Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Fireballer

Pedo teacher describes how looking up girls' skirts distracts him from teaching class

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Well sure, obviously, but no dude is gonna be like "Hey I'm attracted to young girls, lock me up!".  We as men need to how each other accountable so that when a dude is like "I get boners looking at my students", stand up and tell the dude he's a creep.  I don't know that it changes their thoughts, but at least that kind of talk wouldn't be viewed as acceptable, or celebrated even.  That's the whole point of flipping the script on toxic masculinity.  Don't accept that behavior anymore.

Man, thats seems easy...tough talk to treat mental illness.  Somebody should have thought of that sooner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Man, thats seems easy...tough talk to treat mental illness.  Somebody should have thought of that sooner.

Why even have prison sentences for pedos? All the judge has to do is scold the guy into submission. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, craftsman said:

Why even have prison sentences for pedos? All the judge has to do is scold the guy into submission. :dunno:

You're on record as stating that you are sexually attracted to 14 year old girls.  Are you saying you should be in jail for that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shooter McGavin said:

You're on record as stating that you are sexually attracted to 14 year old girls.  Are you saying you should be in jail for that?

No I'm not.  I said Brook Shields was hot in Blue Lagoon movie.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd imagine teaching with a load of jizz in your draws can't be easy?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, craftsman said:

No I'm not.  I said Brook Shields was hot in Blue Lagoon movie.

 

When she was 14.  And you also said 15 year olds are hot.  So should be in jail for this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Voltaire said:

I'm just saying there's a responsibility that comes with this profession that doesn't exist in many others. A teacher is a community role model and there are certain standard you are expected to adhere, not just in the classroom but in your free time in public.

Pretty sure there in ALL professions you're not supposed to sexualize 14 year old girls.

4 hours ago, Voltaire said:

For example, look at the guy in this video. We're all revulsed by him. Did he ever hit on these fourteen y/o girls? His big crime is sitting at his desk and enjoying the show rather than tell the girls they were in violation of the dress code then bragging about the opportunity to look up the skirts of 9th graders while at work. When you're a boy in the class, looking up the girls' skirts is great, when you're behind the teacher's desk, there's an obligation that comes with that.

Did you watch the entire video?  Let me quote a little of it for you:

Quote

“I get the vibe, it’s obvious, but I refuse, because I don’t fock my students. That’s my principle. I don’t do that, but sometimes I make exceptions. Sometimes,” the director added.

If someone says they don't "fock" a certain class of females but then says they make exceptions, what does that mean to you? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Voltaire said:

I'm just saying there's a responsibility that comes with this profession that doesn't exist in many others. A teacher is a community role model and there are certain standard you are expected to adhere, not just in the classroom but in your free time in public.

Like you post this link to a pretty girl in a school outfit and, of course, I agree with you. But if we were teachers, not even at school but hanging out at the mall, and you said, "V check out Jin BeiBei in that skirt, yellow fever doesn't discriminate." I'd have an obligation to report you. It's not that I'd disagree, Jin BeiBei probably is all that,  my eyes still function and underage girls are often gorgeous, but I can't be looking at these chicks sexually, it's just inappropriate. You have to have more of a "dad" relationship with them.

For example, look at the guy in this video. We're all revulsed by him. Did he ever hit on these fourteen y/o girls? His big crime is sitting at his desk and enjoying the show rather than tell the girls they were in violation of the dress code then bragging about the opportunity to look up the skirts of 9th graders while at work. When you're a boy in the class, looking up the girls' skirts is great, when you're behind the teacher's desk, there's an obligation that comes with that.

If that was a requirement, we wouldn't have schools because there would be no teachers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

If that was a requirement, we wouldn't have schools because there would be no teachers.

All teachers talk about how hot their students are?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

All teachers talk about how hot their students are?

Enough that schools wouldn't have the necessary numbers to teach the kids.  Also, you're making a straw man argument out of this.  The post I was referring to was in discussion about some one who mentioned a student was sexually attractive.  Not every student who is sexually attractive has to be "hot".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

Enough that schools wouldn't have the necessary numbers to teach the kids.  Also, you're making a straw man argument out of this.  The post I was referring to was in discussion about some one who mentioned a student was sexually attractive.  Not every student who is sexually attractive has to be "hot".

I don't know what you all think or where it comes from but teachers don't sit around talking about how "hot" kids are. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, you know you hit the liberals in soft spot when they make straw man arguments and mock out of context.

Who set up the straw man?  You jumped into this thread and made a statement that there would be no teachers if they had to report each other for talking about focking their students, and then you got called out for it, but then cried strawman.  WTF?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shooter McGavin said:

Who set up the straw man?  You jumped into this thread and made a statement that there would be no teachers if they had to report each other for talking about focking their students, and then you got called out for it, but then cried strawman.  WTF?

🤣

Too funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Shooter McGavin said:

Maybe you should go back to spotting your fiance and attending whatever parties she plans for you.

Triggered!  Sorry your weak. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, you know you hit the liberals in soft spot when they make straw man arguments and mock "out of context" posts.

.

Dude, your post was creepy 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, you know you hit the liberals in soft spot when they make straw man arguments and mock "out of context" posts.

.

I mostly just think it’s funny that you think hot and sexually attractive mean two different things

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Strike said:

Pretty sure there in ALL professions you're not supposed to sexualize 14 year old girls.

Did you watch the entire video?  Let me quote a little of it for you:

If someone says they don't "fock" a certain class of females but then says they make exceptions, what does that mean to you? 

I only listened to about the first 30 seconds, figured I got the gist of it. He said that? Why is that not the headline of the tweet instead of looking at their panties??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TimHauck said:

I mostly just think it’s funny that you think hot and sexually attractive mean two different things

Uh, because they do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Care to explain the difference?

LOL, I'm done feeding you trolls.  Go to your liberal safe space... shew, shew.  🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TBayXXXVII said:

LOL, I'm done feeding you trolls.  Go to your liberal safe space... shew, shew.  🤣

Classic GC retard, says something stupid, gets called out on it, BACKPEDALs away with laughing emojis.  The classic digby and horseman play.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t read this whole thing, but is gutterpedo lining up in his usual stance? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

Classic GC retard, says something stupid, gets called out on it, BACKPEDALs away with laughing emojis.  The classic digby and horseman play.

Lol, yeah I was going to say he sounds like Horseman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, TimHauck said:

I mostly just think it’s funny that you think hot and sexually attractive mean two different things

It does for me .  :dunno:

 

I think Kate Beckinsale is hot (and sexually attractive)  

I think  Helena Bonham Carter is sexually attractive (but not hot).  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Strike said:

Pretty sure there in ALL professions you're not supposed to sexualize 14 year old girls.

Did you watch the entire video?  Let me quote a little of it for you:

If someone says they don't "fock" a certain class of females but then says they make exceptions, what does that mean to you? 

No, you're right. I didn't watch the whole video, only the first third or so, and didn't see that part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

No, you're right. I didn't watch the whole video, only the first third or so, and didn't see that part.

Love how many people on this forum love to comment on things they're totally ignorant about.  It's like Worms offers a class in ignorance and stupidity and some of you pay the tuition and attend.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×