For those that do not believe in Evolution.

[DankNuggs 305]

Doesn't get more liberal than Massachusetts. I was taught bbt too.

Taught before or after:

 

1) beating up the newbie j's at the bar

2) smearing mustard on the Adidas shirt.

[IMMensaMind 462]

This is why I do not debate in this forearm anymore. Those being reasonable in this thread are treated like they're stupid, and the stupid ones have fellow sycophants who assure them that they're reasonable.

 

Too much stupid.

[penultimatestraw 473]

This is why I do not debate in this forearm anymore. Those being reasonable in this thread are treated like they're stupid, and the stupid ones have fellow sycophants who assure them that they're reasonable.

 

Too much stupid.

Plus we've been on this ride before - certainly our opinions haven't evolved.

[MedStudent 56]

Now that Santorum had a good showing we can expect "intelligent design" to show up in the media again.

The Santorum Amendment:

 

 

The origin of the amendment can be traced back to 2000, when leading intelligent design (ID) proponents through the Discovery Institute, a conservative Christian think tank that is the hub of the intelligent design movement, held a congressional briefing in Washington, D.C., to promote their agenda to lawmakers. Sen. Rick Santorum was one of intelligent design's most vocal supporters on Capitol Hill.

 

One result of this briefing was that in 2001 Senator Santorum proposed incorporating pro-intelligent design language, crafted in part by the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture, into the No Child Left Behind bill.^[1] It portrayed evolution as generating "much continuing controversy" and not widely accepted, using the Discovery Institute's Teach The Controversy method.

 

 

 

[Strike 6,023]

This is why I do not debate in this forearm anymore. Those being reasonable in this thread are treated like they're stupid, and the stupid ones have fellow sycophants who assure them that they're reasonable.

 

Too much stupid.

 

You don't debate in this forearm because you were made to look like a total and complete idiot in the last evolution thread. I posted a video that completely trashed your arguments yet you refused to even watch it. Apparently it just wasn't worth 2 hours of your time to become knowledgeable on a subject that you're clearly not, despite your repeated claims of the opposite. And, of course, you spent well more than that amount of time repeating the same stupid claims over and over. So yeah, it's understandable why you don't debate around here anymore. Your ass probably still hurts from the raping it took in that thread.

[NewbieJr 541]

You don't debate in this forearm because you were made to look like a total and complete idiot in the last evolution thread. I posted a video that completely trashed your arguments yet you refused to even watch it. Apparently it just wasn't worth 2 hours of your time to become knowledgeable on a subject that you're clearly not, despite your repeated claims of the opposite. And, of course, you spent well more than that amount of time repeating the same stupid claims over and over. So yeah, it's understandable why you don't debate around here anymore. Your ass probably still hurts from the raping it took in that thread.

BINGO

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Now that Santorum had a good showing we can expect "intelligent design" to show up in the media again.

 

] It portrayed evolution as generating "much continuing controversy" and not widely accepted,

 

 

The Santorum Amendment:

 

According to Edjr and his link it isn't "widely accepted".

[Bishop82 61]

I just wasted half an hour reading these posts, and I haven't seen this many wrong statements since that time Jeopardy had "special" kids on as contestants.

[drobeski 3,061]

I just wasted half an hour reading these posts, and I haven't seen this many wrong statements since that time Jeopardy had "special" kids on as contestants.

I remember that, you finished 3rd right ?

[Bishop82 61]

I remember that, you finished 3rd right ?

 

Still got the certificate, cause even the losers are winners.

 

[KSB2424 3,173]

I just wasted half an hour reading these posts, and I haven't seen this many wrong statements since that time Jeopardy had "special" kids on as contestants.

The theories (whether religious or based on current science) of how 'life' started are all just that....theories, faith, or speculation. None of it has been proven and it's one of, if not THE great debate and question of the human race.

 

So how do you know which is right or wrong when nobody on the planet knows the exact final answer? Do tell OB1-Kenobi.

[Bishop82 61]

The theories (whether religious or based on current science) of how 'life' started are all just that....theories, faith, or speculation. None of it has been proven and it's one of, if not THE great debate and question of the human race.

 

So how do you know which is right or wrong when nobody on the planet knows the exact final answer? Do tell OB1-Kenobi.

+1

 

Because I just read 5 pages of people claiming to know the unknowable.

[IGotWorms 4,063]

I would like to also point out that the original story in this thread really doesn't have anything to do with evolution at all.

 

edjr went on a massive fishing trip here and was quite successful. Bravo. Apparently if you simply put "evolution" in the thread title its a guaranteed eight-pager.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

I would like to also point out that the original story in this thread really doesn't have anything to do with evolution at all.

 

 

From the OP:

 

"This is evolution in action."

 

 

Do you ever get tired of humiliating yourself?

[KSB2424 3,173]

I would like to also point out that the original story in this thread really doesn't have anything to do with evolution at all.

The thread evolved from the OP to a similar, yet different discussion. You do believe in evolution right?

[IGotWorms 4,063]

From the OP:

 

 

 

 

Do you ever get tired of humiliating yourself?

 

The person who wrote the article can say whatever they want--doesn't mean that they're right. This story is about cross-breeding, not evolution. You're humiliating yourself (yet again) if you can't understand the difference.

[IGotWorms 4,063]

The thread evolved from the OP to a similar, yet different discussion. You do believe in evolution right?

 

[Recliner Pilot 61]

The person who wrote the article can say whatever they want--doesn't mean that they're right. This story is about cross-breeding, not evolution. You're humiliating yourself (yet again) if you can't understand the difference.

 

You didn't say the person who wrote it was wrong to call it evolution. You said it wasn't about evolution, when clearly it was. Nice crawfish though.

 

You really should move along, the beating will just get worse.

[IGotWorms 4,063]

You didn't say the person who wrote it was wrong to call it evolution. You said it wasn't about evolution, when clearly it was. Nice crawfish though.

 

Holy jesus you really are thick. It isn't about evolution. The person who wrote it doesn't understand evolution and, like a blind fool, you chose to follow him off the cliff of stupidity rather than think for yourself "wait a minute, what in the fock does this have to do with evolution?" Man you really need to critically examine some of these things instead of just blindly parroting them like a Fox News Rush Limbaugh dittohead.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Holy jesus you really are thick. It isn't about evolution. The person who wrote it doesn't understand evolution and, like a blind fool, you chose to follow him off the cliff of stupidity rather than think for yourself "wait a minute, what in the fock does this have to do with evolution?" Man you really need to critically examine some of these things instead of just blindly parroting them like a Fox News Rush Limbaugh dittohead.

Fox News? Rush? What are their positions on evolution? I have no idea. How sad you have already gone there.

 

I didn't follow him anywhere, Corky. Where have I said I buy his conclusions? Let me help you out. I haven't.

 

Once again you claim the original article isn't about evolution, but the original article directly contradicts you.

 

"This is evolution in action."

[IGotWorms 4,063]

Once again you claim the original article isn't about evolution, but the original article directly contradicts you.

 

OK, well since apparently anything any person ever writes is completely and unequivocally true, you can't contradict this:

 

 

 

 

RP is such a pedo he makes Jerry Sandusky blush.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

OK, well since apparently anything any person ever writes is completely and unequivocally true, you can't contradict this:

 

 

 

 

RP is such a pedo he makes Jerry Sandusky blush.

I never said what he claimed is true, Cletus.

 

Keep digging, it's fun bitchslapping you around the bored.

[IGotWorms 4,063]

I never said what he claimed is true, Cletus.

 

Keep digging, it's fun bitchslapping you around the bored.

 

RP enjoys long walks on the beach and getting focked in the ass by Mandingo.

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Dayum Worms, this is sad to watch.......even for me.

[edjr 6,898]

The thread evolved from the OP to a similar, yet different discussion. You do believe in evolution right?

 

[edjr 6,898]

I would like to also point out that the original story in this thread really doesn't have anything to do with evolution at all.

 

edjr went on a massive fishing trip here and was quite successful. Bravo. Apparently if you simply put "evolution" in the thread title its a guaranteed eight-pager.

 

 

Scientists said on Tuesday that they had discovered the world's first hybrid sharks in Australian waters, a potential sign the predators were adapting to cope with climate change.

 

The mating of the local Australian black-tip shark with its global counterpart, the common black-tip, was an unprecedented discovery with implications for the entire shark world, said lead researcher Jess Morgan.

 

"It's very surprising because no one's ever seen shark hybrids before, this is not a common occurrence by any stretch of the imagination," Morgan, from the University of Queensland, told AFP.

 

"This is evolution in action."

 

[IGotWorms 4,063]

Hey Geeks, I just found this groundbreaking new article on evolution:

 

Amber Rose Says Kim Kardashian Caused Split With Kanye West

During a November appearance on "The Wendy Williams Show," Amber Rose opened up about her ex, Kanye West, and his relationship with Kim Kardashian, dropping a big hint that the socialite may have driven a wedge between them. But now Amber is past hints, reportedly telling Star magazine in an interview, “"Kim is one of the main reasons why me and Kanye are not together.”

