Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
The Psychic Observer

Project 2025

Recommended Posts

tl/dr

from the summary it's all good except #6 there, the ban on pornography 

I mean, I guess that's actually a good thing too but uh... it would be greatly missed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

tl/dr

from the summary it's all good except #6 there, the ban on pornography 

I mean, I guess that's actually a good thing too but uh... it would be greatly missed

I’d like porn sites to only be accessible with a driver’s license or credit card verification of some kind. Parents can buy all the net nanny and blocker stuff but it’s way to accessible to kids and I worry about what it’s going to do to a whole generation. There’s already evidence that it’s focking up youngsters.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MDC said:

I’d like porn sites to only be accessible with a driver’s license or credit card verification of some kind. Parents can buy all the net nanny and blocker stuff but it’s way to accessible to kids and I worry about what it’s going to do to a whole generation. There’s already evidence that it’s focking up youngsters.

Based. 100% needs to happen.

 

OP is a chronic masturbator that's why he's freaking out 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

None of the MAGAMOOKS care. They support this crap. They need a STRONG leader to fight for them. And if that leader becomes authoritarian they'll be fine with that too, as long as they keep listening to the right wing media tell them how wonderful their leader is.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Fnord said:

None of the MAGAMOOKS care. They support this crap. They need a STRONG leader to fight for them. And if that leader becomes authoritarian they'll be fine with that too, as long as they keep listening to the right wing media tell them how wonderful their leader is.

Since I am usually lumped in with the Magamooks, I will say I do not support this. Some of it? Perhaps, I didn't read it. But I am sure it has at least one or two things I'd agree with. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

Since I am usually lumped in with the Magamooks, I will say I do not support this. Some of it? Perhaps, I didn't read it. But I am sure it has at least one or two things I'd agree with. 

I don't lump you in with them, you seem too decent.

Project 2025 is straight out of a fascist playbook. Read up on it and decide for yourself if bigly increasing executive power over the entirety of the federal government while ignoring the law and constitution sounds like a good idea. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In 2025, will Trump be allowed to disregard the rulings  of the Supreme Court like Biden does? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fnord said:

I don't lump you in with them, you seem too decent.

Project 2025 is straight out of a fascist playbook. Read up on it and decide for yourself if bigly increasing executive power over the entirety of the federal government while ignoring the law and constitution sounds like a good idea. 

I really don't believe in anything that goes against the Constitution, since I think that's what our country was founded on, really. Anything that gives one branch power over the others is wrong; and I really don't believe that much in the use of EO's outside the event of an emergency, wartime, or catastrophic event. But things like using them to forgive student loans? Crock of shiite. They aren't meant to be used like that, IMO. 

Putting things back to states rights? Yes. I think the Federal govt should have limited power, states need to have their own laws/constitutions and the federal govt is over that, making sure nothing is against the constitution. 

So, from the sounds of it, this project sounds like a load of garbage. I just can't imagine anyone "allowing" a POTUS just doing it. Seems like he/she'd have to go through an awful lot to make it happen....but given how these days POTUS throw around EO's signing to undo what the previous guy did, signing shiiite to just do it for more voters, I just don't know anymore. Lots of stuff is happening that just shouldn't. On BOTH sides (before anyone decides to argue). 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

I really don't believe in anything that goes against the Constitution, since I think that's what our country was founded on, really. Anything that gives one branch power over the others is wrong; and I really don't believe that much in the use of EO's outside the event of an emergency, wartime, or catastrophic event. But things like using them to forgive student loans? Crock of shiite. They aren't meant to be used like that, IMO. 

Putting things back to states rights? Yes. I think the Federal govt should have limited power, states need to have their own laws/constitutions and the federal govt is over that, making sure nothing is against the constitution. 

So, from the sounds of it, this project sounds like a load of garbage. I just can't imagine anyone "allowing" a POTUS just doing it. Seems like he/she'd have to go through an awful lot to make it happen....but given how these days POTUS throw around EO's signing to undo what the previous guy did, signing shiiite to just do it for more voters, I just don't know anymore. Lots of stuff is happening that just shouldn't. On BOTH sides (before anyone decides to argue). 

I hope you don’t leave California. We need reasonable conservatives and reasonable liberals to combat the extremists on both sides who want to take over the state (and this country.) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Pimpadeaux said:

Baloney. If he gets back in, he'll devote a lot of time in the beginning to going after Biden and anyone who opposed him on anything instead of doing things that will help the country. He's a lunatic vindictive fock who wants to be a dictator, and this country is at risk of becoming a real-life "Handmaid's Tale."

Bologna? 🤔

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, TheNewGirl said:

So, from the sounds of it, this project sounds like a load of garbage. I just can't imagine anyone "allowing" a POTUS just doing it. Seems like he/she'd have to go through an awful lot to make it happen.

This is the mindset that is being counted on. "He didn't do it last time, so he won't do it this time, either."

Unfortunately that does not appear to be true. If you remember back to early 2017, his administration was in total disarray. They didn't have a lot of things in place that normal candidates would have, like lists of potential appointees for various positions. When they finally filled them out, many of the appointees were Republican establishment types, stalwarts of the party with political experience and chops. These were the people that shut Trump down on ideas like using the National Guard to quell riots in 2020 (remember he once suggested shooting protestors in the leg) as an example. Plenty more from this article about his first 100 days..

The Heritage Foundation, among many other political think tanks, have worked with the RNC (which was completely absorbed by Trump and his like-minded brethren) closely to put together a roster of loyalists that will proliferate appointments. He wants to fire tens of thousands of civil servants to replace them with said loyalists. He will not appoint or hire anyone that is not in lockstep with his "vision." What that means is a bunch of subordinates that cannot be counted on to tell Trump 'NO' when his stupidest, most destructive ideas are being pushed.

Basically, he has NOTHING to lose by doing every dingbat thing that enters what passes for his brain nowadays, no one to curtail his worst impulses, a DOJ full of yes-men that he plans on bringing entirely under his control to run cover for him, and no loyalty to the electorate since he can't run again. Plus, he'll pardon himself for any charges that can't be squashed by his DOJ henchmen.

He's telling us what he plans to do. This is not a secret or a conspiracy theory. If you think he won't be able to do it, think about the years of work that have gone into it, and ask yourself if any of this sounds plausible knowing who Donald Trump is. Vote accordingly. 

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They should move a lot of these federal agencies, the ones that they don’t get rid of, out of the DC area. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Fnord said:

This is the mindset that is being counted on. "He didn't do it last time, so he won't do it this time, either."

 

No that's not what I am saying.

I think the current admin could do the same, honestly. the number of people coming into our border without being properly vetted is frightening; they aren't all from South American countries or Mexico, they are coming from everywhere. We know this, they are coming from countries that hate us with a passion. The anti-semitism shown at rallies and parades right now is very very frightening, not just because of what they are doing, but because they aren't afraid to disrupt the daily lives of students, families, and politics. 

We know about past wars being started with just one shot, and it scares me to think that's how the next one will be. I think it will be at an event like this, and these small sleeper cells will suddenly make themselves known, and they will be in places that we never expected. And no one will be safe 

Sorry if that sounds alarmist or whatever, but I think that there are just too many people that are brushing this kind of crap aside. Too focused on abortions and transexual rights to really be paying attention to things that are going on. In the long run, those things really aren't going to matter. And neither will this Project 2025 crap, or 2030 or 2035 or whatever the other "projects" are. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

No that's not what I am saying.

I think the current admin could do the same, honestly. the number of people coming into our border without being properly vetted is frightening; they aren't all from South American countries or Mexico, they are coming from everywhere. We know this, they are coming from countries that hate us with a passion. The anti-semitism shown at rallies and parades right now is very very frightening, not just because of what they are doing, but because they aren't afraid to disrupt the daily lives of students, families, and politics. 

We know about past wars being started with just one shot, and it scares me to think that's how the next one will be. I think it will be at an event like this, and these small sleeper cells will suddenly make themselves known, and they will be in places that we never expected. And no one will be safe 

Sorry if that sounds alarmist or whatever, but I think that there are just too many people that are brushing this kind of crap aside. Too focused on abortions and transexual rights to really be paying attention to things that are going on. In the long run, those things really aren't going to matter. And neither will this Project 2025 crap, or 2030 or 2035 or whatever the other "projects" are. 

Fair. Ask yourself what government stands the best chance of working on solutions to these issues: one led by Trump and his administration full of people hired based on loyalty to him; or a Biden admin full of people hired (at least mostly) on merit and bona fides.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, TheNewGirl said:

the number of people coming into our border without being properly vetted is frightening; they aren't all from South American countries or Mexico, they are coming from everywhere. We know this, they are coming from countries that hate us with a passion.

What countries and how many?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Fair. Ask yourself what government stands the best chance of working on solutions to these issues: one led by Trump and his administration full of people hired based on loyalty to him; or a Biden admin full of people hired (at least mostly) on merit and bona fides.

That's a terrible way to form a question, with lies throughout. 

But the answer is 100% Trump. 

But you keep running with the DEI approach and the supreme court justice who is female and doesn't know what a female is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Fnord said:

Fair. Ask yourself what government stands the best chance of working on solutions to these issues: one led by Trump and his administration full of people hired based on loyalty to him; or a Biden admin full of people hired (at least mostly) on merit and bona fides.

Lol. Yeah, Buttegeig is a traffic whiz. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

What countries and how many?

Looks like you got her. Darn. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

Looks like you got her. Darn. 

Not trying to get anyone you POS, just trying to understand what's so frightening.  Maybe butt out, turd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Not trying to get anyone you POS, just trying to understand what's so frightening.  Maybe butt out, turd.

So you are unaware of the type of people being encountered at the border, yet here you are running your mouth. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

So you are unaware of the type of people being encountered at the border, yet here you are running your mouth. 

you tell me d1ckface.  How many people and from what countries that hate us?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

you tell me d1ckface.  How many people and from what countries that hate us?

Lots of Muslims and Chineseeses. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Lots of Muslims and Chineseeses. 

How many, what countries loudmouth?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Lol. Yeah, Buttegeig is a traffic whiz. 

Infinitely more competent in that role than Betsy DeVos was in hers.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

How many, what countries loudmouth?

DHS id’s 400 migrants smuggled in to the U.S. by Isis .  50 unaccounted for. It’s not happening. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

DHS id’s 400 migrants smuggled in to the U.S. by Isis .  50 unaccounted for. It’s not happening. 

I thought Trump defeated ISIS?  But yeah 50 people, that number is frightening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

I thought Trump defeated ISIS?  But yeah 50 people, that number is frightening.

Ok. So you’re preemptively saying a terrorist attack within the country committed by 50 people or less can’t possibly be a big deal.  Got it. Nothing to be concerned with. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/25/2024 at 5:29 PM, Hardcore troubadour said:

Lol. Yeah, Buttegeig is a traffic whiz. 

Remember when he breastfed his baby with a fake tit 🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

 

Project 2025 existed before Trump even said he was running.  It was started by the Heritage foundation and it was meant for any conservative that won. Fake news.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Project 2025 existed before Trump even said he was running.  It was started by the Heritage foundation and it was meant for any conservative that won. Fake news.  

If trump wins, it's happening.  You vote for it.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We used to protect children. Now the Bidens want it that there is no age required to get a sex change operation.  And the brainwashed cultists here are for it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

We used to protect children. Now the Bidens want it that there is no age required to get a sex change operation.  And the brainwashed cultists here are for it. 

You're a 60 year old male and your biggest issue is what age a kid can get a sex change operation?  Pathetic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Project 2025 Google searches up, word is getting out, this should scare every American.

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×