Trump looking at Musk as policy advisor

[TBayXXXVII 2,485]

31 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I was going to comment on this.  Gutter thinks Elon is a "right wing nut job." I imagine Vox told him that.   Elon nailed it years ago; anyone right of Marx is a right wing nut job to Lefties like Gutter.

 

 

Exactly.  The Center and Right never move... the Left gets further and further left and they call out everyone else for being extreme.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

24 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

I've seen that graphic before. I would argue that the right has moved further right since 2008 as well. Not sure what that would to Musk's overall standing.

Let’s see. In 2008 the right was against gay marriage. Now they don’t care.  The right was the major war machine. Now they are the only side speaking up against the wars.  The right was way more religious. Now atheists are welcomed

[GutterBoy 2,898]

Just now, TBayXXXVII said:

Exactly.  The Center and Right never move... the Left gets further and further left and they call out everyone else for being extreme.

[TBayXXXVII 2,485]

Just now, GutterBoy said:

So republicans aren't corrupt is what you're saying.  You're fine with the relationship because a republican would never act in a corrupt manner.

Every politician is corrupt.  It's why the everyday conservative citizen wants the government involved in less things.  You seem to think it's only Republican's that are corrupt, because you're calling out Trump for something he didn't do while still voting for the people who actually do it.

[TBayXXXVII 2,485]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

Dude, I found a picture of you on the interwebs!!!!!  PIC

[TBayXXXVII 2,485]

9 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

This is, IMO, a delusional analysis. If Ronald Reagan were alive today I believe he would strongly consider voting for Joe Biden, or at the very least abstain. He would NEVER vote for Donald Trump. 

Interesting, because if someone ran on the same policies today that Bill Clinton ran on, he'd be considered a Republican.

[TimHauck 2,627]

15 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I tell you what if Trump or the rnc tells Twitter what to censor then you can check back here. 

Already happened.

 

But again, I don’t have an issue with Musk being an advisor

 

[Tree of Knowledge 1,714]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

I’ll take it. If Trump is elected (I hope I hope I hope it doesn’t happen) he needs somebody besides Stephen Miller to give him advice. Say what you want about Musk (I can’t stand the guy) but at least he’s not a moron. 

Many people are saying the legendary social media pundit and patriot Catturd2 will be a trusted advisor.  Sweet. 

[jonmx 2,424]

As usually, you are all jackasses and bootlicking buffoons who don't get it. I really could give a fuk about the source or credentials of advice, but the substance. 

- Does the advice promote freedom or suppress it.

It is that simple.  None of you fockers can think for yourself.  

[jerryskids 6,576]

8 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

I'm just speaking as someone who voted primarily Republican for a long time and would've been in between Elon and the person on the right in 2008 and have seen some of the things in the party move away from me (primarily because I'm more socially liberal than most). 

As a centrist I think both sides have moved more towards their extremes leaving a lot of people in the middle feeling like they aren't being respected for their opinions. 

I would agree that conservatives are more vocal than they used to be.  Two possible reasons come to mind.

One, social media and the interwebs have made it much easier.  We used to rely mostly on MSM, which always leaned left.  There weren't many conservative voices, other than folks like Rush Limbaugh, the original Satan's spawn boogeyman of the Left (the title of which obviously belongs to Trump now).

Two, I think we let progressives have too much control, causing too much change too fast, and a "wait, wut?!" reaction from the right.  Change CAN be good, but change for change's sake isn't necessarily good.  Most normal people can look back on gay marriage and say yeah, nothing wrong with that, I'm glad we worked through that.  And besides, it doesn't affect me or society in general.  But now we want medically mutilate confused children? (I know, I hate trans people...)?  Now we're impacting innocent children.  History will not look back kindly at stuff like this. (actually, it probably will, because the Left will write it and they will say "oh well, we meant well!").

[MDC 7,149]

Elon Musk’s father Erroll Musk had two kids with his own stepdaughter. Maybe Trump likes the Musks because he would also like to fock his own daughter?

  

[jerryskids 6,576]

Leftie Dictionary:

Right wing nut job = someone who doesn't hate Trump with the same passion of a thousand burning suns as I do.

[IGotWorms 4,057]

Wouldn’t mind his input on stuff like manned space programs (which we’ve basically privatized) and trade

[5-Points 3,397]

2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

Alright so when the govt made suggestions to twitter on spreading misinformation, the right cried about how the govt was supressing free speech.

Now a right wing nut job bought twitter, and Trump wants him as policy advisor.  So the govt will employ the guy who runs twitter, but of course the govt will have zero influence on twitter content.  Do I have that right?

This guy doesn't seem to know the difference between the "govt making suggestions" on how a private business should operate and a businessman advising the govt on how it should operate. 

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

26 minutes ago, TimHauck said:

Already happened.

 

But again, I don’t have an issue with Musk being an advisor

 

do we have a list of who was banned by each side?

I would be curious to see if Trump tried to ban Biden or Obama

 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,243]

15 minutes ago, MDC said:

Elon Musk’s father Erroll Musk had two kids with his own stepdaughter. Maybe Trump likes the Musks because he would also like to fock his own daughter?

  

and yet you vote for the guy who molested his

 

[MDC 7,149]

1 minute ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

and yet you vote for the guy who molested his

 

I didn’t vote for either molester.  

[5-Points 3,397]

3 hours ago, zsasz said:

Just waiting for the usual clown car of shills, RRLLD, HT and Emperor Jon to show up this time to tell us "it's different".  

Well it is different. It couldn't be more different. It's the exact opposite. He would be advising the govt. on how they could operate better.  Not the govt telling him what to do with HIS business. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

26 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

Well it is different. It couldn't be more different. It's the exact opposite. He would be advising the govt. on how they could operate better.  Not the govt telling him what to do with HIS business. 

Sure, Trump isn't going to tell him that he wants more pro trump content on twitter and critical trump accounts banned in exchange for govt contracts. 

[listen2me 23 1,831]

3 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

Alright so when the govt made suggestions to twitter on spreading misinformation, the right cried about how the govt was supressing free speech.

Now a right wing nut job bought twitter, and Trump wants him as policy advisor.  So the govt will employ the guy who runs twitter, but of course the govt will have zero influence on twitter content.  Do I have that right?

Why is Musk a right wing nut job?  

Care to explain the reasons you come to this conclusion?

[listen2me 23 1,831]

2 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Why is Musk a right wing nut job?  

Care to explain the reasons you come to this conclusion?

Nevermind looks like others beat me to it.  I see Gutter has no real response because he cant come up with some vomit quick enough.   

[TimHauck 2,627]

2 hours ago, Engorgeous George said:

 

I wonder if Musk would try to use the position to get contraacts for SpaceX with NASA or for Tesla with any of the various federal fleets of vehicles.  I can picture Tesla postal trucks in my neighborhood.  They would be sold as quiet and nonpolluting, just an extention  of green deals, when what they would be is graft.

I could definitely see this as a motivation for Musk.  Maybe also trying to get Trump posting on x again.

[TimHauck 2,627]

38 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

do we have a list of who was banned by each side?

I would be curious to see if Trump tried to ban Biden or Obama

 

Goalpost moving, thanks for admitting you were wrong

[The Real timschochet 6,448]

4 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Why is Musk a right wing nut job?  

Care to explain the reasons you come to this conclusion?

He certainly seems to sympathize with a lot of the obnoxious conspiracy theories that comes out of the right these days. 

[GutterBoy 2,898]

5 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Why is Musk a right wing nut job?  

Care to explain the reasons you come to this conclusion?

I've read his tweets

[GutterBoy 2,898]

2 minutes ago, listen2me 23 said:

Nevermind looks like others beat me to it.  I see Gutter has no real response because he cant come up with some vomit quick enough.   

I just responded to you retard

[jonmx 2,424]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

This is, IMO, a delusional analysis. If Ronald Reagan were alive today I believe he would strongly consider voting for Joe Biden, or at the very least abstain. He would NEVER vote for Donald Trump. 

Everytime you think you think you know what conservstives think, you get it completely wrong.  Reagan was very anti-regulation and favored smaller government except on issues of law and order and the military.  Reagan absolutely trusted the military and the FBI/CIA, which ended up burning him in the whole Iran-Contra fiasco.  If Reagan saw what the FBI-CIA was doing as far as censorship, criminalizing conservstive protests, influencing elections for pro-establishment types, he would have buried them and been 100 percent behind Trump.  Reagan loved individual freedom and would never ever ever ever ever bootlick for an big government estsblishment fascist like Biden. You be you, but don't you even try to drag Reagan down to your disgusting levels of cuckhood. 

[The Real timschochet 6,448]

Just now, jonmx said:

Everytime you think you think you know what conservstives think, you get it completely wrong.  Reagan was very anti-regulation and favored smaller government except on issues of law and order and the military.  Reagan trusted the military and the FBI/CIA, which ended up burning him in the whole Iran-Contra.  If Reagan saw what the FBI-CIA was doing as far as censorship, criminalizing conservstive protests, influencing elections for pro-establishment types, he would have buried them and been 100 percent behind Trump.  Reagan loved individual freedom and would never ever ever ever ever bootlick for a big government estsblishment fascist like Biden. You be you, but don't you even try to drag Reagan down to your disgusting levels of cuckhood. 

As usual you’re completely wrong about this subject. Maybe stick to the Detroit Lions and stay away from political history? You don’t have a clue about Reagan or what’s going on now. 

[jonmx 2,424]

1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

I've read his tweets

Because he advocates for advancing freedom of speech?   

[jonmx 2,424]

Just now, The Real timschochet said:

As usual you’re completely wrong about this subject. Maybe stick to the Detroit Lions and stay away from political history? You don’t have a clue about Reagan or what’s going on now. 

Fock you.  You are so clueless. Seriously, fock you. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,852]

1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

This is, IMO, a delusional analysis. If Ronald Reagan were alive today I believe he would strongly consider voting for Joe Biden, or at the very least abstain. He would NEVER vote for Donald Trump. 

Wait... a lifelong Democrat such as yourself thinks they know how Ronald Reagan - a Republican - would vote if he were alive today? 

And you say I'm the delusional one?   GTFO, Tim. 

There is no doubt that the left has moved much, much further left than the right has moved further right.  That's not even debatable.  The only reason it looks like the right has moved further right is because your side is moving so far left.  Think of it as two ships.  One stationary - the Right - and the other moving away - The Left.  As you keep moving further away the Right ship looks smaller and smaller in the distance and instead of correctly thinking "We're moving so fast the other ship can barely be seen", you say "They're moving so fast they can barely see us", even though the Right ship isn't moving at all. 

[The Real timschochet 6,448]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Wait... a lifelong Democrat such as yourself thinks they know how Ronald Reagan - a Republican - would vote if he were alive today? 

And you say I'm the delusional one?   GTFO, Tim. 

There is no doubt that the left has moves much, much further left than the right has moved further right.  That's not even debatable.  The only reason it looks like the right has moved further right is because your side is moving so far left.  Think of it as two ships.  One stationary - the Right - and the other moving away - The Left.  As you keep moving further away the Right ship looks smaller and smaller in the distance and instead of correctly thinking "We're moving so fast the other ship can barely be seen", you say "They're moving so fast they can barely see us", even thought the Right ship isn't moving at all. 

Just to correct you: I’m not a lifelong Democrat. I’ve actually been both a Republican and a libertarian much longer than a Democrat. My first, and possibly proudest vote ever was for Ronald Reagan. I have visited the Reagan Library 4 times and it is one of my favorite places to go. He was my favorite President and the best since Truman. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,852]

53 minutes ago, 5-Points said:

This guy doesn't seem to know the difference between the "govt making suggestions" on how a private business should operate and a businessman advising the govt on how it should operate. 

 

Well, y'know, GutterD0uche isn't the brightest bulb in the far-left shed.  He's a follower, not a thinker.  He gets his glory hole talking points from his masters at the plantation and just goes with that - no thinking necessary.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,852]

1 minute ago, The Real timschochet said:

Just to correct you: I’m not a lifelong Democrat. I’ve actually been both a Republican and a libertarian much longer than a Democrat. My first, and possibly proudest vote ever was for Ronald Reagan. I have visited the Reagan Library 4 times and it is one of my favorite places to go. He was my favorite President and the best since Truman. 

Tim: I voted for Ronald Reagan once 44 years ago!

Also Tim: I have since voted for Democrats, defended Democrats, defended and pushed Democrat policies ever since.  I'm not a liberal!!

I think that about sums it up!

[The Real timschochet 6,448]

5 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Fock you.  You are so clueless. Seriously, fock you. 

You know I think (actually I know) that you are 100% wrong on this and most other political subjects. But I try not to personally insult you and I don’t understand why you always feel the need to do so. Does it really make you feel better to lash out like this? I don’t get it. 

[IGotWorms 4,057]

49 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

and yet you vote for the guy who molested his

 

This might not be your best line of attack

 

[The Real timschochet 6,448]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Tim: I voted for Ronald Reagan once 44 years ago!

Also Tim: I have since voted for Democrats, defended Democrats, defended and pushed Democrat policies ever since.  I'm not a liberal!!

I think that about sums it up!

I would define myself as a social liberal, and a traditional economic conservative. I believe in free trade and open immigration. So did President Reagan. The Republican Party has moved away from me, and him. 

[TimHauck 2,627]

12 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

He certainly seems to sympathize with a lot of the obnoxious conspiracy theories that comes out of the right these days. 

He has done this a couple times, I still wouldn’t call him a “right wing but job” though.  He certainly leans right however

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,852]

Just now, IGotWorms said:

This might not be your best line of attack

or yours:

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/12/billionaire-sex-offender-epstein-gave-heavily/

[GutterBoy 2,898]

3 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Because he advocates for advancing freedom of speech?   

No, it's his endless attacks on "wokeism", his making "cisgender " a slur on twitter, amplifying and allowing the proliferation of nazi and white supremacist accounts, the endless childish memes, attacks on vaccines, etc