TXScubaDiver 3 Posted November 8, 2016 Is this just a 2 week thing, or is the SEA OL so bad that not even Rawls can be depended on when he comes back? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Texas10 15 Posted November 8, 2016 Wondering the same, Rawls is on my wire, I would have to drop CMike to get him though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Oriole8159 86 Posted November 8, 2016 I think it's going to be an issue going forward. Plus now they have 3 guys that they can shuffle in, so they have little incentive to ride Rawls as an every down back. May as well keep him healthy for the playoffs. Glad I traded CMike last week while he still had the illusion of an RB1. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TennisMenace 156 Posted November 8, 2016 Is this just a 2 week thing, or is the SEA OL so bad that not even Rawls can be depended on when he comes back? Both. The OL looked horrible last night which seems to be par. Wilson was also running for his life often. I'm glad he didn't get hurt. I think Rawls will probably be number one from the get go. This will make Prosisi irrelevant and Cmike a back up IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BobSanders_33 127 Posted November 8, 2016 Both. The OL looked horrible last night which seems to be par. Wilson was also running for his life often. I'm glad he didn't get hurt. I think Rawls will probably be number one from the get go. This will make Prosisi irrelevant and Cmike a back up IMO. I don't think any of them will be fantasy relevant. CJP is a good receiver so he will keep that roll. Rawls and CMike form a dreaded hot hand with Rawls getting first shots. Then the second of the Rawls/CMike combo getting a few limited carries. Not a good situation on a team with a poor OL that doesn't seem committed to the run. So you will see something like a 50/10/40 split with the 40 reserved for CJP on passing and hurry up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Viking14 5 Posted November 8, 2016 I was up 60 and playing a team that had both C Mike and Wilson. I do not get ESPN. So had the radio on and could not believe the first half. The two had scored 29.6 together and cut the lead in half. I got busy and started listening to the radio with like 9+ minutes to go in the game and Seattle had not scored again. I think C Mike had no points in the second half and Wilson had like 4? Wilson id a big question mark. All world in the beginning and all nothing at the end, but they win.. NE and Seattle this week and I have Brady. I can watch Sunday night. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Statue of Liberty 2 Posted November 8, 2016 Seattle called a pass play on 1st down with 3 minutes to go and the lead. The O Line is an incredible mess. It might someday be good, but right now they are starting a basketball player and a couple of rookies. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
American Chewy 98 Posted November 8, 2016 If wilson is able to run around and make plays again rawls could have value much like late last yr. Worth a flier. I'm prob passing for now tho. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,461 Posted November 8, 2016 I still own Rawls on one team. I'm going to hold. If anything is positive about holding him , it's that there is no question he's better then Cmike. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giants22 1 Posted November 8, 2016 Traded him for Doug Martin yesterday. Hopefully Martin returns this week or next. Seattle is definitely gonna be a timeshare with Rawls getting majority when he returns. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Byrdman5 104 Posted November 9, 2016 Cmike was a great fill in guy, but I think Rawls will be the rb1 in Seattle. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil Simms 11 127 Posted November 9, 2016 I think RBBC hell Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
weepaws 2,461 Posted November 9, 2016 Cmike hasn't shown anything to me at least that he's worth an RBBC. I want see what Rawls does when he returns. But when Rawls took over last season he looked really good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 1,802 Posted November 10, 2016 Weeks 10-16 are NE-PHI-TB-CAR-GB-LA-ARI According to my leagues rankings, all but TB are in the top third or so against RB's, with the last 4 all in the top 7. Another reason to possibly be nervous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TennisMenace 156 Posted November 10, 2016 Weeks 10-16 are NE-PHI-TB-CAR-GB-LA-ARI According to my leagues rankings, all but TB are in the top third or so against RB's, with the last 4 all in the top 7. Another reason to possibly be nervous. Nice catch. Yikes!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aljack88 5 Posted November 10, 2016 CMike had been a good fill in for me for several weeks, but it now looks like the end has come. I don't get to see him much (opposite coast) but what I saw Monday night was not the same RB I last saw on TV. Granted the O line sucks but he just seemed like ..... mud flowing; just like Booker Sunday night. I still have him on 2 teams along with Rawls on one and at least for now I can hold them to see how it pans out; though with little confidence. I'm curious to see how Rawls does with this O line. Procise might have a good game vrs the Pats. RBs that are good in the passing game can get some numbers on them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Marshall 98 Posted November 11, 2016 Procise might have a good game vrs the Pats. RBs that are good in the passing game can get some numbers on them. You might find this interesting: http://www.fieldgulls.com/2016/11/9/13580766/cj-prosise-christine-michael-starter-week-10-seahawks-patriots-pete-carroll Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray_T 591 Posted November 11, 2016 Wondering the same, Rawls is on my wire, I would have to drop CMike to get him though. If he was on the wire in any of my leagues I'd grab him. I'd find a way to make it happen. Look at Rawls numbers while healthy. what Cmike has done the last few weeks does not compare. Yes, he is a starting calibre RB but he is not a top end RB. He's a lower mid tier RB. Replaceable. Keep in mind, the Seattle line wasnt very good last year either. Lots of people seem to be ignoring this fact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
handbanana 47 Posted November 11, 2016 I'm gonna drop CMike for Starks and then try and drop Starks for Martin... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,814 Posted November 12, 2016 Didnt want to start a Prosise thread... But he have value this week with rawls still out and cmike with a hammy?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stonewall 647 Posted November 12, 2016 Didnt want to start a Prosise thread... But he have value this week with rawls still out and cmike with a hammy?? I just straight-up dropped CMike for Prosise, in every league where he was still available. CMike has had a very good FF season, considering his ADP.....but his # of snaps and carries has been plummeting. The writing seems to be on the wall, and Rawls returns next week. Looking for upside. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpenceToons 70 Posted November 12, 2016 The one thing I have appreciated about C-Mike is that he's always been healthy enough to stick in that RB2 spot. But with Montgomery finally winning dual designation and some of my ne'er-do-plays looking like they're about to leave the trainer's room, i may not play him again this season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
