***The Official Seattle Seahawks 2013 Season Thread***

[phillybear 366]

Philly bear, you're a jackass, but at least you're an entertaining jackass.

 

My mother said this to me once. To this day, the nicest thing that she has ever said to me. God love her.

 

Anyways, go stuff yourself into a gunny sack and throw yourself into a frozen lake, you piker.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

Not quite (and not shocking you didn't understand anything that was said and can't see that you have focked this thread up and this place up for some time now)

This is Gold! So trolls come into a thread of a team they don't root for because of me? Trolls can't control themselves because of me?

[FlaHawker 24]

I've said it before, he's pretty much single handedly caused me to dislike a team I didn't dislike previously. He's the epitome of an internet troll.

 

Exhibit D. An anonymous poster on a low trafficked website has turned your world upside down. What a weak man.

[Sho Nuff 720]

This is Gold! So trolls come into a thread of a team they don't root for because of me? Trolls can't control themselves because of me?

 

Actually, plenty came in the other thread to mock the old thread title and some of the people.

They have stayed because you are the gift that keeps on giving.

 

And its always funny when you, the biggest troll on this board, whines about other people coming into threads of teams you don't root for. Especially given you are over in a Cowboys thread slinging insults at Steelers fans who are actually talking civilly about the topic at hand until you came along.

 

You are a complete troll...its all you do.

Id say 1% of your posts in your own team thread are actually about football.

How many replies to people talking football do you think you have where you just insult them because of who they are rather than even try discussing what they were saying?

 

The biggest problem...is that you don't see yourself as any problem. To you, its all everyone else's fault.

Even your own "friends" don't buy that crap.

[edjr 6,607]

To the person that wondered why this board sucks now.

 

I present this thread as Exhibit A

[FlaHawker 24]

 

Actually, plenty came in the other thread to mock the old thread title and some of the people.

They have stayed because you are the gift that keeps on giving.

 

And its always funny when you, the biggest troll on this board, whines about other people coming into threads of teams you don't root for. Especially given you are over in a Cowboys thread slinging insults at Steelers fans who are actually talking civilly about the topic at hand until you came along.

 

You are a complete troll...its all you do.

Id say 1% of your posts in your own team thread are actually about football.

How many replies to people talking football do you think you have where you just insult them because of who they are rather than even try discussing what they were saying?

 

The biggest problem...is that you don't see yourself as any problem. To you, its all everyone else's fault.

Even your own "friends" don't buy that crap.

Holy catfish! This just keeps getting better. So like I pointed out, you come into the thread because of me. That is the justification for your trolling. Flahawker is a troll so I am justified in trolling the Seahawk thread! So you are basically the rapist who blames his victim because her shorts were too tight

[jgcrawfish 232]

 

My mother said this to me once. To this day, the nicest thing that she has ever said to me. God love her.

 

Anyways, go stuff yourself into a gunny sack and throw yourself into a frozen lake, you piker.

 

 

Exhibit D. An anonymous poster on a low trafficked website has turned your world upside down. What a weak man.

 

you and your inexhaustible supply of d-baggery are of no concern to me, but thanks for playing.

 

[Sho Nuff 720]

Holy catfish! This just keeps getting better. So like I pointed out, you come into the thread because of me. That is the justification for your trolling. Flahawker is a troll so I am justified in trolling the Seahawk thread! So you are basically the rapist who blames his victim because her shorts were too tight

 

You just keep trying...its not surprising you don't understand. You don't seem very bright.

You just keep up the effort buddy.

[BunnysBastatrds 2,449]

 

You just keep trying...its not surprising you don't understand. You don't seem very bright.

You just keep up the effort buddy.

 

 

He's trying his hardest. Kind of sad really. Reminds me of that special kid who couldn't get anyone to help him fly his Barbie kite when we were kids. He'd run his little heart out to get it up but the kite would just drag on the ground until Barbies head began looking like meth Barbie. Little guy never gave up until he got his kite off the ground. Even if it was only for a second. Just like our special Flyhawker. Keep trying little guy.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

 

He's trying his hardest. Kind of sad really. Reminds me of that special kid who couldn't get anyone to help him fly his Barbie kite when we were kids. He'd run his little heart out to get it up but the kite would just drag on the ground until Barbies head began looking like meth Barbie. Little guy never gave up until he got his kite off the ground. Even if it was only for a second. Just like our special Flyhawker. Keep trying little guy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RluxO7wzRa0

[FlaHawker 24]

 

 

 

you and your inexhaustible supply of d-baggery are of no concern to me, but thanks for playing.

 

Says the guy crying that I turned him against an NFL organization. But I'm of no concern.

[BunnysBastatrds 2,449]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RluxO7wzRa0

Saints Super Bowl victories 1 Saints Super Bowl losses 0

 

Seatle Super Bowl Wins 0. Seatle Super Bowl losses 1

 

Me>kite boy

[FlaHawker 24]

Saints Super Bowl victories 1 Saints Super Bowl losses 0

 

Seatle Super Bowl Wins 0. Seatle Super Bowl losses 1

 

Me>kite boy

Man you're slipping. You had some really funny smack going with the 12th grannies and their cans of rocks and that Jerome sob story Now, pppffffttt...nothing. Pick it up.

[R8RMick 242]

You really can't make this up...

[FlaHawker 24]

You really can't make this up...

I know the Raiders are a mess.

[R8RMick 242]

I know the Raiders are a mess.

 

Lol... oh how original. THAT smarts...

 

Dude you are classic. It's like the Comedy Channel here with your routine, sheer entertainment. I mean, we really should tip you.

 

Do you accept PayPal?

[FlaHawker 24]

 

Lol... oh how original. THAT smarts...

 

Dude you are classic. It's like the Comedy Channel here with your routine, sheer entertainment. I mean, we really should tip you.

 

Do you accept PayPal?

Seriously, the Raiders are a mess!

[Joey Gladstone 33]

Holy sh!t, it's almost Sunday and my d!ck won't stay down!!! It's been a PAINFULLLLLLY LONNNNNNNNNG two weeks. But it will be oh so sweet come Sunday night.

 

THE TIME IS HERE FRIENDS!!!

 

CAPS LOCK WILL BE ON FROM HERE ON OUT!!!!!

[FlaHawker 24]

[Hawkfin 32]

GO HAWKS!

Enjoy the game brothers.

 

Lets get this done Hawks. Bring us home the championship!

 

I'll check in after the game for hopefully a great SB victory.

Enjoy all.

[FlaHawker 24]

GO HAWKS!

Enjoy the game brothers.

 

Lets get this done Hawks. Bring us home the championship!

 

I'll check in after the game for hopefully a great SB victory.

Enjoy all.

Same here.

[phillybear 366]

So, let's talk about the game.

 

The reality is that Denver has faced a top ten defense twice this season. Facing the Seahawk defense will be a brand new experience for them. Whereas their offense looked unstoppable at times early in the season, as always, the league adjusts, and they came back to looking human. Denver has had a relatively easy run through the playoffs, facing a couple of teams that overachieved their healthy rosters to advance as far as they did and on top of that, San Diego was ranked #23 on total defense while New England ranked #26. The Denver offense hasn't faced a defense in forever. They led their playoff games from start to finish, winning easily, no pressure, literally no pressure as New England never laid a finger on Peyton Manning. Seattle brings the #1 defense in football, with metrics off the charts eye popping. The misdirection the media likes to give is that you have to cover all their WRs. No big deal, as Seattle can go on forever in covering, ball hawking, big hitting defensive backs. You have to slow down the new Denver rushing attack, and the dink and dunk 5 yard passes that Manning will take all day long as you take away the longer throws. Denver was #1 in the NFL in YAC this year. Perfect, as Seattle has the fastest defense in the league and nobody tackles better. Seattle took away the run from the Saints and San Fran to advance to this game. The only bonafide weapon on offense shown to be effective vs Seattle's defense the past two seasons is a scrambling QB, ala Kaepernick, who will tuck it and run past the hard charging defensive line and hit the next level and open field. Kaepernick has been chirping this week how vulnerable the secondary of Seattle's is, yet this dumb fock has 7 picks and 3 TDs in 3 games against it, so maybe he should shut the fock up. As far as mobility, Manning will move as far as a submarine on dry land. No doubt, the defense has picked up on the little chip play that Denver fancies, where the running back sneaks out for a middle screen after the WRs clear out the middle zone by going deep. Seattle has Chancellor and Thomas in the middle to close extremely fast or Bobby Wagner or any of the interchangeable LBs to lay out a hit to knock some teeth loose, so I don't think this will work. Ask the Saints where their ballyhooed screen game completely disappeared to. Seattle doesn't play gimmick defense. They play you pretty much straight up. They will not blitz much, as they lead the league in QB pressure by defensive line. You have to have perfect execution. And even so, you still get bogged down in the red zone most of the time against these guys. They just do not give up points. They will force Denver to kick FGs. And if Manning is going to try to get greedy at some point, this defense led the league in forcing turnovers. In their last seven games, Seattle's defense has given up 7,19,0,17,9,15,17 points, a good chunk of points scored in garbage time vs prevent defenses. An average of 13.4 points per game. Five of these seven games were rematches with teams they played earlier this season, so if you think 2 weeks of film study for Denver is going to help, you are only kidding yourself.

