Hopefully the end for Fani and her legal abuse

[thegeneral 3,100]

Fani it appears wasn’t ready for prime time. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

Skeezer. Imagine being on the side of that? 

[torridjoe 48]

On 5/10/2024 at 6:40 AM, Tree of Knowledge said:

Hopefully President Trump does not forget her after his triumphant return to Washington.  MAGA will expect her to be treated as a treasonous conspirator.  

Because they are weak and stupid, yes. Nothing they’re more afraid of than a Black woman. Seriously. 

[torridjoe 48]

On 5/10/2024 at 6:58 PM, Strike said:

First of all I don't have a side.  Secondly their absolutely are not more on "my" side.  And of course I'm giving examples of actual violence.  one need not look any further than the current college protests to see much more violence from your side than anything the magas are doing.

The college protests that rich Jewish folks paid people to go attack sleeping protesters? That violence? All the white supremacist cops assaulting people trying to exercise their rights? Are you honestly this much of a piece of shits? Nevermind I know you are. MAGA is for nothing if not cowardice and fear. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

3 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

If she perjured herself she had to quit. I have no idea if she did. 
 

But look, Trump committed a crime here and needs to be held accountable. I knew this months before I had any clue who Fani Willis was. Trump is on tape trying to pressure the Georgia Secretary of State to create more votes so that he can win an election. That’s totally illegal and it feels open and shut. I really have no idea why he wasn’t tried for this in 2021. It’s really ridiculous that it’s taken this long. 

Agreed but probably gets wrapped into Jack smith’s prosecution as well.

Willis had to be above reproach — fair or not. And she wasn’t.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

This torrid guy is really afraid of cops. 

[torridjoe 48]

On 5/10/2024 at 7:48 PM, jonmx said:

She perjuried herself in court numerous times including the time when the relationship started and reimbursements for the trips, which are illegal kickbacks.   She violated numerous laws concerning awarding non-compete contracts which she bypassed the legal process so she could pay her lover hundreds of thousands of dollars.  Fani also falsified numerous disclosure documents she filed where she was suppose to identify any gifts from unauthorized sources.   She also approved of her lovers bills which she had a conflicted interest in which she lied about.  

But you have schit for brains because this has been discussed 100 times over in here, but yet you don't believe any of these illegal acts violated laws, but you somehow think  meaningless check memos are actual fraud which somehow violated some non-existant election interference law.    It is unbelievable how low our legal system has sunk and we have media which provide cover for this BS and morons who believe it. 

  

Those are merely rejected allegations at this point in the case. 

[torridjoe 48]

29 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

This torrid guy is really afraid of cops. 

Crazy to be concerned about white supremacists with guns and other violence tools, and a free hand to use them outside the law, I know. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

19 minutes ago, torridjoe said:

Crazy to be concerned about white supremacists with guns and other violence tools, and a free hand to use them outside the law, I know. 

Did a meany policeman hit you  with his nightstick? 

[Bill E. 703]

On 5/10/2024 at 8:53 PM, Hardcore troubadour said:

Newsome. Can you imagine anyone looking at California and saying “yeah, let’s have some of that”? 

I can.  It seems half the county is looking at Biden's America and about to say “yeah, let’s have four more years of that”.

[Bill E. 703]

5 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

If she perjured herself she had to quit. I have no idea if she did. 
 

But look, Trump committed a crime here and needs to be held accountable. I knew this months before I had any clue who Fani Willis was. Trump is on tape trying to pressure the Georgia Secretary of State to create more votes so that he can win an election. That’s totally illegal and it feels open and shut. I really have no idea why he wasn’t tried for this in 2021. It’s really ridiculous that it’s taken this long. 

Because he was not running for President in 2021.   I am kind of surprised the Justice Department has not asked her to step aside so they could send one of their prosecutors to go after Trump in GA.    Maybe because they just have not found the right judge yet.  

[RLLD 4,191]

10 hours ago, jerryskids said:

Appeals court halts Trump’s Georgia case during appeal of order allowing Willis to stay on case

This one is definitely not going to trial before the election.  

https://apnews.com/article/trump-georgia-election-indictment-fani-willis-1c14171f33e7fb76bf3bdae6aba57d1d

This is a good move.   Any prosecutor that runs on a platform to take down some other politician......then fabricates a prosecution to deliver on that promise should be impeded at every turn

[Tree of Knowledge 1,795]

6 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Did a meany policeman hit you  with his nightstick? 

It would be kind of cool if he did.  

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,006]

8 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

This torrid guy is really afraid of cops. 

And opinions that don't agree with his.  I mean, he ran away and hid for 12 years.  Don't get much more cowardly and afraid than that. 

[edjr 6,580]

12 hours ago, IGotWorms said:

 

I have a feeling Willis perjured herself

   I guess you didn't watch or hear any of it?

[edjr 6,580]

8 hours ago, torridjoe said:

Crazy to be concerned about white supremacists with guns and other violence tools, and a free hand to use them outside the law, I know. 

You need to work on your lies and hatred.

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

On 5/10/2024 at 7:54 PM, The Real timschochet said:

You always bring up the same 2-3 examples. The baseball game happened what, 8 years ago? Meanwhile there are dozens and dozens of Maga types making death threats. You know why there are so many more on your side? Because Trump incites them. There’s nobody on the Democratic side doing this. 

With the possible exceptions of Maxine Waters and iof course Joe Biden who likes to challenge folks to a fight, sometimes behind a gym, sometimes at a pool and sometimes during press encounters.  He's fiesty for an old guy in safety shoes.

 

Actually for a guy his age he is pretty spry.

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

On 6/5/2024 at 6:38 PM, The Real timschochet said:

If she perjured herself she had to quit. I have no idea if she did. 
 

But look, Trump committed a crime here and needs to be held accountable. I knew this months before I had any clue who Fani Willis was. Trump is on tape trying to pressure the Georgia Secretary of State to create more votes so that he can win an election. That’s totally illegal and it feels open and shut. I really have no idea why he wasn’t tried for this in 2021. It’s really ridiculous that it’s taken this long. 

My memory may be faulty but I thought Trump was on tape urging them to find more votes, not necessarily create more votes. "Find", if that is indeed what was said is arguably open to interpretation.  It could have meant locate votes as then uncounted.  Now I don't believe this to be what he actually meant but given his truncated way of speaking in sentence fragments the case is not open and shut.  I do note he was uninterested in finding more Biden votes along with votes for him so I have my belief, but it is not open and shut, it is open and push the door closed aginst a slight breeze until it latches.

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said:

My memory may be faulty but I thought Trump was on tape urging them to find more votes, not necessarily create more votes. "Find", if that is indeed what was said is arguably open to interpretation.  It could have meant locate votes as then uncounted.  Now I don't believe this to be what he actaully meant but given his truncated way of speaking in sentence fragments the case is not open and shut.  I do note he was uninterested in finding more Biden votes along with votes for him so I have my belief, but it is not open and shut, it is open and push the door closed aginst a slight breeze until it latches.

Do you think the very act of the president of the united states calling state officials and "asking" them to investigate or "find" votes in their own state's voting would rise to election interference?  Remember he only did this in states he lost and he only did this with officials of the same party.

To me when the president speaks it carries a lot of weight and can be intimidating.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

3 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Do you think the very act of the president of the united states calling state officials and "asking" them to investigate or "find" votes in their own state's voting would rise to election interference?  Remember he only did this in states he lost and he only did this with officials of the same party.

To me when the president speaks it carries a lot of weight and can be intimidating.

So what kind of votes was he asking them to find? 

[BeachGuy23 642]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So what kind of votes was he asking them to find? 

Just enough for him to win the state.

Or basically telling the officials to make up or fake just enough votes for him to win.

This isn't rocket science boyo.  Dude should be locked up. 

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

On 6/6/2024 at 7:01 AM, BeachGuy23 said:

Do you think the very act of the president of the united states calling state officials and "asking" them to investigate or "find" votes in their own state's voting would rise to election interference?  Remember he only did this in states he lost and he only did this with officials of the same party.

To me when the president speaks it carries a lot of weight and can be intimidating.

Good question.  Me personally I find the behavior disturbing.  I don't know that it fits within the definition of election interference but it certainly puts some pressure on election officials.  I would have to reread whatever statutes there are on election interference to make a determination, but if this behavior is not included I believe that it should be.

 

My post was not about that.  It was simply to correct Tim who had misstated the case so as to make it seem more than it is. 

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

Just now, BeachGuy23 said:

Just enough for him to win the state.

Or basically telling the officials to make up or fake just enough votes for him to win.

This isn't rocket science boyo.  Dude should be locked up. 

No, that’s not the case. But stay ignorant. You seem to be happy wallowing in it.  

[BeachGuy23 642]

Just now, Engorgeous George said:

Good question.  Me personally I find the behavior disturbing.  I don't know taht it fits within the definition of election interference but it certqdainly puts some pressure on election officials.  I would have to reread whatever statutes there are on election interference to make a determination, but if this behavior is not inclkuded i believe taht it should be.

 

My post was not about that.  it was simply to correct Tim who had misstated the case so as to make it seem more than it is. 

Agree on all counts boyo.

[BeachGuy23 642]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

No, that’s not the case. But stay ignorant. You seem to be happy wallowing in it.  

He didn't quote the exact number of votes for him that he wanted the state officials to "find"?

I guess they don't tell you that part on the alt right sites you exclusively get your info from. 

Being ignorant at such an advanced age is no way to live boyo. 

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

On 6/6/2024 at 7:08 AM, BeachGuy23 said:

Agree on all counts boyo.

Trump's action could have violated 18 U.S.C. Section 595 had he been an administrative employee of the federal government.  I believe whether the President fails in that category has been a question recently in a few cases, including the Colorado ballot case.

[jerryskids 6,709]

I learned in this thread that all cops are white supremacists.  At least all the bad ones.   

[RLLD 4,191]

I have to surmise that Fani will not be rewarded by the Democrat party with some later appointment if she does not at least prosecute Trump.......

[torridjoe 48]

6 hours ago, jerryskids said:

I learned in this thread that all cops are white supremacists.  At least all the bad ones.   

Participants in a fairly overtly white supremacist system, at varying levels of commitment. Your typical Black NYC cop isn’t necessarily some confederate flag waving racist and aren’t joining white supremacist gangs and movements like some of their colleagues, but they—led by a clearly fascist enabling Mayor—are all serving the same master. 

[torridjoe 48]

7 hours ago, edjr said:

You need to work on your lies and hatred.

None in your quoted comment. 

[jerryskids 6,709]

1 hour ago, torridjoe said:

Participants in a fairly overtly white supremacist system, at varying levels of commitment. Your typical Black NYC cop isn’t necessarily some confederate flag waving racist and aren’t joining white supremacist gangs and movements like some of their colleagues, but they—led by a clearly fascist enabling Mayor—are all serving the same master. 

Again I'll ask for data supporting police being an "overtly white supremacist system."

I'll start.  Here is data showing it isn't nearly as racist as you think.  Study from Harvard:

Quote

An Empirical Analysis of Racial Differences in Police Use of Force⇤

Roland G. Fryer, Jr.† July 2017

Abstract

This paper explores racial differences in police use of force. On non-lethal uses of force, blacks and Hispanics are more than fifty percent more likely to experience some form of force in interactions with police. Adding controls that account for important context and civilian behavior reduces, but cannot fully explain, these disparities. On the most extreme use of force -- officer-involved shootings– we find no racial differences in either the raw data or when contextual factors are taken into account. We argue that the patterns in the data are consistent with a model in which police officers are utility maximizers, a fraction of which have a preference for discrimination, who incur relatively high expected costs of officer-involved shootings. Keywords: discrimination, decision making, bias, police use of force

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/fryer/files/empirical_analysis_tables_figures.pdf

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,006]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Again I'll ask for data supporting police being an "overtly white supremacist system."

I'll start.  Here is data showing it isn't nearly as racist as you think.  Study from Harvard:

https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/fryer/files/empirical_analysis_tables_figures.pdf

Harvard? 

Don't they lean center-right?   

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

This torrid guy got real boring, real fast. 

[jerryskids 6,709]

5 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Harvard? 

Don't they lean center-right?   

Wait until he finds out that the author of the study, Roland G. Fryer, is an economist...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

... and black.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 4,006]

8 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

This torrid guy got real boring, real fast. 

more like flaccidJoe

[GutterBoy 2,898]

 

I grew up admiring this man.  So sad what he's become.

[Engorgeous George 2,271]

11 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

 

I grew up admiring this man.  So sad what he's become.

Unseemly.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

I prefer skeezer. 

[BeachGuy23 642]

10 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I prefer skeezer. 

Define skeezer.

[Hardcore troubadour 15,228]

4 minutes ago, BeachGuy23 said:

Define skeezer.

Ask nice