illegal ... at least the best I could translate. Will follow tomorrow.

 

 

 

Read more: http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2010/06/22/minicamp-observations-2/#ixzz0rj8CloAR

 

 

 

 

http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seahawks/2010/06/22/minicamp-observations-2/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im loving Housh and Tate this year. Housh can easily return to his glory days...he had what 79 catches last year while the offense was terrible? Pete Carroll knows Housh is his best weapon and will get him the ball. Tate can be a big playmaker and will benefit from the attention Housh draws.

 

BTW Lynch would be a perfect fit.

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fun team to watch, but the final game of the year spoiled the memories for me. I was only 3 at the time, but I'd have to go with the '84 team. Better aftertaste

The 1986 team was actually the best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1986 team was actually the best.

 

Still a bit before my time. I have no idea why they mentioned the 2007 squad. The choke-job they pulled at Lambeau caused me to smash my cell phone against the wall (I was having anger issues back then). The team had nothing resembling a running game, and Mack Strong was forced to retire. They also went into Pittsburgh and were thoroughly embarrassed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is a great hire and one of the greatest assistant coaches ever in the NFL. I will be taking some flyers on SEA rbs. I used to always do this with the Denver depth chart and struck fantasy gold with Mike Anderson and many others.

A case could be made that he is better at his job than any other coach in the league...Wish my Steelers had him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×