 

Offensively, Seattle hasn't faced a defense this shaky since playing the Vikings November 17th. The Seahawks have faced a defense ranked in the top 8 in their past 7 straight games, with the exception of St Louis, who is only ranked #15, but has a terrific defensive front and beats you up physically. Wilson and the Seattle offense hit a slump? No!!! They hit a string of extremely difficult opponents to score upon. Duh. It's what the stupid mooks in the TV studios don't bother to research so they can drop some truth bombs on your head. Denver's defense is decidedly average, as the league average on a yards per play basis is 5.4 while Denver allows 5.3 (for the record, Seattle allows 4.6). It's a credit to them to get this far without a good defense. So, how does Seattle attack them? Well, Denver better not bring those shitty game plans they threw out there against San Diego and NE, because they will give 60 points. They crowded in their ends and left yawning chasms for any QB to run around. Hello, can you say read option? Sure, Seattle hasn't run it much this year, but it's the last game, so there is no reason to save Wilson for the next game. While SF and some of these other defenses Seattle has been facing lately have speed on the outside and can get after the QB on the edge and contain Wilson's running forward, Denver doesn't. Wilson and Lynch will run to the outside on Denver. And is there any doubt that Lynch has his game face on right now? He's going to make some Bronco tacklers pay for them making him talk to the media trolls. St Louis, Arizona, San Francisco, all these teams bring better rushing defenses (rush per play average) to the table than Denver. They couldn't stop Lynch. So you want to bottle up the box and stop Lynch, which nobody has shown they can do. OK, whatever. Percy Harvin is going to be weapon, and I don't think Jon Fox is going to put a bounty on his head like Sean Payton did. Harvin has a chance to make everything right with the trade. A ultimate game changer in the ultimate game. The wildcard. Who is being overlooked completely. Quick throws to the outside to Tate, quick hitters to Harvin in space, Baldwin on 3rd conversions, take some deeps shots, and most of all, the defensive line will bring less heat than San Fran. Wilson will have more time to throw, to make some plays, finally. If Denver spreads out to cover for the outside, Lynch will pound them in the solar plexus and go for some very long gains.

 

It's getting comical watching pundit after pundit pick Denver to win and then scrambling to find any tidbit or morsel of information to try to justify his pick. "I like Denver, because I think their defense is better than Seattle's". "I think Denver wins, because Peyton is a nice guy." "Denver is going to win because he is going to teach Richard Sherman a lesson." "I think Denver is going to win because I haven't watched a Seahawk game on TV this year."

 

Yes, it's being reported that Seattle fans are buying many, many more tickets than Denver fans for the game, and are threatening to make it a semi-home game after all. There is a film showing 13 people showing up to see the Broncos off on their plane trip to New York. In Seattle, the 30 minute bus trip to the airport shows ten of thousands of well wishers lining the streets to cheer on the Seahawks. It's going to happen. The Seahawks are going to stick their d!ck in the NFL's eye and then we get to watch the mushroom stamp on ESPN and the NFL Network's faces for the next 364 days.

 

Seattle 37

Denver 19

 

Go Hawks!!

[uwmalcolm 74]

So, let's talk about the game.

 

The reality is that Denver has faced a top ten defense twice this season. Facing the Seahawk defense will be a brand new experience for them. Whereas their offense looked unstoppable at times early in the season, as always, the league adjusts, and they came back to looking human. Denver has had a relatively easy run through the playoffs, facing a couple of teams that overachieved their healthy rosters to advance as far as they did and on top of that, San Diego was ranked #23 on total defense while New England ranked #26. The Denver offense hasn't faced a defense in forever. They led their playoff games from start to finish, winning easily, no pressure, literally no pressure as New England never laid a finger on Peyton Manning. Seattle brings the #1 defense in football, with metrics off the charts eye popping. The misdirection the media likes to give is that you have to cover all their WRs. No big deal, as Seattle can go on forever in covering, ball hawking, big hitting defensive backs. You have to slow down the new Denver rushing attack, and the dink and dunk 5 yard passes that Manning will take all day long as you take away the longer throws. Denver was #1 in the NFL in YAC this year. Perfect, as Seattle has the fastest defense in the league and nobody tackles better. Seattle took away the run from the Saints and San Fran to advance to this game. The only bonafide weapon on offense shown to be effective vs Seattle's defense the past two seasons is a scrambling QB, ala Kaepernick, who will tuck it and run past the hard charging defensive line and hit the next level and open field. Kaepernick has been chirping this week how vulnerable the secondary of Seattle's is, yet this dumb fock has 7 picks and 3 TDs in 3 games against it, so maybe he should shut the fock up. After as mobility, Manning will move as far as a submarine on dry lang. No doubt, the defense has picked up on the little chip play that Denver fancies, where the running back sneaks out for a middle screen after the WRs clear out the middle zone by going deep. Seattle has Chancellor and Thomas in the middle to close extremely fast or Bobby Wagner or any of the interchangeable LBs to lay out a hit to knock some teeth loose, so I don't think this will work. Ask the Saints where their ballyhooed screen game completely disappeared to. Seattle doesn't play gimmick defense. They play you pretty much straight up. They will not blitz much, as they lead the league in QB pressure by defensive line. You have to have perfect execution. And even so, you still get bogged down in the red zone most of the time against these guys. They just do not give up points. They will force Denver to kick FGs. And if Manning is going to try to get greedy at some point, this defense led the league in forcing turnovers. In their last seven games, Seattle's defense has given up 7,19,0,17,9,15,17 points, a good chunk of points scored in garbage time vs prevent defenses. An average of 13.4 points per game. Five of these seven games were rematches with teams they played earlier this season, so if you think 2 weeks of film study for Denver is going to help, you are only kidding yourself.

 

Offensively, Seattle hasn't faced a defense this shaky since playing the Vikings November 17th. The Seahawks have faced a defense ranked in the top 8 in their past 7 straight games, with the exception of St Louis, who is only ranked #15, but has a terrific defensive front and beats you up physically. Wilson and the Seattle offense hit a slump? No!!! They hit a string of extremely difficult opponents to score upon. Duh. It's what the stupid mooks in the TV studios don't bother to research so they can drop some truth bombs on your head. Denver's defense is decidedly average, as the league average on a yards per play basis is 5.4 while Denver allows 5.3 (for the record, Seattle allows 4.6). It's a credit to them to get this far without a good defense. So, how does Seattle attack them? Well, Denver better not bring those shitty game plans they threw out there against San Diego and NE, because they will give 60 points. They crowded in their ends and left yawning chasms for any QB to run around. Hello, can you say read option? Sure, Seattle hasn't run it much this year, but it's the last game, so there is no reason to save Wilson for the next game. While SF and some of these other defenses Seattle has been facing lately have speed on the outside and can get after the QB on the edge and contain Wilson's running forward, Denver doesn't. Wilson and Lynch will run to the outside on Denver. And is there any doubt that Lynch has his game face on right now? He's going to make some Bronco tacklers pay for them making him talk to the media trolls. St Louis, Arizona, San Francisco, all these teams bring better rushing defenses (rush per play average) to the table than Denver. They couldn't stop Lynch. So you want to bottle up the box and stop Lynch, which nobody has shown they can do. OK, whatever. Percy Harvin is going to be weapon, and I don't think Jon Fox is going to put a bounty on his head like Sean Payton did. Harvin has a chance to make everything right with the trade. A ultimate game changer in the ultimate game. The wildcard. Who is being overlooked completely. Quick throws to the outside to Tate, quick hitters to Harvin in space, Baldwin on 3rd conversions, take some deeps shots, and most of all, the defensive line will bring less heat than San Fran. Wilson will have more time to throw, to make some plays, finally. If Denver spreads out to cover for the outside, Lynch will pound them in the solar plexus and go for some very long gains.

