***The Official Seattle Seahawks 2013 Season Thread***

[Sho Nuff 720]

That's rich...

You cant handle the truth.

[phillybear 366]

Some random thoughts on some topics you folks have mentioned.

 

The players love playing for Carroll, the team is tight, and free agents are coming here for below market value to compete for titles. Great situation to be in as you try to hold onto your best players under cap restrictions. We have no idea the rate of the cap expansion upcoming, so it's all speculative.

 

Cut Clemons. He was the entirety of the pass rush for the past few years, up until this year. He got his pay day after holding out. He's been having a quiet season, albeit coming off a horrific knee injury. Sorry dude.

 

Do not renegotiate Avril. Look, he signed to be with a contender for less money. He knew the deal. If there is money left at the end of the off season, the team will take care of him. But he has another year left.

 

Priority #1. Resign Bennett. He signed for less money to be with a contender, just like Avril. And like Avril, he's played out of his mind this year. Figure out a way to keep him. You might be able to resign him below market value again.

 

Make Golden Tate an offer. Don't break the bank. He's improved greatly and has shown big play ability and terrific YAC and return skills. Well, Harvin is going to show all that next year too. Except Tate is more on the outside while Harvin is over the middle. I'd love to keep Tate if the cap allows it.

 

If Tate leaves, I'd give an incentive offer to Sidney Rice. He'd come cheap, he has expressed a desire to stay, and he while he is injury prone, when healthy he has terrific hands and separation.

 

Sherman is going to be hard to keep. Again, it will be about how the cap escalates. You have to keep Earl Thomas. Sherman is iffy at his expected price. Would they price themselves down to stay as a unit? Why would they? But you then have to lock up Byron Maxwell long term as a safety net as he's been playing out of his mind. Walter Thurmond is up at the end of the year too. Can we keep him? Being that he's only been healthy one year, and that he got a suspension during it, he might be able to come cheaper as a result. But he's been excellent too.

[FlaHawker 24]

Some random thoughts on some topics you folks have mentioned.

 

The players love playing for Carroll, the team is tight, and free agents are coming here for below market value to compete for titles. Great situation to be in as you try to hold onto your best players under cap restrictions. We have no idea the rate of the cap expansion upcoming, so it's all speculative.

 

Cut Clemons. He was the entirety of the pass rush for the past few years, up until this year. He got his pay day after holding out. He's been having a quiet season, albeit coming off a horrific knee injury. Sorry dude.

 

Do not renegotiate Avril. Look, he signed to be with a contender for less money. He knew the deal. If there is money left at the end of the off season, the team will take care of him. But he has another year left.

 

Priority #1. Resign Bennett. He signed for less money to be with a contender, just like Avril. And like Avril, he's played out of his mind this year. Figure out a way to keep him. You might be able to resign him below market value again.

 

Make Golden Tate an offer. Don't break the bank. He's improved greatly and has shown big play ability and terrific YAC and return skills. Well, Harvin is going to show all that next year too. Except Tate is more on the outside while Harvin is over the middle. I'd love to keep Tate if the cap allows it.

 

If Tate leaves, I'd give an incentive offer to Sidney Rice. He'd come cheap, he has expressed a desire to stay, and he while he is injury prone, when healthy he has terrific hands and separation.

 

Sherman is going to be hard to keep. Again, it will be about how the cap escalates. You have to keep Earl Thomas. Sherman is iffy at his expected price. Would they price themselves down to stay as a unit? Why would they? But you then have to lock up Byron Maxwell long term as a safety net as he's been playing out of his mind. Walter Thurmond is up at the end of the year too. Can we keep him? Being that he's only been healthy one year, and that he got a suspension during it, he might be able to come cheaper as a result. But he's been excellent too.

We've been hearing for a few years the Jedi Johnny has several FA models that the team developed to deal with these sticky situations. I'm sure they have any and all scenarios accounted for. But I like you thoughts and agree across the board.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

You cant handle the truth.

 

Link to the truth?

[Hawkfin 32]

Some random thoughts on some topics you folks have mentioned.

 

The players love playing for Carroll, the team is tight, and free agents are coming here for below market value to compete for titles. Great situation to be in as you try to hold onto your best players under cap restrictions. We have no idea the rate of the cap expansion upcoming, so it's all speculative.

 

Cut Clemons. He was the entirety of the pass rush for the past few years, up until this year. He got his pay day after holding out. He's been having a quiet season, albeit coming off a horrific knee injury. Sorry dude.

 

Do not renegotiate Avril. Look, he signed to be with a contender for less money. He knew the deal. If there is money left at the end of the off season, the team will take care of him. But he has another year left.

 

Priority #1. Resign Bennett. He signed for less money to be with a contender, just like Avril. And like Avril, he's played out of his mind this year. Figure out a way to keep him. You might be able to resign him below market value again.

 

Make Golden Tate an offer. Don't break the bank. He's improved greatly and has shown big play ability and terrific YAC and return skills. Well, Harvin is going to show all that next year too. Except Tate is more on the outside while Harvin is over the middle. I'd love to keep Tate if the cap allows it.

 

If Tate leaves, I'd give an incentive offer to Sidney Rice. He'd come cheap, he has expressed a desire to stay, and he while he is injury prone, when healthy he has terrific hands and separation.

 

Sherman is going to be hard to keep. Again, it will be about how the cap escalates. You have to keep Earl Thomas. Sherman is iffy at his expected price. Would they price themselves down to stay as a unit? Why would they? But you then have to lock up Byron Maxwell long term as a safety net as he's been playing out of his mind. Walter Thurmond is up at the end of the year too. Can we keep him? Being that he's only been healthy one year, and that he got a suspension during it, he might be able to come cheaper as a result. But he's been excellent too.

I think Sherman is Priority #1 by far. Even over Earl Thomas. Both those two guy's are the one's you have to keep. Not even a question in my mind.

As much as I want to see Tate stay, if he's the fall guy then that just has to be. Harvin can easily replace him, and hell, Tate has done very little lately. Baldwin looks better. And Kearse looks to be something special or at least just as good.

 

S. Rice should be gone. Did I hear you right, he can seperate? Hell no he can't. He has 1 or 2 decent games all year and can never stay healthy, but his biggest problem is that he CAN'T seperate from defenders. He's a waist and I'd rather have Kearse become our deep man. I guess if he was dirt cheap, ok. But, he should be the last thing on our mind.

 

I'd like to keep one or two of those three DE's. But whatever we have to do as long as Sherman and Earl our here first.

Keep the LOB in tact! Top priority out side of R. Wilson.

 

I think we'll get it right. Love Schneider

[phillybear 366]

I think Sherman is Priority #1 by far. Even over Earl Thomas. Both those two guy's are the one's you have to keep. Not even a question in my mind.

As much as I want to see Tate stay, if he's the fall guy then that just has to be. Harvin can easily replace him, and hell, Tate has done very little lately. Baldwin looks better. And Kearse looks to be something special or at least just as good.

 

S. Rice should be gone. Did I hear you right, he can seperate? Hell no he can't. He has 1 or 2 decent games all year and can never stay healthy, but his biggest problem is that he CAN'T seperate from defenders. He's a waist and I'd rather have Kearse become our deep man. I guess if he was dirt cheap, ok. But, he should be the last thing on our mind.

 

I'd like to keep one or two of those three DE's. But whatever we have to do as long as Sherman and Earl our here first.

Keep the LOB in tact! Top priority out side of R. Wilson.

 

I think we'll get it right. Love Schneider

 

I think Rice can be affordable. Of all the main WRs the past two years, Rice, Tate, Baldwin, this year Kearse, Rice is the only guy that can consistently get open in the redzone. And Wilson goes to him because of that. The other guys need some distance to run past a defensive back to separate. Rice can do it in short space. He's the red zone guy, and one of the reasons that Wilson's passing stats stayed flat overall from last year instead of jumping forward. Sure, he can go deep, but I want red zone efficiency. And if you let Miller go, you are letting another red zone target walk away without a suitable replacement.

 

I think the odds are against them bringing back an old injured WR, but I'm throwing it out there because I think it fills a specific need. Rice has made some ridiculous acrobatic catches the past couple of years to make Wilson look good, and that hit he took in OT to win the game vs the Bears was tough.

 

Edit: although, I believe Rice is still signed. We are all assuming he will be cut. Then and only then maybe brought back if the price is right.

[Hawkfin 32]

Keys to beating Denver:

First, I was happy to see our Offense open up vs S.F. I thought the play calling was much better and more mixed up. I thought that had a lot to do with our win and sustained drives. Also, it opened up our run game.

 

-Need to continoue this offense play calling - As well as long sustained drives keeping Manning off the field.

-Just because we have Harvin, don't forget about Kearse. (Kearse has really stepped up for us this year. Catches that deep ball/open)

-Untilize everybody, but pound them too. Always run first in the redzone until they stop it, and then fake off of it.

 

Def keys:
-Your not going to sack Manning, but keep the continoued pressure up.

-PLEASE, stop that fing Draw play. They run from it ALL the time. With our DE's going out wide, the middle needs pressure/stopped

-Def Coord took a step back against 49ers. No called blitzes or anything creative to rush Kaep. Not saying Manning should be blitzed, but some pressure up the middle would be good at times and also stopping the draw.

-Stop the Thomas's. We need to take both of them out of the game. (Let Decker and Welker try to beat us - But hit them hard after catch)

-Frustrate Manning - Frustrate Manning - Frustrate Manning - And get those turnovers.

-Hold to FG's.

 

GO HAWKS!

I think we take this boys.

[Groundhog 24]

Some random thoughts on some topics you folks have mentioned.

 

The players love playing for Carroll, the team is tight, and free agents are coming here for below market value to compete for titles. Great situation to be in as you try to hold onto your best players under cap restrictions. We have no idea the rate of the cap expansion upcoming, so it's all speculative.

 

Cut Clemons. He was the entirety of the pass rush for the past few years, up until this year. He got his pay day after holding out. He's been having a quiet season, albeit coming off a horrific knee injury. Sorry dude.

 

Do not renegotiate Avril. Look, he signed to be with a contender for less money. He knew the deal. If there is money left at the end of the off season, the team will take care of him. But he has another year left.

 

Priority #1. Resign Bennett. He signed for less money to be with a contender, just like Avril. And like Avril, he's played out of his mind this year. Figure out a way to keep him. You might be able to resign him below market value again.

 

Make Golden Tate an offer. Don't break the bank. He's improved greatly and has shown big play ability and terrific YAC and return skills. Well, Harvin is going to show all that next year too. Except Tate is more on the outside while Harvin is over the middle. I'd love to keep Tate if the cap allows it.

 

If Tate leaves, I'd give an incentive offer to Sidney Rice. He'd come cheap, he has expressed a desire to stay, and he while he is injury prone, when healthy he has terrific hands and separation.

 

Sherman is going to be hard to keep. Again, it will be about how the cap escalates. You have to keep Earl Thomas. Sherman is iffy at his expected price. Would they price themselves down to stay as a unit? Why would they? But you then have to lock up Byron Maxwell long term as a safety net as he's been playing out of his mind. Walter Thurmond is up at the end of the year too. Can we keep him? Being that he's only been healthy one year, and that he got a suspension during it, he might be able to come cheaper as a result. But he's been excellent too.

 

Agree with pretty much all of this. Priority #1 to me is getting Earl locked up long-term. The next best guy on the roster at his position is Chris Maragos. Yeesh. Sherman has been a revelation at CB but they have Maxwell, they have Thurmond, and they even have Tharold Simon waiting in the wings if Sherman's salary demands are too high. I definitely would like to keep Sherm, but for me he is priority #3.

 

Priority #2 would be to re-sign Bennett. He has been the most disruptive force on the D-line, pretty much all season.

 

Priority #4 would be Golden Tate.

 

The common theme with all of these guys is that they are all relatively young, and have all been relatively healthy. I don't think we can afford to allocate too many dollars to guys who are up for renewal but are either (1) getting old, (2) have an injury history, or (3) both. I think this means sayonara to Clemons, because he will be 32 I think next year and we got way more out of him than we had any right to expect to after obtaining him from the Eagles (for a 5th rounder I think?). It also means sayonara to Rice because he cannot stay on the field. Technically you could say the same about Harvin, except Harvin has world-class speed whereas Rice's key attribute is height plus a little speed. Rice can be more easily replaced. So he's the one who has to go. Thurmond is an interesting case. He was a 4th rounder to begin with because of injury concerns. Then he continued to get injured. He finally kicked the injury bug this year, only to run into a PED violation. I have a feeling we can retain him cheap because of these factors, but if he demands big money, I would let him go. Finding a guy for nickel coverage in the draft this year is always an option too.

 

Speaking of draft-eligible DBs: keep an eye out for Pierre Desir of Lindenwood College and Stanley Jean-Baptiste of Nebraska. Both have great length, both are tall, both showed pretty good promise at the Senior Bowl. I would probably be fine with either of these guys as a 2nd rounder. Of course, I would like the brain-trust to trade down out of the first round in order to get back our 3rd rounder that we lost in the Harvin deal.

 

We are probably going to have to make some cap cuts elsewhere too. Can we afford Zach Miller with Luke Willson showing some promise this year? Can we afford Paul McQuistan or Breno Giacomini? These are all good problems to have, when you have too many good players and not enough cap room.

 

Thinking ahead, after next season, presumably Russell Wilson will want to renegotiate. Especially if he already has a ring by that point. So come 2016, we will be more like lots of other teams that dedicate a ton of cap room to the QB. I wonder if this means that the team avoids longer-term deals now, so that if we have to make cuts in 2016, we aren't swimming in dead money.

[Hawkfin 32]

 

I think Rice can be affordable. Of all the main WRs the past two years, Rice, Tate, Baldwin, this year Kearse, Rice is the only guy that can consistently get open in the redzone. And Wilson goes to him because of that. The other guys need some distance to run past a defensive back to separate. Rice can do it in short space. He's the red zone guy, and one of the reasons that Wilson's passing stats stayed flat overall from last year instead of jumping forward. Sure, he can go deep, but I want red zone efficiency. And if you let Miller go, you are letting another red zone target walk away without a suitable replacement.

 

I think the odds are against them bringing back an old injured WR, but I'm throwing it out there because I think it fills a specific need. Rice has made some ridiculous acrobatic catches the past couple of years to make Wilson look good, and that hit he took in OT to win the game vs the Bears was tough.

 

Edit: although, I believe Rice is still signed. We are all assuming he will be cut. Then and only then maybe brought back if the price is right.

I think you over think S. Rice because he scores once in awhile OR because he's not been here so you expect IF he was then it would be better. He usually scores from way out, not up close. He's not much of a redzone threat at all IMO.

If you look at his numbers, the TD's are not there and most are longer ones. I think Tate is a better redzone player actually.

 

I would bet if he played all year, his stats wouldn't be much differenet then he's ever put up or other wides we have. He just disappears. He's a max 6 TD guy if he can even stay healthy. I feel he has litttle seperation, and I actually think he gets worse at the goalline and more bottled up. He has the height, but doesn't take advantage of it.

 

Wilson can utilize anybody in the redzone. S. Rice surely isn't making it better for him.

Z. Miller is a different topic - I don't really want to lose him. But if we do, we need to fill this hole with another redzone TE.

[Kopy 570]

I think Thomas is much more important than Sherman is.

And Baldwin is more important than Tate is.

I can go with the idea of cutting Clemmons and resigning Bennett.

I think I'm also fine with letting Miller go. And getting a rookie (It's a really good TE class) to pair with Willson and McCoy.

Those are just my thoughts when comparing position players. Of course in a perfect world I'd like to keep everyone.

 

I believe the real turnover will be on the oline. I still think McQuiston and Carpenter are both gone. And yes I do like Giacominni. But not at his salary, it'll just be far to high for his worth imo.

[Hawkfin 32]

I think Thomas is much more important than Sherman is.

And Baldwin is more important than Tate is.

I can go with the idea of cutting Clemmons and resigning Bennett.

I think I'm also fine with letting Miller go. And getting a rookie (It's a really good TE class) to pair with Willson and McCoy.

Those are just my thoughts when comparing position players. Of course in a perfect world I'd like to keep everyone.

