Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Blue Horseshoe

Hypothetical: What If Trump Wins POTUS 2024 Then Pardons ALL Convicted From J6?

Recommended Posts

 

 

Trump Vows to Give Full Pardon and Apology to the Hundreds Convicted in J6 Protests

.....Former President Trump....if he is elected to a second presidential term in 2024...."..... If I decide to run and if I win, I will be looking very, very strongly about pardons..... Full pardons... I mean full pardons with an apology to many...."

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/saraharnold/2022/09/02/trump-said-he-would-give-full-pardon-and-apology-to-the-hundreds-convicted-in-j6-protests

 

DeSantis Says He Will Look Into Pardoning Jan. 6 Rioters If Elected President

.....Speaking on the podcast Clay & Buck’s the day after he announced his presidential bid, DeSantis said the FBI and Department of Justice have been “weaponized” to target certain political groups, after he was asked if he would consider pardoning the January 6 defendants and former President Donald Trump. From the start of his presidency, he would be “aggressive about issuing pardons” to groups he believes have been politically targeted, such as pro-life demonstrators, he said. While some cases may involve a true violation of the law, DeSantis said he believes there is an “uneven application of justice” in many incidents—he used the example of a Black Lives Matter protester not getting prosecuted the same as someone involved in January 6.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/katherinehamilton/2023/05/25/desantis-says-he-will-look-into-pardoning-jan-6-rioters-if-elected-president

 

Clay & Buck’s Exclusive Interview with Presidential Candidate Governor Ron DeSantis

....CLAY: We’re talking to Florida Governor Ron DeSantis. He announced yesterday he is joining us live here to start off the program. I’m sure you agree — you have a law background; you’ve obviously been very aggressive legally in what you can and cannot do as the governor of Florida, Department of Justice — the FBI has gone after the January 6 defendants with reckless, I would say abandoned. A big part of being president is pardon powers. Do you think the January 6 defendants deserve to have their cases examined by a Republican president? And if Trump, let’s say, gets charged with federal offenses and you are the president of the United States, would you look at potentially pardoning Trump himself based on the evidence that might emerge of those charges?

GOV. DESANTIS: The DOJ and FBI have been weaponized. We see that. We see it in a variety of contexts, some of which you mentioned. Some of it is the FBI going after parents, going to school board meeting. Some of it’s how they treat a pro-life demonstrator, how they don’t go after people that are attacking pro-lifers. And so what I’m going to do is — I’m going to do on Day One – I will have folks that will get together and look at all these cases, who are people who are victims of weaponization or political targeting, and we will be aggressive at issuing pardons. Now, some of these cases, some people may have a technical violation of the law.....But if there are three other people who did the same thing, but just in a context like BLM and they don’t get prosecuted at all, that is uneven application of justice, and so we’re going to find ways where that did not happen. And then we will use the pardon power — and I will do that at the front end. You know, a lot of people wait until the end of the administration to issue pardons. We’re going to find examples where government’s been weaponized against disfavored groups, and we will apply relief as appropriate. But it will be done on a case-by-case basis, because I think you’ve got to make sure that… There’s a whole bunch of cases that don’t necessarily get headlines. But if people are being treated just because they don’t get on TV or something, they’re being treated disfavorably. They need to have a fair hearing as well....

https://www.clayandbuck.com/clay-bucks-exclusive-interview-with-ron-desantis/

 

Sen. Blumenthal: Trump offering pardons to Jan. 6 prisoners would be grounds for impeachment

Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said that if former President Donald Trump were to pardon convicted January 6 rioters after re-election in 2024, his actions would warrant an impeachment process. Sen. Blumenthal told a CNN reporter on Thursday that a Trump pardon of the January 6 prisoners would be a betrayal of America’s trust.

https://justthenews.com/videos/sen-blumenthal-trump-offering-pardons-jan-6-prisoners-would-be-grounds-impeachment

 

******

I don't believe Trump can win the 2024 general election even if it's against Joe Biden. But let's say that he did. What would happen if Trump gave full pardons to all convicted regarded to J6?

Here's the thing, the "threat" of coming after Trump or his family or impeaching him again or saying you'll trigger rioting, burning and looting becomes pretty toothless from Team Blue and the DNC. Because if Trump wins POTUS again, those things will happen anyway. Trump literally will be in a position where he has nothing to lose at all. If he doesn't pardon anyone from J6, then he'll still be attacked endlessly by the radical left and establishment Democrats. If he pardons all convicted from J6, or even just some of them, the net effect will be the same. Pardoning just one person would be the same "woke justification" to go on the full attack as if all were pardoned period. 

But what if Trump actually did it? And also, as DeSantis points out, does it early in his potential 2nd term? How much burning, looting, rioting and just out of control chaos would we see coming from the radical left if that did play out? 

What's interesting is even if Trump doesn't win the primary, DeSantis would likely issue some early on pardons if he took POTUS instead. So this becomes even more of a looming potential controversy that will split America right in half if it happened. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoever wins, they will need a Senate and House who will support their moves.  I really don't care if it is RFK jr. or Trump, we need someone who is seriously going to drain the f-ing swamp.  And I mean the CIA, FBI, NSA, NIH and DOJ and all the other corrupt agencies which are a abusing citizens..  

These organizations currently answer to nobody.  It is frigging sickening to see those bastards not answer questions.....oh that is part of an on-going investigation.....or that is classified and a national security issue.......

Hey dipshites, you are the ones we are investigating and the threat to our country is coming from you.  

WE NEED ACCOUNTABILITY.  WE NEED CHECKS AND BALANCES.  THESE GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRATIC FASCIST BASTARDS ARE ROGUE AND THEY ARE THE ONES WHO NEED TO BE IN JAIL.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blue....listen man.  You really should consider shortening these.  Your posts are unreadable

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The chances of him winning a FAIR election are about the same as him going a day without a load in his pants. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Pence: I Have No Interest Or Intention In Pardoning January 6th Defendants, They've Had Due Process

....Presidential candidate and former Vice President Mike Pence on Wednesday participated in a town hall event moderated by CNN's Dana Bash. Pence said he has no interest or intention of pardoning those that rioted on January 6th, 2021.
 
BASH: Well, sir -- sir, on that, Donald Trump says he is -- quote -- "inclined to pardon" many members of the mob who attacked the Capitol on January 6.  Those people were, of course, part of the same mob who built gallows and chanted about wanting to hang you. Would you consider pardoning any of them?  
 
PENCE: On the day of January 6, I issued a tweet demanding that people leave the Capitol and end the violence. And I said that those that failed to do that should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.  And I continue to believe that today. We cannot ever allow what happened on January 6 to happen again in the heart of our democracy. And I will stand by the decisions and the due process of court and our laws. And I have no interest or no intention of pardoning those that assaulted police officers or vandalized our Capitol.  They need to be answerable to the law.  

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2023/06/07/pence_i_have_no_interest_or_intention_in_pardoning_january_6th_defendants_theyve_had_due_process.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/26/2023 at 3:26 AM, supermike80 said:

Blue....listen man.  You really should consider shortening these.  Your posts are unreadable

New here?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This hypothetical would be one of the worst possible outcomes. Those that have been sentenced have had their day in court and were found guilty. That's how the system works. Such a move would be the end of law and order in this country. Widespread protests and violence would follow.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of them should get parsons. Many should get commutations. There should not be a blanket pardon.  Also, y’all need to stfu about any of this considering Obama pardoned a terrorist that participated in the bombing of a restaurant in NYC, killing civilians while they ate lunch. No one on Jan 6 approached anything like that. Fraunces Tavern bombing for anyone interested. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Fnord said:

This hypothetical would be one of the worst possible outcomes. Those that have been sentenced have had their day in court and were found guilty. That's how the system works. Such a move would be the end of law and order in this country. Widespread protests and violence would follow.  

LAW AND ORDER?!?!?!?   

 

the democrats incite riots and no one arrests them.  the system of justice doesnt work at all!!!!

 

who are you focking kidding dipshiit!?!?!?

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

fnord doesnt call for justice against biden, pelosi, maxine waters, etc. for inciting riots, then whines like a biitch if trump pardons J6 tourists.  holy FOCK he is EVIL.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Fnord said:

This hypothetical would be one of the worst possible outcomes. Those that have been sentenced have had their day in court and were found guilty. That's how the system works. Such a move would be the end of law and order in this country. Widespread protests and violence would follow.  

 

If DeSantis wins POTUS, he will pardon SOME from J6 right away. Normal tradition is to do it at the end of your term. Or the end of both terms. 

The critical issue is SOME, not all. 

My take is let's look at it from a case by case basis if it happens. 

Now Trump is more likely to just do a blanket pardon for everyone period. But even that is unlikely if the crimes are bad enough. That being said, Trump is unpredictable in that regard. If there is widespread rioting and burning, with the looting and violence, then DeSantis will deploy the National Guard. He will also deploy federal law enforcement. 

Here's the thing about DeSantis. If he wins POTUS, he won't care about reelection. He's not going to hold back just because it might cost him reelection. He's going to do what he wants to do. Look at the abortion issue. That's political poison for a general election. But DeSantis is going to do it anyway. The war with Disney has likely gone too far at this point, it's likely to also cost DeSantis politically in 2024, but he doesn't care, he's going to do it anyway. 

And this is the correct stance IMHO. I don't agree with everything DeSantis does, but the "stance" is correct. In the face of the radical left, do what you feel is authentic to you and never back down. 

This all means DeSantis would rather be respected, even by his enemies, than "loved" by the sentiments of a fickle public that has almost no loyalty besides their personal tribalism. Look at Liz Cheney. The left "currently" loves her. Because she hates Trump. Part of the reason she hates Trump is that it helps her politically on an individual level to do so. But Liz Cheney was a true POTUS contender in 2024 versus Biden ( she's not, but let's run that hypothetical), then do you think the radical left and the establishment Democrats would be singing her praises anymore? They'd spit on her just like they spit on Trump. 

DeSantis understands that there is no loyalty in politics. Once someone has no more political use for you, they stab you in the back. Since it has no real value, he just doesn't care if people don't like him. 

The "threat" of widespread looting, rioting and violence is like current new age political extortion. If you don't convict Daniel Penny over Jordan Neely, then "we" will burn down New York. That's the veiled threat being made by black activists there. DeSantis won't be swayed. Riot, burn and loot and he will deploy shock troops all over the country. Will Antifa and their skateboard helmets and masks take on a bunch highly trained federal law enforcement with APCs and win? 

Personally, if Trump or DeSantis win, I'd say look at it from a case by case basis. Some people during J6 deserve to stay in prison. Some of them however might clearly operate as pawns in political persecution. 

J6 is not a situation that operates as a "monolith" of one kind of Republican. But it's treated that way. And it shouldn't. Each American citizen there needs to be measured as individuals. Of course the radical left doesn't want this, because it humanizes real people. 

If it was up to me, and it's not, every J6 rioter who breached the Capitol should have their citizenship stripped, assets seized and permanently thrown out of the country. (I'm talking about the 4-5 thousand who were the problem, not the entire protest, where most were peaceful and stayed outside)  But also every looting, rioter and criminal from the 2020 "Summer Of Love" too. All of them. Everyone who threw a Molotov cocktail and looted a small business and was bailed out to attack again and again, night after night. Strip them of being an American and throw them all out. That's the MOST BIPARTISAN VIEWPOINT anyone is going to have on J6 here. Then no more arguments. No more questions about "justice" anymore. 

There were people who breached federal buildings in 2016 when Trump won POTUS. Them too. Citizenship stripped and thrown out of the country. Every DA paid by George Soros who was recalled because they literally refused to follow the laws in their respective districts and states for "social justice"? Dereliction of duty against real American citizens. Stripped of citizenship and thrown out. Both sides, the worst elements of the fringe left and the fringe right - Toss them out. 

But if you did that, you'd have no more "wedge issue" for the radical left to complain about. I'd even say make it a Constitutional Amendment to get the law settled for it first. Then enact "real justice" and kick them out of the country. The people who overran the Capitol Police and crushed them via a rush and mob swell inside? Tossed out. Everyone in major Big Blue Cities coming out of UHaul vans with shields, rocks and helmets to actually attack the police? Tossed out. Those who formed the Chaz zone, where cops were literally told to stay away and thugs and criminals controlled a part of those cities? Tossed out. 

Do them all. Take their citizenship. Kick them out. You don't appreciate being an American? ( Because many people would give anything to have their children grow up with the opportunities available in the United States) Then there's the door. GTFO. 

I'm a Conservative, and I just gave you the most extreme method of practical "justice" for J6 possible. Would you take it? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JustinCharge said:

LAW AND ORDER?!?!?!?   

 

the democrats incite riots and no one arrests them.  the system of justice doesnt work at all!!!!

 

who are you focking kidding dipshiit!?!?!?

 

 

Here's a perfect example of the problem you and other MAGAmooks information dissemination: memes aren't fuking news. They're slanted, insipid little messages that try to cram nuanced, complicated issues into a small format that's easy for idiots like you to digest. And if Pelosi, Biden, Obama, or any of the rest of the political boogeyman you obsess over have done the sh1t all of you are so convinced they've done, why haven't THEY been indicted? 

Go back to your bunker and jerk off to more doomsday porn.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Here's a perfect example of the problem you and other MAGAmooks information dissemination: memes aren't fuking news. They're slanted, insipid little messages that try to cram nuanced, complicated issues into a small format that's easy for idiots like you to digest. And if Pelosi, Biden, Obama, or any of the rest of the political boogeyman you obsess over have done the sh1t all of you are so convinced they've done, why haven't THEY been indicted? 

Go back to your bunker and jerk off to more doomsday porn.

It is mostly accurate.  The fact that we are locking up people for 6 to 18 years for a protest which got mildly out of hand is Nazi like justice.  Nurses, old ladies, school teaches, oh my.   Not to mention the slaught of an unarmed woman whose family will never get justice.   

Leftist have crapped all over our justice system.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

trump has openly stated hed look at pardons for j6ers.  so if he wins the election, it becomes the will of the people.  to impeach him for doing what he said hed do on his platform is going against the will of the people.  but fnord doesnt give a shiit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Fnord said:

Here's a perfect example of the problem you and other MAGAmooks information dissemination: memes aren't fuking news. They're slanted, insipid little messages that try to cram nuanced, complicated issues into a small format that's easy for idiots like you to digest. And if Pelosi, Biden, Obama, or any of the rest of the political boogeyman you obsess over have done the sh1t all of you are so convinced they've done, why haven't THEY been indicted? 

Go back to your bunker and jerk off to more doomsday porn.

in 2012, Romney said Russia was a threat and people like you mocked him.  then you are shown you are wrong.

a few years, i was posting on FBGs that Russia was setting up for a huge war of some kind.  i was mocked by liberals on that forum all the time who claimed there was no threat even though the buildup was obvious.  they permabanned me as a trol for warming on russia AND deleted all of my posts.

and now here we are in current day where im warning of nuclear war and liberals like fnord mock it.   

you suck and you know it.  you will oignore the evidence and just keep lying repeatedly.  you should be the ones banned this round instead of me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We now know the election was a sham.  We know the public was misled about the events of that day. Video evidence is being withheld.  We also now know they were urged and let into the building by law enforcement.  
 

All mostly peaceful protesters should be pardoned.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, JustinCharge said:

LAW AND ORDER?!?!?!?   

the democrats incite riots and no one arrests them.  the system of justice doesnt work at all!!!!

Nailed it. Sometime in 2021, in Minneapolis - St Paul, the following 'rule' was implemented. When a LE officer observes a driver with an equipment violation............

Expired license plate tabs. *Have a hard time understanding how expired tabs are an equipment violation*
No light illuminating the rear license plate.
Loud muffler.
Air fresheners or other objects hanging from the rearview mirror.
Cracked windshield.
Windows tinted too dark.
One headlight or rear brake light not working (both headlights or both brake lights out are considered a public safety hazard and not included in the policy).

