Jump to content
GutterBoy

Satanic Panic reborn as LGBTQ phobia

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, League Champion said:

defending the LGBTQ 's disgusting, vile and perverted behavior. 

 

2 minutes ago, League Champion said:

we have no problem with it. Do what you want to do, be what you want to be, love who you want to love. I have no problem. 

So which is it?  Is it disgusting vile and perverted?  Or do you have no problem with it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

 

Argumentum ad lapidemAppeal to the stone is a logical fallacy that consists in dismissing a statement as absurd without giving proof of its absurdity.

Ad lapidem statements are fallacious because they fail to address the merits of the claim in dispute. The same applies to proof by assertion, where an unproved or disproved claim is asserted as true on no ground other than that of its truth having been asserted.

https://cognitive-liberty.online/argumentum-ad-lapidem-appeal-to-the-stone/

Seriously, just take a breath and consider what you’re saying.

There’s a straight cis guy who is totally willing to rape women and/or kids in a public bathroom but he won’t because guys aren’t allowed in the ladies room. Rape is one thing, my man is NOT going to risk using the wrong toilet!

The rapist considers pulling a Mrs. Doubtfire to get into the john, but that’s too risky … until drag queens and trannies are allowed to get in! Now it’s free reign for rapists!

If this scenario sounds at all plausible, you just might be retarded. 🤤 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Now horror movies are bad?  Video games, horror movies, going to disney world, drinking good beer.  Seems as though I can mention anything I enjoy and you immediately poo poo it.

What about fishing.  Is that lame for a 50 year old?

Nope. But the other stuff but the beer is for kids.  You do you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

 

So which is it?  Is it disgusting vile and perverted?  Or do you have no problem with it?

The perverted side of it. You know exactly what im talking about 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, League Champion said:

The perverted side of it. You know exactly what im talking about 

No I don't, you're not making any sense.  You said gays are disgusting vile and perverted, then you said you have no problem with it.  You're lying about something, you always are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, League Champion said:

The perverted side of it. You know exactly what im talking about 

Tiny can't read very well. 

27 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

No I don't, you're not making any sense.  You said gays are disgusting vile and perverted, then you said you have no problem with it.  You're lying about something, you always are.

The first reference of his that you butchered was about a series of posts where he's talking about drag shows, sex parades and tranny story time with children.  It's that type of behavior he doesn't agree with.

The second reference of his that you butchered was referencing gays living how they want and loving who they want without involving the children.

Summary, he's fine with gays as long as they stay in their lane when it comes to children.

It's plain as day if you know how to read.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RogerDodger said:

Summary, he's find with gays as long as they stay in their lane when it comes to children.

It's pain as day if you know how to read.  

Thank you. When everything involves sex is when I have a problem. If he doesn't know what I'm referring to then he's one sick SOB. YouTube any pride parade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Tiny can't read very well. 

The first reference of his that you butchered was about a series of posts where he's talking about drag shows, sex parades and tranny story time with children.  It's that type of behavior he doesn't agree with.

The second reference of his that you butchered was referencing gays living how they want and loving who they want without involving the children.

Summary, he's find with gays as long as they stay in their lane when it comes to children.

It's plain as day if you know how to read.  

He's find with it?

This is the dude that blasts tranny memes non stop on this board.  STFU he's find with it.

If he has a problem with child abuse, why only go after the gays?  When clearly it's not a gay problem.

Once again, you're focking lost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

We I assumed you wouldn't be able to contribute any kind of meaningful conversation, and I was right.

When are you going to start with that meaningful conversation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

He's find with it?

This is the dude that blasts tranny memes non stop on this board.  STFU he's find with it.

If he has a problem with child abuse, why only go after the gays?  When clearly it's not a gay problem.

Once again, you're focking lost.

A-Hole, I blast negative behavior. Have you seen me call out any normal gays or Trannies? 

NO, YOU HAVEN'T. I ONLY CALL OUT THE SICK ONES. STOP YOUR BS 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

He's find with it?

This is the dude that blasts tranny memes non stop on this board.  STFU he's find with it.

If he has a problem with child abuse, why only go after the gays?  When clearly it's not a gay problem.

Once again, you're focking lost.

Everyone understands him but you.  :dunno:

RIF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, League Champion said:

A-Hole, I blast negative behavior. Have you seen me call out any normal gays or Trannies? 

NO, YOU HAVEN'T. I ONLY CALL OUT THE SICK ONES. STOP YOUR BS 

And he can't figure out why people call him out for defending the pedos.    :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RogerDodger said:

And he can't figure out why people call him out for defending the pedos.    :lol:

Between guttervomit and mdcack I don't know who loves the tranny pedos more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

he has a problem with child abuse, why only go after the gays?  When clearly it's not a gay problem.

Last time because you're dumb as F. 

I have said a million times in here that ALL CHILD ABUSERS, PREDATORS AND MOLESTERS should be put to death immediately! I don't care if it's priests, Boy Scout Leaders, a Democrat, a Republican, a Tranny, a straight man/woman, black white, whoever!!!! 

WTF don't you understand??? I can't make it more elementary than that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Everyone understands him but you.  :dunno:

RIF

Anyone who has been here the past 6 months knows the guy spews racist and homophobic BS.  Of course you defend him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, jerryskids said:

This has always been my concern; the unintended consequences that the Left never seems to consider.  I've never thought that a true trans person is using the other restroom to cause trouble.  It's the psychos who want to attack women and children who take advantage of such normalization.

A serial rapist finds his inner tranny so they send him to a women's prison, don't dare question it, what could go wrong?  :dunno: 

Becoming the “bathroom police” creates far more unintended consequences. Trans people used the bathroom for many many years and nobody noticed or cared. But now we need to prevent it! And what has happened? We had a butch-looking woman (born female) get the cops called on her for being in the ladies’ room. Male cops then entered the ladies’ room and removed her.

Somebody who fully transitioned going into the bathroom of their birth gender is far more likely to get negative attention, because a man in a suit walking into the ladies’ room is gonna freak people out.

But instead of looking at reality, let’s make up a bunch of crazy rape fantasies. Then pass laws based on that. Thanks, GOP.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, seafoam1 said:

Between guttervomit and mdcack I don't know who loves the tranny pedos more.

BonusBoy.  He came out today.  Loves to go to Disney World and throw and sangria parties.   :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, FrancieFootball said:

No, and I wouldn't take my kids to something like that, either. Nor would I participate in such a thing. But I'd be quick to correct anyone whom my children can hear talking about how trans people are pedophiles. And if they hear other kids in school talking in such a way because that's what they hear at home, I'll take it up with the principal and all the way up to the school board, if necessary.

 

You are a warrior of righteousness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dogcows said:

But instead of looking at reality, let’s make up a bunch of crazy rape fantasies

That's great but it's happened, no? 

I can post a hundred real articles of Men in wigs perving out in Woman's bathrooms. One just got his ass beat in Charlotte for pulling out his junk and getting himself off. 

Don't act like it doesn't open a window for creeps (not necessarily Trans people). I don't feel comfortable with men in wigs using the same bathroom as my wife and daughter, neither do they. Are you ok with  men using the same stall as your daughter? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, RogerDodger said:

The vast majority of those men are tranny pedos.  I mean they are into kids, often of the same sex.  And get off on weird chit like dressing in women's clothes.  Trannypedos.  There you have it. The shoe fits.  

You have any statistics to back that up?

Also, cross dressers aren't the same thing as transgenders. I dress in women's clothing because I'm a woman and have known this since an early age. Sure, there are cross dressers and pedophiles, but the vast majority of pedophiles are men who are not transgender or cross dressers, but an extremist element of American society is trying hard to pin that pedophile label on the LGBTQ community. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

Were wine spritzers also being served?

Only the fruity ones.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FrancieFootball said:

You have any statistics to back that up?

Also, cross dressers aren't the same thing as transgenders. I dress in women's clothing because I'm a woman and have known this since an early age. Sure, there are cross dressers and pedophiles, but the vast majority of pedophiles are men who are not transgender or cross dressers, but an extremist element of American society is trying hard to pin that pedophile label on the LGBTQ community. 

TimCrotch is going all out here. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, League Champion said:

That's great but it's happened, no? 

I can post a hundred real articles of Men in wigs perving out in Woman's bathrooms. One just got his ass beat in Charlotte for pulling out his junk and getting himself off. 

Don't act like it doesn't open a window for creeps (not necessarily Trans people). I don't feel comfortable with men in wigs using the same bathroom as my wife and daughter, neither do they. Are you ok with  men using the same stall as your daughter? 

It doesn’t open a door for creeps. Creeps are gonna do it no matter what. Do you think a law preventing transgender people from peeing in public restrooms is going to stop crazy pervs from sneaking into the ladies’ room ?

