BunnysBastatrds 2,447 Posted January 20, 2014 Little old ladies with cans filled with rocks threw the Saints off their game, twice  The "loudest" stadium in the league cheats at being the loudest stadium using old ladys shaking cans of rocks. What you going to do without your twelfth granny? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 20, 2014 Â The "loudest" stadium in the league cheats at being the loudest stadium using old ladys shaking cans of rocks. What you going to do without your twelfth granny? The 12th Granny's nicknamed Graham Jimmah 1-Catch! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkfin 32 Posted January 21, 2014 At Murf: Â I personally don't think the games were called remotely close to the same lop sidedness. I thought that game was the biggest rob job ever in NFL history. I mean play after play the ref's kept favoring Pitts I felt. I don't see play after play hurting 49ers. They got a few calls not go there way that basically ended up having zero impact, and the ref's corrected most every call they could that was wrong. But overall, they let both teams play the game and didn't interfere much with it at all, unlike the Seattle/Pitts game. Â BUT, I did actually go back and watch that SB again. It was not nearly as bad as I first thought, but still bad. And you're right, Seattle that year let big plays happen on them. And they could have won it despite the ref's if they just played there game with a better performance. We did not have a team capable of overcoming calls when our momentum was stopped. Â Bottom line: I thought there was a lot of bad calls (or calls not being called) in that pitts game, but I personally never continued to whine about it. Maybe other Hawk fans did? OR probably what upsets you is that the entire media outlet did, which butt hurt your superbowl win. I don't see the entire media questioning this game at all? Only a few of you here who hate the Hawks and Sherman, or most likely a few of my fellow Hawk board members. Â I don't consider the two games called the same at all. Maybe the plays laid out like that one, but not the favoritism refs. There was not even that many penalty's in this one and drive killers or free bee's. Clean game that was played out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 21, 2014 At Murf: Â I personally don't think the games were called remotely close to the same lop sidedness. I thought that game was the biggest rob job ever in NFL history. I mean play after play the ref's kept favoring Pitts I felt. I don't see play after play hurting 49ers. They got a few calls not go there way that basically ended up having zero impact, and the ref's corrected most every call they could that was wrong. But overall, they let both teams play the game and didn't interfere much with it at all, unlike the Seattle/Pitts game. Â BUT, I did actually go back and watch that SB again. It was not nearly as bad as I first thought, but still bad. And you're right, Seattle that year let big plays happen on them. And they could have won it despite the ref's if they just played there game with a better performance. We did not have a team capable of overcoming calls when our momentum was stopped. Â Bottom line: I thought there was a lot of bad calls (or calls not being called) in that pitts game, but I personally never continued to whine about it. Maybe other Hawk fans did? OR probably what upsets you is that the entire media outlet did, which butt hurt your superbowl win. I don't see the entire media questioning this game at all? Only a few of you here who hate the Hawks and Sherman, or most likely a few of my fellow Hawk board members. Â I don't consider the two games called the same at all. Maybe the plays laid out like that one, but not the favoritism refs. There was not even that many penalty's in this one and drive killers or free bee's. Clean game that was played out. You hit the nail on the head. Polls, pundits and even the ref said Seattle was robbed and Murf is butt hurt. You now understand Murf's little mind. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted January 21, 2014 Did anyone really think a mediocre team like San Francisco and a mediocre QB like Kaepernick were going to beat the Seahawks? Â Yep. A ton of pundits on TV pre-game. Holy cow. They were falling all over themselves picking the Niners all day long on Sunday. And damned if they could come up with a single good reason. One nitwit said it's hard to beat a team three times in one season, implying Seattle won the first two meetings this year. Another clown said the Niners would score over 35 points in the game. Is nobody paying attention to anything happening on the West Coast, ever? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 21, 2014 Did anyone really think a mediocre team like San Francisco and a mediocre QB like Kaepernick were going to beat the Seahawks? Â Yep. A ton of pundits on TV pre-game. Holy cow. They were falling all over themselves picking the Niners all day long on Sunday. And damned if they could come up with a single good reason. One nitwit said it's hard to beat a team three times in one season, implying Seattle won the first two meetings this year. Another clown said the Niners would score over 35 points in the game. Is nobody paying attention to anything happening on the West Coast, ever? Warren Sapp predicted that the 49ers would put up 35 points. He also predicted 4 years ago that Pete Carroll had no chance to lead NFL players.when the Seahawks hired him. I guess Sapp graduated from Newbie Sr High School. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 21, 2014 Did anyone really think a mediocre team like San Francisco and a mediocre QB like Kaepernick were going to beat the Seahawks? Â Yep. A ton of pundits on TV pre-game. Holy cow. They were falling all over themselves picking the Niners all day long on Sunday. And damned if they could come up with a single good reason. One nitwit said it's hard to beat a team three times in one season, implying Seattle won the first two meetings this year. Another clown said the Niners would score over 35 points in the game. Is nobody paying attention to anything happening on the West Coast, ever? Crapernick now has the choker label. Choked against the Ravens and choked again against Seattle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted January 21, 2014 Crapernick now has the choker label. Choked against the Ravens and choked again against Seattle. Â I think it was Mooch that predicted that Kaepernick wouldn't throw a pick vs Seattle. I dam near sobered up. It was the nuttiest thing I'd ever heard. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phillybear 366 Posted January 21, 2014 Well, there won't be any talk of not earning anything. 13-3, winning the best division in football, beating the Saints in a rain storm, beating the 2nd best team in the conference in the Niners, and now you get to play Peyton Manning and the top offense in the NFL. And still getting played as the villains, the bad guys, the wrestling heels that everybody wants to boo. Absolutely still the underdogs. The All American Peyton Manning and his cardboard tasting pizza commercials and the coach with a heart problem vs Seadderall Cheathawks and Richard Smacktalk Sherman. Wes Welker tries to kill somebody, and all anybody can talk about is Richard Sherman. Â The thing to take away is "The Immaculate Deflection". Â It just keeps getting more and more surreal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 21, 2014 Well, there won't be any talk of not earning anything. 13-3, winning the best division in football, beating the Saints in a rain storm, beating the 2nd best team in the conference in the Niners, and now you get to play Peyton Manning and the top offense in the NFL. And still getting played as the villains, the bad guys, the wrestling heels that everybody wants to boo. Absolutely still the underdogs. The All American Peyton Manning and his cardboard tasting pizza commercials and the coach with a heart problem vs Seadderall Cheathawks and Richard Smacktalk Sherman. Wes Welker tries to kill somebody, and all anybody can talk about is Richard Sherman. Â The thing to take away is "The Immaculate Deflection". Â It just keeps getting more and more surreal. I wouldn't want it any other way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kopy 570 Posted January 21, 2014 Â I think it was Mooch that predicted that Kaepernick wouldn't throw a pick vs Seattle. I dam near sobered up. It was the nuttiest thing I'd ever heard. I told everyone at work I wasn't worried about this game. The key reason was unlike G.B. or Carolina. We would drop his interceptions. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Groundhog 24 Posted January 21, 2014 Already listed reason they won and they were no different than Seattle from yesterday. So sorry you don't think Seattle earned it. Cause these games were identical  no, the games were not identical. Let's think about the key refereeing decisions in each game:  1. Offensive pass interference on Darrell Jackson. - instead of a 7-0 lead for the Hawks, it is a 3-0 lead. I could argue that he didn't gain an advantage after pushing off, because the defensive back didn't budge. It takes four points off the board for the Hawks.  