Democratic Legislative Candidate Focks Husband On Camera For Money

[HellToupee 749]

 outraged by this mailing but quiet about books teaching pre HS kids about wearing buttplugs or giving BJs 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545]

Just now, HellToupee said:

 outraged by this mailing but quiet about books teaching pre HS kids about wearing buttplugs or giving BJs 

yep.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,691]

5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Were they addressed directly to the children?  Do your kids open up YOUR mail?   Mine don't. GTFO.

Trannies and strippers flailing their junk in front of children you don't bat an eye.  "All Good", says Tim Hauck.

Adults sending explicit pictures to adults: "OMG!!! WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN!!!", says Tim Hauck. GTFO.  Yeah, you get another one.

Great point. 

[TimHauck 1,806]

37 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Were they addressed directly to the children?  Do your kids open up YOUR mail?   Mine don't. GTFO.

Trannies and strippers flailing their junk in front of ACTUAL children you don't bat an eye.  "All Good", says Tim Hauck.

Adults sending explicit pictures only to adults: "OMG!!! WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN!!!", says Tim Hauck. GTFO.  Yeah, you get another one.

Lol I’m not saying to arrest whoever sent these mailers, but it is hypocritical.

My kids are younger, but a kid could easily figure out it was just junk mail that will be thrown away, so yes I’m sure some opened it.  And depending on what was in the picture, it could be argued that that is worse than what is seen at drag shows. I’ve also said multiple times that I would not bring my kid to a drag show, but that doesn’t mean all drag queens are pedos as has been claimed here.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,691]

Just now, TimHauck said:

Lol I’m not saying to arrest whoever sent these mailers, but it is hypocritical.

My kids are younger, but a kid could easily figure out it was just junk mail that will be thrown away, so yes I’m sure some opened it.  And depending on what was in the picture, it could be argued that that is worse than what is seen at drag shows. I’ve also said multiple times that I would not bring my kid to a drag show, but that doesn’t mean all drag queens are pedos as has been claimed here.

The ones that seek to hang around with children are.  

[TimHauck 1,806]

37 minutes ago, HellToupee said:

 outraged by this mailing but quiet about books teaching pre HS kids about wearing buttplugs or giving BJs 

The book thing is dumb because it’s usually in a library that the kid needs to go searching for, and they could easily find the same or worse online.

This is literally sending it right to their house.

[Hardcore troubadour 12,691]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

The book thing is dumb because it’s usually in a library that the kid needs to go searching for, and they could easily find the same or worse online.

This is literally sending it right to their house.

My kids can’t get that stuff on line. I guess yours can.  Way to go. 

[GutterBoy 2,281]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

My kids can’t get that stuff on line.

Yes they can

[Hardcore troubadour 12,691]

6 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Yes they can

Not in my house on my devices. I guess if they go to yours they can. 

[MLCKAA 402]

21 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Lol I’m not saying to arrest whoever sent these mailers, but it is hypocritical.

My kids are younger, but a kid could easily figure out it was just junk mail that will be thrown away, so yes I’m sure some opened it.  And depending on what was in the picture, it could be argued that that is worse than what is seen at drag shows. I’ve also said multiple times that I would not bring my kid to a drag show, but that doesn’t mean all drag queens are pedos as has been claimed here.

Disregard.  Somehow overlooked the clearly stated fact that you have young kids

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545]

21 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

The book thing is dumb because it’s usually in a library that the kid needs to go searching for, and they could easily find the same or worse online.

This is literally sending it right to their house.

Oh, you mean like mail being delivered by the USPS? 

So you're okay with kids "finding" it in the library or online, but heaven forbid it comes sealed, addressed TO the adults in snail mail!

JHC, Tim. 

[jerryskids 5,213]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

I don't know. I kind of feel like that's just part of the game.

Were the pictures exposed directly in the mail? Or was it like a letter that they had to open up to actually look at the screenshots?

There weren't explicit pictures, here is one:

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Fnbc12-republican-party-of-virginia-sends-mailers-with-v0-hknng42lm1wb1.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D3024%26format%3Dpjpg%26auto%3Dwebp%26s%3Dbcece2f15f4a3e9cbe5bc9f51fa885cef2121d76

From the description in reddit:  "I got one - the pictures themselves aren't really explicit. They're just closeups of her face smiling normally in what looks like a bedroom and you can kinda see her shoulders. I think it's more the message excerpts that are explicit, but the bad words are censored."

As usual, our resident leftists are slurping the jizz the MSM feeds them.   