 

It's getting comical watching pundit after pundit pick Denver to win and then scrambling to find any tidbit or morsel of information to try to justify his pick. "I like Denver, because I think their defense is better than Seattle's". "I think Denver wins, because Peyton is a nice guy." "Denver is going to win because he is going to teach Richard Sherman a lesson." "I think Denver is going to win because I haven't watched a Seahawk game on TV this year."

 

Yes, it's being reported that Seattle fans are buying many, many more tickets than Denver fans for the game, and are threatening to make it a semi-home game after all. There is a film showing 13 people showing up to see the Broncos off on their plane trip to New York. In Seattle, the 30 bus trip to the airport shows ten of thousands of well wishers lining the streets to cheer on the Seahawks. It's going to happen. The Seahawks are going to stick their d!ck in the NFL's eye and then we get to watch the mushroom stamp on ESPN and the NFL Network's faces for the next 364 days.

 

Seattle 37

Denver 19

 

Go Hawks!!

Wow, looks like some discussion broke out during the troll fight.

 

Great analysis, Philly. Of course you are preaching to the choir for many of us but that was pretty damn extensive in-depth stuff. I myself have put some scratch on Harvin for MVP. The media has focused on a lot of things but not so much on a pro-bowl level WR returning for the Super Bowl, which is a little puzzling. Doubt the Broncos will be ignoring him though. I have several buddies going to the game from the Seattle area and I would be too if it wasn't for this damned wedding/honeymoon stuff I have to deal with this summer. My consolation is in watching with 30 or so buddies at a friends place in Kirkland. Will be an epic day whichever way it goes but I have faith in our boys...GO HAWKS!!!!!

[Sho Nuff 720]

Great analysis? It is the same over the top homer stuff we see from Philly and Hawker all the time.

Just nothing but gleeming about his own team and acting as if Denver has no shot at it.

 

As for Harvin...why would the media focus on a guy who has barely played in the last 2 years.

Sure...he could be a huge factor. Or he could get hit once and be out again in the 1st quarter. He simply is not as big of a story line as so many other things in that game.

[DrG 103]

I don't think Seattle has faced an offense quite like this one. If Manning has time he will get his.

He also has an extra week of prep and rest - especially valuable for him.

 

If your D line gets pressure it will be advantage Seattle.

[murf74 461]

So, let's talk about the game.

 

The reality is that Denver has faced a top ten defense twice this season. Facing the Seahawk defense will be a brand new experience for them. Whereas their offense looked unstoppable at times early in the season, as always, the league adjusts, and they came back to looking human. Denver has had a relatively easy run through the playoffs, facing a couple of teams that overachieved their healthy rosters to advance as far as they did and on top of that, San Diego was ranked #23 on total defense while New England ranked #26. The Denver offense hasn't faced a defense in forever. They led their playoff games from start to finish, winning easily, no pressure, literally no pressure as New England never laid a finger on Peyton Manning. Seattle brings the #1 defense in football, with metrics off the charts eye popping. The misdirection the media likes to give is that you have to cover all their WRs. No big deal, as Seattle can go on forever in covering, ball hawking, big hitting defensive backs. You have to slow down the new Denver rushing attack, and the dink and dunk 5 yard passes that Manning will take all day long as you take away the longer throws. Denver was #1 in the NFL in YAC this year. Perfect, as Seattle has the fastest defense in the league and nobody tackles better. Seattle took away the run from the Saints and San Fran to advance to this game. The only bonafide weapon on offense shown to be effective vs Seattle's defense the past two seasons is a scrambling QB, ala Kaepernick, who will tuck it and run past the hard charging defensive line and hit the next level and open field. Kaepernick has been chirping this week how vulnerable the secondary of Seattle's is, yet this dumb fock has 7 picks and 3 TDs in 3 games against it, so maybe he should shut the fock up. As far as mobility, Manning will move as far as a submarine on dry lang. No doubt, the defense has picked up on the little chip play that Denver fancies, where the running back sneaks out for a middle screen after the WRs clear out the middle zone by going deep. Seattle has Chancellor and Thomas in the middle to close extremely fast or Bobby Wagner or any of the interchangeable LBs to lay out a hit to knock some teeth loose, so I don't think this will work. Ask the Saints where their ballyhooed screen game completely disappeared to. Seattle doesn't play gimmick defense. They play you pretty much straight up. They will not blitz much, as they lead the league in QB pressure by defensive line. You have to have perfect execution. And even so, you still get bogged down in the red zone most of the time against these guys. They just do not give up points. They will force Denver to kick FGs. And if Manning is going to try to get greedy at some point, this defense led the league in forcing turnovers. In their last seven games, Seattle's defense has given up 7,19,0,17,9,15,17 points, a good chunk of points scored in garbage time vs prevent defenses. An average of 13.4 points per game. Five of these seven games were rematches with teams they played earlier this season, so if you think 2 weeks of film study for Denver is going to help, you are only kidding yourself.

 

Offensively, Seattle hasn't faced a defense this shaky since playing the Vikings November 17th. The Seahawks have faced a defense ranked in the top 8 in their past 7 straight games, with the exception of St Louis, who is only ranked #15, but has a terrific defensive front and beats you up physically. Wilson and the Seattle offense hit a slump? No!!! They hit a string of extremely difficult opponents to score upon. Duh. It's what the stupid mooks in the TV studios don't bother to research so they can drop some truth bombs on your head. Denver's defense is decidedly average, as the league average on a yards per play basis is 5.4 while Denver allows 5.3 (for the record, Seattle allows 4.6). It's a credit to them to get this far without a good defense. So, how does Seattle attack them? Well, Denver better not bring those shitty game plans they threw out there against San Diego and NE, because they will give 60 points. They crowded in their ends and left yawning chasms for any QB to run around. Hello, can you say read option? Sure, Seattle hasn't run it much this year, but it's the last game, so there is no reason to save Wilson for the next game. While SF and some of these other defenses Seattle has been facing lately have speed on the outside and can get after the QB on the edge and contain Wilson's running forward, Denver doesn't. Wilson and Lynch will run to the outside on Denver. And is there any doubt that Lynch has his game face on right now? He's going to make some Bronco tacklers pay for them making him talk to the media trolls. St Louis, Arizona, San Francisco, all these teams bring better rushing defenses (rush per play average) to the table than Denver. They couldn't stop Lynch. So you want to bottle up the box and stop Lynch, which nobody has shown they can do. OK, whatever. Percy Harvin is going to be weapon, and I don't think Jon Fox is going to put a bounty on his head like Sean Payton did. Harvin has a chance to make everything right with the trade. A ultimate game changer in the ultimate game. The wildcard. Who is being overlooked completely. Quick throws to the outside to Tate, quick hitters to Harvin in space, Baldwin on 3rd conversions, take some deeps shots, and most of all, the defensive line will bring less heat than San Fran. Wilson will have more time to throw, to make some plays, finally. If Denver spreads out to cover for the outside, Lynch will pound them in the solar plexus and go for some very long gains.

 

It's getting comical watching pundit after pundit pick Denver to win and then scrambling to find any tidbit or morsel of information to try to justify his pick. "I like Denver, because I think their defense is better than Seattle's". "I think Denver wins, because Peyton is a nice guy." "Denver is going to win because he is going to teach Richard Sherman a lesson." "I think Denver is going to win because I haven't watched a Seahawk game on TV this year."

 

Yes, it's being reported that Seattle fans are buying many, many more tickets than Denver fans for the game, and are threatening to make it a semi-home game after all. There is a film showing 13 people showing up to see the Broncos off on their plane trip to New York. In Seattle, the 30 minute bus trip to the airport shows ten of thousands of well wishers lining the streets to cheer on the Seahawks. It's going to happen. The Seahawks are going to stick their d!ck in the NFL's eye and then we get to watch the mushroom stamp on ESPN and the NFL Network's faces for the next 364 days.

 

Seattle 37

Denver 19

 

Go Hawks!!

Based on your analysis Seattle will win 50 -0 and I would have To assume Seattle is undefeated and have best defensive stats in history of league

 

Nice objective review of the game. !

