Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Cdub100

Report - Will Biden not seek reelection

Recommended Posts

55 minutes ago, Maximum Overkill said:

 

 

In fairness, that could be any of us. More specifically that would be what I looked like in 1991, convinced this was an effective way to pick up chicks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

In fairness, that could be any of us. More specifically that would be what I looked like in 1991, convinced this was an effective way to pick up chicks.

No, it couldn’t have. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Evidence?? It was all over every news channel, even your beloved CNN & MSNBC. 

It was no secret that Biden lost it. We knew it, there's no reason why you shouldn't of. 

Don't give us that Tim, you're smarter than that. 

He really isn't.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

I can only speak for myself: first off, I didn’t buy it. Check into my posts here and you’ll know that’s true. I also thought, and still think, that a lot of the “evidence” you and others were posting was mostly shtick and false. And I’m still not 100% convinced of anything. 
So I for one was fooled. But so was the MSM. And perhaps there was a deliberate attempt by Biden’s closest advisors to be dishonest but I doubt that too. I think they might have been lying to themselves as well. My reasoning is they never would have allowed that debate if they knew what would happen. 
 

So no, I don’t agree with your “we knew all along and you guys lied to us” meme. It’s BS. You didn’t know sh!t and honestly you still don’t. 

I've heard from people that the last 6 months have shown a marked decline.  Who knows.

What we all know was that the debate performance was the worst we've seen, no matter what the reason was, and I set the narrative that probably can't be fixed.  Therefore he should bow out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

I've heard from people that the last 6 months have shown a marked decline.  Who knows.

What we all know was that the debate performance was the worst we've seen, no matter what the reason was, and I set the narrative that probably can't be fixed.  Therefore he should bow out.

Yeah, who knows? It’s a mystery.  All guesswork at this point.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it ever get tiring for you turds to call every female/POC in a good job a DEI hire?

  • Thanks 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liberals - There was no way to know he's declined so much.

THE ENTIRE WORLD - :huh:

Liberals - If only there were a way to know sooner. Darn.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

Does it ever get tiring for you turds to call every female/POC in a good job a DEI hire?

Not all. I wouldn’t say that about let’s say Maxine Waters. She has shown her self to be a competent, even keeled statesperson over her many years of dedicated public service, at great sacrifice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Does it ever get tiring for you turds to call every female/POC in a good job a DEI hire?

Does it ever get tiring for you turds to celebrate every female/POC in a good job as a DEI hire?

As opposed to, y'know, actually being qualified for the job?  When you celebrate diversity/DEI at every turn then expect blowback from people with logical brains asking why we aren't hiring based on merit.  :doh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Does it ever get tiring for you turds to celebrate every female/POC in a good job as a DEI hire?

As opposed to, y'know, actually being qualified for the job?  When you celebrate diversity/DEI at every turn then expect blowback from people with logical brains asking why we aren't hiring based on merit.  :doh:

DEI programs do not mean hiring without merit.  You keep saying this and you keep looking foolish.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GutterBoy said:

DEI programs do not mean hiring without merit.  You keep saying this and you keep looking foolish.

Like I said, people with LOGICAL thinking brains (not you) know that is not true.  The only one looking foolish here is you as you keep repeating the propaganda and lies - no critical thinking on your part.  

DEI is nothing more than racism disguised.  Smart people know that.  Dumb people just repeat the talking points.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Does it ever get tiring for you turds to call every female/POC in a good job a DEI hire?

Its neither a qualifying nor disqualifying characteristic. Barack Obama may well be the most talented politician of our lifetime. Hillary would not have been a DEI candidate. Britain's best prime minister since Churchill was a woman and both 2024 France and Italy have excellent female leadership worth voting for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

DEI programs do not mean hiring without merit.  You keep saying this and you keep looking foolish.

Um... it means merit takes a backseat to skin color.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Voltaire said:

Um... it means merit takes a backseat to skin color.

No, it doesn't.  That's actually illegal.

It means everyone gets a fair shot.  If you're against DEI you're against fairness.  If you think black people are inherently without merit, then you're a racist.

This is pretty simple.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

No, it doesn't.  That's actually illegal.

It means everyone gets a fair shot.  If you're against DEI you're against fairness.  If you think black people are inherently without merit, then you're a racist.

This is pretty simple.

It is.  If you're FOR DEI then your FOR racism.  Of course, that's not surprising since racism is the hallmark of the Democrat Party. 

Repeating anything else just means you can't think for yourself.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

It is.  If you're FOR DEI then your FOR racism.  Of course, that's not surprising since racism is the hallmark of the Democrat Party. 

Repeating anything else just means you can't think for yourself.  

That's guttermutt in a nutshell. He runs on the motto of black people are incapable of taking care of themselves so give jobs to them based on the color of their skin over people who actually are qualified to do a job regardless of their skin color.  

You really can't get any more racist than that.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

No, it doesn't.  That's actually illegal.

It means everyone gets a fair shot.  If you're against DEI you're against fairness.  If you think black people are inherently without merit, then you're a racist.

This is pretty simple.

God you’re a naive dumbasss.  And a horrible racist.

“The soft bigotry of low expectations”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

No, it doesn't.  That's actually illegal.

It means everyone gets a fair shot.  If you're against DEI you're against fairness.  If you think black people are inherently without merit, then you're a racist.

This is pretty simple.

It does not mean everyone gets a fair shot. It means gender and skin color is a large factor. Brandon has made that perfectly clear. He's obsessed with the intersectional Olympics. If it were just liberal white males getting urinated on, who cares, that wouldn't be a problem, they richly deserve it.

Fortunately, DEI is blowing up in the people who embrace it most.

Why is Kamala vice president? I happen to notice that right now, when the stakes are the highest, we are seeing in real time that the same focktards who masturbate over DEI want to go to the bullpen to relieve Brandon, also want to sideline her and bring in someone white.

Let's bring in HalfWhit or Newsome or Buttjudge or Klubuchar.

Sorry sh*tbags, there's a vindictive, evil DEI hire you all installed and clapped along to who you will have to contend with before those hopes and dreams come true. She will not wilt away and go quietly into that good night.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fanni Willis is doing a great job.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Maximum Overkill said:

Seriously? My wife and daughter are in Amsterdam right now to see her. That's no joke, I'm dead serious. 

Have fun 😊 

Not surprised to see all the various outfits celebrating her different albums. But I’ve also seen dozens of people wearing Kansas City Kelce jerseys. That surprised me a little. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

No, it doesn't.  That's actually illegal.

It means everyone gets a fair shot.  If you're against DEI you're against fairness.  If you think black people are inherently without merit, then you're a racist.

This is pretty simple.

What does the E stand for in DEI?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Strike said:

What does the E stand for in DEI?

Why do you always ask stupid questions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, seafoam1 said:

That's guttermutt in a nutshell. He runs on the motto of black people are incapable of taking care of themselves so give jobs to them based on the color of their skin over people who actually are qualified to do a job regardless of their skin color.  

You really can't get any more racist than that.

Spot on......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Why do you always ask stupid questions?

DIDN'T EARN IT (DEI).

You don't earn anything based on color or race. 

You're exactly what's wrong with this Country 🌈 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, GutterBoy said:

Why do you always ask stupid questions?

It's funny how libs dodge legit questions.  Tells you all you need to know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.economist.com/the-world-this-week/2024/07/04/this-weeks-cover

Check out the cover.....wow.....

Quote

Our worldwide cover this week explained why Joe Biden must withdraw from the presidential race. The debate was awful for him, but the cover-up has been worse. It was agony to watch a befuddled old man struggling to recall words and facts. But the operation by his campaign to deny what tens of millions of Americans saw with their own eyes is more toxic than either, because its dishonesty provokes contempt.

Democrats argue, rightly, that Mr Trump is unfit to be president. But the debate and its aftermath have proved Mr Biden unfit, too. First, because of his mental decline. Second, because of his insistence, abetted by his family, senior staff and Democratic elites, that he is still up to the world’s toughest job. Mr Biden’s claim that this election is between right and wrong is ruined by the fact that the existence of his campaign now depends on a lie

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Strike said:

It's funny how libs dodge legit questions.  Tells you all you need to know.

You know what it stands for, jackass.  You think I'm dodging lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

VP Kamala Harris career timeline:

1994: Had an affair with San Francisco’s Mayor to start her political career.

2019: Ran for president with no support. Dropped out before the first primary.

2020: Picked as VP due to race/gender. 

2024: Possibly being swapped in as the Democratic nominee despite receiving zero votes, being the most unpopular VP in history.

DEI in a nutshell.

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Harris has not met the needs of her role. Not sure why exactly, but she has been underwhelming to be sure.  Moreover, she is just so disingenuous..its a complete turn off. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GutterBoy said:

You know what it stands for, jackass.  You think I'm dodging lol

Weren’t you whining about personal attacks just yesterday?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently, Team Biden is trying to get the nomination officially locked up early... July 21st. We'll see if that actually goes through or if he drops out before.

Team Biden does look to be digging in their heels.

The Dems are all looking at each other, trying not to be the first to stab him in the back, hoping somebody else does it or maybe all at once.

Seems like they want to sh*tcan hood ornament Kamala too, in favor or someone the DNC likes better.

And this strategy may actually work... tap say Gretchen HalfWhit, give her an un-vetted honeymoon, all the corporate media swoons and gives her fluff piece after fluff piece of praising her to high heavens for a month and sweep her into office.

Hopefully both Team Biden and Kamala give them hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

You know what it stands for, jackass.  You think I'm dodging lol

I know what it stands for.  I want to make sure we're on the same page regarding that.  Why are you so unwilling to put it in to words?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, GutterBoy said:

DEI programs do not mean hiring without merit.  You keep saying this and you keep looking foolish.

Equity literally means people aren’t being treated equally.  JFC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Fireballer said:

Equity literally means people aren’t being treated equally.  JFC.

For all his faults, Gutter does know how to repeat the propaganda and talking points like a pro, though.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Strike said:

I know what it stands for.  I want to make sure we're on the same page regarding that.  Why are you so unwilling to put it in to words?

Yes we both know it's means equity.  Is this the gotcha?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GutterBoy said:

Yes we both know it's means equity.  Is this the gotcha?

Theres no gotcha.  You’ve plainly shown several times that you know that the word equity exists, but stupidly think it means fair treatment. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×