As for you posting 100 articles with pix of naked men, yes I believe you can do it. In fact, I think you’ve already done it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FrancieFootball said:

You have any statistics to back that up?

Also, cross dressers aren't the same thing as transgenders. I dress in women's clothing because I'm a woman and have known this since an early age. Sure, there are cross dressers and pedophiles, but the vast majority of pedophiles are men who are not transgender or cross dressers, but an extremist element of American society is trying hard to pin that pedophile label on the LGBTQ community. 

Sure.  The largest organized pedophile ring in history all wear dresses and vast majority of victims were little boys.  Hundreds and hundreds of thousands.  

Your turn, back up your bolded claim.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, dogcows said:

It doesn’t open a door for creeps. Creeps are gonna do it no matter what. Do you think a law preventing transgender people from peeing in public restrooms is going to stop crazy pervs from sneaking into the ladies’ room ?

As for you posting 100 articles with pix of naked men, yes I believe you can do it. In fact, I think you’ve already done it.

And you are proof it wouldn't. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Sure.  The largest organized pedophile ring in history all wear dresses and vast majority of victims were little boys.  Hundreds and hundreds of thousands.  

Your turn, back up your bolded claim.  

You're making statements without any statistics to back that up. 

https://screenandreveal.com/pedophile-statistics/

Between 80 percent and 90 percent of pedophiles are male, and nowhere in any statistical study I've read does it mention cross dressers and transgender people. 

You're propagating misinformation instead of educating yourself on the topic. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Blue Horseshoe said:

 

Wanted to point out to @BunnysBastatrds that the above is clearly a timschochet alias. He can't get attention trolling people with his main account, and so "this person" has resorted to all this. 

I'll reiterate that timschochet, squistion and Sho Nuff are going to absolutely ruin this place for good.  At "the other place", they had, with all their aliases, probably a combined half a million posts altogether over how many years. Driving people away and ruining the community there for personal sport. Now the "other place" is basically on permanent lockdown from the after effects of that kind of pure contagion. 

They are going to ruin this place. Using aliases like the above was the same tired dirty game they used over there. IMHO, if you have pull and long tenured interaction with the site owner and/or other Staff members here, I'd highly recommend you and other reach out and ask for the three of them to be permanently banned. They are parasites. They've shown they will kill the "host" elsewhere, and given a little wiggle room, will do it here too. 

@League Champion, if you want to know who were the ones who snitched on you to get you banned, you won't have to look far at all. 

Tim can't just hate himself in silence like most people. Has to try to make everything that other people love burn to ash because he can't compartmentalize his own pathology. 

If he needs attention, he should get a dog. Plenty of people do that instead of this BS. 

 💕   I’ve NEVR had or will ever, Shelok Homey.And I guarantee I have quite a few ghey friends I became friends with because half of my wife’s friends are ghey.    😂😂😂???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FrancieFootball said:

You're making statements without any statistics to back that up. 

https://screenandreveal.com/pedophile-statistics/

Between 80 percent and 90 percent of pedophiles are male, and nowhere in any statistical study I've read does it mention cross dressers and transgender people. 

You're propagating misinformation instead of educating yourself on the topic. 

Well, most logical people realize if you are male, you are a male. Doesn't matter what you wear or if you think you are a female. In the end, you are a male. There is no changing that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said:

You're making statements without any statistics to back that up. 

https://screenandreveal.com/pedophile-statistics/

Between 80 percent and 90 percent of pedophiles are male, and nowhere in any statistical study I've read does it mention cross dressers and transgender people. 

You're propagating misinformation instead of educating yourself on the topic. 

No mention means not included in the study.  Not that there aren't any.  I know of a whole bunch, the largest organized pedophile ring on the planet wears dresses.  That's just fact.  And I'm willing to bet a large number in your study too, if it were taken into consideration.  

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

No mention means not included in the study.  Not that there aren't any.  I know of a whole bunch, the largest organized pedophile ring on the planet wears dresses.  That's just fact.  And I'm willing to bet a large number in your study too, if it were taken into consideration.  

 

Link to information on cross dressers being behind history's largest pedophile ring. I'd like to read up on that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said:

Link to information on cross dressers being behind history's largest pedophile ring. I'd like to read up on that.

Sure.  A good place to start is with this PA grand jury report from a few years ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/14/us/catholic-church-sex-abuse-pennsylvania.html

 

If you want some statistics you can just extrapolate the data from PA:

Using the PA grand jury report and extrapolating out the "over 1000 of identifiable victims" to the total number of parishes in PA and from PA's catholic population to total catholic population results in 500,000 raped children in the past 70 years.  The report also stated that there are likely thousands more victims whose records were lost or who were too afraid to come forward.  That puts the number of raped children in the past 70 years in the MILLIONS by the catholic church.

All of them dress wearers.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Sure.  A good place to start is with this PA grand jury report from a few years ago.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/14/us/catholic-church-sex-abuse-pennsylvania.html

 

If you want some statistics you can just extrapolate the data from PA:

Using the PA grand jury report and extrapolating out the "over 1000 of identifiable victims" to the total number of parishes in PA and from PA's catholic population to total catholic population results in 500,000 raped children in the past 70 years.  The report also stated that there are likely thousands more victims whose records were lost or who were too afraid to come forward.  That puts the number of raped children in the past 70 years in the MILLIONS by the catholic church.

All of them dress wearers.  

Nice pivot attempt away from having to provide a link to crossdressers being behind the world's largest pedophile ring.

But are you seriously equating standard Catholic priest outfits with crossdressing?

These are robes, not dresses. Methodists ministers and congregation leaders from myriad other denominations wear robes. Baptist choirs wear them. 

That's like calling William Wallace a cross-dressing pedophile because he wore kilts.

But thanks for underscoring my point that you have no clue as to what you are talking about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can’t even count all the ways that they are exactly the same…here’s a few.
 

-Schools were pushing the satanic agenda and posting satanic flags

-a whole month was dedicated to satanic pride

-Anton Leveys Satanic Bible was in school libraries

-Satanic lobotomy clinics exploded and performed irreversible procedures on minors

-Schools were withholding vital info from parents about their kids practicing satanism in school.  
 

there may be more…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, FrancieFootball said:

Nice pivot attempt away from having to provide a link to crossdressers being behind the world's largest pedophile ring.

But are you seriously equating standard Catholic priest outfits with crossdressing?

These are robes, not dresses. Methodists and ministers from myriad other denominations wear robes. 

That's like calling William Wallace a cross-dressing pedophile because he wore kilts.

But thanks for underscoring my point that you have no clue as to what you are talking about.

Cassock - gown

Gown - dress

You don't get to parse out what you don't like. This isn't the 12th Century. They like to wear gowns, they like to play dress up.  They like having sex with the same sex.  They like to have sex with minors.  All definitions lead to cross-dressing pedophiles. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, jerryskids said:

This has always been my concern; the unintended consequences that the Left never seems to consider.  I've never thought that a true trans person is using the other restroom to cause trouble.  It's the psychos who want to attack women and children who take advantage of such normalization.

A serial rapist finds his inner tranny so they send him to a women's prison, don't dare question it, what could go wrong?  :dunno: 

This. The unintended consequences. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

Cassock - gown

Gown - dress

You don't get to parse out what you don't like. This isn't the 12th Century. They like to wear gowns, they like to play dress up.  They like having sex with the same sex.  They like to have sex with minors.  All definitions lead to cross-dressing pedophiles. 

The Southern Baptist Convention has 13.2 million congregation members and 47,198 churches.

The choir at all of their formal services wears robes, which you classify as dresses, meaning that all the robe-wearing men in those choirs are pedophiles, and that all the women alongside them support pedophiles, as do the 13.2 million congregation members who stand up and sing along with them.

So anyone here who attends Baptist church services is a pedophile or supports pedophiles, by your definition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, FrancieFootball said:

The Southern Baptist Convention has 13.2 million congregation members and 47,198 churches.

The choir at all of their formal services wears robes, which you classify as dresses, meaning that all the robe-wearing men in those choirs are pedophiles, and that all the women alongside them support pedophiles, as do the 13.2 million congregation members who stand up and sing along with them.

So anyone here who attends Baptist church services is a pedophile or supports pedophiles, by your definition.

Not all dress wearing people are pedophiles.  :lol:  Who ever said that?  Gutterboy alias?

You can extrapolate the data I've already provided to determine a percentage of priests that are pedophiles if you want.  I mean there is no reason to think PA is different than any other state or country with the cover up going all the way to the top.

They all support pedophiles it appears tho.

ETA:  I'm not sure if Baptist have the same magnitude of the problem that Catholics do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×