 

I believe the real turnover will be on the oline. I still think McQuiston and Carpenter are both gone. And yes I do like Giacominni. But not at his salary, it'll just be far to high for his worth imo.

I understand Thomas is our #1 or #2 priority. But, much more important then Sherman?

How do you figure?

 

I get that we have little depth after Thomas, but safety is an easier position to find then Corner and IMO not as important. And you already have Chanchlor locked up who's great. Safety's can almost come right in and be plugged in and they can be hidden easier if they are a weakness.

A shutdown corner like Sherman (Who by the way allows Thomas to roam free or play more on the weak corner side) does wonders.

You don't have that shutdown corner and EVERYTHING on Def slips and is not the same.

 

Thomas (while a head hunter) is fast, but he also lacks height and prone to missed tackles with a work horse RB.

Sherman is both fast, tall, more Physical, Good tackler, and also best at a harder position to play in the NFL.

He's younger too right?

 

I would say I personally like Chanchlor more then Thomas, and Sherman is up there with Chance. Thomas is #3 on Def to me.

Now I think we need to keep BOTH (At all others cost) - But Sherman to me is my #1 or tied with Thomas.

 

I think people are spoiled and think we can pick CB's a dime a dozen. And we really can pick them, but If we lose Sherman, you will see Maxwell struggle and will never pan out to be a #1 shutdown. (And if anybody should be gone at CB it's Browner and Thurmand)

 

Look what happened to the Jets when Revis left. They thought they had just as good of a cover corner and good Def. to overcome it. The entire Def slipped, the field was opened up on everybody, and now that corner that was suppost to take over for Revis is probably going to be cut/gone. They are starting over with a rookie in the HOPE they have the next Revis.

[Skinny_Bastard 157]

Pure a@@ bump.

[FlaHawker 24]

I think Thomas is much more important than Sherman is.

And Baldwin is more important than Tate is.

I can go with the idea of cutting Clemmons and resigning Bennett.

I think I'm also fine with letting Miller go. And getting a rookie (It's a really good TE class) to pair with Willson and McCoy.

Those are just my thoughts when comparing position players. Of course in a perfect world I'd like to keep everyone.

 

I believe the real turnover will be on the oline. I still think McQuiston and Carpenter are both gone. And yes I do like Giacominni. But not at his salary, it'll just be far to high for his worth imo.

I like Breno as well and hope they bring him back. He's loved in the locker room so that should count for something. Financially Miller should go but that will be a mistake. Hopefully he will re-structure. He's invaluable.

[FlaHawker 24]

I understand Thomas is our #1 or #2 priority. But, much more important then Sherman?

How do you figure?

 

I get that we have little depth after Thomas, but safety is an easier position to find then Corner and IMO not as important. And you already have Chanchlor locked up who's great. Safety's can almost come right in and be plugged in and they can be hidden easier if they are a weakness.

A shutdown corner like Sherman (Who by the way allows Thomas to roam free or play more on the weak corner side) does wonders.

You don't have that shutdown corner and EVERYTHING on Def slips and is not the same.

 

Thomas (while a head hunter) is fast, but he also lacks height and prone to missed tackles with a work horse RB.

Sherman is both fast, tall, more Physical, Good tackler, and also best at a harder position to play in the NFL.

He's younger too right?

 

I would say I personally like Chanchlor more then Thomas, and Sherman is up there with Chance. Thomas is #3 on Def to me.

Now I think we need to keep BOTH (At all others cost) - But Sherman to me is my #1 or tied with Thomas.

 

I think people are spoiled and think we can pick CB's a dime a dozen. And we really can pick them, but If we lose Sherman, you will see Maxwell struggle and will never pan out to be a #1 shutdown. (And if anybody should be gone at CB it's Browner and Thurmand)

 

Look what happened to the Jets when Revis left. They thought they had just as good of a cover corner and good Def. to overcome it. The entire Def slipped, the field was opened up on everybody, and now that corner that was suppost to take over for Revis is probably going to be cut/gone. They are starting over with a rookie in the HOPE they have the next Revis.

Age, money, off field issues = Browner won't be back.

[Groundhog 24]

I understand Thomas is our #1 or #2 priority. But, much more important then Sherman?

How do you figure?

 

I get that we have little depth after Thomas, but safety is an easier position to find then Corner and IMO not as important. And you already have Chanchlor locked up who's great. Safety's can almost come right in and be plugged in and they can be hidden easier if they are a weakness.

A shutdown corner like Sherman (Who by the way allows Thomas to roam free or play more on the weak corner side) does wonders.

You don't have that shutdown corner and EVERYTHING on Def slips and is not the same.

 

 

 

I'm not sure you understand what it means for the Hawks to play a Cover-3 defense, which they are in, a lot. Earl is not roaming free. There are three guys covering the deep pass: Sherman and Maxwell each get 1/3 of the field, and Earl gets the middle 1/3. This leaves Chancellor the ability to roam the short middle like an extra LB. So the Hawks run D benefits from 8 in the box, and the long pass is defended by three guys.

 

The easiest way to attack this defense is to go short middle. Earl has the rare ability to start out with deep middle responsibility and then have the speed to recover for the short passing game. Remember his breakup of a pass to Jimmy Graham in the divisional playoff game, the breakup where it almost looked like pass interference? No other FS is getting there in time.

 

If we lost Earl, then we've got Chris Maragos sitting back there defending the long throw up the middle, which means we would get picked apart on short throws to Julius Thomas or whoever in the middle, because Maragos won't get there in time.

 

Obviously if we lost Sherm, then whoever replaces him (Jeremy Lane?) is going to get picked on because he won't do as good a job. But to me, in this defense, that is less important than if we lost Earl.

[Hawkfin 32]

I understand what were playing, but things would change if we lost either guy. You won't be able to run it the same way or at least at the same level.

Most likely our Def would have to adjust to what's best suited by our personal.

If you don't have Sherman taking his part of the field, then your still screwed. So what's your point?

The difference is Sherman is also manning up the best wide too and slowing them down. And we don't always run cover 3.

 

Regardless, I think both will be back anyway. And I bet they both will be the top priority, which they should be.

 

To me, the system we run is a non issue to the point. You can say Earl (middle of the field), I'll say Sherman (strong side of the field). They both handle their business and without either it gets much harder.

 

And I'm not saying to roll out there with C. Maragos if it came to that. If we lost Thomas then we have a HUGE hole and need to draft there or free agent a cheaper product.

My point - Sherman should not be #3 option or on the Tate level of need. He's right there with Thomas to me.

They are 1A 1B and then everybody else.

 

P.S. - I still think Thomas leans more to the "weak side of the field - opposite Sherman" when possible and sometimes roams when given the chance. Maybe roaming is not the right word. But, he has more freedom because he's not lined up over a wide usually and knows Sherman will handle his man. Of course depending on where Chancellor is too.

[BunnysBastatrds 2,442]

Hey...leave him alone. He has to try something new.

Since adding 34 to my name didn't work. Calling me chime didn't work (since he chimes into topics unprovoked more than anyone else here)..baldy did nothing. So now he has to try shorty.

 

Oh, and I give him credit, he even tried talking about football today.

He's doing his best. Let him. Petty Carroll has special footballs for him in make believe land.

[murf74 461]

He's doing his best. Let him. Petty Carroll has special footballs for him in make believe land.

He does live there doesn't he?

[NewbieJr 541]

Well, we all found out why Marshawn Lynch doesn't talk to the media. Holy crap! How doers he even function? He is Flahawker-level stupid.

[FlaHawker 24]

Well, we all found out why Marshawn Lynch doesn't talk to the media. Holy crap! How doers he even function? He is Flahawker-level stupid.

Says the guy who couldn't save enough money to put his daughter through college. Really.Sad.

[FlaHawker 24]

Well, we all found out why Marshawn Lynch doesn't talk to the media. Holy crap! How doers he even function? He is Flahawker-level stupid.

Hmmm how does Marshawn function? Well, he's functioned all the way to the NFL and endorsement deals. You've functioned all the way to the warehouse. Congrats Newbs you're a raging success!! LOL

[NewbieJr 541]

Hmmm how does Marshawn function? Well, he's functioned all the way to the NFL and endorsement deals. You've functioned all the way to the warehouse. Congrats Newbs you're a raging success!! LOL

Mike Tyson succeeded in life too. And Leon Spinks. I didn't say he wasn't a success. I said he's dumb as a soap dish. Surely, you can relate.

