Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Maximum Overkill

Kamala's latest word salad on Israel:

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

You are about to rile up the nitwits!

It reminds me of seeing a dude challenge another dude to a fight. The second dude accepts, but just before the fight, the challenger finds some lame excuse to back out of the fight. 

"60 Minutes" kept agreeing to Trump's terms until he proposed two that "60 Minutes" surely would refuse.

Not fact-check him?

Apologize for previous accurate reporting?

Geez, the smoke and mirrors on this guy, not to mention egregious cowardice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Lou Gee said:

It reminds me of seeing a dude challenge another dude to a fight. The second dude accepts, but just before the fight, the challenger finds some lame excuse to back out of the fight. 

"60 Minutes" kept agreeing to Trump's terms until he proposed two that "60 Minutes" surely would refuse.

Not fact-check him?

Apologize for previous accurate reporting?

Geez, the smoke and mirrors on this guy, not to mention egregious cowardice. 

Yep.

Funny enough though It’s the smartest thing he has done on this campaign. The more he talks, the less popular he gets with normal people. If he just shuts up he has the best chance of winning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, jonmx said:

Pretty impressive.  How can you string together 35 words in a sentence and not articulate a single discernable idea or fact?  

She says things that seem vague but in reality are meaningless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Lou Gee said:

Odd thread topic, seeing as the Harris unscripted sit-down interview with "60 Minutes"  is airing as we speak. She's fielding tough questions and killing it on the answers. 

Meanwhile, "60 Minutes" agreed to meet Trump at Mar-a-Lago, but then he asked to meet instead in Pennsylvania. Then he demanded that "60 Minutes" not fact-check his responses in addition to demanding a "60 Minutes" apology for a 2020 interview for which he was nailed for his false comments.

Then he pulled out of the interview, and yet here with her being interviewed while Trump supporters say she sucks at interviews.

Seems to be pretty hypocritical, ya know?

 

RIP GutterBoy 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Her 60 minutes interview did little to dispel the 78 IQ story.  She is really dumb.  

No kidding, what kind of lemmings watch that and are impressed.  😂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, squistion said:

A 22 second clip out taken out of context. 😁

There is a reason the clip is so short as hearing what she said after this make this coherent and not misleadingly abbreviated.

This was broadcast on 60 Minutes, are you saying they took her quote out of context?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't need a President who can speak with intelligence. I just need someone who can flood our country with foreigners and who can send my money to terrorist countries. Blue no matter who.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, seafoam1 said:

Trump debated 2 liberal presidential candidates. She has debated one. Whine all you like, your whining has been going on for 10 years now. It's old. 

To be honest, he’s debated 6 people to her1. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Can anyone articulate why they support Kamala without referring to Trump?  I mean you ARE going all in for 8 years of this imbecile rather than 4 years of Trump.  

No. I’m either voting for Harris or 3rd party. If I end up voting Harris, it will 100% be because she’s not Trump. :thumbsup: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Horseman said:

No kidding, what kind of lemmings watch that and are impressed.  😂

Squish

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, MDC said:

No. I’m either voting for Harris or 3rd party. If I end up voting Harris, it will 100% be because she’s not Trump. :thumbsup: 

FAKE NEWS!! Timmy says that isn't the case at all!  He said people are voting for her because of her. He flat out rejected the notion that people will vote for her just cause she's not Trump.
So please, stop lying.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, MDC said:

No. I’m either voting for Harris or 3rd party. If I end up voting Harris, it will 100% be because she’s not Trump. :thumbsup: 

Why do you hate Trump THAT much?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

Why do you hate Trump THAT much?

I don’t like either of these candidates and I don’t think either of them will do much of consequence or have much impact on my life. One of them seems to hate half the country and behaves like a deranged toddler most of the time. I can’t think of any POTUS in my lifetime who is more responsible for dragging the dialogue into the gutter and pitting Americans against each other more. 

That would be the only reason I’d vote for Harris. She might be mediocre in a slightly quieter less disgusting way. 