[IGotWorms 3,321]

1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

All's fair in politics.

Unless the letters themselves were addressed directly to the kids, I'm not seeing a problem. Be no different than getting a penthouse magazine in the mail. The USPS is not going to send out pornography that's visible in the mail.

You order the penthouse magazine, fockwit. Nobody asked the RNC to send them pron 

[RogerDodger 797]

This is metal helmet level stupid.

Things that are legal to mail:

- pornography

- prescription drugs

- live bees

- actual sh!t

None of which should you be able to find in a school library.

[RogerDodger 797]

1 minute ago, IGotWorms said:

You order the penthouse magazine, fockwit. Nobody asked the RNC to send them pron 

Title 39 U.S.C. § 3008: Protection from Pornographic Mail

If you receive pornography in the mail and you wish to not receive any further go to the post office and file form PS Form 1500 and then they will be restricted from sending you future mail.

That's the law and the way it works.  You claim to be a lawyer?  

[GutterBoy 2,281]

Dodger not understanding the point per usual.  No one claimed it's illegal, it's just unethical, but that's Maga for you.

[jerryskids 5,213]

12 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

There weren't explicit pictures, here is one:

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Fnbc12-republican-party-of-virginia-sends-mailers-with-v0-hknng42lm1wb1.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D3024%26format%3Dpjpg%26auto%3Dwebp%26s%3Dbcece2f15f4a3e9cbe5bc9f51fa885cef2121d76

From the description in reddit:  "I got one - the pictures themselves aren't really explicit. They're just closeups of her face smiling normally in what looks like a bedroom and you can kinda see her shoulders. I think it's more the message excerpts that are explicit, but the bad words are censored."

As usual, our resident leftists are slurping the jizz the MSM feeds them.   

for @GutterBoy, @IGotWorms, @MDC

[IGotWorms 3,321]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

for @GutterBoy, @IGotWorms, @MDC

Yeah I assumed it wasn’t a close up of her riding the rod or something. Still inappropriate

Not to mention bringing her kids into it.

[jerryskids 5,213]

3 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Yeah I assumed it wasn’t a close up of her riding the rod or something. Still inappropriate

Not to mention bringing her kids into it.

Which part is inappropriate?  Mentioning to the electorate that she focks her husband on camera for money?  Or that she has children and still does it?

[RogerDodger 797]

10 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Dodger not understanding the point per usual.  No one claimed it's illegal, it's just unethical, but that's Maga for you.

This is illegal dipshit.  

3 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

Republicans are pushing sex on kids.  When will it stop?

But I wasn't addressing that, my tiny brain reading challenged friend.

Worms implied you have to ask for pornography to be delivered.  That's not how it works (law).  

[IGotWorms 3,321]

10 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Which part is inappropriate?  Mentioning to the electorate that she focks her husband on camera for money?  Or that she has children and still does it?

The picture and “SEX” displayed everywhere. A narrative mention would be fine. The issue is perfectly fair, imo, it’s just how they did it.

And yeah, leave her kids out of it. Especially don’t include a picture of them (even if their faces are at least blotted out)

[Engorgeous George 1,200]

Did she canvas for votes door-to-door?

[MDC 5,902]

24 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Yeah I assumed it wasn’t a close up of her riding the rod or something. Still inappropriate

Not to mention bringing her kids into it.

Just LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE! Right?!? I can’t believe I have to say this, but here we are.

Leave the goddam MFing kids alone?

is that so hard?  

[IGotWorms 3,321]

2 minutes ago, MDC said:

Just LEAVE THE KIDS ALONE! Right?!? I can’t believe I have to say this, but here we are.

Leave the goddam MFing kids alone?

is that so hard?  

Apparently you have to tell jer-bear. He’s such a hack he has to defend this garbage even though it’s probably just some dumb anonymous PAC that sent it out 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545]

1 hour ago, IGotWorms said:

You order the penthouse magazine, fockwit. Nobody asked the RNC to send them pron 

It's almost as if you're intentionally this stupid. 

Back to your glory hole - maybe you and gutterpedo will spot your candidate there.

[League Champion 1,593]

Another Liberal Woman who can't keep her legs closed. She's most definitely Pro-abortion 

[TimHauck 1,806]

2 hours ago, jerryskids said:

There weren't explicit pictures, here is one:

https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpreview.redd.it%2Fnbc12-republican-party-of-virginia-sends-mailers-with-v0-hknng42lm1wb1.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D3024%26format%3Dpjpg%26auto%3Dwebp%26s%3Dbcece2f15f4a3e9cbe5bc9f51fa885cef2121d76

From the description in reddit:  "I got one - the pictures themselves aren't really explicit. They're just closeups of her face smiling normally in what looks like a bedroom and you can kinda see her shoulders. I think it's more the message excerpts that are explicit, but the bad words are censored."

As usual, our resident leftists are slurping the jizz the MSM feeds them.   

Ok the content isn’t explicit, I’ll give you that.  Putting a picture of the family is pretty sh1tty though, so still not quite “protecting the children”

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545]

3 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Ok the content isn’t explicit, I’ll give you that.  Putting a picture of the family is pretty sh1tty though, so still not quite “protecting the children”

The "protect the children" is something you made up and then argued against that.  That does not fit this situation at all but you're trying very hard - but still failing.

You're comparing apples to oranges.

[Voltaire 4,567]

If I were a Democrat in this forum, I'd walk away and toss the wh0re to the wolves rather than whine about the Republicans sending out mailers to make sure voters realize that she's a wh0re.

Once news broke on who they nominated, it was time to concede the 'L" and move on. Try to win the seat back by nominating a better candidate next time.

[TimHauck 1,806]

27 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

The "protect the children" is something you made up and then argued against that.  That does not fit this situation at all but you're trying very hard - but still failing.

You're comparing apples to oranges.

“Protect the children” didn’t come from Republicans?  Interesting.

And yes, it does apply to this situation.  Putting a picture of her children on a mailer about her performing sex acts for money is not protecting the children.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 2,545]

1 minute ago, TimHauck said:

“Protect the children” didn’t come from Republicans?  Interesting.

And yes, it does apply to this situation.  Putting a picture of her children on a mailer about her performing sex acts for money is not protecting the children.

No, it does not.  they are not sending letters directly to children.

However, the trannies and other perverts are literally doing it DIRECTLY in front of children.

Also, I never said "protect the children" didn't come from Republicans.  That's you, onnce again, making shiat up.  I said it doesn't apply to this situation, which it clearly doesn't.

[jerryskids 5,213]

2 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Apparently you have to tell jer-bear. He’s such a hack he has to defend this garbage even though it’s probably just some dumb anonymous PAC that sent it out 

Jer-bear is more than a little cringy.  Just saying.

[jerryskids 5,213]

47 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Ok the content isn’t explicit, I’ll give you that.  Putting a picture of the family is pretty sh1tty though, so still not quite “protecting the children”

I haven't seen the picture you are referring to, do you have a link?

[RogerDodger 797]

OMG after the big black circles hiding their entire heads and faces you can still see about 4 square inches of one of the kids neck!  You can totally tell the distinguishing feature that they are white!  Just in case you weren't smart enough to deduce that from their parents.  The horror, protect the children!

[TimHauck 1,806]

3 minutes ago, RogerDodger said:

OMG after the big black circles hiding their entire heads and faces you can still see about 4 square inches of one of the kids neck!  You can totally tell the distinguishing feature that they are white!  Just in case you weren't smart enough to deduce that from their parents.  The horror, protect the children!

It didn’t need a picture at all.  It’s setting the kids up to be tormented for the rest of their schooling.  But it’s ok, people like cdub think we need more bullying

[RogerDodger 797]

2 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

Apparently you have to tell jer-bear. He’s such a hack he has to defend this garbage even though it’s probably just some dumb anonymous PAC that sent it out 

Republican Party of Virginia if you want to bother yourself with any of the facts.

[RogerDodger 797]

Just now, TimHauck said:

It didn’t need a picture at all.  It’s setting the kids up to be tormented for the rest of their schooling.  But it’s ok, people like cdub think we need more bullying

So no pot shots at politicians with kids huh.   Novel idea you have there.

[RogerDodger 797]

Mom, the kids are making fun of me at school because you were foking on the internet for everyone to see.  For money.  That's not true is it?

Yeah, but, if the darn republicans would have the decency to not say anything about it honey.  Totally their fault.  

[IGotWorms 3,321]

2 hours ago, Voltaire said:

If I were a Democrat in this forum, I'd walk away and toss the wh0re to the wolves rather than whine about the Republicans sending out mailers to make sure voters realize that she's a wh0re.

Once news broke on who they nominated, it was time to concede the 'L" and move on. Try to win the seat back by nominating a better candidate next time.

It’s not about her or her loss. I think it’s fair and she deserved to lose. But that mailer could still be inappropriate

[IGotWorms 3,321]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Jer-bear is more than a little cringy.  Just saying.