[Hawkfin 32]

Well, we all found out why Marshawn Lynch doesn't talk to the media. Holy crap! How doers he even function? He is Flahawker-level stupid.

Why do you come here bashing Seahawks all the time? Who the fuk cares what you think!

[NewbieJr 541]

Why do you come here bashing Seahawks all the time? Who the fuk cares what you think!

You apparently.

[jgcrawfish 232]

Says the guy who couldn't save enough money to put his daughter through college. Really.Sad.

WTF does this have to do with anything? He's right, Lynch is a complete dumbass. Fortunately for him as a football player, and you as a professional broom pusher, intelligence isn't a pre-req.

 

However, I wasn't under the impression that we had to put our kids through college, in fact I was pretty sure getting through college is the KIDS responsibility. But we shouldn't expect a short, fat, bald, single, virginal jackass such as yourself to even comprehend that. Just because Darwinism in the females of our species has ruled out ANY possibility of you spawning a flock of Flahawker Jr retards (thank God) makes you distinctly unqualified to judge anybody else on it.

 

[FlaHawker 24]

WTF does this have to do with anything? He's right, Lynch is a complete dumbass. Fortunately for him as a football player, and you as a professional broom pusher, intelligence isn't a pre-req.

 

However, I wasn't under the impression that we had to put our kids through college, in fact I was pretty sure getting through college is the KIDS responsibility. But we shouldn't expect a short, fat, bald, single, virginal jackass such as yourself to even comprehend that. Just because Darwinism in the females of our species has ruled out ANY possibility of you spawning a flock of Flahawker Jr retards (thank God) makes you distinctly unqualified to judge anybody else on it.

 

Clownish on full tilt. Here's a quarter go call someone who gives a fock what you think. OBTW Succop missed that FG again

[FlaHawker 24]

Why do you come here bashing Seahawks all the time? Who the fuk cares what you think!

Why do the trolls like Newbie come here? I'll fill you in as you only started posting here in 2010. Back in 2009 I created a legend of a thread called IT'S AN EXCITING TIME TO BE A SEAHAWKS FAN. The trolls went off the deep end. However, I didn't allow them to drop smacks and insults unchallenged. I hurt their feelings so now they are on a mission to attack every Seahawks thread and will tell you that they are doing it because of me. That was great thread. Sorry you missed it!

[Sho Nuff 720]

Why do the trolls like Newbie come here? I'll fill you in as you only started posting here in 2010. Back in 2009 I created a legend of a thread called IT'S AN EXCITING TIME TO BE A SEAHAWKS FAN. The trolls went off the deep end. However, I didn't allow them to drop smacks and insults unchallenged. I hurt their feelings so now they are on a mission to attack every Seahawks thread and will tell you that they are doing it because of me. That was great thread. Sorry you missed it!

 

The only one who continues to go off the deep end is you.

Its a tip...people have kept mocking you, because you have continued to make an ass out of yourself on this board and in the geek club.

You didn't hurt anyone's feelings...nobody else is on tilt...you don't get to anyone.

You just continue to look stupid.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

The only one who continues to go off the deep end is you.

Its a tip...people have kept mocking you, because you have continued to make an ass out of yourself on this board and in the geek club.

You didn't hurt anyone's feelings...nobody else is on tilt...you don't get to anyone.

You just continue to look stupid.

See what I mean Hawkfin?

[Hawkfin 32]

I joined in 2010 so I could post.... But, I've been here lurking for at least 10 years before that probably for F.F. purposes.

So I was here well before you posted that link.

 

But anyway, just seems like a whole new level of hatred (Or jealousy) aimed at the Hawks and not just you.

 

Whatever though, don't really want to get into it. Not worth my time.

[Sho Nuff 720]

See what I mean Hawkfin?

 

See what you mean? That every point you tried going over as to why people are here was refuted with the actual truth?

Face it...you reply to even solid football posts with antagonistic crap. Its all you have ever done.

Even when people are in the middle of football discussion with other actual good Seahawks fans. You constantly chime in to bash people rather than actually have a civil discussion.

You created the mess chief.

[Sho Nuff 720]

I joined in 2010 so I could post.... But, I've been here lurking for at least 10 years before that probably for F.F. purposes.

So I was here well before you posted that link.

 

But anyway, just seems like a whole new level of hatred (Or jealousy) aimed at the Hawks and not just you.

 

Whatever though, don't really want to get into it. Not worth my time.

 

Where is this new level of hate for the Hawks? Or even jealousy?

They are a great team now...no doubt about that. But what do most fans have to be jealous of?

Im a Packers fan. We have 4 SB titles...more overall championships than any other team and are doing quite well right now.

Not a jealous bone in my body about the Seahawks.

It all comes down to mainly one poster acting like a d-bag (I ignore more of Philly's whining at this point...he is stuck on the same ol Schtick he has had for years).

When he talks football...he can do it pretty well.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

See what you mean? That every point you tried going over as to why people are here was refuted with the actual truth?

Face it...you reply to even solid football posts with antagonistic crap. Its all you have ever done.

Even when people are in the middle of football discussion with other actual good Seahawks fans. You constantly chime in to bash people rather than actually have a civil discussion.

You created the mess chief.

Exhibit B.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

Where is this new level of hate for the Hawks? Or even jealousy?

They are a great team now...no doubt about that. But what do most fans have to be jealous of?

Im a Packers fan. We have 4 SB titles...more overall championships than any other team and are doing quite well right now.

Not a jealous bone in my body about the Seahawks.

It all comes down to mainly one poster acting like a d-bag (I ignore more of Philly's whining at this point...he is stuck on the same ol Schtick he has had for years).

When he talks football...he can do it pretty well.

Exhibit C. (see a Packer fan comes in a Seahawk thread because of me).

[FlaHawker 24]

I joined in 2010 so I could post.... But, I've been here lurking for at least 10 years before that probably for F.F. purposes.

So I was here well before you posted that link.

 

But anyway, just seems like a whole new level of hatred (Or jealousy) aimed at the Hawks and not just you.

 

Whatever though, don't really want to get into it. Not worth my time.

Gotcha!

[phillybear 366]

I joined in 2010 so I could post.... But, I've been here lurking for at least 10 years before that probably for F.F. purposes.

So I was here well before you posted that link.

 

But anyway, just seems like a whole new level of hatred (Or jealousy) aimed at the Hawks and not just you.

 

Whatever though, don't really want to get into it. Not worth my time.

 

Don't spend any time worrying about it.

 

The popular excuse to invade the Seattle Seahawk threads is to fight with FlaHawker and myself, but that's a pretty faggitty explanation. No, the real reason is that these fans of other teams just really, really, crave the feel of an excited purple dragon spurting yogurt onto their eager faces.

[Sho Nuff 720]

Exhibit C. (see a Packer fan comes in a Seahawk thread because of me).

 

Not quite (and not shocking you didn't understand anything that was said and can't see that you have focked this thread up and this place up for some time now)

[BunnysBastatrds 2,442]

Shake those awful cans babies.

[BunnysBastatrds 2,442]

 

Don't spend any time worrying about it.

 

The popular excuse to invade the Seattle Seahawk threads is to fight with FlaHawker and myself, but that's a pretty faggitty explanation. No, the real reason is that these fans of other teams just really, really, crave the feel of an excited purple dragon spurting yogurt onto their eager faces.

.

 

You reduced to yogurt now? That sucks!

[jgcrawfish 232]

 

Don't spend any time worrying about it.

 

The popular excuse to invade the Seattle Seahawk threads is to fight with FlaHawker and myself, but that's a pretty faggitty explanation. No, the real reason is that these fans of other teams just really, really, crave the feel of an excited purple dragon spurting yogurt onto their eager faces.

It's nice of you to console him, very thoughtful. Philly bear, you're a jackass, but at least you're an entertaining jackass. Not some plagaristic retread dooshbag who hasn't had an original thought in his head ever, like Flahooker. Reads an article or a post on another website and posts it here like he's got insider information in the Hawks clubhouse. I've said it before, he's pretty much single handedly caused me to dislike a team I didn't dislike previously. He's the epitome of an internet troll.