Trannies Are Mental Illness

[League Champion 1,896]

7 minutes ago, Sagging Scrot said:

I'm ready for the war how about you?

The Trannies need to be careful of what they wish for

[seafoam1 2,799]

2 hours ago, League Champion said:

The Trannies need to be careful of what they wish for

Can you imagine if they get what they want. We are all focked. 

[jerryskids 6,559]

4 hours ago, Engorgeous George said:

I would think cycling would be helpful in keeping the wound from healing closed.  

Thanks for taking me into the weekend with that visual.   

[zsasz 361]

6 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

I have compassion for the people who are being strongarmed to accept this as not mental illness.

You know damn well the left is pushing this as normalcy on the public. Their take is 'accept it or face the consequences'. It is pushed in my company daily. Inclusion and Diversity includes accepting men who think they are women and treating them as normal. 

The left does not agree that it's mental illness. 

But you specifically don't have compassion for the individual who is suffering from the mental illness itself?

Maybe the over pushing of it is a result because there's such a blowback over it; both towards the individual and towards the agenda? You can't deny that historically...these people haven't exactly been treated great by a good portion of our society.

At the end of the day, I think most of it is a combination of:

1) - The gay culture coming into the mainstream and showing people that in those cultures there are dominiant partners who identify with the opposite sex (i.e. a Butch lesbian and a Hardcore Troubadour Homo Sexual who is the lady) and engage in certain types of make believe gender fluidity.

2) Straight or gay kids tweaking their parents and society a bit in an act of rebellion

3) A legitimate few who truly believe they are not gay or who don't realize they are gay but think they are a different sex.  You'll say that the manipulation of these people is deliberate. And it may be.  I think its more representative of a culture that (amongst most facets) lives a mantra of "if it feels good...just do it" and "YOU BE YOU, BABY!!!". I don't think there's a nefarious cabal that exists to make you gayer than you already are.....but I would probably agree that the DNC shouldn't be taking these peoples money and wholeheartedly encouraging it.  Then again, I think the RNC plays on mentally ill people as well...so what do I know?

The first two groups will be fine as this thing goes on.  Kids will grow up and not try to tweak their parents anymore.  Homosexuals will realize that being "out in the mainstream" ain't all its cracked up to be.

It's the third group; regardless of if they've been brainwashed or are willing participants in a politicalization of it, who we really should feel sympathy for.  They're receving a safe...but probably wrong message from people who might or might not really be thinking about their best interests while at the same time, seeing people across the aisle(not all..but you can't deny the rhetoric that comes from that group at times)  who at best, don't want anything to do with them and at worst would like nothing more than to see them at the bottom of the ocean.  

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[Sagging Scrot 44]

The ideology needs to die

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

25 minutes ago, zsasz said:

But you specifically don't have compassion for the individual who is suffering from the mental illness itself?

 

You can have compassion for someone's circumstances but not compassion for their behavior. There's a difference. You are intentionally conflating the two as a type of cheap purity test. 

Live how you want to live. Just don't push it onto kids. Don't demand that others subscribe to your behavior in absolute terms. You can't demand empathy and then give none back. That's exactly what the most fringe of the radical LGBT movement has done. 

What is the best course? 

Let the LGBT have their own towns, communities, cities and even an entire state. Have their own businesses and internal insular economy. Do what you want to do in your neighborhoods with your own people. Stay away from everyone else, and they'll stay away from you. But do you know what would happen if that occurred? Some elements of the LGBT community would ostracize and marginalize others within. In most cases, odds are, it would be lesbians. Anyone who happens to be a biological woman in today's current LGBT is completely marginalized. Not by outsiders. But from within. 

Do what you want in your own neighborhood. But stay out of mine. I'll stay out of yours. That's not bigotry. That's not racism. That's not xenophobia. That's not hate. Plenty of people do that already today. They want to live in places around others with like minded values. 

You aren't asking for "compassion", you are asking for "surrender" 

If you choose to try to start gaslighting Conservatives here, at least try to show some actual skill. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

Seriously, is there really a debate on wither this is a mental illness?  It 100% assuredly is.  There is no debate.

