Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
HenryHill9323

NFL: 11 of 12 Pat's balls under inflated.

Recommended Posts

It is my personal belief that the refs didn't really inspect the PSI before the game started and that they were underinflated at that time.

 

 

That may be your theory but I'm not sure why. Do you have any actual support for that? Don't you think you would by now if that is in fact what occurred?

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is sounding indisputable that somebody deliberately tampered with the game balls. Maybe it was the equipment manager or an over zealous ball boy, who knows? I doubt we ever will. Seems like it would have had to be intentional though.

 

Given the Pats history of gamesmanship outside the rules a fine and loss of draft pick(s) is the likely outcome here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's day 6 of the investigation. I'm pretty sure the first question asked on the first day was directed towards Walt Coleman. "Did you do your job and check the game balls prior to the game?". Had the answer been no, it would have been the shortest investigation in the history of investigations. Since it's day 6, Worms is going to have to switch back to the atmospheric pressure on half the field theory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is my personal belief that the refs didn't really inspect the PSI before the game started and that they were underinflated at that time.

 

Is it really your contention that someone manually under inflated eleven game balls on the sidelines of a conference championship game without anyone noticing? Without anyone catching it on video or anything? Without some lowly ball boy cracking and admitting that he tampered with the footballs?

 

Which one is crazier?

 

Wait...so the NFL is just lying when it says it inspected the balls before?

 

Its my contention that a team did do that..whether by direction of the coach or QB (because no assistant is just doing that on his own).

There is time between when the refs inspect, and they come out ...its possible to be done.

 

I think claiming the NFL is lying about their procedures is crazier than a team doing something to gain an advantage (a team that has been caught skirting the rules in the past to gain an advantage).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Worms wonders why we call him a fake lawyer. Better get 1 Pats fan on the jury. :doublethumbsup:

 

I don't think he wonders why a bunch of hacks call him a fake lawyer.

Probably wonders why a group of you follow him around every where he goes though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

TI'm starting to think they inflated them in a nice and warm part of the Locker room. Not their fault they tend to deflate when exposed to cold air. patriots just found a weakness in the rule and exploit it. Still a terrible pr and image problem due to their actual past instances of cheating

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's day 6 of the investigation. I'm pretty sure the first question asked on the first day was directed towards Walt Coleman. "Did you do your job and check the game balls prior to the game?". Had the answer been no, it would have been the shortest investigation in the history of investigations. Since it's day 6, Worms is going to have to switch back to the atmospheric pressure on half the field theory.

Well, to play devil's advocate, I think there is a (very) small chance that the officials are doing a bit of CYA on this. Although if they did even a squeeze test you would think they could notice a 15% reduction in pressure, otherwise it is a pretty useless test. I wonder if there is a written log of the inflation results? If not, you can bet there will be next year.

 

That being said, if that were the case, I would think Brady would have said something like "hey, I like the balls on the low end of the inflation scale, so we like to submit them a little low (kinda like Rodgers liking them a little high). If the officials think it is too low they inflate them." That is a statement of innocence, at least against the charge of altering them after the inspection. Then again, if you are lawyered up the best advice is usually to say nothing...

 

On another note, has anyone discussed the 12th ball? Why would one be left as regulation? Was there any special marking on that ball?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On another note, has anyone discussed the 12th ball? Why would one be left as regulation? Was there any special marking on that ball?

 

I read a report, which I think someone here has linked, that the 12th ball was also under inflated but not by the 2psi the other 11 were.

 

Maybe the cow that ball was made from used sunscreen, or ate something that rendered his leather immune to atmospheric changes. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Serious question ?

 

Who is more likely to lie ? Who had more to lose ?

The part time ref who would most likely be fired if its found out didn't do a proper job of inspecting the balls or the multi million dollar married to richest super model on the planet qb who at most will get a fine/and or a suspension ?

 

 

Pretty easy choice in this one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another very real possibility is the balls were filled with warmed air.

Would easily explain the pressure loss in a two hour period.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All kidding aside, I'm starting to think that if it's shown Brady had any connection with this, he should be suspended from the SB. In any sport, tampering with the equipment equates to a suspension, cork a bat, you are sitting for 7 games. As minor as the infraction is, if someone intentionally broke rules & tampered with inspected/approved footballs, then a suspension should be levied.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Serious question ?

 

Who is more likely to lie ? Who had more to lose ?

The part time ref who would most likely be fired if its found out didn't do a proper job of inspecting the balls or the multi million dollar married to richest super model on the planet qb who at most will get a fine/and or a suspension ?

 

 

Pretty easy choice in this one.

 

Yeah, the QB with millions in endorsements, possible SB suspension had nothing to lose. :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, the QB with millions in endorsements, possible SB suspension had nothing to lose. :rolleyes:

does the ref ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The warm air thing is a possibility. Maybe a good one. Wouldn't really be cheating though, would it? Gaming the system, sure, but every focking team in the league does that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The warm air thing is a possibility. Maybe a good one. Wouldn't really be cheating though, would it? Gaming the system, sure, but every focking team in the league does that

 

It's on the cheating spectrum, but IMO much less egregious than doctoring the balls after the inspection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, to play devil's advocate, I think there is a (very) small chance that the officials are doing a bit of CYA on this. Although if they did even a squeeze test you would think they could notice a 15% reduction in pressure, otherwise it is a pretty useless test. I wonder if there is a written log of the inflation results? If not, you can bet there will be next year.

 

That being said, if that were the case, I would think Brady would have said something like "hey, I like the balls on the low end of the inflation scale, so we like to submit them a little low (kinda like Rodgers liking them a little high). If the officials think it is too low they inflate them." That is a statement of innocence, at least against the charge of altering them after the inspection. Then again, if you are lawyered up the best advice is usually to say nothing...

 

On another note, has anyone discussed the 12th ball? Why would one be left as regulation? Was there any special marking on that ball?

I'm thinking that would be the kicking / punting ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

You asked who had MORE to lose, Brady clearly does...not the guy working a part time job. :wave:

I don't believe so, I'm pretty sure Brady has a little more job security than any ref. But then again I'm not a retarded this is our super bowl moment eagles fan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking that would be the kicking / punting ball.

There is a different, special set of kicking/punting balls.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It's on the cheating spectrum, but IMO much less egregious than doctoring the balls after the inspection.

I'd think it would hardly register on the spectrum. Certainly well below PEDs and plenty of other things we know happen on a regular basis throughout the league. Hell I'd even put it below the times Belichick gets cute with the injury report

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a different, special set of kicking/punting balls.

Was the properly inflated one that ball? I really don't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm thinking that would be the kicking / punting ball.

There are six if those and they're kept by the refs separate from all the other balls. Somebody hasn't been paying much attention :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe so, I'm pretty sure Brady has a little more job security than any ref. But then again I'm not a retarded this is our super bowl moment eagles fan.

 

Who is more likely to lie ? Who had more to lose ?

 

The answer to both questions is Brady, not a guy working a part-time job. :wave:

 

And don't sell yourself short, you might not be an Eagles fan, but you are clearly retarded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are six if those and they're kept by the refs separate from all the other balls. Somebody hasn't been paying much attention :(

That's true, the Pats cheating again is more a source of amusement than something I care to read a whole lot about. :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another very real possibility is the balls were filled with warmed air.

Would easily explain the pressure loss in a two hour period.

That is still cheating, and wouldn't be done without Brady's knowledge.

 

Timmy boy is pig tails deep in this mud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is still cheating, and wouldn't be done without Brady's knowledge.

 

Timmy boy is pig tails deep in this mud.

he's more deep into his prep for his amazing record 6th Superbowl :overhead:

 

Link to rule that using warm air is illegal ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

he's more deep into his prep for his amazing record 6th Superbowl :overhead:

 

Link to rule that using warm air is illegal ?

Although the warm air theory is no doubt just the latest in desperate Pate fans attempts at explaining away yet another example of why their legacy is a fraud, even if that WERE the explanation, it would still be just another example of Belichick and Co. needing to resort to trickery to try to get an unfair advantage over their opponents. It's sad what that franchise has become.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the warm air theory is no doubt just the latest in desperate Pate fans attempts at explaining away yet another example of why their legacy is a fraud, even if that WERE the explanation, it would still be just another example of Belichick and Co. needing to resort to trickery to try to get an unfair advantage over their opponents. It's sad what that franchise has become.

yes they needed that in that game :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam Schefter reported on SportsCenter that the NFL is having trouble finding evidence that the Patriots tampered with footballs. A team found heating footballs in a sauna probably could put together a compelling argument that it didnt know doing so was against any league rules, since its not listed in the lengthy rulebook. Only altering footballs after an official check is barred.Read more at: http://nesn.com/2015/01/patriots-deflategate-controversy-could-be-explained-by-scientific-theory/2/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they needed that in that game :lol:

ROFL. Yeah, because this was the only game they did it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adam Schefter reported on SportsCenter that the NFL is having trouble finding evidence that the Patriots tampered with footballs. A team found heating footballs in a sauna probably could put together a compelling argument that it didnt know doing so was against any league rules, since its not listed in the lengthy rulebook. Only altering footballs after an official check is barred.Read more at: http://nesn.com/2015/01/patriots-deflategate-controversy-could-be-explained-by-scientific-theory/2/

 

All I know is this has been one ballbuster of a controversy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×