TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 15, 2019 20 minutes ago, The Observer said: No, the one where Ukraine thanked us for the weapons and said they would like to buy more and Trump answered with I'd like a favor though. After already cutting off funding. That one. Don't remember that one. I do remember the one where Trump alerted the Ukraine President that a US official was bragging about interfering in Ukraine business. And that he might look into it. Is it that one? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 8 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: Don't remember that one. I do remember the one where Trump alerted the Ukraine President that a US official was bragging about interfering in Ukraine business. And that he might look into it. Is it that one? LOL Yeah, maybe that's the one. I bet the last two 10 hour interviews were all about that. #thejigisup Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 36 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: Don't remember that one. I do remember the one where Trump alerted the Ukraine President that a US official was bragging about interfering in Ukraine business. And that he might look into it. Is it that one? Ukraine had already reopened the Burisma investigation back in February 2019; MONTHS before Trump spoke with Ukraine. The left knows Ukraine is domino #1 and a river of dirty money went through there to them. IMF/US aid.........billions of dollars missing. Newbie's getting his news from CNN so all Zucker is telling him is Impeachment, impeachment, impeachment. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 15, 2019 1 hour ago, The Observer said: LOL Yeah, maybe that's the one. I bet the last two 10 hour interviews were all about that. #thejigisup Was this the 10 hour interview with the woman who left the WH in May? 2 months before the call? She must have had great input. #desperation 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 14 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: Was this the 10 hour interview with the woman who left the WH in May? 2 months before the call? She must have had great input. #desperation Turn on an actual news network for a few hours. I'm not going to try to educate you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, The Observer said: Turn on an actual news network for a few hours. I'm not going to try to educate you. Like CNN? Where Zucker is the puppet master? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Like CNN? Where Zucker is the puppet master? His choice. But it can't be Fox News. That's all Trump propaganda. He seems very in-the-dark about what's been happening the last few days. I'm trying to help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr. Hand 482 Posted October 15, 2019 5 minutes ago, The Observer said: His choice. But it can't be Fox News. That's all Trump propaganda. Wrong again https://video.foxnews.com/v/6089432776001/#sp=show-clips Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 15, 2019 19 minutes ago, The Observer said: Turn on an actual news network for a few hours. I'm not going to try to educate you. What would the actual news know about a private hearing that most of congress can't even attend? Please educate me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,703 Posted October 15, 2019 It appears the Meathead has added Gasbag it his resume. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Baker Boy said: It appears the Meathead has added Gasbag it his resume. I already destroyed you terribly when you asked when Trump promoted violence. You should probably take some time to heal before exposing yourself again, pappy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 21 minutes ago, The Observer said: His choice. But it can't be Fox News. That's all Trump propaganda. He seems very in-the-dark about what's been happening the last few days. I'm trying to help. He (along with any sane individual here) ARE in the dark about what delusional aspect of CNN's coverage has been. You appear to view this debacle as an actual impeachment inquiry; it's not. That's done through the Judiciary. You appear to view this debacle as legitimate; it's not. The Dems have tried desperately to make this appear as impeachment to appease meatheads such as yourself. In actuality, they're afraid of an impeachment vote. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baker Boy 1,703 Posted October 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, The Observer said: I already destroyed you terribly when you asked when Trump promoted violence. You should probably take some time to heal before exposing yourself again, pappy. [ˈɡasˌbaɡ] NOUN informal a person who talks too much, typically about unimportant things. synonyms: talker · chatterer · jabberer · babbler · prattler · blatherer · [more] 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Baker Boy said: [ˈɡasˌbaɡ] informal a person who talks too much, typically about unimportant things. synonyms: Impeachment! Bwahahahaha Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, The Observer said: Impeachment! Bwahahahaha There's no involvement with the House Judiciary thus there's no impeachment inquiry. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,297 Posted October 15, 2019 Quote Giuliani paid $500K for work for indicted associate's firm President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani said he was paid $500,000 for his work at a company co-founded by an associate who was arrested on campaign finance charges. Starting to understand WHY Rudy thinks everyone is corrupt... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 4 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: There's no involvement with the House Judiciary thus there's no impeachment inquiry. Ok, then they're just interviewing key players for sh!ts and giggles. Call it what you want. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