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

2 hours ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Seriously, is there really a debate on wither this is a mental illness?  It 100% assuredly is.  There is no debate.

 

Yes and No. 

Being a transgender violates biological imperative. We are hardwired instinctively to survive and then reproduce. Anyone who is LGBT and lives that way will likely be violating their baseline hard coding. It's like a factory that makes some kind of food product. Nearly all of what is churned out has a uniform end result. But sometimes you have deviations in the system. 

There was a time when it was socially acceptable to consider anyone on the LGBT spectrum as a "deviant"  I.E. they were deviating from the core imperative to survive and reproduce. 

Culture and society did not tolerate the LGBT lifestyle and pathway because you needed lots of physical labor when the core economy was built upon agriculture. Also giving birth was risky and hazardous. Lots of women died giving birth. Lots of children were born and died soon after. 

Also those who were mentally ill perished in previous harder times in the world. If everyone was going off to war, and you couldn't keep it together, you didn't last long on the battlefield. Either from your enemies or from your own side. Also when you have food scarcity, it's hard to justify feeding someone who doesn't contribute to the collective. 

The toleration of the mentally ill can only really happen with a society of abundance. That's just not politically correct to say, but it's the hard truth. 

Where the debate splits in half is being LGBT now offers status to young people. It can be monetized. It allows external validation and virtue signaling. They might really want to do this because it's how they are built inside from birth ( deviation) or it might just be "trendy" 

Do you remember the first Blade film with Wesley Snipes in the late 90s? Part of the idiotic plan for Deacon Frost was to turn everyone into a vampire. OK, nimrod, if everyone is a vampire, then who do you eat?  If the LGBT community wants to invade schools and turn kids into LGBT, then who is going to have kids naturally in a society where the birth rate is declining? 

No new babies in enough quantities = No new future workers and taxpayers = Economic collapse = Everyone in your society dies 

This is happening in Japan RIGHT NOW AS WE SPEAK. 

When someone dials 911, sure is nice when cops show up when bad things happen. When you go into a hospital, sure is nice that there is someone there to offer medical care. When you turn on your faucet, sure is nice to have clean potable water come out of it. When you are cold, sure is nice to flip a switch and to have heat come on. All this requires massive industries that need people. New people all the time to replace people cycling out. What happens when your birth rate collapses to the point where you don't have those new people? 

Society can TOLERATE the LGBT community. But only in certain numbers. You cannot have a functioning society, with some pathway for a future, where half your young people decide they want to be LGBT. 

The woke unhinged activist radical leftists should think about that the next time they go into their kitchens. What happens if your kids and grandkids turn on that faucet and nothing comes out of it? For those who want to hate Republicans and the GOP, go ahead. Lots of idiots in professional politics who are Republican. I won't disagree. If you want to hate Trump, go ahead. I'm already tired and exhausted of having to hear about that idiotic mother f**ker.  But if you continue to push woke beyond all measure, including this bizarre push to make everyone LGBT, then you've sentenced your children and grandchildren to suffering and death. 

You need new babies. Lots of them to make any society work. It's apparently easy for woke shock troopers for the DNC to scream out about some culture war crap. But suddenly very hard to do some basic math. The math does not add up. "Social norms" exist beyond just keeping some people in power, they also exist because it usually lines up with a pathway to keep society functioning on a practical level. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

6 hours ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

Yes and No. 

Being a transgender violates biological imperative. We are hardwired instinctively to survive and then reproduce. Anyone who is LGBT and lives that way will likely be violating their baseline hard coding. It's like a factory that makes some kind of food product. Nearly all of what is churned out has a uniform end result. But sometimes you have deviations in the system. 

There was a time when it was socially acceptable to consider anyone on the LGBT spectrum as a "deviant"  I.E. they were deviating from the core imperative to survive and reproduce. 