[FlaHawker 24]

Nice objective review of the game. !

That's why we are called FANS. Are you really this dumb? If you want objective go some place else.

[Kopy 570]

Based on your analysis Seattle will win 50 -0 and I would have To assume Seattle is undefeated and have best defensive stats in history of league

 

Nice objective review of the game. !

 

Actually. Based on his analysis. Seattle will win 37 -19

[phillybear 366]

Great analysis? It is the same over the top homer stuff we see from Philly and Hawker all the time.

Just nothing but gleeming about his own team and acting as if Denver has no shot at it.

 

As for Harvin...why would the media focus on a guy who has barely played in the last 2 years.

Sure...he could be a huge factor. Or he could get hit once and be out again in the 1st quarter. He simply is not as big of a story line as so many other things in that game.

 

Seriously? We've gone away from flame wars to analysis and statistics, but you are befuddled because the statistics point towards distinct advantages in the direction of Seattle.

 

Hey, bring some counterarguments so I can smack 'em back at 'cha.

 

Also, I hear that Green Bay is looking to make a play for Schneider as the next Green Bay GM when Thompson leaves. I'm a little bit concerned about that, to be honest. But let me throw something to worry about in your direction...

 

Jermichael Finley: “I mean there’s a couple of teams I would love and would be on the first flight out to play with but like I said the Packers are going to come at me with something and I’m going to go to them first and see what they’ve got and if it’s not I would love to be on the first flight out to good old Seattle,” Finley said.

 

Seahawk fans, prepare to rosterbate. This is merely the beginning.

[Kopy 570]

Alright guys.

I'm gonna go with Seattle 27 - 19

And Doug Baldwin with the MVP with 2 scores.

 

Drink alot and stay safe.

I'll see you monday.

[phillybear 366]

I don't think Seattle has faced an offense quite like this one. If Manning has time he will get his.

He also has an extra week of prep and rest - especially valuable for him.

 

If your D line gets pressure it will be advantage Seattle.

 

Eh, you SF guys faced us 3 times this year. Did it really, really help? Same old formula. Kaep runs for a bunch of yards, SF loses. Except for that Gore run and last second FG in SF this year.

 

But you are correct. Seattle needs to apply pressure to Manning. If they can do this without blitzing, the game will be a blowout. If they have to blitz, then...game on, shoot out. Because Denver's defense can't afford to trade scores.

[tikigods 76]

Seattle 31 - Denver 28 in OT

 

Russell Wilson- MVP

[Sho Nuff 720]

 

Seriously? We've gone away from flame wars to analysis and statistics, but you are befuddled because the statistics point towards distinct advantages in the direction of Seattle.

 

Hey, bring some counterarguments so I can smack 'em back at 'cha.

 

Also, I hear that Green Bay is looking to make a play for Schneider as the next Green Bay GM when Thompson leaves. I'm a little bit concerned about that, to be honest. But let me throw something to worry about in your direction...

 

Jermichael Finley: “I mean there’s a couple of teams I would love and would be on the first flight out to play with but like I said the Packers are going to come at me with something and I’m going to go to them first and see what they’ve got and if it’s not I would love to be on the first flight out to good old Seattle,” Finley said.

 

Seahawk fans, prepare to rosterbate. This is merely the beginning.

 

Im sure they would look to bring Schneider back...would make sense since he knows the organization.

As for Finley...if you want to pay what he will likely want...coming off that neck surgery. Have at it.

Does not worry me in the slightest.

 

As for your analysis...plenty of statistics point to Denver as well. Should be a great game.

But there are zero statistics that come to the conclusion of this easy Seattle blowout...so if you don't want people to mock your homeristic post...don't be so obviously homeristic about it.

[murf74 461]

 

As for your analysis...plenty of statistics point to Denver as well. Should be a great game.

But there are zero statistics that come to the conclusion of this easy Seattle blowout...so if you don't want people to mock your homeristic post...don't be so obviously homeristic about it.