2. Ben's phantom rushing TD - if the call is made correctly, it is 4th and goal instead of a TD. The replays show he was down short of the goal line. Maybe Cowher kicks the field goal in order to get some points on the board. Maybe he remembers the Bus fumbling at the 2 in their divisional round game against the Colts and nearly losing that game if not for Ben tackling the guy at midfield. Or maybe he goes for it and the score is still 7-3 anyway. We'll never know.  3. Offensive holding on Sean Locklear. - this is the referee play of the game. Wiping out a 30-yard gain to Jerramy Stevens to the 2-yd line, and therefore killing a 1st and goal situation. Keep in mind, the Hawks had Big Walt at LT and Hutch at LG. Shaun Alexander had scored on something like 25 short yardage plunges over the left side that year. Everyone knew what was coming all year and no one could stop it anyway. So if that penalty was never called, the Hawks are almost certainly going ahead 17-14 early in the 4th quarter. It is easily an entirely different ballgame.  4. Clipping call on Matt Hasselbeck. - the 2nd most absurd call of the day, shortly after the Locklear one. But the Steelers had the ball at this point so instead of being at midfield or thereabouts, it would have been a longer haul for them, up 14-10. This is the least important bad call.  Now think about the bad calls the Niners got:  5. Kearse fumbles at the 1 yd line. - fantastic play by Bowman, I can't even imagine how he could hold on to the ball after shredding his knee like that. Why that play is not reviewable makes no sense to me, but here's the important thing to remember: instead of getting a 1st and 10 at the one yard line, the Niners ended up with a 1st and 10 at their 12 yard line. They actually ended up better off because of it! Lynch's bobble on the next play meant that the Hawks earned no points on that drive.  6. Running into the kicker call. - since the Hawk player stumbled into his plant leg, that should have been a 15-yarder and a first down. Niners would have had the ball at their own 35, which is pretty good field position but still at least 30 yards away from a long field goal try. We'll never know if they would have capitalized. On the Hawks side, we know that their drive after the Niners punted, stalled, no points.  Am I missing any bad calls against the Niners? I think those were the two biggies. The 1st of two Russell Wilson 'get me out of here' heaves was not called intentional grounding, but the 2nd one was. But if the rule says that the ball needs to get past the line of scrimmage, which it did, then the first one was an ok play and not grounding. The second one did not, and it was flagged. If you don't like the call, it's not that you're arguing that the refs made a bad call, you're just saying you don't like the rule.  Bottom line, there were at least three instances in Super Bowl XL where Seahawk points were taken off the board, or Steelers points were added, because of key calls. Nothing like that happened in this game.  To be fair to the Steelers, Willie Parker's 75-yard TD run was earned, and so was Hines Ward's TD catch. My point is that they got a generous helping of referee calls in that game and if the refs made each of those calls differently (which they could have - all of those calls except for Hasselbeck's were pretty borderline) then this game could have turned out very differently. Nothing like that here. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey Gladstone 33 Posted January 21, 2014 NFC West Champs= check NFC Champs= check Super Bowl champs over the greatest offense in NFL history= TBD (though I'm just going to preemptively put down a check) Â YOU CAN TELL EVERYBODYYYYYY, YOU CAN TELL EVERYBODYYYYYYY Â http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSO8P61-jPs Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kopy 570 Posted January 22, 2014 I really havn't seen too much media yet. I've had crazy OT the last few days at work. But the little I have seen, plus the people I talk too has me thinking this isn't Denver vesus Seattle. It's good against bad. I'm sure Richard Sherman is the main culprit here because of his outburst. (Plus was he really that wrong? I know it wasn't PC, and he scared and shocked the heck out of Andrews. But really. Harbaugh is a big fat douche bag, and Crabs is a mediocre wr, plus a d!ckhead himself, and this dates back to his T.Tech days.) But that's a different topic, and my main point was. It's the big bad evil Seattle Seahawks, versus the white knight good guys, Denver Broncos. Â Good versus Evil? Â Go for the Broncos, their nice and the Seahawks are a bunch of jerks? IDK, what do you guys think, and are experiencing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 22, 2014 I really havn't seen too much media yet. I've had crazy OT the last few days at work. But the little I have seen, plus the people I talk too has me thinking this isn't Denver vesus Seattle. It's good against bad. I'm sure Richard Sherman is the main culprit here because of his outburst. (Plus was he really that wrong? I know it wasn't PC, and he scared and shocked the heck out of Andrews. But really. Harbaugh is a big fat douche bag, and Crabs is a mediocre wr, plus a d!ckhead himself, and