CA gay couple kills baby

[Stryker Ryker 188]

Two gay men from Southern California hired a woman to be their surrogate so they could have a child. Weeks after the woman, Brittney Pearson, got pregnant she found out she had cancer and would need to undergo chemo treatment. In order to do that, she would need to give birth to the baby early. 25 weeks to be exact but it would give both her and the baby the best possible chance to live. However, the gay couple didn’t want that. Anything less than 38 weeks they didn’t want and didn’t want to pay her. They want the baby to be “immediately terminated”. Brittney refused to kill the child so they threatened legal action. When she offered to adopt the baby they demanded a death certificate. Surrogacy laws in Cali give no rights to her or the baby. She was able to push the baby out at 25 weeks but the purchasing couple had “ownership” of the child after birth. They ordered life saving care to be withheld. The baby boy died shortly after. I have ZERO respect to people that think like this and quite frankly it makes me want to ban surrogacy for gay couples after this entire fiasco
 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12254637/amp/Surrogate-claims-gay-dads-told-terminate-pregnancy-24-weeks-cancer-diagnosis.html

[League Champion 1,896]

MDC & GUTTERBOY at it again. 

[thegeneral 2,950]

What a sad and strange story.

Side note: The fact that they are a gay couple is irrelevant. 

[seafoam1 2,807]

7 minutes ago, League Champion said:

MDC & GUTTERBOY at it again. 

Don't forget this turd. All three are butt pirates with each other.  

6 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Side note: The fact that they are a gay couple is irrelevant. 

 

[TBayXXXVII 2,485]

Do we know if the woman was willing to reimburse the guys for any bills they paid for, if she did adopt the baby?

[League Champion 1,896]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Side note: The fact that they are a gay couple is irrelevant. 

Why is that irrelevant? It's part of the story, perhaps they had no parenting instinct and couldn't care for a baby, so they killed it. 

Or it disrupted their lifestyle??? 

[thegeneral 2,950]

4 minutes ago, seafoam1 said:

Don't forget this turd. 

Peefoam…living a secret life is why you are so angry. Hate to see it. 

[seafoam1 2,807]

Just now, thegeneral said:

Peefoam…living a secret life is why you are so angry. Hate to see it. 

Ok mdcack. 

[thegeneral 2,950]

Just now, League Champion said:

Why is that irrelevant? It's part of the story, perhaps they had no parenting instinct and couldn't care for a baby, so they killed it. 

Or it disrupted their lifestyle??? 

It could be any couple who cannot have kids and goes this route.

The OP alluded this should be a reason to ban the gheys using surrogates. 

[Hawkeye21 2,382]

18 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Why is that irrelevant? It's part of the story, perhaps they had no parenting instinct and couldn't care for a baby, so they killed it. 

Or it disrupted their lifestyle??? 

I understand what he means by it.  Straight couples have killed their babies as well and it had nothing to do with their sexuality.  Why does this mean it had to do with their sexuality?  I know it's going to be used that way though.

[weepaws 3,158]

13 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I understand what he means by it.  Straight couples have killed their babies as well and it had nothing to do with their sexuality.  Why does this mean it had to do with their sexuality?  I know it's going to be used that way though.

That they are gay doesn’t make it worst, but that they are a gay couple is just part of the whole story.  

[Hawkeye21 2,382]

1 minute ago, weepaws said:

That they are gay doesn’t make it worst, but that they are a gay couple is just part of the whole story.  

That is true but I think we all know it going to be used in order to push an agenda.

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, weepaws said:

That they are gay doesn’t make it worst, but that they are a gay couple is just part of the whole story.  

That's what I'm getting at. Whether they just happen to be gay or not, they're still gay. 

[weepaws 3,158]

People who think it should be legal to abort, or let’s call it what it is kill their own children, and then find this story to be sad, Hypocrite. 

Abortion of any kind, at any time should be should not be legal. N

[weepaws 3,158]

1 minute ago, Hawkeye21 said:

That is true but I think we all know it going to be used in order to push an agenda.

What agenda, that two men that are gay had their born child killed? What kind of agenda can come of it, it’s call murder no matter who did it.  

[thegeneral 2,950]

4 minutes ago, weepaws said:

What agenda, that two men that are gay had their born child killed? What kind of agenda can come of it, it’s call murder no matter who did it.  

The OP laid it out…

”quite frankly it makes me want to ban surrogacy for gay couples after this entire fiasco”

That it is a gay couple has no bearing. Was simply pointing this out. It is a very bizarre and tragic story otherwise. Lots went wrong there. 

[squistion 1,964]

51 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

What a sad and strange story.

Side note: The fact that they are a gay couple is irrelevant. 

Totally and completely irrelevant. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

The OP laid it out…

”quite frankly it makes me want to ban surrogacy for gay couples after this entire fiasco”

That it is a gay couple has no bearing. Was simply pointing this out. It is a very bizarre and tragic story otherwise. Lots went wrong there. 

Exactly.  Many bigots don't think gays should be allowed to adopt.  So here is a story of 2 gays "killing" a baby they were going to adopt, so now they can argue their point.

[Hawkeye21 2,382]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

Exactly.  Many bigots don't think gays should be allowed to adopt.  So here is a story of 2 gays "killing" a baby they were going to adopt, so now they can argue their point.

I thought that seemed obvious but apparently not for everyone.

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

So here is a story of 2 gays "killing" a baby they were going to adopt, so now they can argue their point.

Hey dumbass, nobody should be killing babies. 

[TimHauck 2,633]

57 minutes ago, Stryker Ryker said:

She was able to push the baby out at 25 weeks but the purchasing couple had “ownership” of the child after birth. They ordered life saving care to be withheld. The baby boy died shortly after. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12254637/amp/Surrogate-claims-gay-dads-told-terminate-pregnancy-24-weeks-cancer-diagnosis.html

That's not what the article says:

"Pearson told DailyMail.com she found a hospital that would deliver her baby, but would not elaborate on whether or not the procedure was inducement or termination, and whether or not the fetus was born alive."

[TimHauck 2,633]

1 hour ago, Stryker Ryker said:

They ordered life saving care to be withheld. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12254637/amp/Surrogate-claims-gay-dads-told-terminate-pregnancy-24-weeks-cancer-diagnosis.html

This was not mentioned in the article.

[Hawkeye21 2,382]

2 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Hey dumbass, nobody should be killing babies. 

Exactly.  Who cares what their sexuality is?

[squistion 1,964]

6 minutes ago, League Champion said:

Hey dumbass, nobody should be killing babies. 

And 100% of liberals and Democrats would agree and are totally against infanticide. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

6 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

This was not mentioned in the article.

Yeah seriously, it's not in the article, or any other article I can find.

digby made the whole thing up

What a douche

 

Quote

 

Pearson told DailyMail.com that she had found a hospital that would deliver her baby, but would not comment on whether or not the procedure was inducement or termination and whether or not the fetus was born alive.

She would only confirm that it has since passed away.

“The baby was born on Father’s Day, my mom got to hold him and take pictures, but he didn’t survive,” she explained.

 

[Cloaca du jour 2,147]

1 hour ago, thegeneral said:

What a sad and strange story.

Side note: The fact that they are a gay couple is irrelevant. 

Lol...designer babies?  Totally in the queer wheelhouse.

[thegeneral 2,950]

1 minute ago, Cloaca du jour said:

Lol...designer babies?  Totally in the queer wheelhouse.

Designer babies?

[TimHauck 2,633]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

Yeah seriously, it's not in the article, or any other article I can find.

digby made the whole thing up

What a douche

Wait this is digby?  LOL.

Looks like that part was plagiarized from this tweet:

 

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Wait this is digby?  LOL.

Looks like that part was plagiarized from this tweet:

 

 

yeah it's digby, makes sense now right?

believes everything he reads online.

[Engorgeous George 2,161]

44 minutes ago, Hawkeye21 said:

I understand what he means by it.  Straight couples have killed their babies as well and it had nothing to do with their sexuality.  Why does this mean it had to do with their sexuality?  I know it's going to be used that way though.

I read the assertion as an indictment of Californians, not gays.

[Cloaca du jour 2,147]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Designer babies?

Dont want no baby with cancer genetics...hell to the no!!!

2 snaps down

[iam90sbaby 2,494]

Satanic group strikes again 

[TimHauck 2,633]

I'm also disappointed in the Geek Club not yet blaming the covid vaccine for giving the surrogate mother "turbocancer"

[League Champion 1,896]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

I'm also disappointed in the Geek Club not yet blaming the covid vaccine for giving the surrogate mother "turbocancer"

Damn, how did I miss that one? 

[thegeneral 2,950]

9 minutes ago, Cloaca du jour said:

Dont want no baby with cancer genetics...hell to the no!!!

2 snaps down

That’s not what seems to have happened here. 

[thegeneral 2,950]

8 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

I'm also disappointed in the Geek Club not yet blaming the covid vaccine for giving the surrogate mother "turbocancer"

Hunter Biden’s Laptop IMO

[Stryker Ryker 188]

32 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

That's not what the article says:

"Pearson told DailyMail.com she found a hospital that would deliver her baby, but would not elaborate on whether or not the procedure was inducement or termination, and whether or not the fetus was born alive."

What is it with you and gutter with your constant lies? I swear I’ve never seen anyone on this site lie as much as you two. Literally all I had to do was google “Brittney Pearson” and you get MULTIPLE articles backing up everything I said. I see nothing has changed since since me rarely checking in. Only things certain in this life: death, taxes, and these two morons lying 
 

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/surrogate-mother-threatened-gay-couple-abort-baby-cancer-blocked-adoption

 

Also, gays should still be able to adopt or have surrogates. The entire thing however is disgusting and so are gutterpedo and TimHack for trying to defend those sickos 

[TimHauck 2,633]

1 minute ago, Stryker Ryker said:

What is it with you and gutter with your constant lies? I swear I’ve never seen anyone on this site lie as much as you two. Literally all I had to do was google “Brittney Pearson” and you get MULTIPLE articles backing up everything I said. I see nothing has changed since since me rarely checking in. Only things certain in this life: death, taxes, and these two morons lying 
 

https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/surrogate-mother-threatened-gay-couple-abort-baby-cancer-blocked-adoption

 

Also, gays should still be able to adopt or have surrogates. The entire thing however is disgusting and so are gutterpedo and TimHack for trying to defend those sickos 

Looks like this article's source was whoever the fock "Lila Rose" is

[Stryker Ryker 188]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

Looks like this article's source was whoever the fock "Lila Rose" is

That’s literally the first article that popped up among dozens. Google is free but I know you refuse to believe anything or anyone that goes against what you want 

[lickin_starfish 1,893]

Why did the dudes hire her in the first place? Were they having trouble conceiving?

 

Also, the baby was spared from a twisted, degenerate life. RIP.