Culture and society did not tolerate the LGBT lifestyle and pathway because you needed lots of physical labor when the core economy was built upon agriculture. Also giving birth was risky and hazardous. Lots of women died giving birth. Lots of children were born and died soon after. 

Also those who were mentally ill perished in previous harder times in the world. If everyone was going off to war, and you couldn't keep it together, you didn't last long on the battlefield. Either from your enemies or from your own side. Also when you have food scarcity, it's hard to justify feeding someone who doesn't contribute to the collective. 

The toleration of the mentally ill can only really happen with a society of abundance. That's just not politically correct to say, but it's the hard truth. 

Where the debate splits in half is being LGBT now offers status to young people. It can be monetized. It allows external validation and virtue signaling. They might really want to do this because it's how they are built inside from birth ( deviation) or it might just be "trendy" 

Do you remember the first Blade film with Wesley Snipes in the late 90s? Part of the idiotic plan for Deacon Frost was to turn everyone into a vampire. OK, nimrod, if everyone is a vampire, then who do you eat?  If the LGBT community wants to invade schools and turn kids into LGBT, then who is going to have kids naturally in a society where the birth rate is declining? 

No new babies in enough quantities = No new future workers and taxpayers = Economic collapse = Everyone in your society dies 

This is happening in Japan RIGHT NOW AS WE SPEAK. 

When someone dials 911, sure is nice when cops show up when bad things happen. When you go into a hospital, sure is nice that there is someone there to offer medical care. When you turn on your faucet, sure is nice to have clean potable water come out of it. When you are cold, sure is nice to flip a switch and to have heat come on. All this requires massive industries that need people. New people all the time to replace people cycling out. What happens when your birth rate collapses to the point where you don't have those new people? 

Society can TOLERATE the LGBT community. But only in certain numbers. You cannot have a functioning society, with some pathway for a future, where half your young people decide they want to be LGBT. 

The woke unhinged activist radical leftists should think about that the next time they go into their kitchens. What happens if your kids and grandkids turn on that faucet and nothing comes out of it? For those who want to hate Republicans and the GOP, go ahead. Lots of idiots in professional politics who are Republican. I won't disagree. If you want to hate Trump, go ahead. I'm already tired and exhausted of having to hear about that idiotic mother f**ker.  But if you continue to push woke beyond all measure, including this bizarre push to make everyone LGBT, then you've sentenced your children and grandchildren to suffering and death. 

You need new babies. Lots of them to make any society work. It's apparently easy for woke shock troopers for the DNC to scream out about some culture war crap. But suddenly very hard to do some basic math. The math does not add up. "Social norms" exist beyond just keeping some people in power, they also exist because it usually lines up with a pathway to keep society functioning on a practical level. 

Spoken as if it came directly from God himself.  100% agreement. 

There is simply no way in a normal society we have this many anomalies.  It should be a small percentage of the population.  It used to be along the lines 2-4% but now were up to what?  10%?  15%?  20%?  GTFO.

Retards like sqizturd want everyone to think it's because there is no more Rainbow Mob Bully™ standing on every corner anymore and people are not afraid to come out - all at the same time insisting that there STILL is a Rainbow Mob Bully™ to then force this crap on others.  GTFO.

This whole bullsh@t of it being "natural" is absurd and has literally jumped the shark  It's now used as an excuse to promote the perversion instead.  There is no way we should have that many numbers of anomalies of nature - which is what they are.  This is being learned and taught - learned and taught to children who then grow up confused and think being a member of the rainbow mob is an option.

Like you said, being a member of the rainbow mob is LITERALLY in direct conflict with the prime directive - propagation of the species.  It also conflicts with child rearing as well - you need a mother (females) and a father (males) to give that child what they need.  The female brings things to the table that males can't - and vice-versa.  You can't duplicate that with two members of the same sex or people pretending to be the opposite sex.  It also confuses the child into thinking that is normal.  It's not.  The only reason a same-sex couple should be ever be able to adopt is if they LITERALLY cannot find a normal sex couple.

Also, we should not be celebrating, promoting or advancing the rainbow mob "lifestyle" at all.  Yet, somehow, they get a whole f'n month to celebrate their perversion?  Veterans only get 2 or 3 days but we've given these anomalies the entire month of June?  GTFO.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

58 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Veterans only get 2 or 3 days but we've given these anomalies the entire month of June?  GTFO.

May is military appreciation month, and November is veterans and military family month.

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

55 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

May is military appreciation month, and November is veterans and military family month.

Look when you are crazy you have no time for facts. 

[seafoam1 2,799]

1 minute ago, Sean Mooney said:

Look when you are crazy you have no time for facts. 

I agree. Public school teachers need to meditate or something. They are focked up.

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

As of 2022- 86% of adults in the US identify as straight or heterosexual, 7% offer no opinion, and 7% identify as LGBT. That means roughly 222 million people identify as straight and 18 million identify as LGBT with another 18 million declining to offer their sexual orientation. 

Yet we can people saying things like "The LGBT are invading schools to convert kids."  or the most bizarre slippery slope rant one could give while comparing it to the plot of a 90's Marvel comic book movie. This is the epitome of a bad faith argument. 

And when people are saying things like: "The only reason a same-sex couple should be ever be able to adopt is if they LITERALLY cannot find a normal sex couple." You are dealing with someone who is a straight up azzhole. And these idiotic thoughts being thrown out there are the exact reason why we have these months and programs. Because the idea is to say "Hey it's okay these people exist. You don't have to agree with them but be cool to them."

[seafoam1 2,799]

12 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

As of 2022- 86% of adults in the US identify as straight or heterosexual, 7% offer no opinion, and 7% identify as LGBT. That means roughly 222 million people identify as straight and 18 million identify as LGBT with another 18 million declining to offer their sexual orientation. 

Yet we can people saying things like "The LGBT are invading schools to convert kids."  or the most bizarre slippery slope rant one could give while comparing it to the plot of a 90's Marvel comic book movie. This is the epitome of a bad faith argument. 

And when people are saying things like: "The only reason a same-sex couple should be ever be able to adopt is if they LITERALLY cannot find a normal sex couple." You are dealing with someone who is a straight up azzhole. And these idiotic thoughts being thrown out there are the exact reason why we have these months and programs. Because the idea is to say "Hey it's okay these people exist. You don't have to agree with them but be cool to them."

"18 million identify as LGBT with another 18 million declining to offer their sexual orientation" 

That's a pretty big defect in humanity.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

10 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

"18 million identify as LGBT with another 18 million declining to offer their sexual orientation" 

That's a pretty big defect in humanity.

Time for you to take another break from here.  Do us all a favor.

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Time for you to take another break from here.  Do us all a favor.

What so he can create a 6th screen name to post under?

He is a pretty big defect in humanity. 

[seafoam1 2,799]

5 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Time for you to take another break from here.  Do us all a favor.

You din't think it's a defect?

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

2 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

As of 2022- 86% of adults in the US identify as straight or heterosexual, 7% offer no opinion, and 7% identify as LGBT. That means roughly 222 million people identify as straight and 18 million identify as LGBT with another 18 million declining to offer their sexual orientation. 

Yet we can people saying things like "The LGBT are invading schools to convert kids."  or the most bizarre slippery slope rant one could give while comparing it to the plot of a 90's Marvel comic book movie. This is the epitome of a bad faith argument. 

And when people are saying things like: "The only reason a same-sex couple should be ever be able to adopt is if they LITERALLY cannot find a normal sex couple." You are dealing with someone who is a straight up azzhole. And these idiotic thoughts being thrown out there are the exact reason why we have these months and programs. Because the idea is to say "Hey it's okay these people exist. You don't have to agree with them but be cool to them."

So - if your numbers are actually correct (debatable) - you're still saying 18 million people is NOT a lot? GTFO.

We're not talking 20 or 30 people here.  We're talking 18 MILLION going by your numbers.  That's not small by any stretch of reality. You don't think 18 million people can cause a problem?  That's roughly 9x more than what we have in the entire USA military (including reserves), and we're the strongest, most dominant force in the world of 6 billion population, you dumb mf'er.

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

4 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

May is military appreciation month, and November is veterans and military family month.

 

 

 

 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

So - if your numbers are actually correct (debatable) - you're still saying 18 million people is NOT a lot? GTFO.

We're not talking 20 or 30 people here.  We're talking 18 MILLION going by your numbers.  That's not small by any stretch of reality. You don't think 18 million people can cause a problem?  That's roughly 9x more than what we have in the entire USA military (including reserves), and we're the strongest, most dominant force in the world of 6 billion population, you dumb mf'er.

There are 258,300,000 million adults in the US as of the 2020 census. Gallup is where the percentage numbers are from.

You're statement was "We are now at 10%?  15%?  20%?  GTFO." You are wrong. You said "We used to be at 2-4%." We haven't been at 2% in a considerably long time. Furthest I can find back in a short glance is 3.5% in 2012. It was 4.5% in 2017 and 5.6% in 2020. 

And yes 18 million is small considering it is only 7% of the population. There are 222 million straight people and another 16 million that might be straight but choose not to say (and yes there could be some in that 18 million who are gay and choose not to say.) 18 million of 222 million is 8%. So yes- it is a small number.

There are 1.4 million people in the US military. Of that 1.4 million- 6.1% identify as LGBT according to the Rand corporation which is roughly 86 thousand people. So 7% of the adults in the US identify as LGBT...6.1% of the military identify as LGBT...that seems to match up pretty well. In fact- for fun let's say the military had 258,300,000 million people in it- at 6.1% that would mean there are about 16 million LGBT people in the military. Those numbers are not far off.

So apparently- the US military "the strongest, most dominant force in the world of 6 billion population," is still all that despite a similar ratio of LGBT identifying individuals to the overall population ratio of LGBT identifying individuals.

Looks like you the dumb m'fer. And you come off as a bigoted azzhole to boot. 

 

 

[edjr 6,578]

I have the answer. Swap out the people in the military and replace them when LGBT. Then send them all to fight the war they love so much, to help Ukraine. 

WIN WIN

[Blue Horseshoe 348]

32 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

There are 258,300,000 million adults in the US as of the 2020 census. Gallup is where the percentage numbers are from.

You're statement was "We are now at 10%?  15%?  20%?  GTFO." You are wrong. You said "We used to be at 2-4%." We haven't been at 2% in a considerably long time. Furthest I can find back in a short glance is 3.5% in 2012. It was 4.5% in 2017 and 5.6% in 2020. 

And yes 18 million is small considering it is only 7% of the population. There are 222 million straight people and another 16 million that might be straight but choose not to say (and yes there could be some in that 18 million who are gay and choose not to say.) 18 million of 222 million is 8%. So yes- it is a small number.

 

 

Mooney is trying to split hairs. The issue for Team Blue and the DNC is "legacy voters"  The LGBT community, nearly all of them, cannot have children on their own. So they will attempt to "convert" your children. Everyone else's children. And by using public schools, they can saturate kids in that ideology while using tax dollars. And if they destroy the economy, then so many working class parents will be so embattled trying to just pay rent and afford gas and groceries, that they won't pay attention to the harm being inflicted. 

Mooney keeps talking about "adults" 

What the DNC wants are your children. All your children. Future woke shock troopers to be used as pure cannon fodder for the identity politics agenda. 

Mooney has no answer for this ( And since he's outed himself as an alleged "educated / teacher", it's not like this isn't apparent just by looking at his industry, which makes his logical fallacy bombing even more offensive and egregious) so he'll likely just roll out another personal attack. 

Go on Mooney, tell everyone here that the main target is not children. Say it and watch everyone silently realize they will never want someone like you near their children ever again. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

38 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

There are 258,300,000 million adults in the US as of the 2020 census. Gallup is where the percentage numbers are from.

You're statement was "We are now at 10%?  15%?  20%?  GTFO." You are wrong. You said "We used to be at 2-4%." We haven't been at 2% in a considerably long time. Furthest I can find back in a short glance is 3.5% in 2012. It was 4.5% in 2017 and 5.6% in 2020. 

And yes 18 million is small considering it is only 7% of the population. There are 222 million straight people and another 16 million that might be straight but choose not to say (and yes there could be some in that 18 million who are gay and choose not to say.) 18 million of 222 million is 8%. So yes- it is a small number.

There are 1.4 million people in the US military. Of that 1.4 million- 6.1% identify as LGBT according to the Rand corporation which is roughly 86 thousand people. So 7% of the adults in the US identify as LGBT...6.1% of the military identify as LGBT...that seems to match up pretty well. In fact- for fun let's say the military had 258,300,000 million people in it- at 6.1% that would mean there are about 16 million LGBT people in the military. Those numbers are not far off.

So apparently- the US military "the strongest, most dominant force in the world of 6 billion population," is still all that despite a similar ratio of LGBT identifying individuals to the overall population ratio of LGBT identifying individuals.

Looks like you the dumb m'fer. And you come off as a bigoted azzhole to boot. 

Yeah, it's clear you can't understand words or sentences.  Is English your first language?  You completely ignored the point that 18 F'N MILLION people is a large number no matter which way you cut it you f'n moron.  That many people ingraining themselves into our systems and causing problems IS the problem.  JHC you're f'n dense.

I get you and the 5 other the other idiots in here mixed up - are you the f'n teacher?  I hope to god you are not.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

2 minutes ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

 

Mooney is trying to split hairs. The issue for Team Blue and the DNC is "legacy voters"  The LGBT community, nearly all of them, cannot have children on their own. So they will attempt to "convert" your children. Everyone else's children. And by using public schools, they can saturate kids in that ideology while using tax dollars. And if they destroy the economy, then so many working class parents will be so embattled trying to just pay rent and afford gas and groceries, that they won't pay attention to the harm being inflicted. 

Mooney keeps talking about "adults" 

What the DNC wants are your children. All your children. Future woke shock troopers to be used as pure cannon fodder for the identity politics agenda. 

Mooney has no answer for this ( And since he's outed himself as an alleged "educated / teacher", it's not like this isn't apparent just by looking at his industry, which makes his logical fallacy bombing even more offensive and egregious) so he'll likely just roll out another personal attack. 

Go on Mooney, tell everyone here that the main target is not children. Say it and watch everyone silently realize they will never want someone like you near their children ever again. 

Mooney is a f'n idiot, for sure.  He's a lot like squizturd - ignore facts and logic for the cause!

[jerryskids 6,559]

1 hour ago, Sean Mooney said:

There are 258,300,000 million adults in the US as of the 2020 census. Gallup is where the percentage numbers are from.

You're statement was "We are now at 10%?  15%?  20%?  GTFO." You are wrong. You said "We used to be at 2-4%." We haven't been at 2% in a considerably long time. Furthest I can find back in a short glance is 3.5% in 2012. It was 4.5% in 2017 and 5.6% in 2020. 

And yes 18 million is small considering it is only 7% of the population. There are 222 million straight people and another 16 million that might be straight but choose not to say (and yes there could be some in that 18 million who are gay and choose not to say.) 18 million of 222 million is 8%. So yes- it is a small number.

There are 1.4 million people in the US military. Of that 1.4 million- 6.1% identify as LGBT according to the Rand corporation which is roughly 86 thousand people. So 7% of the adults in the US identify as LGBT...6.1% of the military identify as LGBT...that seems to match up pretty well. In fact- for fun let's say the military had 258,300,000 million people in it- at 6.1% that would mean there are about 16 million LGBT people in the military. Those numbers are not far off.

So apparently- the US military "the strongest, most dominant force in the world of 6 billion population," is still all that despite a similar ratio of LGBT identifying individuals to the overall population ratio of LGBT identifying individuals.

Looks like you the dumb m'fer. And you come off as a bigoted azzhole to boot. 

 

 

Parts of the following have been said, but:

1. The number is more than 18M.  It's reasonable to presume a good number of the "I don't wanna say" crowd would identify on the spectrum as well.

2. It's the young folks, primarily confused girls, which are succumbing to the social contagion.  Retirees aren't as easily influenced by social media and their peers.  The percentages for younger groups are way higher, like "the species would cease to exist if this were accurate" trajectory.

[Fireballer 2,639]

5 hours ago, Sean Mooney said:

As of 2022- 86% of adults in the US identify as straight or heterosexual, 7% offer no opinion, and 7% identify as LGBT. That means roughly 222 million people identify as straight and 18 million identify as LGBT with another 18 million declining to offer their sexual orientation. 

Yet we can people saying things like "The LGBT are invading schools to convert kids."  or the most bizarre slippery slope rant one could give while comparing it to the plot of a 90's Marvel comic book movie. This is the epitome of a bad faith argument. 

And when people are saying things like: "The only reason a same-sex couple should be ever be able to adopt is if they LITERALLY cannot find a normal sex couple." You are dealing with someone who is a straight up azzhole. And these idiotic thoughts being thrown out there are the exact reason why we have these months and programs. Because the idea is to say "Hey it's okay these people exist. You don't have to agree with them but be cool to them."

CDC says 25% of high school kids identify as LGBTQ.  Legit?

[seafoam1 2,799]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, it's clear you can't understand words or sentences.  Is English your first language?  You completely ignored the point that 18 F'N MILLION people is a large number no matter which way you cut it you f'n moron.  That many people ingraining themselves into our systems and causing problems IS the problem.  JHC you're f'n dense.

I get you and the 5 other the other idiots in here mixed up - are you the f'n teacher?  I hope to god you are not.

He's the "teacher". This is what public  schools have to offer these days. 

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,926]

Jews are 2.5. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

16 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

He's the "teacher". This is what public  schools have to offer these days. 

I weep for our children's future.  No doubt looney Mooney is a purple haired, nose and nipple ring freakazoid.

[squistion 1,947]

46 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

CDC says 25% of high school kids identify as LGBTQ.  Legit?

I am not sure the CDC says that exactly, but there was a poll with questionable methodology that claimed something like 20% for LGBT (the Q letter was not included in the choices for some reason).

[MDC 7,124]

The title of this thread bugs me. Shouldn’t it be “trannies have mental illness” or “transgenderism is a mental illness”?  

[seafoam1 2,799]

1 minute ago, MDC said:

The title of this thread bugs me. 

Who the fock cares what "bugs" you? 

[MDC 7,124]

9 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Who the fock cares what "bugs" you? 

You do, obviously.  

I couldn’t help but notice you spent all night posting again. You absolute focking loser.  

[seafoam1 2,799]

4 minutes ago, MDC said:

You do, obviously.  

I couldn’t help but notice you spent all night posting again. You absolute focking loser.  

24x7 for over 25 years even on vacations and Christmas and Thanksgiving = You. 

[MDC 7,124]

2 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

24x7 for over 25 years even on vacations and Christmas and Thanksgiving = You. 

4 am in the morning, sobbing while you type with one hand and jerk your warty little pud with the other.  

Don’t you have any friends or hobbies?  

[seafoam1 2,799]

11 minutes ago, MDC said:

4 am in the morning, sobbing while you type with one hand and jerk your warty little pud with the other.  

Don’t you have any friends or hobbies?  

24x7 for over 25 years even on vacations and Christmas and Thanksgiving = You. 

[Fireballer 2,639]

1 hour ago, squistion said:

I am not sure the CDC says that exactly, but there was a poll with questionable methodology that claimed something like 20% for LGBT (the Q letter was not included in the choices for some reason).

You’re right.  They didn’t say 25% exactly…it was 25.8%.  And yes, Q was included.  

[League Champion 1,896]

1 hour ago, MDC said:

4 am in the morning, sobbing while you type with one hand and jerk your warty little pud with the other.  

Don’t you have any friends or hobbies?  

Yet here you are