KSB2424 3,085 Posted December 1, 2016 That isn't Donald Trump? If so please let CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, all of them know. Because they have no idea. Mass Forest Fires in Tenn and NC, Colombian soccer team plane crash, anything? TIA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,814 Posted December 1, 2016 Lot of people could die freezing Monday in North Dakota because of this pipeline faux outrage (Shrug) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fandandy 3,311 Posted December 1, 2016 Record cold coming next week for pretty much the entire country. Some areas might be 36 degrees below normal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,598 Posted December 1, 2016 That isn't Donald Trump? If so please let CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, all of them know. Because they have no idea. Mass Forest Fires in Tenn and NC, Colombian soccer team plane crash, anything? TIA That is your problem right there, usa today or wall street journal > any cable news network. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SUXBNME 1,346 Posted December 1, 2016 My peemus may or may not be getting smaller or bigger with age. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 12,764 Posted December 1, 2016 That isn't Donald Trump? If so please let CNN, MSNBC, FoxNews, all of them know. Because they have no idea. Mass Forest Fires in Tenn and NC, Colombian soccer team plane crash, anything? TIA Charlotte cop cleared. Riots to follow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ROCKFORD 134 Posted December 1, 2016 i was going to post here about the dakota standoffs, but didnt want to feed the trolls. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wiffleball 4,654 Posted December 1, 2016 Mosul anyone? New cold war much? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GuidingLight 3 Posted December 1, 2016 All media is government controlled by five (5) groups. All politicians are controlled by higher governments and media. All people are controlled by social media. YOU are are controlled by higher sources telling you how to think because you believe ..the news as true. You believe your "smartphone". is the truth. You.. are..the fail. *sidenote - miss ya girl Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JTB 52 Posted December 1, 2016 That is your problem right there, usa today or wall street journal > any cable news network. I read the U.S.A. Today online everyday. The slant is definitely Democratic so to say > is a stretch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MTSkiBum 1,598 Posted December 1, 2016 I read the U.S.A. Today online everyday. The slant is definitely Democratic so to say > is a stretch. You missed the point entirely, most of the news has nothing to do with politics. I only read the money section and tech section at usa today. Usa today is good because it is easy to completely ignore politics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted December 1, 2016 There are no more news agencies. HTH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted December 1, 2016 Lot of people could die freezing Monday in North Dakota because of this pipeline faux outrage (Shrug) Is it fake outrage? I understand the concern for a pipeline burst if it's running through a certain area. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 5,594 Posted December 1, 2016 Tiger tees off today! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,814 Posted December 1, 2016 Is it fake outrage? I understand the concern for a pipeline burst if it's running through a certain area. Yes and no....new pipelines shouldn't be much concern. If they were going to complain....they should have been bit hung about the 50 year old pipeline already in the area. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,489 Posted December 1, 2016 Yes and no....new pipelines shouldn't be much concern. If they were going to complain....they should have been bit hung about the 50 year old pipeline already in the area.There are 305,000 miles of interstate and intrastate natural gas and petroleum (hazardous liquids) pipelines in the US. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cruzer 1,992 Posted December 1, 2016 Kim Jong-un's wife has not been seen in 7 months. She is rumored to have been ground up and eaten as hamburgers by her wack-job, fat ass, dictator husband. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,814 Posted December 1, 2016 There are 305,000 miles of interstate and intrastate natural gas and petroleum (hazardous liquids) pipelines in the US. Right. That's kinda my point. Quite a bit of faux outrage over a NEW line that every land owner along it has signed off on. It's a product that's getting from A to B one way or the other.....tankers and railways are far more dangerous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Frozenbeernuts 1,652 Posted December 1, 2016 Right. That's kinda my point. Quite a bit of faux outrage over a NEW line that every land owner along it has signed off on. It's a product that's getting from A to B one way or the other.....tankers and railways are far more dangerous. I think it's more because they know this pipeline will get old and then become a concern. And when these things bust it's a catastrophe. My union does work on the pipelines. All it takes is one little arc mark on the side of the pipe which creates cracks undetectable to the eye. Over time this is where the pipe is more likely to fail Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted December 1, 2016 I think it's more because they know this pipeline will get old and then become a concern. And when these things bust it's a catastrophe. My union does work on the pipelines. All it takes is one little arc mark on the side of the pipe which creates cracks undetectable to the eye. Over time this is where the pipe is more likely to failthat's why they xray all the welds Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cyclone24 1,814 Posted December 1, 2016 I think it's more because they know this pipeline will get old and then become a concern. And when these things bust it's a catastrophe. My union does work on the pipelines. All it takes is one little arc mark on the side of the pipe which creates cracks undetectable to the eye. Over time this is where the pipe is more likely to fail Not saying you are not correct.....but then they should be biitching about existing old pipelines...not new ones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites