Sound of Freedom

[GutterBoy 2,898]

2 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

Uh boyo, the groups actually harming kids are all conservative.

Cultist moron...SMH

Actually no political party has a hold on harming kids.  It's not a political thing, not a gay thing, it's a terrible person thing that cuts across everything.

[Wade Garrett 155]

3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Actually no political party has a hold on harming kids.  It's not a political thing, not a gay thing, it's a terrible person thing that cuts across everything.

So are churches, youth groups, boy scouts, etc staffed by liberals or conservatives mainly boyo?

Stop trying to play nice and appease both sides.  It's conservatives and their groups that are largely raping and harming young children.

Dems da facts. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 minute ago, Wade Garrett said:

So are churches, youth groups, boy scouts, etc staffed by liberals or conservatives mainly boyo?

Stop trying to play nice and appease both sides.  It's conservatives and their groups that are largely raping and harming young children.

Dems da facts. 

You're no better than the cultists claiming that the DNC is the party of pedos.

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, Wade Garrett said:

Dems da facts

Let's see your data. Because your President is a Pedo. 

Nothing to see there??? 

[BuckSwope 654]

5 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Actually no political party has a hold on harming kids.  It's not a political thing, not a gay thing, it's a terrible person thing that cuts across everything.

Correct, it's men in power with access to kids - things like church, coaches, school, scouts have that in abundance.     I have 0 clue why so many try to tie to political party.   

Party over pedos, I guess?  

[Wade Garrett 155]

7 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

You're no better than the cultists claiming that the DNC is the party of pedos.

LOL

Which groups have historically harmed children?

Why do you need to play both sides so much?  The idiots on the right hate you and always will.

Holy freaking cringe. 

[Wade Garrett 155]

8 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Let's see your data. Because your President is a Pedo. 

Nothing to see there??? 

I need to pull up news articles about the thousands of young children churches and boy scouts have abused?

You serious right now cultist?

And I'm not talking about some fake, cultist bs like about Biden.  I'm talking about ACTUAL convictions and facts of abuse of children.

Please tell your fellow cultist to keep their hands off our kids. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,923]

The actual act of pedophilia cuts across both sides. But it’s the policies of one side that make it easier for it to happen. 

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[MDC 7,122]

27 minutes ago, BuckSwope said:

Correct, it's men in power with access to kids - things like church, coaches, school, scouts have that in abundance.     I have 0 clue why so many try to tie to political party.   

Party over pedos, I guess?  

It’s an election strategy. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

20 minutes ago, Wade Garrett said:

LOL

Which groups have historically harmed children?

Why do you need to play both sides so much?  The idiots on the right hate you and always will.

Holy freaking cringe. 

Not playing both sides, just being honest and not a partisan douche.

Religious leaders, teachers, cops, probably the biggest groups of offenders.  If I had to guess I would say 2/3 right wing, 1/3 left.

To say it's all one or the other is dumb.

[TimHauck 2,604]

1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

You're no better than the cultists claiming that the DNC is the party of pedos.

Is that Raven Fan/possibly an alias of a righty here?

[MDC 7,122]

1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

Not playing both sides, just being honest and not a partisan douche.

Religious leaders, teachers, cops, probably the biggest groups of offenders.  If I had to guess I would say 2/3 right wing, 1/3 left.

To say it's all one or the other is dumb.

Seems like Hollywood, Washington DC and the military are hotbeds of sexual assault too for the same reasons.

[jonmx 2,424]

5 hours ago, TimHauck said:

Grooming can be “legal” dumbass.  

If a 30-something year old guy is a church youth counselor for an early teenage girl, then starts dating her shortly after she graduates high school?  Yeah, that’s grooming.    Swap “church youth counselor” for “liberal teacher” then tell us if you still don’t think that’d be considered grooming. 

I did not say grooming was illegal dumbass.  Nice f-ing strawman retard. 

Courting a girl after she turns 18 is not grooming.  Grooming is enabling underage children into having sex while they are underage.  

 

[jonmx 2,424]

2 hours ago, BuckSwope said:

Correct, it's men in power with access to kids - things like church, coaches, school, scouts have that in abundance.     I have 0 clue why so many try to tie to political party.   

Party over pedos, I guess?  

Because Democrats have taken the flag to defend pedos.  What decent human being gets so up in arms about a movie which exposes these crimes?   Low-life pedo-loving leftist.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,923]

So this whole “child kidnapping” thing is BS, and the guy was one of 6k people that contributed money to the movie, for a whopping 500 bucks. Pathetic. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

12 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Grooming is enabling underage children into having sex while they are underage.  

 

Yeah like I said, you don't know what grooming is.

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

17 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So this whole “child kidnapping” thing is BS, and the guy was one of 6k people that contributed money to the movie, for a whopping 500 bucks. Pathetic. 

Really?  He wasnt arrested?  He only donated $500?  Got any facts to support these claims?

[Hardcore troubadour 14,923]

7 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Really?  He wasnt arrested?  He only donated $500?  Got any facts to support these claims?

A custodial dispute isn’t really kidnapping like you attempted to portray. The kid was never unaccounted for. Try and read up on things sometimes. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

A custodial dispute isn’t really kidnapping like you attempted to portray. The kid was never unaccounted for. Try and read up on things sometimes. 

Link to it only being a custody dispute?

Link to only donating $500?

Don't believe everything you read on Twitter old man.

Also telling that you're desperate to defend your movie.  Who cares about the kidnapped kids right?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Also he posted on Facebook that he's an equity owner in the film.

It's a shame there are no real men here willing to condemn him

[Reality 3,092]

14 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

A custodial dispute isn’t really kidnapping like you attempted to portray. The kid was never unaccounted for. Try and read up on things sometimes. 

Right, gutter looks like a focking idiot. Again.

It's pretty incredible how much of a problem he & his minions here have with child trafficking awareness. Some people really are just pieces of shlt. Look how far they'll go to invent narratives. Just straight up horrible focking people. Makes you wonder...

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

3 minutes ago, Reality said:

Right, gutter looks like a focking idiot. Again.

It's pretty incredible how much of a problem he has with child trafficking awareness. Some people really just pieces of shlt. 

 

Oh Greg price says so, well it must be true then.

Greg price disputes what Marta posted on Facebook, but let's believe Greg price.

Anything to defend accused kidnappers who are maga.

[Reality 3,092]

4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Oh Greg price says so, well it must be true then.

Greg price disputes what Marta posted on Facebook, but let's believe Greg price.

Anything to defend accused kidnappers who are maga.

https://www.kmov.com/2023/08/04/chesterfield-man-charged-with-accessory-child-kidnapping-donated-anti-child-trafficking-movie-newsweek-report-claims/

Moron.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

2 minutes ago, Reality said:

https://www.kmov.com/2023/08/04/chesterfield-man-charged-with-accessory-child-kidnapping-donated-anti-child-trafficking-movie-newsweek-report-claims/

Moron.

The lawyer says it's nothing.  Ok well then I guess just dismiss the charges then.  Good job Mr lawyer.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,923]

6 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

The lawyer says it's nothing.  Ok well then I guess just dismiss the charges then.  Good job Mr lawyer.

Take the L kid.  

[GutterBoy 2,898]

28 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Take the L kid.  

L?

What did I say that was false?

He was arrested for kidnapping - true.  Could the case be dismissed? Sure, but we'll find out.

Did he find the movie? Yes.  How much?  Not released.  The $500 number is the avg donation, but since he got his name in the credits and an equity stake, it's probably more, but we'll see eventually.

Is he a creep for hosting sugar baby parties?  Yes.

[TimHauck 2,604]

1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

Link to it only being a custody dispute?

Link to only donating $500?

Don't believe everything you read on Twitter old man.

Also telling that you're desperate to defend your movie.  Who cares about the kidnapped kids right?

It does seem like the arrest could be over a “custody dispute,” still missing some details there though:

I don’t see any evidence he only donated $500, best I can tell that came from a statement from Angel Studios saying that was the “average.”

edit: beat me to it 

[TimHauck 2,604]

1 hour ago, jonmx said:

I did not say grooming was illegal dumbass.  Nice f-ing strawman retard. 

