House Jan. 6 Committee deleted more than 100 encrypted files days before GOP took majority

[Engorgeous George 2,137]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Maybe.  But there is no justifiable reason for the cover up. But they will try. 

None which I have currently been able to come up with, but perhaps that is my failure of imagination.  also, i am not yet certain that the extent of the allegations are true, I like to wait a bit before arriving at conclusions in case the initial report was oversold.  Certainly tnhis looks, on its face, if accepted at face value, to be damning.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,941]

Just now, Engorgeous George said:

None which I have currently been able to come up with, but perhaps that is my failure of imagination.  also, i am not yet certain that the extent of the allegations are true, I like to wait a bit before arriving at conclusions in case the initial report was oversold.  Certainly tnhis looks, on its face, if accepted at face value, to be damning.

I can’t see how it’s not. If they are going to claim they are protecting someone, there are other ways to do that than destroying the property of the us government. 

[jerryskids 6,567]

20 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

What info is being covered up? 
 

I can’t fathom that there is anything that would exonerate Trump or any of the insurrectionists/rioters/oops I mean hostages. 

Really?  Can't even fathom it?

I can fathom that a pangolin and a bat had wild sex just outside of the Wuhan Coronavirus Lab and created Covid.  I mean, it sounds idiotic saying it, but I can fathom it.

If you try again really hard, can you fathom what might be in the deleted material that could exonerate Trump?   

[IGotWorms 4,057]

13 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Really?  Can't even fathom it?

I can fathom that a pangolin and a bat had wild sex just outside of the Wuhan Coronavirus Lab and created Covid.  I mean, it sounds idiotic saying it, but I can fathom it.

If you try again really hard, can you fathom what might be in the deleted material that could exonerate Trump?   

Give some examples. Drop this coy bullsh1t

[BeachGuy23 642]

49 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Really?  Can't even fathom it?

I can fathom that a pangolin and a bat had wild sex just outside of the Wuhan Coronavirus Lab and created Covid.  I mean, it sounds idiotic saying it, but I can fathom it.

If you try again really hard, can you fathom what might be in the deleted material that could exonerate Trump?   

You can not be serious.  Did the FBI know that Trump would send his "supporters" to march on the capital?  Was there some kind of program handed out pre-klan...I mean pre-Trump rally?

[jerryskids 6,567]

36 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Give some examples. Drop this coy bullsh1t

What, you too?  A total inability to fathom something?

I can fathom evidence of feds in the crowd.  I'm not even saying they were stirring the pot (although I could fathom it), but just that they were there.

[IGotWorms 4,057]

18 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

What, you too?  A total inability to fathom something?

I can fathom evidence of feds in the crowd.  I'm not even saying they were stirring the pot (although I could fathom it), but just that they were there.

Okay so you’re on board the jonmx crazy train. That’s cool.

You gonna admit you were stupid when it doesn’t turn out that January 6 was a false flag operation perpetrated by federal agents?

[jerryskids 6,567]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Okay so you’re on board the jonmx crazy train. That’s cool.

You gonna admit you were stupid when it doesn’t turn out that January 6 was a false flag operation perpetrated by federal agents?

Apparently English is not your first (or any) language, as my entire final sentence is in opposition to this post.  Then again, you consistently successfully defend your crown as the King of No Nuance, and this is no exception.   

[IGotWorms 4,057]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Apparently English is not your first (or any) language, as my entire final sentence is in opposition to this post.  Then again, you consistently successfully defend your crown as the King of No Nuance, and this is no exception.   

This is why you’re bullsh1t, jerry. You want to say it but you don’t want to be held to it.

Grow a pair

[jonmx 2,424]

19 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Okay so you’re on board the jonmx crazy train. That’s cool.

You gonna admit you were stupid when it doesn’t turn out that January 6 was a false flag operation perpetrated by federal agents?

The feds have already admitted to having over 100 assets in the crowd.  What you call crazy is really just f-ing ignorance on your part 

[seafoam1 2,803]

19 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

Okay so you’re on board the jonmx crazy train. That’s cool.

You gonna admit you were stupid when it doesn’t turn out that January 6 was a false flag operation perpetrated by federal agents?

Talk about crazy train. Ignoring the 2020 riots over a selfie fest has got to be the dumbest things you liberals did since your lack of intelligence handling your money.

[jerryskids 6,567]

4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

This is why you’re bullsh1t, jerry. You want to say it but you don’t want to be held to it.

Grow a pair

Not at all.  This was all hashed out back at the time, and you weren't around, so I won't bother to go back and reconstruct all the details.  My personal objection with the 1/6 committee was that it wasn't a "truth seeking" committee, it was a one-way kangaroo court.  They carefully culled the most damning of video, conveniently leaving out video of, say, guards at one entrance pulling up a bar to allow in a well-behaved crowd, then turning their backs on the crowd with no fear for their safety (left-leaning posters like @Fnord, I believe, agreed that this was troubling and should be investigated).

So basically, I entered today thinking that we have not been given the entire story on what happened that day.  And learning that the committee Hillary'd a bunch of data just before the transition, well, that goes to support my belief, wouldn't you say?   

[Tree of Knowledge 1,705]

1/6 was a made for television event.  

[seafoam1 2,803]

2 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

1/6 was a made for television event.  

And appeals to the same people who spend their nights watching the Gilmore Girls reruns. 

[The Real timschochet 6,430]

3 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Really?  Can't even fathom it?

I can fathom that a pangolin and a bat had wild sex just outside of the Wuhan Coronavirus Lab and created Covid.  I mean, it sounds idiotic saying it, but I can fathom it.

If you try again really hard, can you fathom what might be in the deleted material that could exonerate Trump?   

Not really no. The problem with Trump’s guilt is that his actions and inactions on Jan 6 are all very well documented. We have his speech, his tweets, his statements to people close to him at the time. None of that has been challenged. Based on that alone he’s guilty of some very serious crimes. 
 

So no, even if the absurd theory that the FBI secretly orchestrated the riot was true, it still wouldn’t exonerate Trump. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

Not at all.  This was all hashed out back at the time, and you weren't around, so I won't bother to go back and reconstruct all the details.  My personal objection with the 1/6 committee was that it wasn't a "truth seeking" committee, it was a one-way kangaroo court.  They carefully culled the most damning of video, conveniently leaving out video of, say, guards at one entrance pulling up a bar to allow in a well-behaved crowd, then turning their backs on the crowd with no fear for their safety (left-leaning posters like @Fnord, I believe, agreed that this was troubling and should be investigated).

So basically, I entered today thinking that we have not been given the entire story on what happened that day.  And learning that the committee Hillary'd a bunch of data just before the transition, well, that goes to support my belief, wouldn't you say?   

None of that establishes the theory that you’re trying to float and which loony jonmx claims is already established as fact — that January 6 was essentially a false flag operation perpetrated by federal law enforcement.

[seafoam1 2,803]

2 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

None of that establishes the theory that you’re trying to float and which loony jonmx claims is already established as fact — that January 6 was essentially a false flag operation perpetrated by federal law enforcement.

Excellent. You understand now. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,941]

The FBI keeps getting called out by the courts for their dirty dealings and yet we have Libtards acting like questioning them is tin foil hat time. They didn’t orchestrate Jan 6. They also didn’t let an opportunity escape them.  They were there Worms, deal with it. Go watch your boy Christopher Wray dance around it when he’s asked. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The FBI keeps getting called out by the courts for their dirty dealings and yet we have Libtards acting like questioning them is tin foil hat time. They didn’t orchestrate Jan 6. They also didn’t let an opportunity escape them.  They were there Worms, deal with it. Go watch your boy Christopher Wray dance around it when he’s asked. 

Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, etc., I’m sure they were monitoring it. And as well they should. But that’s a whole different beast from the assertion that they basically orchestrated it 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,941]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, etc., I’m sure they were monitoring it. And as well they should. But that’s a whole different beast from the assertion that they basically orchestrated it 

I don’t think they did. But as we have seen recently, they aren’t above it. So dismissing the notion as an absurdity is absurd. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I don’t think they did. But as we have seen recently, they aren’t above it. So dismissing the notion as an absurdity is absurd. 

It’s a pvssy move to insinuate this stuff, like you and Jerry are doing. That’s why I’m pinning you down. Either you think that happened or you don’t. Guys like jonmx might be nutso but at least they’re willing to put their money where their mouth is 

[jerryskids 6,567]

11 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

None of that establishes the theory that you’re trying to float and which loony jonmx claims is already established as fact — that January 6 was essentially a false flag operation perpetrated by federal law enforcement.

Again, nuance is your mortal enemy.  I believe that somewhere between one extreme (the Feds were completely uninvolved) and the other (the Feds coordinated the whole thing) is the truth.  I'd like to judge Trump based on the actual truth, not the kangaroo court that it has been to date.

I realize that these words are lost on you, but I'm not a fan of Trump, and I'd rather the Repubs push other candidates.  But I also don't these shenanigans on a former POTUS and presumptive candidate.  You seem peachy with them; you do you, I guess.   

[thegeneral 2,913]

13 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

The FBI keeps getting called out by the courts for their dirty dealings and yet we have Libtards acting like questioning them is tin foil hat time. They didn’t orchestrate Jan 6. They also didn’t let an opportunity escape them.  They were there Worms, deal with it. Go watch your boy Christopher Wray dance around it when he’s asked. 

Watch out with this bootlicker type of thought. A batsignal was just sent to Jonmx!

 

[seafoam1 2,803]

Liberals needed to counter violent riots, terrorist liberal groups like antifa, and shear hatred, with a terrible pretend set up of it on the right.

Face it, the liberals have failed over and over again with the whole jan 6 bullshlt. It's farcicle. 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,941]

4 minutes ago, IGotWorms said:

It’s a pvssy move to insinuate this stuff, like you and Jerry are doing. That’s why I’m pinning you down. Either you think that happened or you don’t. Guys like jonmx might be nutso but at least they’re willing to put their money where their mouth is 

They were there. And the FBI director won’t answer the question. And the democrats wouldn’t release all the footage and they attempted to destroy records of their investigation. We are open to the possibility that a cop would plant drugs on a person. Why? Because cops have planted drugs on a person before. Well, I’m open to the possibly that the FBI were acting as agent provocateurs on Jan 6. Because they have done it before. 

[seafoam1 2,803]

48 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

They were there. And the FBI director won’t answer the question. And the democrats wouldn’t release all the footage and they attempted to destroy records of their investigation. We are open to the possibility that a cop would plant drugs on a person. Why? Because cops have planted drugs on a person before. Well, I’m open to the possibly that the FBI were acting as agent provocateurs on Jan 6. Because they have done it before. 

Liberals don't wanr the details of the truth. They have well thought out extremist opinions that need to be heard. 

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

Secret Service Foreknowledge or Criminal Negligence? Damning New Evidence Surfaces In FBI’s January 6 “Pipe Bomb” Story January 18, 2024 (6 days ago)

[iam90sbaby 2,490]

Why do you guys argue with these highly educated idiots? Just call them retards and move on 

[jonmx 2,424]

4 minutes ago, iam90sbaby said:

Why do you guys argue with these highly educated idiots? Just call them retards and move on 

Because I would never insult retards by associating them with these f-ing idiots.  

[seafoam1 2,803]

Just now, jonmx said:

Because I would never insult retards by associating them with these f-ing idiots.  

Good point. 

[iam90sbaby 2,490]

2 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Because I would never insult retards by associating them with these f-ing idiots.  

Fair enough