Exactly. It was as homer a post as I have ever read. Best in league at this best at that .....Denver never played a good team we did. We went undefeated. Oh wait how in world did they ever lose a game this year? Must have let them or the refs or some natural disaster

[FlaHawker 24]

12th Man in space

 

http://crosscut.com/2014/01/30/humor/118550/seahawks-12th-man-space-station-super-bowl/

[FlaHawker 24]

Seahawk trolls complaining about Seahawks fans being homers in a Seahawk thread. Gotta love it, gotta just love it. WHO HAS IT BETTER THAN US??? NOBODY

[Joey Gladstone 33]

I came in to say that Seattle was 15 points away from 16-0, but upon further review the Broncos were only 16 points away.

 

I have faith in the offense putting points up on the Broncos defense. Seattle's offense isn't flashy but they have been tested against some DAMN good NFC defenses. While nothing I would bank on, Harvin's return is a nice little x-factor.

 

Keys on defense are stopping the run game, getting consistent pressure on Peyton and forcing 2 to 3 turnovers. All very doable.

[Groundhog 24]

Here's my take.

 

Think about the games that Seattle lost this year. Colts, Niners, Cardinals. In the case of the Niners and Cards, defense mostly throttled us, although the Niners did make some plays when they needed to, like Gore's 51 yard run. In the case of the Colts though, they went after us deep and succeeded. T.Y. Hilton burned us for two TDs deep. Our offense made some plays too, but not enough, and we lost 34-28.

 

I'm not dismissing the Broncos offense by saying that our D cannot be burned, because it can. I don't think it will a LOT, but Peyton is too good to be bottled up all game. Besides, if they simply write off the deep ball by saying, ooh, we can't go there, those guys are unbeatable, then the D has the advantage of being able to help out more on the short game. I'm not saying that Sherman et al can simply ignore their deep ball responsibility, but I don't think they'll be able to 'cheat' up all that much.

 

This is a long way of saying that I think Peyton is going to challenge us deep early, and often. He will probably put the ball only in a place where the receiver can catch it, or else it falls incomplete. Seeing that they are going after the deep ball is predicated on the middle of their offensive line - Vasquez and Beadles at the guard spots - winning the battle against Mcdonald, Bennett, etc.. Bennett is going to play inside I think, try to get Peyton to move off his spot, disrupt his timing. If he can't do that, then Peyton will take his shots down the field. The weather looks to be getting a little more Peyton-friendly as well. All in all, I think the Denver offensive line wins more of the battles, at least in the middle, than we win against them. They take their shots deep, spread out the D, and then come back with the dink and dunk stuff.

 

Ultimately, I see this as a pretty high scoring game. And if all you saw was Seattle struggling on offense the last few weeks, you would then probably think that Seattle loses. But I'll echo Philly's point here: Seattle has played a bunch of really good D's lately. Denver's D is nowhere as good, not after losing Chris Harris, Von Miller and Derek Wolfe. All three of those guys were disruptive. We are absolutely lucking out on the injury side of things, with basically everyone available and more or less healthy. So the extent to which Seattle's offense has been hogtied lately is a function, I think, of playing some pretty nasty defenses.

 

Denver's D, especially its safeties, can be beaten deep. Trevathan has some speed but how do you keep someone to spy on Wilson and then not spy on Harvin? Pick your poison. I suppose Harvin could easily get knocked out of this game too, so I think he will play decoy early on. I think Lynch will barrel into them early, set the tone for a very physical game, and after they get tired of getting hit in the mouth, we come back with Harvin actually getting the ball.

 

Bottom line, I think we are more than capable of winning a high scoring affair. Previously I said Seattle 31 Denver 24 when I thought the weather was going to be a factor. Now I think it won't be, and I'm seeing a shootout. Seattle 38 Denver 33. Wilson MVP with 3 TD passes, Lynch getting the other two. And Seattle winning the game by making Denver settle for FGs too many times (3 TDs and 4 FGs, vs. Seattle's 5 TDs and 1 FG).

[Sho Nuff 720]

Seahawk trolls complaining about Seahawks fans being homers in a Seahawk thread. Gotta love it, gotta just love it. WHO HAS IT BETTER THAN US??? NOBODY

 

Seahawk homer actually defending being a blind homer with nothing objective about it...you can't make this up.

[FlaHawker 24]

 

Seahawk homer actually defending being a blind homer with nothing objective about it...you can't make this up.

Never said I was objective. Never argued against it. That's your hang up baldy.