 

Rose told Star that the affair between Kim and Kanye began when the 31-year-old reality TV star began sending explicit pictures of herself. “She was sending pictures, and I was like, ‘Kim, just stop. Don’t be that person,’” Amber said, adding that she reached out to Kim via e-mail for an explanation. “I thought at least she’d be woman enough to respond to me. She never responded. It’s very important that us women stick together and we don’t f--- each other over like that.”

 

"This is evolution in action."

 

She says that the affair happened during the time that she was dating Kanye and Kim was still tied to NFL player Reggie Bush. “They were both cheating,” Rose said. “They were both cheating on me and Reggie with each other.” Either way, Amber Rose doesn’t sound too bitter about things, thanks to her current relationship with Pittsburgh rapper Wiz Khalifa. “I want to thank her,” she said, referring to Kim. “Because if she was never a homewrecker, then I never would have met Wiz, and I wouldn’t be as happy as I am now.”

 

RP, I am curious about your thoughts on the impact of Amber Rose/Kim Kardashian feud on evolutionary theory. Specifically, do you think Kim Kardashian evolved into a mega-wh0re or did God intelligently design her to go around spreading her legs for every black male pseudo-celebrity in the world?

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Moved past sad and right into pathetic.

 

Cut your losses and move along, Sport.

[IGotWorms 4,063]

Moved past sad and right into pathetic.

 

Cut your losses and move along, Sport.

 

Please don't dodge the question RP. The article said it was about evolution. So why won't you respond? Are you really so afraid that your intelligent design theory won't hold weight in light of the Kardashian/Rose development?

[MedStudent 56]

Holy jesus you really are thick. It isn't about evolution. The person who wrote it doesn't understand evolution and, like a blind fool, you chose to follow him off the cliff of stupidity rather than think for yourself "wait a minute, what in the fock does this have to do with evolution?" Man you really need to critically examine some of these things instead of just blindly parroting them like a Fox News Rush Limbaugh dittohead.

 

The fact that the hybrid shark was created may not be evolution. But I think the evolution is that these hybrids are better equiped to survive in these waters and that they may survive while the two original black tip sub species of sharks die off. That would be evolution.

[IGotWorms 4,063]

The fact that the hybrid shark was created may not be evolution. But I think the evolution is that these hybrids are better equiped to survive in these waters and that they may survive while the two original black tip sub species of sharks die off. That would be evolution.

 

That's breeding, not evolution.

 

If I bred some wild felines to become domestic house-cats, would you say that those cats "evolved" into being able to live indoors, side-by-side with humans?

[Recliner Pilot 61]

Please don't dodge the question RP. The article said it was about evolution. So why won't you respond? Are you really so afraid that your intelligent design theory won't hold weight in light of the Kardashian/Rose development?

Usually when one of the bored libs goes full retard it's comical.

 

Usually.

[Patriotsfatboy1 1,433]

That's breeding, not evolution.

 

If I bred some wild felines to become domestic house-cats, would you say that those cats "evolved" into being able to live indoors, side-by-side with humans?

If it happens on its own and over the course of time, then it is evolution. If humans cause it to happen, then it is breeding.

[edjr 6,898]

That's breeding, not evolution.

 

 

is there some mad shark scientist somewhere that is breeding sharks that we don't know about?

[phillybear 366]

is there some mad shark scientist somewhere that is breeding sharks that we don't know about?

 

Yeah, and mother fockin' Samuel L Jackson isn't going to make it out alive.

[KSB2424 3,173]

Yeah, and mother fockin' Samuel L Jackson isn't going to make it out alive.

[IGotWorms 4,063]

I won this thread.

[MedStudent 56]

That's breeding, not evolution.

 

If I bred some wild felines to become domestic house-cats, would you say that those cats "evolved" into being able to live indoors, side-by-side with humans?

 

Did you even read my post?

[edjr 6,898]

Yeah, and mother fockin' Samuel L Jackson isn't going to make it out alive.

 

 

When that shark ripped his arm off, I thought he was going to rip his other arm off and beat the shark to death with it.

[DankNuggs 305]

That's breeding, not evolution.

 

If I bred some wild felines to become domestic house-cats, would you say that those cats "evolved" into being able to live indoors, side-by-side with humans?

absolutely...

 

 

Evolution is about species adapting traits that allow them to survive and breed more successfully.... I'm not sure what the hangup is about intergenerational traits...

 

 

If two humans had a child with 3 legs that could run faster, jump higher...etc... that human would likely become successful with more access to resources, would breed with a higher quality female, and have higher chances of passing those genes onward... Thats evolution...