cyclone24 1,935 Posted May 12, 2017 And yet, we've both stated the same thing like 5 times, and they can't seem to comprehend it. They live in some sort of alternate reality, where everything is black and white, left and right, Trump and Trump. Again, timing is everything. It wouldnt have mattered. If he fired him immediately without Sessions or Rothstein who JUST got apoointed you guys would be yapping the same stuff but with added whine of how he didnt have that authority without them. The witch hunt will continue even though theres still nothing. But sweet flip flopping on Comey. Its been fun to watch. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,747 Posted May 12, 2017 It wouldnt have mattered. If he fired him immediately without Sessions or Rothstein who JUST got apoointed you guys would be yapping the same stuff but with added whine of how he didnt have that authority without them. The witch hunt will continue even though theres still nothing. But sweet flip flopping on Comey. Its been fun to watch. Exactly. They have not provided any proof of collusion because there is no proof. The idea is to keep a cloud of doubt and suspicion over Trump as long as possible. There's no there, there. But they'll drag this thing out as long as posssible so the lemmings stay riled up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,783 Posted May 12, 2017 Comey was so close to tying Trump to "russian hacking", I just know it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 So someone gives you liberals what you want and you b!tch about it. Sorry your ice cream is cold ladies. So...you still don't get it...oof. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cbfalcon 827 Posted May 12, 2017 Comey was so close to tying Trump to "russian hacking", I just know it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 Let's see. The Democrats claim the Russians hacked their server and gave emails to Wikileaks to embarrass them. None of this is classified information and exposed just how corrupt the Democrats and Clintons are. The Democrats want someone's head on a platter, namely Trump and his associates. It's well documented in the press that classified information was leaked. Trump wants the leakers of classified information prosecuted. The Democrats aren't concerned with the leaking of classified info so long as it is embarrassing for Trump and associates. The Intel Community are democrats? Including Trump's own guy Mike Pompeo who agrees with the assessment? Its well documented that there is no source of the leaks yet...and quite a bit of speculation going on that some of it is in his own admin. Trump doesn't give a about the leakers...he cares about distracting from what the leaks have shown. This is again showing his and your hypocrisy. Only the substance of the leaks mattered with wiki...not who did it or who may have helped them...have to downplay that. Only the leakers matter now...not what has come out about Trump...just the leakers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 12, 2017 So...you still don't get it...oof. You still don't get it. The timing doesn't matter as the investigation is ongoing. That isn't going to change. That stooge called Comey was an embarrassment to the country with his long laundry list of failures pointed out by others here. Numerous people are dead on his watch since his agency failed to act on numerous accounts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 It wouldnt have mattered. If he fired him immediately without Sessions or Rothstein who JUST got apoointed you guys would be yapping the same stuff but with added whine of how he didnt have that authority without them. The witch hunt will continue even though theres still nothing. But sweet flip flopping on Comey. Its been fun to watch. You are completely incorrect. And flip flopping on Comey? Like Trump and you all who defended him in the fall for the letter to congress? Please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 Exactly. They have not provided any proof of collusion because there is no proof. The idea is to keep a cloud of doubt and suspicion over Trump as long as possible. There's no there, there. But they'll drag this thing out as long as posssible so the lemmings stay riled up. Its an ongoing investigation...you get that...right? That they don't just come out and put the proof on the front page to make you happy. No there there? So Flynn was nothing right? Fake news. He wasn't fired...wasn't a foreign agent...has not had grand jury subpoenas issued? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 You still don't get it. The timing doesn't matter as the investigation is ongoing. That isn't going to change. That stooge called Comey was an embarrassment to the country with his long laundry list of failures pointed out by others here. Numerous people are dead on his watch since his agency failed to act on numerous accounts. He could have done it before the investigation heated up. He could have done it soon after coming in...if it was about how he handled Hillary. Here is the question...do you believe he was fired because of how he handled the Hillary email thing (the first official story that came from the white house)? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 12, 2017 So Flynn was nothing right? Fake news. He wasn't fired...wasn't a foreign agent...has not had grand jury subpoenas issued? When did Flynn begin to take monies? On whose watch did this begin? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 15,908 Posted May 12, 2017 It's funny watching the clips of all the democrats saying how bad Comey was and then showing them unhinged when he was fired. Maxine Watters, one of the lefts prominent members, was the funniest. Auntie Maxine! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted May 12, 2017 It's funny watching the clips of all the democrats saying how bad Comey was and then showing them unhinged when he was fired. Maxine Watters, one of the lefts prominent members, was the funniest. Auntie Maxine! This was great as well! http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-retweets-rosie-odonnells-2016-call-comey-fired/story?id=47356800 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 12, 2017 He could have done it before the investigation heated up. He could have done it soon after coming in...if it was about how he handled Hillary. Here is the question...do you believe he was fired because of how he handled the Hillary email thing (the first official story that came from the white house)? You and the left would b!tch no matter when the timing was. Admit it. Question: No. He was fired (and rightfully so) because he's a hack who should have prosecuted Hillary. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,121 Posted May 12, 2017 FIRE HIM NOW!! Wait, you fired him? Umm, hrmmmmm, OMG, NO!!! WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT!!! You people on the left are focking clowns. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the show. Please keep it up, it's nothing less than spectacular. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted May 12, 2017 FIRE HIM NOW!! Wait, you fired him? Umm, hrmmmmm, OMG, NO!!! WHY WOULD YOU DO THAT!!! You people on the left are focking clowns. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate the show. Please keep it up, it's nothing less than spectacular. It is very amusing to watch especially sho's meltdowns here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 When did Flynn begin to take monies? On whose watch did this begin? To take monies? Ahh...trying to blame it on Obama...who fired him pretty quickly when he was shown to be focking up. Warned Trump not to hire him too. Try again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 You and the left would b!tch no matter when the timing was. Admit it. Question: No. He was fired (and rightfully so) because he's a hack who should have prosecuted Hillary. Why would I admit something that isn't true? Hack? That is funny as hell...and so you do believe it was about Hillary. Why answer no...when you then said yes it was about Hillary? Psst...his firing had nothing to do with how he handled Hillary...or it would have been done immediately. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,433 Posted May 12, 2017 You still don't get it. The timing doesn't matter as the investigation is ongoing. That isn't going to change. That stooge called Comey was an embarrassment to the country with his long laundry list of failures pointed out by others here. Numerous people are dead on his watch since his agency failed to act on numerous accounts. You are hilarious. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,747 Posted May 12, 2017 Its an ongoing investigation...you get that...right? That they don't just come out and put the proof on the front page to make you happy. No there there? So Flynn was nothing right? Fake news. He wasn't fired...wasn't a foreign agent...has not had grand jury subpoenas issued? It's been ongoing for almost a year now. Still, not one shred of evidence of collusion has been presented. Are you suggesting that they have proof that they aren't releasing? Seriously? They have rock solid proof of collusion but they're just going to let him continue to serve as POTUS until they uncover MORE proof? You worry about the subpoenas. Talk to me when they come back with indictments. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 It's been ongoing for almost a year now. Still, not one shred of evidence of collusion has been presented. Are you suggesting that they have proof that they aren't releasing? Seriously? They have rock solid proof of collusion but they're just going to let him continue to serve as POTUS until they uncover MORE proof? You worry about the subpoenas. Talk to me when they come back with indictments. Not all of it has been going on that long. Still...many investigations do take quite a long time to tie things up. Why would they present evidence while its ongoing? Again...do you understand how that works? I believe they have ties to certain people...I believe they think there is more to it and want to make sure. Do you think Grand Juries do things like that for Flynn without proof? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted May 12, 2017 Not all of it has been going on that long. Still...many investigations do take quite a long time to tie things up. Why would they present evidence while its ongoing? Again...do you understand how that works? I believe they have ties to certain people...I believe they think there is more to it and want to make sure. Do you think Grand Juries do things like that for Flynn without proof? Considering how many leaks have come out one would think that if there was something there it would have been leaked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,433 Posted May 12, 2017 Why do we think that Trump would tell Comey that he better not have any tapes of their conversations? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted May 12, 2017 Under Comey: 1. Before he bombed the Boston Marathon, the FBI interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev but let him go. Russia sent the Obama Administration a second warning, but the FBI opted against investigating him again. 3. The FBI had possession of emails sent by Nidal Hasan saying he wanted to kill his fellow soldiers to protect the Taliban -- but didn't intervene, leading many critics to argue the tragedy that resulted in the death of 31 Americans at Fort Hood could have been prevented. 7. During its investigation into Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified material, the FBI made an unusual deal in which Clinton aides were both given immunity and allowed to destroy their laptops. 9. The FBI also investigated the terrorist who killed 49 people and wounded 53 more at the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando, Fla. Despite a more than 10-month investigation of Omar Mateen -- during which Mateen admitting lying to agents -- the FBI opted against pressing further and closed its case. 10. CBS recently reported that when two terrorists sought to kill Americans attending the "Draw Muhammad" event in Garland, Texas, the FBI not only had an understanding an attack was coming, but actually had an undercover agent traveling with the Islamists, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi. The FBI has refused to comment on why the agent on the scene did not intervene during the attack. All on Comey's watch. Bloody hell..............literally. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 Why do we think that Trump would tell Comey that he better not have any tapes of their conversations? Because he is a lying focker who is now trying to intimidate people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,842 Posted May 12, 2017 It's been funny for me to watch all the video of Trump praising Comey during the campaign. They say the Don was yelling at his TV over the Russia thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,993 Posted May 12, 2017 So I tried to get one lib to answer this. He declined, which is pretty typical of the libs around here when asked REAL questions. Maybe another can. Is Trump not allowed to fire someone he deems incompetent as long as they have an investigation open on him? So if Comey kept the investigation open for 8 years Trump couldn't fire him? Anyone care to tackle this simple question? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,710 Posted May 12, 2017 So the Russians told Trump to fire Comey? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,710 Posted May 12, 2017 Because he is a lying focker who is now trying to intimidate people. Get a job loser! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 So I tried to get one lib to answer this. He declined, which is pretty typical of the libs around here when asked REAL questions. Maybe another can. Is Trump not allowed to fire someone he deems incompetent as long as they have an investigation open on him? So if Comey kept the investigation open for 8 years Trump couldn't fire him? Anyone care to tackle this simple question? Sure...he is allowed to. Just as we are allowed to question the timing of it...when the investigation begins heating up as it has been. Are we not allowed to question this timing? Question back to you...that you and others will ignore. If this was about how he handled Hillary or other things they are digging up on him and not about Russian investigation...why wasn't this done in January or February? Why wait til now when Comey is set to testify to committees and these committees are heating up? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,747 Posted May 12, 2017 Not all of it has been going on that long. Still...many investigations do take quite a long time to tie things up. Why would they present evidence while its ongoing? Again...do you understand how that works? I believe they have ties to certain people...I believe they think there is more to it and want to make sure. Do you think Grand Juries do things like that for Flynn without proof? I understand how investigations work. I also understand how a Grand Jury is convened and that their purpose is to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to charge someone with a crime. They don't determine guilt or innocence, only whether or not there's enough to indict someone. Has Flynn been indicted? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 Get a job loser! I have one plagiarizer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sho Nuff 720 Posted May 12, 2017 I understand how investigations work. I also understand how a Grand Jury is convened and that their purpose is to determine whether or not there is sufficient evidence to charge someone with a crime. They don't determine guilt or innocence, only whether or not there's enough to indict someone. Has Flynn been indicted? So...there is sufficient evidence on Flynn to request his financial documents? Are you trying to take the side that Flynn did nothing wrong? The level of denial by Trump fans is something quite interesting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,842 Posted May 12, 2017 Who posted in: James Comey Fired. Member name Posts Sho Nuff 86 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5-Points 3,747 Posted May 12, 2017 So...there is sufficient evidence on Flynn to request his financial documents? Are you trying to take the side that Flynn did nothing wrong? The level of denial by Trump fans is something quite interesting. I said talk to me when people start getting indicted. Until then I'll let you do all the hyperventilating over it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted May 12, 2017 I said talk to me when people start getting indicted. Until then I'll let you do all the hyperventilating over it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Patriotsfatboy1 1,433 Posted May 12, 2017 So I tried to get one lib to answer this. He declined, which is pretty typical of the libs around here when asked REAL questions. Maybe another can. Is Trump not allowed to fire someone he deems incompetent as long as they have an investigation open on him? So if Comey kept the investigation open for 8 years Trump couldn't fire him? Anyone care to tackle this simple question? I am not a lib, but I can take a stab. Of course, he can fire someone that he deems incompetent. However, this case it raises several questions: - How did this guy go from having "guts" in October to being incompetent in May? - How did we get to this investigation going 8 years? That is certainly hyperbole and not pertinent. If the investigation takes too long and is a distraction to what is going on, then why not just say that? If Trump wanted Comey out because it was not one of his guys, then he should have canned him when he took office. Trump wants to drain the swamp, but he sure seems to be selecting which weeds are removed and when. It raises lots of eyebrows on the timing and his own party is looking at this as bad timing. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,710 Posted May 12, 2017 I have one plagiarizer. Being a stay at home Mom for kids who are in school all day is not a job. I think the reason you are so angry is that your wife wears the pants in your family and you can't do anything about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,993 Posted May 12, 2017 I am not a lib, but I can take a stab. Of course, he can fire someone that he deems incompetent. Thanks. So that should be the end of this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites