If Trump wins

[supermike80 1,801]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Of course I agree it was a long process. We could look at McArthur’s screwup. Or Bush’s canceling the payments deal. It was a long road. But that was a crucial moment. He still embraces Kim, loves him.

Im sad.  I didnt realize NK wouldnt have nukes if it wasnt for trump.  

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

3 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

Im sad.  I didnt realize NK wouldnt have nukes if it wasnt for trump.  

Sarcasm, but I’m sure you see my point about Kim’s constantly humiliating Trump.

Take Iran. 150 soldiers were harmed in an Iranian missile attack. Trump opposed even awarding Purple Hearts. No response.

[supermike80 1,801]

6 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Sarcasm, but I’m sure you see my point about Kim’s constantly humiliating Trump.

Take Iran. 150 soldiers were harmed in an Iranian missile attack. Trump opposed even awarding Purple Hearts. No response.

I absolutely dont see your point about NK, at all.  In fact it makes no sense whatsoever.  You claimed NK developed nukes under Trumps regime. Im still trying to find out if you feel that would not have happened if Trump wasnt president. Youre blaming him for it so im asking if thats your conclusion

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,831]

12 minutes ago, supermike80 said:

I absolutely dont see your point about NK, at all.  In fact it makes no sense whatsoever.  You claimed NK developed nukes under Trumps regime. Im still trying to find out if you feel that would not have happened if Trump wasnt president. Youre blaming him for it so im asking if thats your conclusion

It didn't happen at all.  It's an outright lie.  NK didn't develop nukes under Trump's regime as it had it 's first nuclear test in 2006.

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

1 minute ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

It didn't happen at all.  It's an outright lie.  NK didn't develop nukes under Trump's regime as it had it 's first nuclear test in 2006.

The first H-bomb level nuke with ICBM capability. Massive leap forward & specifically aimed as a threat to the US.

[BunnysBastatrds 2,310]

3 hours ago, OldMaid said:

Trump is not winning this election. Stop hyperventilating.

 Tell you what my favorite nectarous of the goddesses. I challenge you to a duel. Glove slap from moi. As has been for centuries, the one challenged gets to decide the method of the duel. The opponent accepts the opponent’s challenge and have their duel. I challenge you to a duel of who will win in this erection, wait, no election. I choose Trump. I’m quite sure you will pick Karmela. The winner wins an sig bet of whatever they choose. I’ll await your response.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,831]

10 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

The first H-bomb level nuke with ICBM capability. Massive leap forward & specifically aimed as a threat to the US.

Yeah, okay.  You're insane.  All of these tight, cherry-picked specifics to feed your insanity. 

They developed nukes long before Trump hit office.  Nice try, but you're revising history and cherry-picking. Fail.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,831]

3 hours ago, OldMaid said:

Trump is not winning this election. Stop hyperventilating.

This tells me that you are, indeed, not prepared for a Kamala loss and will be losing your sh#t IF Trump wins.

[BrahmaBulls 628]

4 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Tim, this is a terrific well written piece, but I’d move this to no. 1. His comments have become more intense, including today. This is the guy Washington warned us against and shielded us against. It’s a full on alert.

You stupid sons of b!tches threatened to stack the SCOTUS when you got beat there.  You've literally gone after a political opponent in any way possible.  Spare us all your bullsh!t fear tactics.  

[Dizkneelande 1,085]

10 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, okay.  You're insane.  All of these tight, cherry-picked specifics to feed your insanity. 

They developed nukes long before Trump hit office.  Nice try, but you're revising history and cherry-picking. Fail.

Fake China virus and the fake insurrection ruined a lot of previously rational people. I’ve witnessed it first hand with someone that was one of my best friends. It’s really sad. 

[OldMaid 2,129]

14 minutes ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

 Tell you what my favorite nectarous of the goddesses. I challenge you to a duel. Glove slap from moi. As has been for centuries, the one challenged gets to decide the method of the duel. The opponent accepts the opponent’s challenge and have their duel. I challenge you to a duel of who will win in this erection, wait, no election. I choose Trump. I’m quite sure you will pick Karmela. The winner wins an sig bet of whatever they choose. I’ll await your response.

According to the rules you just posted: I (the challenged) get to decide the method of the duel. Are you sure you want to do that?

 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,831]

6 minutes ago, Dizkneelande said:

Fake China virus and the fake insurrection ruined a lot of previously rational people. I’ve witnessed it first hand with someone that was one of my best friends. It’s really sad. 

TDS killed more people than Covid ever did.

[OldMaid 2,129]

15 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

This tells me that you are, indeed, not prepared for a Kamala loss and will be losing your sh#t IF Trump wins.

