Al Smith Dinner, Trump wins the election

[SaintsInDome2006 379]

11 hours ago, jonmx said:

Oh no, Trump called some cucks, cucks that is so disgusting..

I don’t understand the reference, I guess this is something he did recently? But I don’t know how much of Trump’s attacks like this really bother me, but no I don’t like the cursing & the event last night where he talked about an American sports hero’s package is indicative of behavior that’s beneath the presidency.

[Reality 3,096]

6 pages of triggered liberals.

You people live a miserable existence.

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237]

1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I don’t recall being disrespectful towards you. And I won’t now. None of that has any to do with my comment, which had to do with political strategy & Al Smith, the man. I’ll add the way all convos return to pedophilia, transsexuals & the like is bizarre. Has zip to do with conservatism, the Republican Party or 99.999% of what Trump or Harris may or may not do as president. And to boot Trump will be just as bound by the ADA as Harris, though at the core of this is the ‘argument’ whether a US president should be subject to the law at all, because that’s the only way any of this makes sense.

I was not being disrespectful. I was calling out as a catholic you support something so much worse than anything Trump does. 
 

im not a trump supporter. I’m a libertarian anti religion person. So I see hypocrisy in who you support

[SaintsInDome2006 379]

7 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I was not being disrespectful. I was calling out as a catholic you support something so much worse than anything Trump does. 
 

im not a trump supporter. I’m a libertarian anti religion person. So I see hypocrisy in who you support

But you’re not a Catholic, or are you?

[jerryskids 6,564]

1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I don’t recall being disrespectful towards you. And I won’t now. None of that has any to do with my comment, which had to do with political strategy & Al Smith, the man. I’ll add the way all convos return to pedophilia, transsexuals & the like is bizarre. Has zip to do with conservatism, the Republican Party or 99.999% of what Trump or Harris may or may not do as president. And to boot Trump will be just as bound by the ADA as Harris, though at the core of this is the ‘argument’ whether a US president should be subject to the law at all, because that’s the only way any of this makes sense.

You seem intelligent, please tell me that you don't buy into the Leftist disinformation that the SCOTUS decision said the bolded about the POTUS.   

[jbycho 591]

2 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

So I think yesterday or the day before I saw a post here by an obvious Maga guy just out and out praising & pulling for Putin. Maybe it was a troll post, I don’t know but he seemed serious. Not that that’s the rule but it’s out there.

What:s a "maga guy"?

[SaintsInDome2006 379]

7 hours ago, jerryskids said:

You seem intelligent, please tell me that you don't buy into the Leftist disinformation that the SCOTUS decision said the bolded about the POTUS.  

No, I’m talking about online & media rhetoric.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

11 hours ago, Fnord said:

I am "catholic" in that I was confirmed into that sect of Christianity as a minor and partook in my first cannibalism--errr- communion sacrament. 

The Catholic church means little or nothing to me and I have not attended a normal mass for decades.

They are Catholics like I am. They can use it as a small cudgel in an argument when it's convenient. Hardcore Twatadour can claim he's a Catholic all day long, he's not in a position to pass morality judgment on anyone, ever.

Well, you are ok with children being mutilated. I’m fine passing judgement on you. 

[TimHauck 2,619]

On 10/18/2024 at 12:55 PM, Death said:

Trump admits Fox helped him write the speech:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/18/media/trump-fox-al-smith-dinner-speech/index.html

A news outlet writing material for a presidential candidates.

The media has hit a new low.

@jonmx, weren’t you recently complaining about Presidential campaigns having MSM networks do their dirty work for them?

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

16 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I don’t recall being disrespectful towards you. And I won’t now. None of that has any to do with my comment, which had to do with political strategy & Al Smith, the man. I’ll add the way all convos return to pedophilia, transsexuals & the like is bizarre. Has zip to do with conservatism, the Republican Party or 99.999% of what Trump or Harris may or may not do as president. And to boot Trump will be just as bound by the ADA as Harris, though at the core of this is the ‘argument’ whether a US president should be subject to the law at all, because that’s the only way any of this makes sense.

It's the only thing they have. 

[SaintsInDome2006 379]

14 hours ago, jbycho said:

What:s a "maga guy"?

I was referring to this post. I take it this is a gentleman who is a full on supporter of Donald & his Maga movement.

[Fnord 2,051]

23 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I was referring to this post. I take it this is a gentleman who is a full on supporter of Donald & his Maga movement.

If that poster is not a Russian bot, he is missing out on a lucrative side gig. You're a smart, decent dude. The less you pay attention to the guy that does little in the forum but push Russian propaganda isn't worth your time, nor anyone else's. 

[Fnord 2,051]

8 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Well, you are ok with children being mutilated. I’m fine passing judgement on you. 

No I'm not.

In fact, I'm much closer to being a Christian than you are, whether you play the part in chuch or not. Wishing horrific things on other posters and their children is definitely something the rest of us are okay with judging punitively.

You are the kind of Christian that gives the religion a bad name.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

Just now, Fnord said:

No I'm not.

In fact, I'm much closer to being a Christian than you are, whether you play the part in chuch or not. Wishing horrific things on other posters and their children is definitely something the rest of us are okay with judging punitively.

You are the kind of Christian that gives the religion a bad name.

Yes you are. You vote for it. EOS.  If that’s not a line you won’t cross what exactly is? 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

2 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yes you are. You vote for it. EOS.  If that’s not a line you won’t cross what exactly is? 

Where does wishing rape on a kid because you disagree with their dad on a fantasy football message board fall on the Catholicism scale?

[Fnord 2,051]

5 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Where does wishing rape on a kid because you disagree with their dad on a fantasy football message board fall on the Catholicism scale?

Somewhere between Bishop and Cardinal.

[Fnord 2,051]

9 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yes you are. You vote for it. EOS.  If that’s not a line you won’t cross what exactly is? 

Wishing harm on others. Period. HTH.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

7 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Where does wishing rape on a kid because you disagree with their dad on a fantasy football message board fall on the Catholicism scale?

I clearly stated I wish no one harm.  But you can continue to take things out of context or provide no context if it helps you with your obsession. Enjoy. Cling. You have nothing else. 

[Fnord 2,051]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I clearly stated I wish no one harm.  But you can continue to take things out of context or provide no context if it helps you with your obsession. Enjoy. 

Just stop. There are receipts all over this place. The only person here obsessed with you is YOU.

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

Just now, Hardcore troubadour said:

I clearly stated I wish no one harm.  But you can continue to take things out of context or provide no context if it helps you with your obsession. Enjoy. 

Quote

And lowlife, sniveling little twerps here going after the father of a rape victim who only wanted answers from the people that  covered up his daughters rape for political purposes. Because they caused it. I wish it was your daughters instead of his

Where in this are you wishing no one harm?

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

1 minute ago, Fnord said:

Wishing harm on others. Period. HTH.

I merely presented a hypothetical. Sorry you can’t grasp the concept. But like with the idiot above, cling if it helps. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

1 minute ago, Fnord said:

Just stop. There are receipts all over this place. The only person here obsessed with you is YOU.

Yeah. I know there are. But you’ll never give the whole story. It’s all you got.  Muh very fine people.  

[MDC 7,127]

19 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Where does wishing rape on a kid because you disagree with their dad on a fantasy football message board fall on the Catholicism scale?

It’s about on par with claiming another dad’s 10 y/o son watches porn.

[Fnord 2,051]

5 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Yeah. I know there are. But you’ll never give the whole story. It’s all you got.  Muh very fine people.  

I'm not getting into a 3-page back and forth with you. Last response for today: nobody cares about your "whole story", whatever the fock that is. People care that you're such a crude, debased, damaged person that you even have the capability of typing and submitting that sort of venomous vitriol, let alone defending doing it. You do not present yourself as anything remotely close to a decent human here, and literally nobody is confusing you with any very fine people. Own it, Mr. "Big Deal Around Here."

[jonnyutah 248]

25 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Where does wishing rape on a kid because you disagree with their dad on a fantasy football message board fall on the Catholicism scale?

Well considering in this fantasy scenario this then means he is wishing unrape on another child, its kind of a wash on the catholic scale. They dont mind good/bad deed bartering. They never have. 

