Trump talk only- no Eagles talk allowed (Steelers talk is OK though)

[IGotWorms 4,057]

22 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I am extremely surprised the GOP signed back up for Donald. I don’t get your alls deal with this dude. 

 

They don’t have anything else. What do they stand for? What’s their platform? Nobody buys that trickle down bullsh1t anymore

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

Biden Authorizes WW3

decision is easy

anyone that votes for war, should be constricted and their kids and grandkids immediately

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/C74CxPZsH8R/?igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

[RLLD 4,143]

I have to wonder....of they are unable to leverage lawfare to prosecute Trump out of the election, to what depths will they drift?  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,903]

Quinnipiac with its first poll post sham conviction has Trump up 5 in Georgia.  I’d say the Dems can write GA off now that election integrity measures have been taken. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

Biden sh1ts himself on stage at the D-Day ceremony

[Fnord 2,049]

10 hours ago, torridjoe said:

Newsweek is a right wing magazine wut

????

You serious, Clark? I'm not going to pretend I'm a subscriber or anything, but I recall them having a mechanism for readers to determine if articles appear to be politically biased. Not exactly boilerplate procedure for a highly biased media entity. Pretty sure zerohedge and breitbart aren't asking "readers" to evaluate bias.

[RLLD 4,143]

2 minutes ago, Fnord said:

????

You serious, Clark? I'm not going to pretend I'm a subscriber or anything, but I recall them having a mechanism for readers to determine if articles appear to be politically biased. Not exactly boilerplate procedure for a highly biased media entity. Pretty sure zerohedge and breitbart aren't asking "readers" to evaluate bias.

It might depend on recent articles....and whether or not those articles suitably supported the liberal ideological positions....it would make sense for some less-intellgent folks to make such a connection....that Newsweek is suddenly "far right"  

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1798685173216927843

dont know how to imbed the twitter

[RLLD 4,143]

Yikes

Seems as though this is being labelled some of that right-wing-nut conspiracy stuff they like to throw around.....it is good to see that more sane people are moving away from Democrats

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

19 minutes ago, RLLD said:

Yikes

Seems as though this is being labelled some of that right-wing-nut conspiracy stuff they like to throw around.....it is good to see that more sane people are moving away from Democrats

The number one issue in the latest poll on voting is no longer immigration or economy. It’s incompetence in leadership 

[LOD01 198]

The state of biden:

https://x.com/MagaMemeWizard/status/1798722138318516258

His hag wife covers her mouth as she tells the idiot to keep standing and then he sh1ts his pants again.

[LOD01 198]

1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1798685173216927843

dont know how to imbed the twitter

With audio in my post. 

[Fnord 2,049]

1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

The number one issue in the latest poll on voting is no longer immigration or economy. It’s incompetence in leadership 

Well look at our choices, FFS. I wouldn't hire either of them for a menial job, let alone the most powerful position in the world. Biden's a zombie and Trump and his followers are so deranged they make a zombie seem reasonable. Either way it's gonna be another long 4 years. 

[Mike Honcho 5,080]

1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1798685173216927843

dont know how to imbed the twitter

How to embed is discussed in these posts...
 

 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

1 hour ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/1798685173216927843

dont know how to imbed the twitter

That's because you're retarded.  Also a non thinking tool.

 

 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,903]

21 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Well look at our choices, FFS. I wouldn't hire either of them for a menial job, let alone the most powerful position in the world. Biden's a zombie and Trump and his followers are so deranged they make a zombie seem reasonable. Either way it's gonna be another long 4 years. 

Yeah but no one is asking us to believe men can get pregnant and that letting in millions of unvetted illiterate third world grubs is a good thing. Talk about deranged 

[Fnord 2,049]

13 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yeah but no one is asking us to believe men can get pregnant and that letting in millions of unvetted illiterate third world grubs is a good thing. Talk about deranged 

No, instead they believe the entire American justice system is targeting your lord and savior, who also happens to be a philandering, fraudulent, insurrectionist felon nincompoop. That sure is some intellectual high ground you're standing on.

[The Real timschochet 6,388]

46 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Well look at our choices, FFS. I wouldn't hire either of them for a menial job, let alone the most powerful position in the world. Biden's a zombie and Trump and his followers are so deranged they make a zombie seem reasonable. Either way it's gonna be another long 4 years. 

I don’t believe  Biden is a zombie and I think he’s been very competent. IMO that Wall Street Journal article is a hack piece because it only quotes Republicans directly, like Kevin McCarthy, who has reversed himself on this issue: earlier this year he discussed how alert Biden was. It just goes to show how downhill WSJ has gone since Murdoch took over. 

[The Real timschochet 6,388]

4 hours ago, RLLD said:

I have to wonder....of they are unable to leverage lawfare to prosecute Trump out of the election, to what depths will they drift?  

There is no “they” and there is no “lawfare”- these terms exist in your mind but not in reality. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,903]

8 minutes ago, Fnord said:

No, instead they believe the entire American justice system is targeting your lord and savior, who also happens to be a philandering, fraudulent, insurrectionist felon nincompoop. That sure is some intellectual high ground you're standing on.

Kamala.

[RLLD 4,143]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

There is no “they” and there is no “lawfare”- these terms exist in your mind but not in reality. 

They exist in reality....but not for you....not yet....if you think the Republicans will not do this back I might suggest you are not appreciated human nature.....and later when they do it back to YOUR preferred political player....and you object....come find me, we can object together...because it will still be wrong.

[The Real timschochet 6,388]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Kamala.

Why do you bring her up? She’ll most likely be running in 2028 after Joe finishes his second term. Of course she’ll face some tough competition, but if she wins the nomination hopefully you’ll consider voting for her. 

[The Real timschochet 6,388]

1 minute ago, RLLD said:

They exist in reality....but not for you....not yet....if you think the Republicans will not do this back I might suggest you are not appreciated human nature.....and later when they do it back to YOUR preferred political player....and you object....come find me, we can object together...because it will still be wrong.

I will object when and if a particular prosecution seems unjust to me. In the case of Trump I haven’t seen that. 

[Fnord 2,049]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I don’t believe  Biden is a zombie and I think he’s been very competent. IMO that Wall Street Journal article is a hack piece because it only quotes Republicans directly, like Kevin McCarthy, who has reversed himself on this issue: earlier this year he discussed how alert Biden was. It just goes to show how downhill WSJ has gone since Murdoch took over. 

I think he has been as good as he is capable of being, which is great for him but not for most of the rest of the country. I do not believe he is cognitively fit enough to be POTUS, or any other elected official, for that matter.

Unfortunately, being a "walking vegetable" is still preferable to his counterpart's litany of personality disorders.

[The Real timschochet 6,388]

Just now, Fnord said:

I think he has been as good as he is capable of being, which is great for him but not for most of the rest of the country. I do not believe he is cognitively fit enough to be POTUS, or any other elected official, for that matter.

Unfortunately, being a "walking vegetable" is still preferable to his counterpart's litany of personality disorders.

IMO you’re buying in to the conservative narrative on this “walking vegetable” stuff and that it’s without solid foundation. I’m hoping the upcoming debate will not only disprove this once and for all but will also cause the public to question Trump’s competence. Provided Trump actually shows up. 

[RLLD 4,143]

3 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I will object when and if a particular prosecution seems unjust to me. In the case of Trump I haven’t seen that. 

You do not see it because it serves you....today.....

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

39 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

That's because you're retarded.  Also a non thinking tool.

 

 

sorry I don't live on twitter, I saw something funny and hopped over there 

and yah that totally looked like someone just waiting for a speech to end, thats why Jill told him to stand up

[Fnord 2,049]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

IMO you’re buying in to the conservative narrative on this “walking vegetable” stuff and that it’s without solid foundation. I’m hoping the upcoming debate will not only disprove this once and for all but will also cause the public to question Trump’s competence. Provided Trump actually shows up. 

Maybe, though I'm not normally one to buy into conservative narratives. Biden was never that smart, effective, or charismatic, and his advanced age has degraded all of his faculties. It comes down to believing he will surround himself with a far superior group of advisors than Trump could ever fathom, being that he favors corrupt, power hungry gutter slime like himself. Don't worry, if he dies in October he'd still get my vote over Trump in November. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,236]

1 minute ago, Fnord said:

Maybe, though I'm not normally one to buy into conservative narratives. Biden was never that smart, effective, or charismatic, and his advanced age has degraded all of his faculties. It comes down to believing he will surround himself with a far superior group of advisors than Trump could ever fathom, being that he favors corrupt, power hungry gutter slime like himself. Don't worry, if he dies in October he'd still get my vote over Trump in November. 

tim still dreams about him sniffing kids and twisting nipples, he can't see that hes a man who should be in a home

 

[The Real timschochet 6,388]

2 minutes ago, RLLD said:

You do not see it because it serves you....today.....

I find this insulting. I think I can try and look at things objectively whether they serve me or not.I have defended Trump many times in the past when I thought he was being wrongfully criticized. If I thought he was being wrongfully prosecuted I would say so. 
 

For example I’m still not fully convinced that Trump incited violence on January 6. Part of me believes that he had no idea what was going to happen and simply reacted. Thats a dereliction of his duty IMO, and shows gross incompetence, but it’s not a crime so if true he shouldn’t be prosecuted. Im waiting to hear the evidence on that one. Even so I don’t think it’s “law fare”

[BudBro 173]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

I find this insulting. I think I can try and look at things objectively whether they serve me or not.I have defended Trump many times in the past when I thought he was being wrongfully criticized. If I thought he was being wrongfully prosecuted I would say so. 
 

For example I’m still not fully convinced that Trump incited violence on January 6. Part of me believes that he had no idea what was going to happen and simply reacted. Thats a dereliction of his duty IMO, and shows gross incompetence, but it’s not a crime so if true he shouldn’t be prosecuted. Im waiting to hear the evidence on that one. Even so I don’t think it’s “law fare”

Saw this earlier. 

Ann Coulter: How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos

[RLLD 4,143]

5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I find this insulting. I think I can try and look at things objectively whether they serve me or not.I have defended Trump many times in the past when I thought he was being wrongfully criticized. If I thought he was being wrongfully prosecuted I would say so. 
 

For example I’m still not fully convinced that Trump incited violence on January 6. Part of me believes that he had no idea what was going to happen and simply reacted. Thats a dereliction of his duty IMO, and shows gross incompetence, but it’s not a crime so if true he shouldn’t be prosecuted. Im waiting to hear the evidence on that one. Even so I don’t think it’s “law fare”

I do not mean to insult.  I am intending to highlight that were this done to say, Joe Biden, you would rightfully object....but since it is done to the candidate you do not like, you allow it.

I am not supportive of allowing political factors to dictate judicial matters.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

19 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

sorry I don't live on twitter, I saw something funny and hopped over there 

and yah that totally looked like someone just waiting for a speech to end, thats why Jill told him to stand up

You thought it was him sh1tting his pants.  You're an idiot.

[GutterBoy 2,898]

13 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

I find this insulting. I think I can try and look at things objectively whether they serve me or not.I have defended Trump many times in the past when I thought he was being wrongfully criticized. If I thought he was being wrongfully prosecuted I would say so. 
 

For example I’m still not fully convinced that Trump incited violence on January 6. Part of me believes that he had no idea what was going to happen and simply reacted. Thats a dereliction of his duty IMO, and shows gross incompetence, but it’s not a crime so if true he shouldn’t be prosecuted. Im waiting to hear the evidence on that one. Even so I don’t think it’s “law fare”

Don't take anything RLLD says seriously.  He's a clown.  He's not a real person.  Anything he says towards you should be dismissed.

[MDC 7,111]

12 minutes ago, BudBro said:

Saw this earlier. 

Ann Coulter: How Liberals Pay Off Their Bimbos

Ann Coulter thinks Trump didn’t fock Stormy? Bwahahaha wut a maroon.

[The Real timschochet 6,388]

10 minutes ago, RLLD said:

I do not mean to insult.  I am intending to highlight that were this done to say, Joe Biden, you would rightfully object....but since it is done to the candidate you do not like, you allow it.

I am not supportive of allowing political factors to dictate judicial matters.

You do not mean to insult but you just did it again. And you’re wrong. If Joe Biden committed crimes I would not object to him being prosecuted. If Trump is wrongly prosecuted I will object. It does not matter who I like or dislike. 
 

Let me offer you one final example from history: Julius Streicher was one of the worst anti-semites who ever lived. A high level Nazi, a personal friend of Hitler’s, he was all for the Holocaust and would have gladly participated had he known about it. But he didn’t know; he wasn’t directly involved. Even so he was tried at Nuremberg with the top Nazis, found guilty and executed. This was a gross injustice IMO. He was an evil man who deserved to die but we should never have executed him. It’s a stain on what we did at Nuremberg which was otherwise mostly just. Back in college I wrote a whole paper on this question and I defended Streicher. 

[RLLD 4,143]

57 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

You do not mean to insult but you just did it again. And you’re wrong. If Joe Biden committed crimes I would not object to him being prosecuted. If Trump is wrongly prosecuted I will object. It does not matter who I like or dislike. 
 

Let me offer you one final example from history: Julius Streicher was one of the worst anti-semites who ever lived. A high level Nazi, a personal friend of Hitler’s, he was all for the Holocaust and would have gladly participated had he known about it. But he didn’t know; he wasn’t directly involved. Even so he was tried at Nuremberg with the top Nazis, found guilty and executed. This was a gross injustice IMO. He was an evil man who deserved to die but we should never have executed him. It’s a stain on what we did at Nuremberg which was otherwise mostly just. Back in college I wrote a whole paper on this question and I defended Streicher. 

We can agree to disagree.

What is being done here is not who we are.  It is wrong.  Allowing it to just happen because it happens to suit your interests is no way to think.

[Fnord 2,049]

8 minutes ago, RLLD said:

We can agree to disagree.

What is being done here is not who we are.  It is wrong.  Allowing it to just happen because it happens to suit your interests is no way to think.

He just explained to you that it is NOT the way he thinks.

Christ man, will the GC conservatives ever learn that when they claim to know what a liberal thinks or feels they are almost certainly wrong? Stop believing your bullshit spewing favorite talking heads and listen to the people that are actually telling you their feelings. 

Why is this so fuking hard for you guys?

[RLLD 4,143]

6 minutes ago, Fnord said:

He just explained to you that it is NOT the way he thinks.

Christ man, will the GC conservatives ever learn that when they claim to know what a liberal thinks or feels they are almost certainly wrong? Stop believing your bullshit spewing favorite talking heads and listen to the people that are actually telling you their feelings. 

Why is this so fuking hard for you guys?

It is not something worth taking as personally as you are doing.