This tells me you have absolutely no idea how to use a comma.  J/K

I’m gonna go to bed election night knowing Trump is in the lead (most likely) and wake up to Kamala pulling ahead. Pretty much just like last time.  I’ll be fine.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,831]

4 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

This tells me you have absolutely no idea how to use a comma.  J/K

I’m gonna go to bed election night knowing Trump is in the lead (most likely) and wake up to Kamala pulling ahead. Pretty much just like last time.  I’ll be fine.

For the record, I do know how to use a comma.  Feel free to go to Grammarly or any online grammar checker and see if you get any errors on my previous post (you won't). 

Fair enough.  If you get up and Trump won what are you going to do?  How many neighborhoods are going to burn?  Business looted?  People assaulted?   Maybe not necessarily you, but your side of the aisle.

[OldMaid 2,129]

Just now, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

For the record, I do know how to use a comma.  Feel free to go to grammerly or any online grammar checker and see if you get any errors (you won't). 

Fair enough.  If you get up and Trump won what are you going to do?  How many neighborhoods are going to burn?  Business looted?  People assaulted?   Maybe not necessarily you, but your side of the aisle.

They didn’t loot last time, that I’m aware of. Crying? Sure. I remember a bunch of women in pink pvssy hats protesting, but that’s about it.  I mean, it’s not like they sacked the Capitol or anything.

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

22 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

threatened to stack the SCOTUS when you got beat there. 

I agree this is not practical. Reform should happen though, but it’s impossible given how the Dems & GOP have practically turned it into a mini clerical council of guardians. Just following past norms would’ve prevented this though.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,831]

2 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

They didn’t loot last time, that I’m aware of. Crying? Sure. I remember a bunch of women in pink pvssy hats protesting, but that’s about it.  I mean, it’s not like they sacked the Capitol or anything.

"Sacked" the capitol? 

You have more drama than a Mexican soap opera.  We'll see how the left reacts if they lose the election.  History predicts that it won't be gracefully.

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

23 minutes ago, BrahmaBulls said:

You've literally gone after a political opponent in any way possible. 

Eh no. For instance Dems haven’t violently rioted to prevent the handover of legal power from one administration to the next.

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

33 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Yeah, okay.  You're insane.  All of these tight, cherry-picked specifics to feed your insanity.  

They developed nukes long before Trump hit office.  Nice try, but you're revising history and cherry-picking. Fail.

You can tell it was important & different because Trump himself treated it as important & different.

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,831]

Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Eh no. For instance Dems haven’t violently rioted to prevent the handover of legal power from one administration to the next.

they've just shown they'll burn down cities, loot businesses, take over city blocks and assault/murder people.  But, yeah, other than that don't violently riot.

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

4 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

they've just shown they'll burn down cities, loot businesses, take over city blocks and assault/murder people.  But, yeah, other than that don't violently riot.

See you’re demonstrating your awareness of what I’m referring to. You can make a point about law & order - & I’d even agree with you - but it’s unrelated to the transfer of democratic power.

[BrahmaBulls 628]

10 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Eh no. For instance Dems haven’t violently rioted to prevent the handover of legal power from one administration to the next.

Yeah, I'm not doing this stupid back and forth BS with you.  You know damn well what I meant with all the ridiculous charges.  No one is going to buy your nonsense.  You went off the deep end at FBG several years ago.   Trump broke you.

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

1 minute ago, BrahmaBulls said:

You know damn well what I meant with all the ridiculous charges. 

Actually I wasn’t sure, but that’s fine. Have a good evening.

[Kopy 559]

God damn.

These lefties really are dillusional, f0cked up people. Aren't they.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,923]

32 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Actually I wasn’t sure, but that’s fine. Have a good evening.

This clown. Was fine with Biden sucking up to Saudi Arabia and Meduro.  And Getting rich from China. Stfu. 

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Was fine with Biden sucking up to Saudi Arabia

You’re supporting the guy cutting golfing deals with KSA at his country clubs while his son in law & daughter rake in the fees from their sovereign wealth fund.

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Getting rich from China

Yeah I can see how this can be problematic.

[SaintsInDome2006 377]

12 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Meduro

Yeah imagine electing someone who prefers Maduro’s Venezuela to the USA.

[Frozenbeernuts 2,114]

More rights? What rights do gays, trans, and minorities not have now that others have?

[BunnysBastatrds 2,310]

1 hour ago, OldMaid said:

According to the rules you just posted: I (the challenged) get to decide the method of the duel. Are you sure you want to do that?

 

 Yes my beautiful Darlin. I am awaiting your acceptance. Damn, it just moved.

[jerryskids 6,558]

5 hours ago, squistion said:

That is an outlier? I don't see anything that has happened to Trump or Harris that would shift the momentum in his favor. NBC at 5 points I would imagine is not within the margin of error, but the other reputable polls probably are. 

The Harris honeymoon is ending, and people are reminded that she was a terrible candidate before the coup that put her in the nomination.  She is trying to be Solomon splitting the baby with her flip flopping positions on fracking, the border, etc., and it ends up she is pleasing no one.  HTH

5 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Tim, this is a terrific well written piece, but I’d move this to no. 1. His comments have become more intense, including today. This is the guy Washington warned us against and shielded us against. It’s a full on alert.

I've often pimped the Freakonomics podcast here, and will again.  They just posted a two-part series on the president, dictatorship, and how to predict the election.

https://freakonomics.com/podcast/has-the-u-s-presidency-become-a-dictatorship-update/

https://freakonomics.com/podcast/how-to-predict-the-presidency/

The host, Stephen Dubner, is definitely NOT a fan of Trump.  His pods rarely get into politics tho, and even these were more academic than partisan.

The first was a replay/update of one they did in 2016 before Trump was elected.  One of the main guests is a legal historian and U of Chicago professor, who talked about how the office of POTUS has amassed a lot more power than the Founders envisioned.  He was actually quite critical of Obama and his selective law enforcement or lack thereof.  The second one was primarily about betting markets for the election (also very interesting), but Dubner talked to the same professor about the risk of Trump becoming somethin of a dictator.

The professor's opinion was... not really a risk.  His reasoning is that to be a dictator, you need to be disciplined and organized, which isn't Trump.  

[BunnysBastatrds 2,310]

 The dance floor is yours our beautiful friend. How bout a fandango?

[avoiding injuries 1,506]

2 hours ago, BrahmaBulls said:

Yeah, I'm not doing this stupid back and forth BS with you.  You know damn well what I meant with all the ridiculous charges.  No one is going to buy your nonsense.  You went off the deep end at FBG several years ago.   Trump broke you.

Yeah, I remember Saints being a good poster for quite some time. Then poof, he changed. Reading what he’s posting now is very peculiar. 

[OldMaid 2,129]

1 hour ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

 Yes my beautiful Darlin. I am awaiting your acceptance. Damn, it just moved.

Ok, sig bet accepted!

 

17 minutes ago, avoiding injuries said:

Yeah, I remember Saints being a good poster for quite some time. Then poof, he changed. Reading what he’s posting now is very peculiar. 

Isn’t he Sho? 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

1 hour ago, jerryskids said:

The professor's opinion was... not really a risk.  His reasoning is that to be a dictator, you need to be disciplined and organized, which isn't Trump.  

I tend to agree with this. I'm not going to pretend, or say, Trump is a dumb guy- he isn't. But I don't think he is as smart as some people- many posters here- tend to believe he is. Essentially he is a used car salesman. He knows how to say what the person on the other end needs to hear in order to "buy". It doesn't matter the logistics of it, the reality of it, if you can talk it up enough the other person will buy. He hasn't really given any specifics about what he is going to do to combat some of the issues he is facing but people magically believe he is going to solve things. But his verbal manipulation does not necessarily equate with intelligence- at least as it relates to his own intelligence. It equates more with the lack of intelligence the general voting public has (and yes I'm including liberal voters in that as well). 

What I think someone could make a case about is- who will he surround himself with and what are their intentions? Because all you really need to say to Trump is "Hey this will make you very popular" and he will go with it. he won't look at the pros and cons of something, it will be whatever best feeds his image. And someone around him may be smart enough to exploit that. 

[EternalShinyAndChrome 3,831]

40 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Ok, sig bet accepted!

 

Isn’t he Sho? 

Uhm...no.  definitely not 

[BunnysBastatrds 2,310]

40 minutes ago, OldMaid said:

Ok, sig bet accepted!

 

Isn’t he Sho? 

 Now it’s really moving. I haven’t been this happy since my colonoscopy exam and MRI appointments from nurse Shankwa.

[OldMaid 2,129]

6 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Uhm...no.  definitely not 

I don’t know why but for some reason I associate those 2 together. Sho left quite awhile ago, so I’m sure my memory is rusty.

[OldMaid 2,129]

11 minutes ago, BunnysBastatrds said:

 Now it’s really moving. I haven’t been this happy since my colonoscopy exam and MRI appointments from nurse Shankwa.

I’m taking one of your balls when you lose. 

[BunnysBastatrds 2,310]

1 hour ago, avoiding injuries said:

Yeah, I remember Saints being a good poster for quite some time. Then poof, he changed. Reading what he’s posting now is very peculiar. 

 I joined Fawk Butt Gheys many years ago, a decade plus years ago. I went there as tchoupitoulas. I quit after less than a week getting banned for writing that this place needs helmets for the ones you love. And I never ever went back again. The cascades of post responses were beyond tardnation.Notice here that you respond to a post and you then post on your own. Don’t need the other phaggots to hold your hand? It’s on you. I knew that place would eventually go down like Ellen on a brownie.