Is there anything else I can help with you sensitive little girl? 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

3 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Well considering in this fantasy scenario this then means he is wishing unrape on another child, its kind of a wash on the catholic scale. They dont mind good/bad deed bartering. They never have. 

Is there anything else I can help with you sensitive little girl? 

Defending a piece of human garbage? Not a good choice.

 

[Fnord 2,051]

2 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Defending a piece of human garbage? Not a good choice.

 

It's the MAGA way.

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

18 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I'm not getting into a 3-page back and forth with you. Last response for today: nobody cares about your "whole story", whatever the fock that is. People care that you're such a crude, debased, damaged person that you even have the capability of typing and submitting that sort of venomous vitriol, let alone defending doing it. You do not present yourself as anything remotely close to a decent human here, and literally nobody is confusing you with any very fine people. Own it, Mr. "Big Deal Around Here."

Wow. I did a number on you. Sad. “Deranged”. lol. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

13 minutes ago, jonnyutah said:

Well considering in this fantasy scenario this then means he is wishing unrape on another child, its kind of a wash on the catholic scale. They dont mind good/bad deed bartering. They never have. 

Is there anything else I can help with you sensitive little girl? 

Ah, they cling. Let em. 

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

9 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Defending a piece of human garbage? Not a good choice.

 

Go do some work thief. 

[RaiderHaters Revenge 4,237]

17 hours ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

But you’re not a Catholic, or are you?

Nope I’m not a catholic nor a hypocrite 

[Death 300]

56 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I merely presented a hypothetical. Sorry you can’t grasp the concept. But like with the idiot above, cling if it helps. 

You sure do a lot of denying that you posted something and double down when it's reposted and obviousy that you indeed wrote it. Everyone knows you wrote it. Just own it, for heaven's sake.

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

20 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Go do some work thief. 

The HT posting cycle:

1.) Get called on something he said

2.) Deny it

3.) Get shown evidence of what he said

4.) Accuse person of being triggered and insult them and/or their manhood  we are here

5.) Post some other nonsense trying to pretend like he is a better person than another poster

6.) Return to step 1

[Hardcore troubadour 14,933]

4 minutes ago, Death said:

You sure do a lot of denying that you posted something and double down when it's reposted and obviousy that you indeed wrote it. Everyone knows you wrote it. Just own it, for heaven's sake.

When did I deny it? You clowns are so defeated. 

[Horseman 2,365]

45 minutes ago, Fnord said:

I'm not getting into a 3-page back and forth with you. Last response for today: nobody cares about your "whole story", whatever the fock that is. People care that you're such a crude, debased, damaged person that you even have the capability of typing and submitting that sort of venomous vitriol, let alone defending doing it. You do not present yourself as anything remotely close to a decent human here, and literally nobody is confusing you with any very fine people. Own it, Mr. "Big Deal Around Here."

TRIGGERED!!

[SaintsInDome2006 379]

4 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

Nope I’m not a catholic nor a hypocrite 

Thank you for responding. So you’re not familiar with the sacraments or issues like free will, Aquinas’ balancing of moral virtues & sins, or anything similar. You’re really not in a position to discuss what the meaning of hypocrisy is in this context.

[Death 300]

1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

When did I deny it. 

 

1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I clearly stated I wish no one harm.  

Obtuse much?

[Fnord 2,051]

1 minute ago, Horseman said:

TRIGGERED!!

Wasn't Trigger the name of the Lone Ranger's horse, Horseman? With your fondness of that term, Trigger is a perfect name for you. Encapsulates your GC persona quite nicely, I think. 

[Sean Mooney 1,937]

Just now, Death said:

 

Obtuse much?

I don't think HT is obtuse. He is just of a very low IQ in general. 

[Horseman 2,365]

3 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

Thank you for responding. So you’re not familiar with the sacraments or issues like free will, Aquinas’ balancing of moral virtues & sins, or anything similar. You’re really not in a position to discuss what the meaning of hypocrisy is in this context.

Dumb dumb here thinks you must be a Catholic to know their history and beliefs.