Courting a girl after she turns 18 is not grooming.  Grooming is enabling underage children into having sex while they are underage.  

 

So if the same thing happened with a high school teacher and a student, you wouldn’t consider that grooming?

[League Champion 1,896]

 

[jonmx 2,424]

58 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

So if the same thing happened with a high school teacher and a student, you wouldn’t consider that grooming?

If he actually waited until after she graduated, it is not grooming.  Maybe a bit creepy, but not grooming.  If he is going to marry her and have children together, good luck to them.  That is not a preditor-victim relationship.  

[TimHauck 2,604]

2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

If he actually waited until after she graduated, it is not grooming.  Maybe a bit creepy, but not grooming.  If he is going to marry her and have children together, good luck to them.  That is not a preditor-victim relationship.  

Lol, ok

[GutterBoy 2,898]

29 minutes ago, jonmx said:

If he actually waited until after she graduated, it is not grooming.  Maybe a bit creepy, but not grooming.  If he is going to marry her and have children together, good luck to them.  That is not a preditor-victim relationship.  

Grooming is when someone builds a relationship, trust and emotional connection with a child or young person so they can manipulate, exploit and abuse them.

A 30 year old church leader groomed a 15 year old kid to marry him when she turned 18.

Focking dope.

[jonmx 2,424]

6 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Grooming is when someone builds a relationship, trust and emotional connection with a child or young person so they can manipulate, exploit and abuse them.

A 30 year old church leader groomed a 15 year old kid to marry him when she turned 18.

Focking dope.

There is no evidence that he did any of those.  She was 18, at that point she can make her own damn descions.  You are such a lame bastard trying to equate that with kidnapping young children and selling them to sex predators.  Really, can you be anymore of a pathetic disgusting bastard?  What is it about pedos that makes you love them so damn much?

[GutterBoy 2,898]

17 minutes ago, jonmx said:

There is no evidence that he did any of those.  She was 18, at that point she can make her own damn descions.  You are such a lame bastard trying to equate that with kidnapping young children and selling them to sex predators.  Really, can you be anymore of a pathetic disgusting bastard?  What is it about pedos that makes you love them so damn much?

I'm not equating the two, you are, because you don't know what grooming is.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,923]

Liberals think a kid can decide to have a sex change operation. Dismiss their input. 

[BuckSwope 654]

32 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Grooming is when someone builds a relationship, trust and emotional connection with a child or young person so they can manipulate, exploit and abuse them.

A 30 year old church leader groomed a 15 year old kid to marry him when she turned 18.

Focking dope.

Baffling take by Jon.   WTF?    Grooming and creepy AF.    

Also, I'm SURE his sexual attraction and thoughts only took place the second she turned 18.   No pedo tendencies going on.  

[TimHauck 2,604]

41 minutes ago, jonmx said:

There is no evidence that he did any of those.  She was 18, at that point she can make her own damn descions.  You are such a lame bastard trying to equate that with kidnapping young children and selling them to sex predators.  Really, can you be anymore of a pathetic disgusting bastard?  What is it about pedos that makes you love them so damn much?

Just to confirm, you have no issue if an 18 year old wants to chop off their breasts or or , correct?

[jonmx 2,424]

34 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Just to confirm, you have no issue if an 18 year old wants to chop off their breasts or or , correct?

After 18 it becomes their choice, but I believe doctors need to be held accountable if they are misdiagnosising patients and giving improper advice without disclosing the negative impacts.  A truly gender dysphoric person at 18 should be able to proceed with surgeries.  

[weepaws 3,153]

I like the OP title for this thread, I think the sound of freedom sounds like the discussions we see taken place on this thread.  The Freedom to speak, it’s a great way to be able freely express ones self.  The Red blazer people, and the Blue blazer people are working as one to remove that right.  

God didn't make us robots, he gave us freedoms to speak, and to either choose Hell or Heaven, oh boy it’s great to have those freedoms.