Recliner Pilot 61 Posted March 29, 2011 If you look at the two forms one thing comes to mind. Obama's looks unusually modern. The other is obviously done on a typewriter. Letters are at different heights, different ink densities, etc........... Obama's looks like it came off an inkjet printer. Do we have another Dan Rather forgery here? Also, look at the first form. It was redacted by hand with a marker. The second form has the certificate number redacted. That looks computer generated, not even close to a marker. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voice_Of_Reason 0 Posted March 29, 2011 Count me in the very small % of people who believe that the long form shows cack size. And since he's half white.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 Do you know that the Republican Governor of hawaii said the short form was legit. This is the same woman who was stumping for McCain. If you lived in hawaii and needed a copy of your birth certificate for a driver's license or a passport, you would be issued what Obama has already shown as proof of birth. So, during the original birther controversy, the campaign finally released the "short form", to shut the nut jobs up. What happened? It stirred a hornets nest of whackos who said it was a forgery. why would he release anything else? There was also his birth announcement in the Honululu newspaper. I guess they just figured he would be President so they called the newspaper from kenya so that they could one day say he was an American citizen. ROFL. This conspiracy runs deep! And has been planned for decades! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 Also, look at the first form. It was redacted by hand with a marker. The second form has the certificate number redacted. That looks computer generated, not even close to a marker. Imagine the details you'd discovered if you gave a rat's ass about this subject. Bwahahaha. Another lie. Par for the course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted March 29, 2011 Do you know that the Republican Governor of hawaii said the short form was legit. This is the same woman who was stumping for McCain. If you lived in hawaii and needed a copy of your birth certificate for a driver's license or a passport, you would be issued what Obama has already shown as proof of birth. So, during the original birther controversy, the campaign finally released the "short form", to shut the nut jobs up. What happened? It stirred a hornets nest of whackos who said it was a forgery. why would he release anything else? There was also his birth announcement in the Honululu newspaper. I guess they just figured he would be President so they called the newspaper from kenya so that they could one day say he was an American citizen. You keep regurgitating the same tired and misleading snippets. The Republican Governor of Hawaii has said that short forms are legit, because Hawaii does use short forms. That does not mean that they contain all the necessary information to establish candidacy eligibility, nor do they contain all the information that this supposed "most transparent administration in US history" is supposed to provide its interested public - or do you think that their 'transparency' is reserved only for those people and groups with whom they agree? The "original birther controversy" was catalyzed due to the the lack of information on the Hawaiian short form, and the undestanding that Hawaii played fast and loose with its certificate issuance policy (giving certificates to children not born on the islands). Hawaii is and was an odd duck when it came to their issuance policies. Lastly: a birth announcement in a Honululu paper doesn't address a single thing about where the baby was born. It just announces that a certificate was issued for a new child that is considered Hawaiian under their fast and loose issuance policies at the time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted March 29, 2011 Imagine the details you'd discovered if you gave a rat's ass about this subject. Bwahahaha. Another lie. Par for the course. Hooked you. I'm entertained, how 'bout you Bubbles? :overhead: :overhead: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 Hooked you. I'm entertained, how 'bout you Bubbles? :overhead: :overhead: Oh for sure!! The birthers have entertained me since the first time I ever heard the theory. It's like watching the Special Olymics. Except funnier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted March 29, 2011 Oh for sure!! The birthers have entertained me since the first time I ever heard the theory. It's like watching the Special Olymics. Except funnier. Only thing funnier is when you try to convince us how awesome your life is. :banana: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 Only thing funnier is when you try to convince us how awesome your life is. :banana: I've been totally honest about my life and how I feel about things. How about you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted March 29, 2011 I've been totally honest about my life :shocking: I guess all the lies in my sig you foisted upon us don't count. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,435 Posted March 29, 2011 If you look at the two forms one thing comes to mind. Obama's looks unusually modern. The other is obviously done on a typewriter. Letters are at different heights, different ink densities, etc........... Obama's looks like it came off an inkjet printer. Do we have another Dan Rather forgery here? Just from my memory of the story, the Obama camp requested a birth certificate in 2007-08 due to this story coming up. Hawaiin records then print a new one and notorize it, send it to Obama camp. So it should look like it came from an inkjet printer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted March 29, 2011 Just from my memory of the story, the Obama camp requested a birth certificate in 2007-08 due to this story coming up. Hawaiin records then print a new one and notorize it, send it to Obama camp. So it should look like it came from an inkjet printer. So all the original info was entered into a computer and stored there since 1961. Makes sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 :shocking: I guess all the lies in my sig you foisted upon us don't count. Please read Medstudent's sig. MKaythanks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted March 29, 2011 Please read Medstudent's sig. MKaythanks What does that have to do with your lie here today that you have been totally honest about your life? We can throw that one on top of the mounting heap of Newbie lies you have been busted on. Nice try at deflection. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DankNuggs 305 Posted March 29, 2011 I didn't see Obama's long form but I have seen other Hawaiian long forms. Here is an actual Hawaiian birth certificate from 1963 (the same era as Obama's birth), which while redacted includes detailed information documenting a birth, including the name of the birth hospital and the attending physician. Beneath it is the short-form "Certification of Live Birth" offered by President Obama as proof of his Hawaiian birth. It is possible to have been born outside of Hawaii and still obtain the latter form, but not the former: Read more: What's the difference? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=101483#ixzz1I0V4hOdN Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
surferskin 31 Posted March 29, 2011 So all the original info was entered into a computer and stored there since 1961. Makes sense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 What does that have to do with your lie here today that you have been totally honest about your life? We can throw that one on top of the mounting heap of Newbie lies you have been busted on. Nice try at deflection. Bwahahaha. Says the tool who shares absolutely NOTHING about his life. You're a focking clown. All anyone knows about you is that you worship Fox News and the Cowboys. That's it. Everyone here knows everything there is about me. I'm an open book. You're an ugly failure who's afraid to reveal anything. Oh, and a lying scumbag welching ###### to boot. You lose. Winning! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DankNuggs 305 Posted March 29, 2011 You keep regurgitating the same tired and misleading snippets. The Republican Governor of Hawaii has said that short forms are legit, because Hawaii does use short forms. That does not mean that they contain all the necessary information to establish candidacy eligibility, nor do they contain all the information that this supposed "most transparent administration in US history" is supposed to provide its interested public - or do you think that their 'transparency' is reserved only for those people and groups with whom they agree? The "original birther controversy" was catalyzed due to the the lack of information on the Hawaiian short form, and the undestanding that Hawaii played fast and loose with its certificate issuance policy (giving certificates to children not born on the islands). Hawaii is and was an odd duck when it came to their issuance policies. Lastly: a birth announcement in a Honululu paper doesn't address a single thing about where the baby was born. It just announces that a certificate was issued for a new child that is considered Hawaiian under their fast and loose issuance policies at the time. Nicely said... Liberals are taught that logic based questioning makes you a retard... The smart liberals just blob into little thug factions and demand stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DankNuggs 305 Posted March 29, 2011 Do you know that the Republican Governor of hawaii said the short form was legit. This is the same woman who was stumping for McCain. If you lived in hawaii and needed a copy of your birth certificate for a driver's license or a passport, you would be issued what Obama has already shown as proof of birth. So, during the original birther controversy, the campaign finally released the "short form", to shut the nut jobs up. What happened? It stirred a hornets nest of whackos who said it was a forgery. why would he release anything else? There was also his birth announcement in the Honululu newspaper. I guess they just figured he would be President so they called the newspaper from kenya so that they could one day say he was an American citizen. All that money spend on a med degree and you missed 5th grade civic... Requirements of POTUS are more stringent that requirements to get a licence or passport.. Thats the whole strawman... We know the avg schmuck gets a shortform for passports...etc... and while thats good enough for the scmuck, that doesn't mean they are qualified to be POTUS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 All that money spend on a med degree and you missed 5th grade civic... Requirements of POTUS are more stringent that requirements to get a licence or passport.. Thats the whole strawman... We know the avg schmuck gets a shortform for passports...etc... and while thats good enough for the scmuck, that doesn't mean they are qualified to be POTUS I thought he already became President. Who enforces these rules when you decide you want to run? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DankNuggs 305 Posted March 29, 2011 I thought he already became President. Who enforces these rules when you decide you want to run? Who's on first? Agreed that this issue should have been meted out LONG before an election... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted March 29, 2011 Bwahahaha. Says the tool who shares absolutely NOTHING about his life. You're a focking clown. All anyone knows about you is that you worship Fox News and the Cowboys. That's it. Everyone here knows everything there is about me. I'm an open book. You're an ugly failure who's afraid to reveal anything. Oh, and a lying scumbag welching ###### to boot. You lose. Winning! Deflection, Round 2! Problem with you is that "everything there is to know" about you changes from one week to the next, Bubbles. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted March 29, 2011 So all the original info was entered into a computer and stored there since 1961. Makes sense. What makes you think it was entered into a computer in 1961? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Recliner Pilot 61 Posted March 29, 2011 What makes you think it was entered into a computer in 1961? Nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted March 29, 2011 Here is an actual Hawaiian birth certificate from 1963 (the same era as Obama's birth), which while redacted includes detailed information documenting a birth, including the name of the birth hospital and the attending physician. Beneath it is the short-form "Certification of Live Birth" offered by President Obama as proof of his Hawaiian birth. It is possible to have been born outside of Hawaii and still obtain the latter form, but not the former: Read more: What's the difference? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=101483#ixzz1I0V4hOdN You can obtain it, but it wouldn't give the place of birth as 'Honolulu'. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 You can obtain it, but it wouldn't give the place of birth as 'Honolulu'. Don't try to reason with the birthers. They are retarded. They refuse to hear anything unless it supports their conspiracy theory. Total whack jobs. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted March 29, 2011 Don't try to reason with the birthers. They are retarded. They refuse to hear anything unless it supports their conspiracy theory. Total whack jobs. I know. I'm bored out of my skull. I'm even challenging RP when he's flat out admitted he's just trolling. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,626 Posted March 29, 2011 I know. I'm bored out of my skull. I'm even challenging RP when he's flat out admitted he's just trolling. http://www.theflyfishingforum.com/forums/coldwater-fly-fishing/43764-brown-trout-pics-11.html Check out that 25", 7lb brown that my coworker landed on the lower gallatin last weekend. It was on a side channel in a beaver pond. I managed to catch a 3lb rainbow, but I didnt even want my picture with it after he landed that. The picture does not do it justice, but he is getting it mounted, second biggest trout I have ever seen. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted March 29, 2011 http://www.theflyfishingforum.com/forums/coldwater-fly-fishing/43764-brown-trout-pics-11.html Check out that 25", 7lb brown that my coworker landed on the lower gallatin last weekend. It was on a side channel in a beaver pond. I managed to catch a 3lb rainbow, but I didnt even want my picture with it after he landed that. The picture does not do it justice, but he is getting it mounted, second biggest trout I have ever seen. Nice. Never have fished the Gallatin. Nymphs I assume? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,626 Posted March 29, 2011 Nice. Never have fished the Gallatin. Nymphs I assume? We were stripping streamers. There were midges hatching like crazy, but I didn't see a fish rise all day. The very lower gallatin by manhattan has some giant fish, but a good day is catching 2-3. It is not like the clarks fork where you can catch double digit fish. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 29, 2011 We were stripping streamers. There were midges hatching like crazy, but I didn't see a fish rise all day. The very lower gallatin by manhattan has some giant fish, but a good day is catching 2-3. It is not like the clarks fork where you can catch double digit fish. Do you have the long form birth certificate of that fish ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted March 29, 2011 We were stripping streamers. There were midges hatching like crazy, but I didn't see a fish rise all day. The very lower gallatin by manhattan has some giant fish, but a good day is catching 2-3. It is not like the clarks fork where you can catch double digit fish. I probably won't throw out a line until May or June. I'm too big a puss to go out this time of year. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KSB2424 3,174 Posted March 29, 2011 Whats up with all that whiteout on the short form anyway? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted March 29, 2011 Whats up with all that whiteout on the short form anyway? That's the part that lists Osama Bin Laden as his father, duh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,626 Posted March 29, 2011 I probably won't throw out a line until May or June. I'm too big a puss to go out this time of year. Next weekend I am either going to head to hauser reservoir in helena, or I am going to float either the lower madison or the missouri headwaters. Depends whether the people I go with want to catch pike, walleye, or trout. This is one of the better times of year for fishing. The warming water triggers the fish to feed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted March 29, 2011 This is one of the better times of year for fishing. The warming water triggers the fish to feed. I know, that's what makes my pussiness so sad. I hit Rock Creek this time of year with a buddy a couple years ago and killed them with a Prince/San Juan worm setup. One of the best days I've ever had. Haven't been back. Good luck on your outing. I would you might be squeezing a few more days at Bridger. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
IMMensaMind 462 Posted March 29, 2011 You can obtain it, but it wouldn't give the place of birth as 'Honolulu'. Can you quantify whether that was true in Hawaii in the 1960's? My understanding is that that is not true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
parrot 789 Posted March 29, 2011 Can you quantify whether that was true in Hawaii in the 1960's? My understanding is that that is not true. No, I'm sorry, this is a fly fishing thread now. I don't know that I can 'quantify' it, I'm just taking this lady's word for it... “It’s crazy,” said Janice Okubo, director of communications for the Hawaii Department of Health. “I don’t think anything is ever going to satisfy them.” Okubo, who said that she gets weekly questions from Obama ‘Birthers’ that are “more like threats,” explained that the certificate of live birth reproduced by Obama’s campaign should have debunked the conspiracy theories. “If you were born in Bali, for example,” Okubo explained, “you could get a certificate from the state of Hawaii saying you were born in Bali. You could not get a certificate saying you were born in Honolulu. The state has to verify a fact like that for it to appear on the certificate. But it’s become very clear that it doesn’t matter what I say. The people who are questioning this bring up all these implausible scenarios. What if the physician lied? What if the state lied? It’s just become an urban legend at this point.” It sounds to me like she is referring to past tense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Voltaire 5,491 Posted March 29, 2011 This is all so frustrating. As it stands now, I vote in alliance with welfare leaches, unproductive turds, and people that encourage discrimitation against white people. This sucks and I want to switch. The thing is, if ever I do switch back over, the thought that I'll be alliance with these humanoid birthers/and other assorted fringe right fruits and nuts (evilgelicals, chickenhawks) makes my stomach turn just as much. With the Dems, the stoopid liberals let the smart liberals run the show and defer to them because the smart liberals care take care of the stoopid liberals. And that's a huge plus even though they are delusional, at least they are rational. In the GOP, the stoopid conservatives are a powerful force. They don't listen to/trust to the smart conservatives because deep down, they have been able to figure out that the smart conservatives are only in it for themselves and really don't give a fock about the useful idiot stoopid conservatives. I like the smart conservatives but I don't know how many there are left. Then there's the next layer... the mouthbreathers conservatives make asses of themselves much worse and are more embarrassing than the mouthbreather liberals but at least they are productive members of society. The mouthbreather liberals are just totally beyond useless. So -because I hate everyone- the voting decision ultimately becomes which group disgusts me least. And I'm having a hard time deciding which one that is at present. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted March 29, 2011 This is all so frustrating. As it stands now, I vote in alliance with welfare leaches, unproductive turds, and people that encourage discrimitation against white people. This sucks and I want to switch. The thing is, if ever I do switch back over, the thought that I'll be alliance with these humanoid birthers/and other assorted fringe right fruits and nuts (evilgelicals, chickenhawks) makes my stomach turn just as much. With the Dems, the stoopid liberals let the smart liberals run the show and defer to them because the smart liberals care take care of the stoopid liberals. And that's a huge plus even though they are delusional, at least they are rational. In the GOP, the stoopid conservatives are a powerful force. They don't listen to/trust to the smart conservatives because deep down, they have been able to figure out that the smart conservatives are only in it for themselves and really don't give a fock about the useful idiot stoopid conservatives. I like the smart conservatives but I don't know how many there are left. Then there's the next layer... the mouthbreathers conservatives make asses of themselves much worse and are more embarrassing than the mouthbreather liberals but at least they are productive members of society. The mouthbreather liberals are just totally beyond useless. So -because I hate everyone- the voting decision ultimately becomes which group disgusts me least. And I'm having a hard time deciding which one that is at present. do you have a liberal or conservative running your country of china ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites