VP Debate: Vance vs Walz

[thegeneral 2,896]

I feel better now supporting the guy who, because his betch ass ego can’t accept he lost, riled up a bunch or rubes and tried to wreck our system for months.

It’s all good. Put that dude back in charge in the position of unlimited power!

[jerryskids 6,559]

2 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

The link says 10 states (but I actually count 11 ) + The Virgin Islands and D.C. so that is only 13. And I actually happen to think that not requiring signature verification is stupid. But that’s their laws…  

I mean if you want to make a case that the election was stolen through those 11 states plus VI & DC, who am I to stop you?

Actually, my case isn't that it was stolen.  My case is the "most secure election evah!" assertion is absurd on its face, and that there were ample opportunities for cheating.

Keep in mind also that the "Biden won by 9M votes!" position is also absurd; he won be much smaller amounts in key swing states.  That is where surgical shenanigans would be focused.

[Jeff Probst 59]

4 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

The link says 10 states (but I actually count 11 ) + The Virgin Islands and D.C. so that is only 13. And I actually happen to think that not requiring signature verification is stupid. But that’s their laws…  

I mean if you want to make a case that the election was stolen through those 11 states plus VI & DC, who am I to stop you?

The reasoning is that people's signatures change over time, especially old people, and it's not fair to arbitrarily throw out someone's vote based on someone's opinion which is often biased.

Also some of those states have other verifications instead of signature.

That idiot horsesh1t tried to make the same argument.   Too many night sleeping on Costco sheets.

[Reality 3,096]

3 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I feel better now supporting the guy who, because his betch ass ego can’t accept he lost, riled up a bunch or rubes and tried to wreck our system for months.

It’s all good. Put that dude back in charge in the position of unlimited power!

Enjoy. 

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,832]

43 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

I think you are starting to get it!

TDS Guy!!  Congrats!

[Jeff Probst 59]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Biden won

Thank you

[thegeneral 2,896]

2 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Actually, my case isn't that it was stolen.  My case is the "most secure election evah!" assertion is absurd on its face, and that there were ample opportunities for cheating.

Keep in mind also that the "Biden won by 9M votes!" position is also absurd; he won be much smaller amounts in key swing states.  That is where surgical shenanigans would be focused.

It’s the perfect crime!

[Jeff Probst 59]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

Enjoy. 

 

Which one of them tried to steal an election?

[OldMaid 2,129]

4 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

Actually, my case isn't that it was stolen.  My case is the "most secure election evah!" assertion is absurd on its face, and that there were ample opportunities for cheating.

Keep in mind also that the "Biden won by 9M votes!" position is also absurd; he won be much smaller amounts in key swing states.  That is where surgical shenanigans would be focused.

Yes, because it couldn’t possibly be because Trump was just a horrible candidate and more people dislike him than not.

[seafoam1 2,799]

2 minutes ago, Jeff Probst said:

Which one of them tried to steal an election?

killery.

[jerryskids 6,559]

2 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

It’s the perfect crime!

Thanks for getting it.   

[OldMaid 2,129]

2 minutes ago, Jeff Probst said:

Which one of them tried to steal an election?

Which one of them never conceded, either? Or didn’t attend the inauguration?  

[Reality 3,096]

4 minutes ago, Jeff Probst said:

Which one of them tried to steal an election?

 

Just now, OldMaid said:

Which one of them never conceded, either? Or didn’t attend the inauguration?  

We know, it's (D)ifferent.

Do y'all realize how hypocritical you sound?  It's pathetic, really. 

 

[OldMaid 2,129]

Just now, Reality said:

 

We know, it's (D)ifferent.

Do y'all realize how hypocritical you sound?  It's pathetic, really. 

 

You forgot to change your login.

[thegeneral 2,896]

1 minute ago, jerryskids said:

Thanks for getting it.   

Don’t be shy, just embrace it. No one gives a shet. Just say it was stolen. I’m good supporting Donald. He didn’t try to overturn the election because it could have been stolen. We just can’t tell!

[Reality 3,096]

Just now, OldMaid said:

You forgot to change your login.

21 years and running, 1 account.

Unlike your midget boyfriend, sadly.

[jerryskids 6,559]

3 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Yes, because it couldn’t possibly be because Trump was just a horrible candidate and more people dislike him than not.

No, it's possible.   

[Jeff Probst 59]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

 

We know, it's (D)ifferent.

Do y'all realize how hypocritical you sound?  It's pathetic, really. 

 

You have zero self awareness.

 

[Reality 3,096]

Just now, Jeff Probst said:

I have zero self awareness.

Correct.

[OldMaid 2,129]

1 minute ago, Reality said:

21 years and running, 1 account.

Unlike your midget boyfriend, sadly.

My BF doesn’t post here. He is short, though. 

[Reality 3,096]

Just now, OldMaid said:

My BF doesn’t post here. He is short, though. 

Makes sense.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,927]

6 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

My BF doesn’t post here. He is short, though. 

Kinda short or gutterboy insignificant short? 

[OldMaid 2,129]

7 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Kinda short or gutterboy insignificant short? 

My height, short.

[jerryskids 6,559]

12 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Don’t be shy, just embrace it. No one gives a shet. Just say it was stolen. I’m good supporting Donald. He didn’t try to overturn the election because it could have been stolen. We just can’t tell!

I would think that after all of your years of kissing the asses of tech folks at trade shows, you would begin to understand how our minds work.   

[thegeneral 2,896]

3 minutes ago, jerryskids said:

I would think that after all of your years of kissing the asses of tech folks at trade shows, you would begin to understand how our minds work.   

You don’t have to put on the dog and pony show is all I’m saying

[Horseman 2,357]

48 minutes ago, Jeff Probst said:

The reasoning is that people's signatures change over time, especially old people, and it's not fair to arbitrarily throw out someone's vote based on someone's opinion which is often biased.

Also some of those states have other verifications instead of signature.

That idiot horsesh1t tried to make the same argument.   Too many night sleeping on Costco sheets.

You've gone from name one state that doesn't have verification to signature verification (the most widelty used and most successful form) is stupid. Next time just start with the low IQ hot take, you'd look less stupid getting there.  

[Hardcore troubadour 14,927]

21 minutes ago, Horseman said:

You've gone from name one state that doesn't have verification to signature verification (the most widelty used and most successful form) is stupid. Next time just start with the low IQ hot take, you'd look less stupid getting there.  

Gutterdope

[Beaker15 233]

Going to be so sweet when Kamala calls Trump to concede

[Jeff Probst 59]

59 minutes ago, Horseman said:

You've gone from name one state that doesn't have verification to signature verification (the most widelty used and most successful form) is stupid. Next time just start with the low IQ hot take, you'd look less stupid getting there.  

1) You still couldn't name any state that didn't have any ballot verification.

2) I never said signature verification is stupid. You're not good at reading.

[Horseman 2,357]

29 minutes ago, Jeff Probst said:

1) You still couldn't name any state that didn't have any ballot verification.

2) I never said signature verification is stupid. You're not at reading.

1 - Alaska.  And tell me, did PA have signature verification?  You can't even answer simple questions.  

2 - Tiny brain wants to argue that "not fair" is different than "stupid"   

 RIP GutterBoy 

 

 

 

 

 

[Horseman 2,357]

 

 

 

[Gepetto 1,288]

 

My state had voter id on the ballot in the last election and it passed. I already have my ballot, I just had to write my license number on my early voter application. Every in person voter will have to show i.d.

[Maximum Overkill 1,739]

8 hours ago, Jeff Probst said:

You have zero self awareness.

 

Says the Biden voter?  

[Jeff Probst 59]

6 hours ago, Horseman said:

1 - Alaska.  And tell me, did PA have signature verification?  You can't even answer simple questions.  

2 - Tiny brain wants to argue that "not fair" is different than "stupid"   

 RIP GutterBoy 

 

 

 

 

 

Ok.  I need to go real slow for you.  Please try and follow along.

1) we already went over Alaska.  Alaska requires an id to receive an absentee ballot.  That is verification.

2) PA did not have signature verification in 2020.  Already said that.  The mail in ballots were sent to registered voters. In order to get one you had to be a registered voter. In order to register you need ID.  That is validation.

So tell me, where is the fraud?  How was the election stolen?

You can't explain yourself you just repeat the lies you're told.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,927]

7 hours ago, Horseman said:

 

 

 

Calling it what it is. Replacement. Don’t let them cow you by calling it racist.  They continue to prove they just don’t love this country. 

[The Real timschochet 6,410]

58 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Calling it what it is. Replacement. Don’t let them cow you by calling it racist.  They continue to prove they just don’t love this country. 

Replacement would mean that, as these people come in, folks like you would be forced to leave. Unfortunately that’s not the case; you’re quite safe. 

And yes your attitude on this is extremely racist, by any definition of the word. HTH. (not to mention that you continue to prove that YOU are the one who doesn’t love this country- or at the very least you don’t understand it at all.) 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,927]

7 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Replacement would mean that, as these people come in, folks like you would be forced to leave. Unfortunately that’s not the case; you’re quite safe. 

And yes your attitude on this is extremely racist, by any definition of the word. HTH. (not to mention that you continue to prove that YOU are the one who doesn’t love this country- or at the very least you don’t understand it at all.) 

It’s about replacing the votes they are losing you moron. And it’s not just white votes they need to replace. How about you stick to defending your own instead of everyone else? They don’t need you and you suck at it anyway.  Condescending Karen.  

[TrailGuy 552]

22 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Replacement would mean that, as these people come in, folks like you would be forced to leave. Unfortunately that’s not the case; you’re quite safe. 

And yes your attitude on this is extremely racist, by any definition of the word. HTH. (not to mention that you continue to prove that YOU are the one who doesn’t love this country- or at the very least you don’t understand it at all.) 

The Great Replacement Theory is a far right wing racist conspiracy theory that resulted in the mass murder of dozens of people of color from Buffalo to El Paso by Maga Trump Supporters.

Elon Musk pushing this rhetoric is extremely dangerous for Kamala Harris.

It's a shame to hear this vitriol repeated here.

[RLLD 4,143]

27 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Replacement would mean that, as these people come in, folks like you would be forced to leave. Unfortunately that’s not the case; you’re quite safe. 

And yes your attitude on this is extremely racist, by any definition of the word. HTH. (not to mention that you continue to prove that YOU are the one who doesn’t love this country- or at the very least you don’t understand it at all.) 

These people, other than the criminals we now know these countries dumped on us, are no threat to the majority of Americans at all.  In fact, they are likely very hard working and bring a culture of achieving with them. They will work hard, suffer the early challenges and not cry about facing hardships, we should welcome this.

Their main threat is to the lower classes, as these folks step up and engage they will succeed and deliver.

Want to venture any guesses as to who might be disproportionately harmed?

[Horseman 2,357]

3 hours ago, Jeff Probst said:

Ok.  I need to go real slow for you.  Please try and follow along.

1) we already went over Alaska.  Alaska requires an id to receive an absentee ballot.  That is verification.

2) PA did not have signature verification in 2020.  Already said that.  The mail in ballots were sent to registered voters. In order to get one you had to be a registered voter. In order to register you need ID.  That is validation.

So tell me, where is the fraud?  How was the election stolen?

You can't explain yourself you just repeat the lies you're told.

You need to speed up rather than slow down if you don't understand that the verification we are talking about is to verify that the returned ballot was filled out by the person for whom it was intended.  

You don't need an ID to register to vote or request a ballot. That would be racist