.........................they are to use the laptop in their squad car to quickly note it and the department mails the registered owner a letter to notify them. They’ve sent more than 1,500 letters so far this year. 

 

What about those of us that don't live in one of the counties in Minneapolis St. Paul ? We have to follow the rules, while others don't ?

That's not even the worst of it. Ramsey County Attorney John Choi made an announcement in September 2021. He would no longer prosecute most felonies found during traffic stops for any of the violations shown above. 

How the fock can that even be legal ? Isn't that the same as saying he's not going to do his job as county attorney!

At the very least he should been fired that very same day.

Besides, these ridiculous rules haven't had the desired effect anyway.

An analysis of the first year of data shows the changes led to a significant decrease in stops for equipment violations and dramatically decreased the racial disparity in subsequent vehicle searches. However, Black drivers continued to be much more likely to be stopped for a moving violation and have their vehicle searched compared to drivers of other races and ethnicities.

So apparently African-Americans commit far more moving violations than other races and ethnicities. Face the focking facts & stop the nonsense.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Trump sees ‘political advantage’ in floating pardons for Jan. 6 defendants: Haberman

New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman suggested Tuesday that former President Trump sees a “political advantage” in floating pardons for those convicted of crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.....Following Tuesday’s sentencing of former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio to 22 years in prison over the Jan. 6 riot, CNN’s Kaitlan Collins asked Haberman whether “the fact that domestic terror is now a part of this” would change Trump’s mind about potential pardons.

“I don’t think it’s going to stop Trump from saying what he has been saying,” Haberman said. “He’s been fundraising to try to help some of the defendants in Jan. 6-related cases. I don’t think that this will have him adjust anything.” ....“I’m sure his lawyers would like it if he would adjust some of what he’s saying and doing,” she added. “But I don’t think for what he is saying himself — he sees political advantage in continuing to say that he might pardon people. He thinks that it rallies his supporters.”

Tarrio was convicted of seditious conspiracy and other serious felonies in May for spearheading a plot to block the Jan. 6 certification of the 2020 election....His 22-year sentence is the longest handed down in connection with the Jan. 6 riot.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4189132-trump-sees-political-advantage-in-floating-pardons-for-jan-6-defendants-haberman/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

Trump sees ‘political advantage’ in floating pardons for Jan. 6 defendants: Haberman

New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman suggested Tuesday that former President Trump sees a “political advantage” in floating pardons for those convicted of crimes related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.....Following Tuesday’s sentencing of former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio to 22 years in prison over the Jan. 6 riot, CNN’s Kaitlan Collins asked Haberman whether “the fact that domestic terror is now a part of this” would change Trump’s mind about potential pardons.

“I don’t think it’s going to stop Trump from saying what he has been saying,” Haberman said. “He’s been fundraising to try to help some of the defendants in Jan. 6-related cases. I don’t think that this will have him adjust anything.” ....“I’m sure his lawyers would like it if he would adjust some of what he’s saying and doing,” she added. “But I don’t think for what he is saying himself — he sees political advantage in continuing to say that he might pardon people. He thinks that it rallies his supporters.”

Tarrio was convicted of seditious conspiracy and other serious felonies in May for spearheading a plot to block the Jan. 6 certification of the 2020 election....His 22-year sentence is the longest handed down in connection with the Jan. 6 riot.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4189132-trump-sees-political-advantage-in-floating-pardons-for-jan-6-defendants-haberman/

The real terrorists are inside our government and are abusing their power to silence and target citizens.   Their Oath is really to protecting the agency and the power within and not to the Constitution.   The system is inherently corrupt and getting worse by the day. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The good news is they wouldn't have to throw out the stale bread and putrid water they have been providing to the J6 politcal detainees.    

They can simply lock up these 300 folks and provide those rations to them:

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/dozens-arrested-inside-cannon-house-office-building-after-rallying-for-israel-hamas-ceasefire/3447731/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×