this dates back to his T.Tech days.) But that's a different topic, and my main point was. It's the big bad evil Seattle Seahawks, versus the white knight good guys, Denver Broncos. Â Good versus Evil? Â Go for the Broncos, their nice and the Seahawks are a bunch of jerks? IDK, what do you guys think, and are experiencing. Â Other than Sherman...I have not gotten that vibe at all out of the media. Most have been quite kind to Carroll and understand how classy of a guy Wilson is and that will be talked about. Â But because of how big the Sherman thing blew up...it will get played up as him vs. Manning as some method to hype the game even more. Â And some of the Harbaugh being a tool stance softened with his post game stuff and how he responded to things. Though, yes, he is a cack on the sidelines. Crabs and Boldin are dickbags on the field too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kopy 570 Posted January 22, 2014 Â Other than Sherman...I have not gotten that vibe at all out of the media. Most have been quite kind to Carroll and understand how classy of a guy Wilson is and that will be talked about. Â But because of how big the Sherman thing blew up...it will get played up as him vs. Manning as some method to hype the game even more. Â And some of the Harbaugh being a tool stance softened with his post game stuff and how he responded to things. Though, yes, he is a cack on the sidelines. Crabs and Boldin are dickbags on the field too. Boldin? Really? This is something I've never come across. I make my stance in this thread assertive and known. Harbaugh is a piece of trash. Kap is over rated. And the crabster is a dotal diva punk. Which was why I had him red flagged and put him on my do not draft list for my rookie drafts the year he came out. But I do have a tremendous amount of respect for the organisation as a whole. Especially for a kid like Quinton Patton who I spent alot of time scouting (for Fantasy purposes), and veterans I consider flat out ballers like Gore and Boldin. I'd actually like to here what you have to say about Anquan if you have the time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted January 22, 2014  no, the games were not identical. Let's think about the key refereeing decisions in each game:  1. Offensive pass interference on Darrell Jackson. - instead of a 7-0 lead for the Hawks, it is a 3-0 lead. I could argue that he didn't gain an advantage after pushing off, because the defensive back didn't budge. It takes four points off the board for the Hawks.  DJax FULLY extended his arm, it's the letter of the rule an offensive PI....besides it did Push Hope back and propelled Djax away from him. See before and after photos  Before: Hopes foot is at front of E letter in endzone  https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTJyAFJs2fjVyIugInapz1jIuGx2UcpJtiwdF5gd4K1CphmxgVs  After Push: Hope has clearly been pushed away from DJax, but if you keep repeating a lie you will start to believe it, but proof is in the photo, he extended his arm with propelled DB away  http://pullonsupermanscape.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/seahawks_steelers_highlight_300k__rmr__1_5.jpg    2. Ben's phantom rushing TD - if the call is made correctly, it is 4th and goal instead of a TD. The replays show he was down short of the goal line. Maybe Cowher kicks the field goal in order to get some points on the board. Maybe he remembers the Bus fumbling at the 2 in their divisional round game against the Colts and nearly losing that game if not for Ben tackling the guy at midfield. Or maybe he goes for it and the score is still 7-3 anyway. We'll never know.  The replay was inconclusive. No way anyone can tell from image below if ball broke the plane.....remember where he landed doesn't matter whatsoever. If we want to play the game of overturning without visual evidence it's 4th and inches and Steelers have Bettis and a Faneca and Kreider and Hartings....or you have a QB as big as an OT who could have sneaked it in for a TD. Nobody knows what happens next play cause it didn't happen. You can't pick your scenario and say they would have kicked. They could have ended up with 7, 3 or nothing like you said. Seahawk fans act like he is 2 yards away. It was literally right there and that may not even be at the peek of his forward progress. Phantom...come on now look at that picture how is that phantom.  http://i.imgur.com/7mjHFuw.jpg   3. Offensive holding on Sean Locklear. - this is the referee play of the game. Wiping out a 30-yard gain to Jerramy Stevens to the 2-yd line, and therefore killing a 1st and goal situation. Keep in mind, the Hawks had Big Walt at LT and Hutch at LG. Shaun Alexander had scored on something like 25 short yardage plunges over the left side that year. Everyone knew what was coming all year and no one could stop it anyway. So if that penalty was never called, the Hawks are almost certainly going ahead 17-14 early in the 4th quarter. It is easily an entirely different ballgame.  It's a judgment call, like all holding. Even if we give that to you first and goal why do you assume an automatic 7 pts? You could have fumbled just like the other night and got zero points or like you mentioned before Bettis. See you Hawk fans want to have it both ways.....PItt would have been held out but Seattle would have scored guarantee. You could have passed and got intercepted like you did anyway 2 plays later. Could have had a false start, fumbled snap, anything. Nobody knows what would have happened, but Hasselback did throw an INT when a completion gets you in at least field goal range and it may have been first down area....but you want to give him a free pass on that and blame it on the refs. OK you are a Seahawk fan and I understand that. If he doesn't have his hand wrapped around him (see below image) and Haggans doesn't fall a bit after it doesn't get called. Remember when Ben threw the INT at the goalline in that game? You don't get an auto 7 pts just for getting close to a score.  http://www.steelersdepot.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Sean-Locklear-holding-Super-Bowl-XL-2.jpg   4. Clipping call on Matt Hasselbeck. - the 2nd most absurd call of the day, shortly after the Locklear one. But the Steelers had the ball at this point so instead of being at midfield or thereabouts, it would have been a longer haul for them, up 14-10. This is the least important bad call.  Bad call gave them field position 15 yards closer. Well so did the non roughing the kicker penalty not called correctly with the 49ers. The big difference here is the 49ers did not get the ball back which is a much bigger deal. But who cares it was early in the game.    See my comments and images above, my point is all these calls affect how the game is played out, not the final score unless it is literally on the last play of the game. Also the point is you have these definite statements of what you believe is true from XL but look at these images, these calls were not just made up out of thin air.  Seahawk fans have talked about the scenario where they could have won if A, B, C and D all went in their favor so much that they convinced themselves it's all played out that way in an alternative universe. The calls were close, but the only out of left field call was the low block, big deal, all other by the textbook qualified. And everyone knows when you play the "if we scored there or if you didn't score there we win" thing doesn't work because the game would have been played completely different giving or taking each situation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 22, 2014 Â See my comments and images above, my point is all these calls affect how the game is played out, not the final score unless it is literally on the last play of the game. Also the point is you have these definite statements of what you believe is true from XL but look at these images, these calls were not just made up out of thin air. Â Seahawk fans have talked about the scenario where they could have won if A, B, C and D all went in their favor so much that they convinced themselves it's all played out that way in an alternative universe. The calls were close, but the only out of left field call was the low block, big deal, all other by the textbook qualified. And everyone knows when you play the "if we scored there or if you didn't score there we win" thing doesn't work because the game would have been played completely different giving or taking each situation. Gotta love Squealer fans coming into a Seahawk thread to rehash SB XL and then complain that Seahawks fans cry about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 22, 2014 Boldin? Really? This is something I've never come across. I make my stance in this thread assertive and known. Harbaugh is a piece of trash. Kap is over rated. And the crabster is a dotal diva punk. Which was why I had him red flagged and put him on my do not draft list for my rookie drafts the year he came out. But I do have a tremendous amount of respect for the organisation as a whole. Especially for a kid like Quinton Patton who I spent alot of time scouting (for Fantasy purposes), and veterans I consider flat out ballers like Gore and Boldin. I'd actually like to here what you have to say about Anquan if you have the time. Â On the field. Mostly the trash talking. Watch that Carolina game to see it from the divisional round. I don't think he is nearly the guy Crabs is...but he was at least a big talker that day. Â And maybe he is not that bad all the time and can't remember him jawing much against Green Bay. Just something I noticed a few games recently with him squawking after every play. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 22, 2014 Gotta love Squealer fans coming into a Seahawk thread to rehash SB XL and then complain that Seahawks fans cry about it. Â Considering you were the biggest crying whiner about that...this is great coming from you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 22, 2014 Â Considering you were the biggest crying whiner about that...this is great coming from you. Link? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 22, 2014 Link? Â Yeah, not going to dig up all your posts crying about the refs from XL. Everyone on this board knows you were the biggest crybaby about it for years. You want to deny that? Go ahead, would just make you a liar too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 22, 2014 Â Yeah, not going to dig up all your posts crying about the refs from XL. Everyone on this board knows you were the biggest crybaby about it for years. You want to deny that? Go ahead, would just make you a liar too. Link? If you can't back up your claims: http://blacksportsonline.com/home/2014/01/legend-has-it-crabtree-tried-to-beat-up-richard-sherman-at-charity-event/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DrG 103 Posted January 22, 2014 The bigger problem for Seattle is going to be trying to contain a rested Peyton Manning and a fully armed receiving corps. Richard Sherman can't guard everyone. Nice job getting to Super Bowl, but I think Denver takes this one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 22, 2014 Link? If you can't back up your claims: http://blacksportsonline.com/home/2014/01/legend-has-it-crabtree-tried-to-beat-up-richard-sherman-at-charity-event/ Â I have no need to back up what is common knowledge around here. Could link it if I want. But will ask a question first. Are you denying you whined and cried about the refs for years on this board? Â As for your link? So what...Sherman's brother makes a claim. Still does not make Sherman less of a tool for spouting off after the game. He must think so as well since he basically apologized. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,447 Posted January 22, 2014 The 12th Granny's nicknamed Graham Jimmah 1-Catch! Â Â The 12th Granny nickname should stick. It's original unlike the 12th Man. The one the Seafags stole from A&M and paid 100 Grand to in 2006 as part of a settlement. And also pay them 5 grand a year for their user agreement to copy the term which A&M has used for over sixty years. Shake them cans Seatle Grannies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 22, 2014 Â I have no need to back up what is common knowledge around here. Could link it if I want. But will ask a question first. Are you denying you whined and cried about the refs for years on this board? Â As for your link? So what...Sherman's brother makes a claim. Still does not make Sherman less of a tool for spouting off after the game. He must think so as well since he basically apologized. HTH Never whined or cried. Talked in FACTS only. Clowns like you and Murf love to bring up the SB and then when Hawk fans respond you classify it as crying. No win situation. The experts have spoken. The experts admitted the Hawks were robbed. End of story. SB XL is over. The Hawks are in SB XLVIII But you and Murf can keep bringing it up. Â As for my link it was about the choke sign to you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 22, 2014 Â Â The 12th Granny nickname should stick. It's original unlike the 12th Man. The one the Seafags stole from A&M and paid 100 Grand to in 2006 as part of a settlement. And also pay them 5 grand a year for their user agreement to copy the term which A&M has used for over sixty years. Shake them cans Seatle Grannies. Grannies 2 Saints 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BunnysBastatrds 2,447 Posted January 22, 2014 Grannies 2 Saints 0 Â Â In the immortal words of KC And The Sunshine Band- Shake shake shake.... Shake shake shake...........Shake your cansss.....Shake your cans aaaaaa! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 22, 2014 Never whined or cried. Talked in FACTS only. Clowns like you and Murf love to bring up the SB and then when Hawk fans respond you classify it as crying. No win situation. The experts have spoken. The experts admitted the Hawks were robbed. End of story. SB XL is over. The Hawks are in SB XLVIII But you and Murf can keep bringing it up. Â As for my link it was about the choke sign to you. Â So, you are a liar. Yes, it is a FACT that you whined and cried about that Super Bowl for years. You brought it up far more than I ever did...care to link wo when I brought it up? Â Your link was about Crabtree wanting to fight Sherman at Fitz's party...hell, you are such a fail you don't even know what link you are posting at any given time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 23, 2014 Â So, you are a liar. Yes, it is a FACT that you whined and cried about that Super Bowl for years. You brought it up far more than I ever did...care to link wo when I brought it up? Â Your link was about Crabtree wanting to fight Sherman at Fitz's party...hell, you are such a fail you don't even know what link you are posting at any given time. You wouldn't know a fact if it hit you in the face. And my link was all about the picture. Didn't even bother to read the article. It wasn't important. I'll think I'll go the route of my Seahawk buddies at FBG like Dr. Detroit and just ignore you with the hopes that you'll go away. Doubt it though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 23, 2014 You wouldn't know a fact if it hit you in the face. And my link was all about the picture. Didn't even bother to read the article. It wasn't important. I'll think I'll go the route of my Seahawk buddies at FBG like Dr. Detroit and just ignore you with the hopes that you'll go away. Doubt it though. Â You don't have any buddies there. And Dr. D ignores me? Thats funny...he talks to me and about me quite often. BTW, you tried ignoring me before...it never works. You care too much about people making fun of you to stop responding. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 23, 2014 Â You don't have any buddies there. And Dr. D ignores me? Thats funny...he talks to me and about me quite often. BTW, you tried ignoring me before...it never works. You care too much about people making fun of you to stop responding. Yea you're right. I love smacking you upside the bald head too much. OBTW nice family pic at the closet. You weren't kidding. You're Mr. Clean bald! You're a little guy too! What 5'6? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 23, 2014 Couldn't even make it an hour. Oh, and your eyesight sucks. Im right at 6 foot chief...glad you like stalking though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
murf74 461 Posted January 23, 2014 Couldn't even make it an hour. Oh, and your eyesight sucks. Im right at 6 foot chief...glad you like stalking though. Â Yeah, that's a bit too creepy. I knew he was weird but this a whole new level. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NewbieJr 541 Posted January 23, 2014 It's pretty obvious that we're Faghawkers only means of socialization. Can you even imagine such a creepy, unintelligent troll having real life friends? That's why he creeps everyone like he does. This is real life to him. Hell, he'll tell you you're favorite cereal from a thread you commented in three years ago. The loser probably lyrics has a spreadsheet on all of us. Lolol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 23, 2014 It's pretty obvious that we're Faghawkers only means of socialization. Can you even imagine such a creepy, unintelligent troll having real life friends? That's why he creeps everyone like he does. This is real life to him. Hell, he'll tell you you're favorite cereal from a thread you commented in three years ago. The loser probably lyrics has a spreadsheet on all of us. LololHaters gonna hate! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 23, 2014 Couldn't even make it an hour. Oh, and your eyesight sucks. Im right at 6 foot chief...glad you like stalking though. Says the Packer fan stalking me in a Seahawk thread. Right at 6 foot huh? LOL Not even close! That's why you said right at 6 foot and not 6 foot. All guys with short man syndrome are right at 6 foot! Lol Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted January 23, 2014 Says the Packer fan stalking me in a Seahawk thread. Right at 6 foot huh? LOL Not even close! That's why you said right at 6 foot and not 6 foot. All guys with short man syndrome are right at 6 foot! Lol Again you try this. This is an active thread on this board...where I post quite a bit. You have talked about me from two different boards now where you follow me around. Yeah...the facts show you to be the one stalking little guy. Â Not even close? Right at...meaning not any more, not any less. I guess you then think my wife and kids are "little people" since you think Im so small. Â You don't ever tire of being an ignorant fool do you? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FlaHawker 24 Posted January 23, 2014 Again you try this. This is an active thread on this board...where I post quite a bit. You have talked about me from two different boards now where you follow me around. Yeah...the facts show you to be the one stalking little guy. Â Not even close? Right at...meaning not any more, not any less. I guess you then think my wife and kids are "little people" since you think Im so small. Â You don't ever tire of being an ignorant fool do you? You mean active thread where you troll quite a bit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites