***The Official Seattle Seahawks 2013 Season Thread***

[MDC 7,494]

The refs again - really?

[FlaHawker 24]

Then how do you know if I'm posting in it or not? LOLOL What a lying sack of sh!t. You can't even keep your stories straight.

Link to my posting in the Eagles thread? Have a nice day melon head!

[FlaHawker 24]

That guy was begging for that. He was videotaping it. Hoping to entice someone to react. He got off SOOOOOOO easy. A little spit? He's lucky he didn't get his jaw busted.

Stay classy Filthydelphia!

[MDC 7,494]

Link to my posting in the Eagles thread? Have a nice day melon head!

You only had 15 of 49 posts in this thread:

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=430546&page=2&do=findComment&comment=5179207

 

D'oh!

[FlaHawker 24]

Can't wait for the 12 th man to take over Filthydelphia next year when Seahawks invade!

[FlaHawker 24]

You only had 15 of 49 posts in this thread:

 

http://www.fftodayforums.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=430546&page=2&do=findComment&comment=5179207

 

D'oh!

Is that a team thread? Oh no it was an in game discussion! Stick to making coffee you mascara wearing fruit cake.

[MDC 7,494]

Is that a team thread? Oh no it was an in game discussion! Stick to making coffee you mascara wearing fruit cake.

Uh Billy begging for the attention of Eagles fans by posting "Eagles suck!" 15 times in a game thread doesn't qualify as football talk.

 

Now enjoy recess and I hope Scut Farkus and his Toadie don't steal your lunch money gain today.

[FlaHawker 24]

Uh Billy begging for the attention of Eagles fans by posting "Eagles suck!" 15 times in a game thread doesn't qualify as football talk.

 

Now enjoy recess and I hope Scut Farkus and his Toadie don't steal your lunch money gain today.

Stop moving the goal posts you fockin queen. An in game discussion is NOT a team thread as you claimed. So STFU and put on your lipstick.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Stop moving the goal posts you fockin queen. An in game discussion is NOT a team thread as you claimed. So STFU and put on your lipstick.

Whats the focking difference...you lived in that thread not to actually talk about the game...but to troll it.

Like you do with many threads.

[MDC 7,494]

Stop moving the goal posts you fockin queen. An in game discussion is NOT a team thread as you claimed. So STFU and put on your lipstick.

Internet Tough Guy:

 

You constantly troll threads that have nothing to do with the Seabags trying to get a reaction. The only difference is that nobody here but you takes the bait all day long every day to the tune of 23+ pages of your bullsh1t.

 

Now why don't you go take your ProActive and strike some karate poses in the mirror until your twisted little dork friends come over to play, Dungeon Master? If I feel like playing Slap the Retard I'll stop back later to wind you up for another couple pages but I'm sure Newbs and murf have got it covered in my absence.

[phillybear 366]

Well you come across as a whiny, excuse-making pussie. Just thought I'd let you in on how everyone sees you.

 

I'm bestowing my genius and insight upon you troglodytes with tidbits of information you otherwise would have never ascertained on your own.

 

Now come back after you look up half the words I typed out so you can understand what I just said, Stupid.

[FlaHawker 24]

Internet Tough Guy:

 

You constantly troll threads that have nothing to do with the Seabags trying to get a reaction. The only difference is that nobody here but you takes the bait all day long every day to the tune of 23+ pages of your bullsh1t.

 

Now why don't you go take your ProActive and strike some karate poses in the mirror until your twisted little dork friends come over to play, Dungeon Master? If I feel like playing Slap the Retard I'll stop back later to wind you up for another couple pages but I'm sure Newbs and murf have got it covered in my absence.

And this has what to do with the fact that you wrongly claimed I live in the Eagles team thread? Oh that's right, nothing. Keep grasping at straws and moving the goal posts shitebag. Now go in the ladies room, stick your head in the toilet and just keep flushing until I tell you to come out.

[FlaHawker 24]

Whats the focking difference...you lived in that thread not to actually talk about the game...but to troll it.

Like you do with many threads.

Hi Chime

[Sho Nuff 720]

Hi Chime

 

You are still trying..Ill give you an A for effort...even a gold star.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

You are still trying..Ill give you an A for effort...even a gold star.

Thanks Chime!

[SaintsInDome2006 441]

Let's see. A few week ago, the Seattle Seahawks on a Monday Night game pulled down the Saint's pants and the nation laughed and laughed at their New Orleans itty bitty pink parts. Fast forward to this rematch, and all of the sudden the Saints are walking around with a swagger after beating the team to emerge out of the worst division in the NFL. You don't get over a demolition like that with lip service. Deep down, way down nestled inside the marrow of their bones, the Saints know exactly what is going to happen. They can deny it all they want. They can also create false controversy to try to get fired up. Sean Payton is whining that the Seahawks ran up the score in the previous game even though the Seahawks scored 7 points in the 2nd half, none in the 4th quarter. You know, Payton is a good coach, but when you resort to clown tactics like a Harbaugh would, then you deserve the beatdown that is coming. I don't want to just win. I want to run up the score. Really stick it in.

 

Wait, when did he say the Hawks ran up the score?

[Groundhog 24]

Back to the game for a sec fellas.

 

How worried should Hawks fans be about the recent ascendance of Mark Ingram? For the longest time he was looking like the prequel to Trent Richardson, but all of a sudden he's got a little more giddyup in his spurs. Check out numbers from his three most recent games:

 

Wildcard game @ Eagles: 18 carries, 97 yards, 1 TD

Week 17 game vs. Bucs: 3 carries, 20 yards

Week 16 game @ Panthers: 13 carries, 83 yards

 

So he's averaging 5,9 yds per carry over three games. Against some pretty decent defenses.

 

Now keep in mind the Hawks' run D is no slouch recently either. We shut down Zac Stacy (15 carries, 15 yards) in wk17 and he carved us up earlier in the year. We shut down Andre Brown of the Giants. Andre Ellington did a decent job with the Cards in wk16, 15 carries for 64 yards, but that includes one long gainer of 26 yards. Take out that one carry, Ellington generated 3.1 yds per carry on the other 14 carries.

 

We shut down Brees in the first meeting. I have to think that the Saints are going to try a ground-and-pound approach behind Ingram and Khiry Robinson, along with a few seam routes for Jimmy Graham given the absence of KJ Wright. Red Bryant is going to have to have a monster game to help defeat the ground attack. I think we're up to it but I don't think this game will be nearly as one-sided as the first one was.

[NewbieJr 541]

 

Wait, when did he say the Hawks ran up the score?

I'd like to see a link to this, too. phillybear?

[SaintsInDome2006 441]

Back to the game for a sec fellas.

 

How worried should Hawks fans be about the recent ascendance of Mark Ingram? For the longest time he was looking like the prequel to Trent Richardson, but all of a sudden he's got a little more giddyup in his spurs. Check out numbers from his three most recent games:

 

Wildcard game @ Eagles: 18 carries, 97 yards, 1 TD

Week 17 game vs. Bucs: 3 carries, 20 yards

Week 16 game @ Panthers: 13 carries, 83 yards

 

So he's averaging 5,9 yds per carry over three games. Against some pretty decent defenses.

 

Now keep in mind the Hawks' run D is no slouch recently either. We shut down Zac Stacy (15 carries, 15 yards) in wk17 and he carved us up earlier in the year. We shut down Andre Brown of the Giants. Andre Ellington did a decent job with the Cards in wk16, 15 carries for 64 yards, but that includes one long gainer of 26 yards. Take out that one carry, Ellington generated 3.1 yds per carry on the other 14 carries.

 

We shut down Brees in the first meeting. I have to think that the Saints are going to try a ground-and-pound approach behind Ingram and Khiry Robinson, along with a few seam routes for Jimmy Graham given the absence of KJ Wright. Red Bryant is going to have to have a monster game to help defeat the ground attack. I think we're up to it but I don't think this game will be nearly as one-sided as the first one was.

 

Someone talking football here, awesome.

 

Seattle as we know is a tough run matchup (they're even tougher vs the pass).

 

The difference between NO & STL is that Brees is obviously a far superior QB. SEA jumped on the Saints early last time, if the Saints can keep it close they will be able to run the ball. I don't think they need to run it terrifically, just well enough. If they can do what the Cards did, 40+ rushes even at 3 or so yards a pop, that will work.

 

Ingram has been much better since he got back from injury. But he is still not a dominant top-5 back.

 

If the Saints stick to the run, succeed or fail, doesn't matter, and hold Wilson and Lynch both in check, then they can win this game.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

Someone talking football here, awesome.

 

Seattle as we know is a tough run matchup (they're even tougher vs the pass).

 

The difference between NO & STL is that Brees is obviously a far superior QB. SEA jumped on the Saints early last time, if the Saints can keep it close they will be able to run the ball. I don't think they need to run it terrifically, just well enough. If they can do what the Cards did, 40+ rushes even at 3 or so yards a pop, that will work.

 

Ingram has been much better since he got back from injury. But he is still not a dominant top-5 back.

 

If the Saints stick to the run, succeed or fail, doesn't matter, and hold Wilson and Lynch both in check, then they can win this game.

I've already told you that NO has a chance. Stop being so needy.

[FlaHawker 24]

I'd like to see a link to this, too. phillybear?

I'd like to see you post in your team thread.

[Chasers Dawg 9]

Do u have pics of Mike diddling his 3yr old son ????

 

Trying to figure out how you are still a member here

[Hawkfin 32]

Back to the game for a sec fellas.

 

How worried should Hawks fans be about the recent ascendance of Mark Ingram? For the longest time he was looking like the prequel to Trent Richardson, but all of a sudden he's got a little more giddyup in his spurs. Check out numbers from his three most recent games:

 

Wildcard game @ Eagles: 18 carries, 97 yards, 1 TD

Week 17 game vs. Bucs: 3 carries, 20 yards

Week 16 game @ Panthers: 13 carries, 83 yards

 

So he's averaging 5,9 yds per carry over three games. Against some pretty decent defenses.

 

Now keep in mind the Hawks' run D is no slouch recently either. We shut down Zac Stacy (15 carries, 15 yards) in wk17 and he carved us up earlier in the year. We shut down Andre Brown of the Giants. Andre Ellington did a decent job with the Cards in wk16, 15 carries for 64 yards, but that includes one long gainer of 26 yards. Take out that one carry, Ellington generated 3.1 yds per carry on the other 14 carries.

 

We shut down Brees in the first meeting. I have to think that the Saints are going to try a ground-and-pound approach behind Ingram and Khiry Robinson, along with a few seam routes for Jimmy Graham given the absence of KJ Wright. Red Bryant is going to have to have a monster game to help defeat the ground attack. I think we're up to it but I don't think this game will be nearly as one-sided as the first one was.

 

Back to the game for a sec fellas.

 

How worried should Hawks fans be about the recent ascendance of Mark Ingram? For the longest time he was looking like the prequel to Trent Richardson, but all of a sudden he's got a little more giddyup in his spurs. Check out numbers from his three most recent games:

 

Wildcard game @ Eagles: 18 carries, 97 yards, 1 TD

Week 17 game vs. Bucs: 3 carries, 20 yards

Week 16 game @ Panthers: 13 carries, 83 yards

 

So he's averaging 5,9 yds per carry over three games. Against some pretty decent defenses.

 

Now keep in mind the Hawks' run D is no slouch recently either. We shut down Zac Stacy (15 carries, 15 yards) in wk17 and he carved us up earlier in the year. We shut down Andre Brown of the Giants. Andre Ellington did a decent job with the Cards in wk16, 15 carries for 64 yards, but that includes one long gainer of 26 yards. Take out that one carry, Ellington generated 3.1 yds per carry on the other 14 carries.

 

We shut down Brees in the first meeting. I have to think that the Saints are going to try a ground-and-pound approach behind Ingram and Khiry Robinson, along with a few seam routes for Jimmy Graham given the absence of KJ Wright. Red Bryant is going to have to have a monster game to help defeat the ground attack. I think we're up to it but I don't think this game will be nearly as one-sided as the first one was.

I'm not worried about Ingram... He's not very good, and he's the type of RB we can stop. It's the young bruising back with quickness that can give us problems or physical with a great line (Gore)

Also, Ingram was the primary runner against us last time. At the time "I think" he was on a role and the primary guy over P. Thomas.

He had the most carries against us.

Sure, we need to stop him. But, I don't think that is where our problem would be overall..

 

Sproles on the screen would be more dangerous and need to focus on that. We did outstanding last time. Need to do that again. Sproles doesn't seem the same so that bodes well.

 

Graham is the big key!!!

 

Also we need to make sure Meachem OR Stills doesn't get deep on us.

 

Colston will be shut down easily. He's the type of Wide we excell against. Slower/big WR. So this helps overall vs Brees.

 

We matchup well against them. Need to pound them, no turnovers, and open the playbook if we are struggeling. Use the TE and Screen if Wilson is getting preasured. And where the heck is the Run/Pass option play with Wilson. That better be used more too.

P. Harvin - Wildcard.

[BunnysBastatrds 2,457]

Let's see. A few week ago, the Seattle Seahawks on a Monday Night game pulled down the Saint's pants and the nation laughed and laughed at their New Orleans itty bitty pink parts. Fast forward to this rematch, and all of the sudden the Saints are walking around with a swagger after beating the team to emerge out of the worst division in the NFL. You don't get over a demolition like that with lip service. Deep down, way down nestled inside the marrow of their bones, the Saints know exactly what is going to happen. They can deny it all they want. They can also create false controversy to try to get fired up. Sean Payton is whining that the Seahawks ran up the score in the previous game even though the Seahawks scored 7 points in the 2nd half, none in the 4th quarter. You know, Payton is a good coach, but when you resort to clown tactics like a Harbaugh would, then you deserve the beatdown that is coming. I don't want to just win. I want to run up the score. Really stick it in.

 

 

Where di Payton say they ran up the score? Haven't heard that here.

 

We are going to do what we did in the second half of last game. Shut down the run contain those poosay receivers. The Cardinals showed how easy it is.

[Hawkfin 32]

 

I'm not worried about Ingram... He's not very good, and he's the type of RB we can stop. It's the young bruising back with quickness that can give us problems or physical with a great line (Gore)

Also, Ingram was the primary runner against us last time. At the time "I think" he was on a role and the primary guy over P. Thomas.

He had the most carries against us.

Sure, we need to stop him. But, I don't think that is where our problem would be overall..

 

Sproles on the screen would be more dangerous and need to focus on that. We did outstanding last time. Need to do that again. Sproles doesn't seem the same so that bodes well.

 

Graham is the big key!!!

 

Also we need to make sure Meachem OR Stills doesn't get deep on us.

 

Colston will be shut down easily. He's the type of Wide we excell against. Slower/big WR. So this helps overall vs Brees.

 

We matchup well against them. Need to pound them, no turnovers, and open the playbook if we are struggeling. Use the TE and Screen if Wilson is getting preasured. And where the heck is the Run/Pass option play with Wilson. That better be used more too.

P. Harvin - Wildcard.

We are also at home, and our running defense is way better.

 

[BunnysBastatrds 2,457]

And don't worry about the refs. We'll be the ones getting all the bad calls.

[NewbieJr 541]

I'd like to see you post in your team thread.

Would you like to see my cack again, Swallowboy?

[NewbieJr 541]

And don't worry about the refs. We'll be the ones getting all the bad calls.

It's not bad calls that the Seahawks benefit from. It's the refs letting their big corners maul and hold receivers. And they'll let them here, too.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

 

Where di Payton say they ran up the score? Haven't heard that here.

 

 

Jimminy Crickets, Can't any of you do a Google search. Google is your friend:

 

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/seahawks/2014/01/08/did-seahawks-try-to-run-it-up-on-the-saints/

[FlaHawker 24]

Would you like to see my cack again, Swallowboy?

Geez more homosexual innuendo

[FlaHawker 24]

It's not bad calls that the Seahawks benefit from. It's the refs letting their big corners maul and hold receivers. And they'll let them here, too.

The refs let the Packers and 49er corners maul the WRs and to a man everyone said that was a great thing for the game. Let the players play.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Jimminy Crickets, Can't any of you do a Google search. Google is your friend:

 

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/seahawks/2014/01/08/did-seahawks-try-to-run-it-up-on-the-saints/

 

So Payton did not actually say it or he would have been quoted.

[jgcrawfish 232]

My god now you are plagiarizing Newbie. Listen idiot, the trick to plagiarism is to take information from people smarter than you (which is just about everyone) not dumber.

 

Wow, that's doubly rich. First because I'm surprised you can spell plagiarized. Second because you are the KING of pawning off stuff you read as your own amazing insights. You likely have never had an original thought in that enormous empty, colossally useless, melon on your shoulders. You post Seachicken football news like you were inside their locker room when we all know your fat, lazy ass has never seen the grass on a field (in any scenario most likely).

 

At this point you are the Lord Dipsh!t of the most obnoxious fanbase in all of sports that has never done, and will never do, anything...the self-appointed mouthpiece of a franchise that aspires to be as historically memorable as the Buffalo Bills. You are the endless vinegar and water supply to the collective dooshbag of Seahawks fandom.

 

 

 

(I await with bated breath your pathetic, repetitive and uninspiring response)

[phillybear 366]

 

Wait, when did he say the Hawks ran up the score?

 

Adam Schefter report ESPN on Monday.

[Hawkfin 32]

It's not bad calls that the Seahawks benefit from. It's the refs letting their big corners maul and hold receivers. And they'll let them here, too.

whaaa - You sound like the 49ers coach who bags for calls. (Hoping for bailouts)

We've had plenty of calls for holding wides and we lead the league in penalties called against us. Were not getting away with anything.

 

They are getting mauled, because they can't get off the line with our press coverage. Were allowed to play physical up to 5 yards, which is usually even pushed out to 7 yards or so by the league.

 

Don't go crying because we are a physical Def.

Every team holds. Every corner holds, pushes and shoves. And most every wide pushes and shoves off too.

(S.F. holds like hell on the Oline)

 

I agree - Let the players play like in the GB/SF game. That's the way a game should be called!

 

That's garbage to try and make a case that we're getting away with something. If the wide is not a pu$$y, then he can seperate or force the foul call. If not, then that's just good tight coverage.

 

Maybe it looks like holding to you cause Sherman is all up in there face and they can never seperate from him.

 

Either way - You got one thing right - Don't expect the foul call. And that's the way it should be, especially in the playoff's. And I agree 100% with the ref's if that's how they call it.

If not, well, then I hope we are smart enough to adapt and play less physical. But, that better go both ways then.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

So Payton did not actually say it or he would have been quoted.

Hi Chime Google is your friend

[FlaHawker 24]

 

Wow, that's doubly rich. First because I'm surprised you can spell plagiarized. Second because you are the KING of pawning off stuff you read as your own amazing insights. You likely have never had an original thought in that enormous empty, colossally useless, melon on your shoulders. You post Seachicken football news like you were inside their locker room when we all know your fat, lazy ass has never seen the grass on a field (in any scenario most likely).

 

At this point you are the Lord Dipsh!t of the most obnoxious fanbase in all of sports that has never done, and will never do, anything...the self-appointed mouthpiece of a franchise that aspires to be as historically memorable as the Buffalo Bills. You are the endless vinegar and water supply to the collective dooshbag of Seahawks fandom.

 

 

 

(I await with bated breath your pathetic, repetitive and uninspiring response)

So when did you move down from Pittsburgh? You refuse to answer.

[jgcrawfish 232]

So when did you move down from Pittsburgh? You refuse to answer.

 

Last time I checked, you're not my employer, not my wife, not my priest and not my God...I think that loosely translates to I don't owe you a fockin thing there Massengill.

 

[FlaHawker 24]

 

Last time I checked, you're not my employer, not my wife, not my priest and not my God...I think that loosely translates to I don't owe you a fockin thing there Massengill.

 

I don't blame you for not answering. Your self-esteem is a fragile. I'll answer for you: YOU'VE NEVER BEEN TO PITTSBURGH YOU BANDWAGON LOSER

[BunnysBastatrds 2,457]

Jimminy Crickets, Can't any of you do a Google search. Google is your friend:

 

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/seahawks/2014/01/08/did-seahawks-try-to-run-it-up-on-the-saints/

 

 

Still don't see where Payton accused them of running up the score. I can see where a coach would be aggravated going for it on 4th down with a few minutes left in the game and up by a few TD's.