drobeski 3,061 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said: Starting to understand WHY Rudy thinks everyone is corrupt... What's wrong with that ? Other than him not being a Democrat ? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 15, 2019 Just now, The Observer said: Ok, then they're just interviewing key players for sh!ts and giggles. Call it what you want. It's called fishing. And it's their right to do so to anyone at anytime. #notimpeachment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 9 minutes ago, TimmySmith said: It's called fishing. And it's their right to do so to anyone at anytime. #notimpeachment Who have they interviewed or asked to interview who isn't a key player? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 14 minutes ago, The Observer said: Ok, then they're just interviewing key players for sh!ts and giggles. Call it what you want. Interviewing key players for a couple quotes that no one will be able to verify. Seems legit............. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 6 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Interviewing key players for a couple quotes that no one will be able to verify. Seems legit............. Not even sure what you're talking about. But you seem upset. Sorry buddy. I don't make the rules. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimmySmith 2,782 Posted October 15, 2019 29 minutes ago, The Observer said: Who have they interviewed or asked to interview who isn't a key player? Biden. Neither one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted October 15, 2019 58 minutes ago, The Observer said: Impeachment! Bwahahahaha So how's that going for ya? Been swinging and missing for years now. Better crawl back to your CNN perma-tuned television. It will make you feel better through 2024. Let me know if the left actually does anything positive for the country rather than playing the butthurt whining child. Move on with your life dude, maybe join a convent with the other liberal Mary's you look up to. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 58 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: Starting to understand WHY Rudy thinks everyone is corrupt... Because the evidence shows it and the same evidence the Dems are trying desperately to keep hidden? The fired Ambassador to Ukraine blocked Ukrainians' visas for months because they were trying to deliver the goods on the Bidens. The same Ambassador that was spying on journalists. The fact that they're going hard after Rudy should tell you he's over the target. Did the Justice Dept go after Rudy or is it the Feds in the rat's nest of New York that are? Now fired Bolton is chiming in............... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 41 minutes ago, The Observer said: Not even sure what you're talking about. But you seem upset. Sorry buddy. I don't make the rules. Of course you don't because you're incapable of following a basic conversation. The House Intel committee is conducting these interviews and blocked the Republicans from attending. Now we can only take the Dems word for what these interviews reveal. Seems legit........... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 11 minutes ago, sderk said: So how's that going for ya? Been swinging and missing for years now. Better crawl back to your CNN perma-tuned television. It will make you feel better through 2024. Let me know if the left actually does anything positive for the country rather than playing the butthurt whining child. Move on with your life dude, maybe join a convent with the other liberal Mary's you look up to. As far as I know, Pelosi just announced the impeachment inquiry 2 or 3 weeks ago. Didn't realize that was 3 years already. Man, time flies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 3 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Of course you don't because you're incapable of following a basic conversation. The House Intel committee is conducting these interviews and blocked the Republicans from attending. Now we can only take the Dems word for what these interviews reveal. Seems legit........... Sorry, buddy. I'm not wasting a second day explaining the difference between an investigation and a hearing. Worms tried helping from a lawyer's perspective too. We failed. You're just going to have to go through your life being stupid on the subject. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, The Observer said: As far as I know, Pelosi just announced the impeachment inquiry 2 or 3 weeks ago. Didn't realize that was 3 years already. Man, time flies. Yeah. Pelosi. Keep trying. Not sure why some like yourself want people shltting in the streets all over America rather than just in San Fran. But you are proof those people exist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sderk 1,040 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, The Observer said: We failed. Again and again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 39 minutes ago, The Observer said: Sorry, buddy. I'm not wasting a second day explaining the difference between an investigation and a hearing. Worms tried helping from a lawyer's perspective too. We failed. You're just going to have to go through your life being stupid on the subject. You still haven't answered a couple questions. When has the House Intel committee EVER conducted anything involving the word impeachment? When has the House Intel ever conducted investigation/hearing with only one party allowed to attend? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: You still haven't answered a couple questions. When has the House Intel committee EVER conducted anything involving the word impeachment? When has the House Intel ever conducted investigation/hearing with only one party allowed to attend? Link to a post of me claiming to be an impeachment in US History major? I don't know how it worked for Nixon or how it worked for Clinton. There are a lot of laws on the books that you seem to dislike. You should get your team to win the congress back and get them changed. I don't know what to tell you buddy. I Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, The Observer said: Link to a post of me claiming to be an impeachment in US History major? I don't know how it worked for Nixon or how it worked for Clinton. There are a lot of laws on the books that you seem to dislike. You should get your team to win the congress back and get them changed. I don't know what to tell you buddy. I Yet you're passing yourself off as an expert on what's going on which is laughable. You should just stop at 'I don't know' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Yet you're passing yourself off as an expert on what's going on which is laughable. You should just stop at 'I don't know' Not an expert at anything. I'm just banging my head against the wall trying to explain to you that your side will get a chance to cross examine every single witness if the Dems decide to move forward with impeachment. Be patient. No one is getting removed from office because of these investigatory interviews. Or being thrown in jail. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 2 minutes ago, The Observer said: Not an expert at anything. I'm just banging my head against the wall trying to explain to you that your side will get a chance to cross examine every single witness if the Dems decide to move forward with impeachment. Be patient. No one is getting removed from office because of these investigatory interviews. Or being thrown in jail. That's not the way it was intended to work and no sane individual would look up what the Dems are doing as a fair process or even legitimate. ANY information released about this testimony can't be taken seriously. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 13 minutes ago, Filthy Fernadez said: That's not the way it was intended to work and no sane individual would look up what the Dems are doing as a fair process or even legitimate. ANY information released about this testimony can't be taken seriously. Well, Trump getting his personal fixer to grab the completed Mueller report , totally misrepresent what it says to the American public, and then wait three weeks to release it, isn't how that process was intended to work. Elections have consequences. Trump won and he got to name his AG. In 2018, that lection had consequences too. I'm sorry that you don't like the way your criminal president is being investigated. He DID have the option of not breaking the law. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cdub100 3,934 Posted October 15, 2019 If you believe the Russian hoax about Trump and current believe the Ukrainian hoax against Trump? You're a special kind of stupid. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Filthy Fernadez 2,696 Posted October 15, 2019 20 minutes ago, The Observer said: Well, Trump getting his personal fixer to grab the completed Mueller report , totally misrepresent what it says to the American public, and then wait three weeks to release it, isn't how that process was intended to work. Elections have consequences. Trump won and he got to name his AG. In 2018, that lection had consequences too. I'm sorry that you don't like the way your criminal president is being investigated. He DID have the option of not breaking the law. Barr didn't have to release the entire Mueller report (which he did). All he had to do was receive the report and review it. And since when do Prosecutors say 'We can't exonerate' anyone? They either prosecute or not because ALL Americans, regardless of what their political beliefs are, have the presumption of innocence. So when Mueller decided not to say whether Obstruction was committed, Trump was exonerated because he started off innocent until proven guilty. And you've still not posted what law Trump has broken. Put up or shut up. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Observer 641 Posted October 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Filthy Fernadez said: Barr didn't have to release the entire Mueller report (which he did). All he had to do was receive the report and review it. And since when do Prosecutors say 'We can't exonerate' anyone? They either prosecute or not because ALL Americans, regardless of what their political beliefs are, have the presumption of innocence. So when Mueller decided not to say whether Obstruction was committed, Trump was exonerated because he started off innocent until proven guilty. And you've still not posted what law Trump has broken. Put up or shut up. Yawn Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,400 Posted October 15, 2019 18 minutes ago, Cdub100 said: If you believe the Russian hoax about Trump and current believe the Ukrainian hoax against Trump? You're a special kind of stupid. What if completely denying that there may be some possible truth to both makes you a special kind of stupid? Ever consider that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