I’m really on the fence about it since this is an admittedly lame reason to cast a vote. But that’s where I’m at.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Trump refused the 60 minutes interview because he didn't want to get fact checked.  Sad.

Link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MDC said:

I don’t like either of these candidates and I don’t think either of them will do much of consequence or have much impact on my life. One of them seems to hate half the country and behaves like a deranged toddler most of the time. I can’t think of any POTUS in my lifetime who is more responsible for dragging the dialogue into the gutter and pitting Americans against each other more. 

That would be the only reason I’d vote for Harris. She might be mediocre in a slightly quieter less disgusting way. 

I’m really on the fence about it since this is an admittedly lame reason to cast a vote. But that’s where I’m at.

So you are basing it on all personality and not results?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Tree of Knowledge said:

So you are basing it on all personality and not results?

I don’t think either of them offer much in the way of results. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, MDC said:

I don’t like either of these candidates and I don’t think either of them will do much of consequence or have much impact on my life. One of them seems to hate half the country and behaves like a deranged toddler most of the time. I can’t think of any POTUS in my lifetime who is more responsible for dragging the dialogue into the gutter and pitting Americans against each other more. 

That would be the only reason I’d vote for Harris. She might be mediocre in a slightly quieter less disgusting way. 

I’m really on the fence about it since this is an admittedly lame reason to cast a vote. But that’s where I’m at.

Dialogue in the gutter!  

Did you put on women's underwear just to type that out? 

🤣🤣🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Feelings

You guys feel like Trump won in 2020. 🤷 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Horseman said:

Dialogue in the gutter!  

Did you put on women's underwear just to type that out? 

🤣🤣🤣

I miss the days when our POTUS wasn’t so obviously a disgusting grifter rapist POS. :dunno: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, MDC said:

I miss the days when our POTUS wasn’t so obviously a disgusting grifter rapist POS. :dunno: 

Yeah, and you have that in common with creepy joe. Look at you go girl.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Baker Boy said:

This was broadcast on 60 Minutes, are you saying they took her quote out of context?

Her answer posted here was edited and cut short so we didn't see all of it, which would make it out of context of her entire answer. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, avoiding injuries said:

To be honest, he’s debated 6 people to her1. 

What is it with liberals that if they demand something, and you say "No", that somehow you are scared of them? That's their "logic" in all this. 

Liberal: "I demand you to do things I want you to do and under my terms!!"

Conservative: "Fock off."

Liberal: "You're a-scared."

Conservative: "Fock off."

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

What is it with liberals that if they demand something, and you say "No", that somehow you are scared of them? That's their "logic" in all this. 

Liberal: "I demand you to do things I want you to do and under my terms!!"

Conservative: "Fock off."

Liberal: "You're a-scared."

Conservative: "Fock off."

 

You dopes were saying the exact same thing when Trump was saying Kamala was ducking debates that he had agreed to do without her camp in the conversation 😂

They then do the one, he gets worked, and now he doesn’t want another thrashing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, thegeneral said:

You dopes were saying the exact same thing when Trump was saying Kamala was ducking debates that he had agreed to do without her camp in the conversation 😂

They then do the one, he gets worked, and now he doesn’t want another thrashing.

There it is again. Dopey liberals saying dopey things. Some things never change. :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, seafoam1 said:

There it is again. Dopey liberals saying dopey things. Some things never change. :dunno:

Trump’s a big chicken.

Stick with the “it’s rigged” shtick. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, squistion said:

Her answer posted here was edited and cut short so we didn't see all of it, which would make it out of context of her entire answer. 

What did we miss? Link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Baker Boy said:

What did we miss? Link?

It was only 22 seconds long and her complete answer was cut off, so yes we missed something. 😁

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, squistion said:

It was only 22 seconds long and her complete answer was cut off, so yes we missed something. 😁

There is nothing she could say that would make her first statement coherent. And why can’t you produce her entire answer? I would assume anything she said after wouldn’t be much better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, thegeneral said:

Stick with the “it’s rigged” shtick

Or be like KAMALA and put on a fake racist accent when addressing certain ethnicities. 🌈 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×