Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
squistion

Trump: “It doesn’t cost 60,000 bucks to bury a f****** Mexican!”

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

Link?

Decorated vet general John Kelly former chief of staff must be lying right?  Everyone is lying, except trump. Trump never lies right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kamala on tape at P. Diddy's:  "It doesn't take $6 for me to blow 60,000 Mexicans."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jonmx said:

Kamala on tape at P. Diddy's:  "It doesn't take $6 for me to blow 60,000 Mexicans."

Yup just laugh it all off. Trump over everything.  You're the dirtiest of the bootlickers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh please. I love how he supposedly lectured Trump about the history of Hitler. Like he didnt know.  What a bunch of Bs. Also, the autobahn is awesome. That’s probably what he was talking about.  Funny how he doesn’t say what good things Trump said he did. Kelly is the same guy that was physically assaulting people in the White House.  Enjoy your little fantasies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Yup just laugh it all off. Trump over everything.  You're the dirtiest of the bootlickers.

I would say one day you will get it, but some cultist idiots are too effing gone to ever get it.   It was not Trump who built up dozens of heavily armed federal agencies with millions of agents and millions of pages of rules empowered to turn their guns on citizens.   These agencies have turned into politically driven machines which have systematically overturned the Constitution and can turn us into an authoritarian state at the blink of an eye. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Oh please. I love how he supposedly lectured Trump about the history of Hitler. Like he didnt know.  What a bunch of Bs. Also, the autobahn is awesome. That’s probably what he was talking about.  Funny how he doesn’t say what good things Trump said he did. Kelly is the same guy that was physically assaulting people in the White House.  Enjoy your little fantasies. 

Here we go go.  John Kelly is lying, John Bolton is lying, HR McMaster is lying, Mike Pence, Mark Esper, Bill Barr, they're all lying.  All these decorated vets who had been known for their entire lives as respected men who were hired by trump and served under him, they're all just lying.  Let's choose to believe a lifetime con artist who has proven to be the most dishonest president and candidate of our lifetime over all of these respected men.

Have you no shame? You certainly have no spine.  I question your soul.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jonmx said:

I would say one day you will get it, but some cultist idiots are too effing gone to ever get it.   It was not Trump who built up dozens of heavily armed federal agencies with millions of agents and millions of pages of rules empowered to turn their guns on citizens.   These agencies have turned into politically driven machines which have systematically overturned the Constitution and can turn us into an authoritarian state at the blink of an eye. 

Projection 101. It is Trump that asked to shoot protesters.  It is Trump that has said repeatedly that he will arrest and use the military against people who disagree with him.  It is Trump that literally said we should suspend the Constitution.

And you bootlick for Trump.  So so sad 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:
Decorated vet general John Kelly former chief of staff must be lying right?  Everyone is lying, except trump. Trump never lies right?

Imma need a link to Trump saying it. I'm filing your link under: Hogwash.

No proof, no happen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, lickin_starfish said:

Imma need a link to Trump saying it. I'm filing your link under: Hogwash.

No proof, no happen. 

This is your line?  You will only believe what he said with audio evidence directly from trump?  To knowledge doesn't exist but even if it did I'm sure you would just call it AI.

Funny you have no problem believing random garbage on twitter but respected veterans who all served under trump all day the same thing, nah never happened.

Keep licking those boots, scum.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Here we go go.  John Kelly is lying, John Bolton is lying, HR McMaster is lying, Mike Pence, Mark Esper, Bill Barr, they're all lying.  All these decorated vets who had been known for their entire lives as respected men who were hired by trump and served under him, they're all just lying.  Let's choose to believe a lifetime con artist who has proven to be the most dishonest president and candidate of our lifetime over all of these respected men.

Have you no shame? You certainly have no spine.  I question your soul.

You’re right. Trump didn’t know about Hitler. John Kelly had to inform him.  Got it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

This is your line?  You will only believe what he said with audio evidence directly from trump?  To knowledge doesn't exist but even if it did I'm sure you would just call it AI.

Funny you have no problem believing random garbage on twitter but respected veterans who all served under trump all day the same thing, nah never happened.

Keep licking those boots, scum.

You sound flustered. Might want to take a deep breath.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Projection 101. It is Trump that asked to shoot protesters.  It is Trump that has said repeatedly that he will arrest and use the military against people who disagree with him.  It is Trump that literally said we should suspend the Constitution.

And you bootlick for Trump.  So so sad 

Biden's Defense Department has just secretly made it legal through the reissue of Directive 5240.01 to use the military against our own citizens.  You are such a clueless dumfuk. 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, jonmx said:

Biden's Defense Department has just secretly made it legal through the reissue of Directive 5240.01 to use the military against our own citizens.  You are such a clueless dumfuk. 

Here is a good article on the timeline for this: https://www.cip.uw.edu/2024/10/18/rumors-defense-department-directive-5240-01/

Essentially- the directive was put out in 2007 and updated in 2013 and 2020 and then again in September of 2024.

A reporter for Steve Bannon's media network put out there about some change in language.

It got picked up by a newsbroker on Twitter

A natural healing blog ran with the story and is the first place to directly tie it to the 2024 election. Then a bunch of crazy extreme right wing sites latch on and it gets passed around Rumble and Gettr. 

Then a TikToker- named TitoComrade makes a video about it. Then a gun enthusiast channel on YouTube makes a video about it 

 

So yeah it seems like this is a directive that gets updated. It did this time and a bunch of nuts decided it means "LETHAL FORCE AGAINST CITIZENS!!" and it is becoming a story that is not based in any kind of factual ideas.  I get that people hate Biden and hate Harris (and hate Trump) but don't fall for every single idiotic story that gets thrown out there just cause it fits the narrative you want to project. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bootlickermx is a conspiracy theorist.  Of course he's going to believe that.

He believes this conspiracy more than Trump's own words when he says he wants to use the military against people who disagree with him.  So so sad 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

Here is a good article on the timeline for this: https://www.cip.uw.edu/2024/10/18/rumors-defense-department-directive-5240-01/

Essentially- the directive was put out in 2007 and updated in 2013 and 2020 and then again in September of 2024.

A reporter for Steve Bannon's media network put out there about some change in language.

It got picked up by a newsbroker on Twitter

A natural healing blog ran with the story and is the first place to directly tie it to the 2024 election. Then a bunch of crazy extreme right wing sites latch on and it gets passed around Rumble and Gettr. 

Then a TikToker- named TitoComrade makes a video about it. Then a gun enthusiast channel on YouTube makes a video about it 

 

So yeah it seems like this is a directive that gets updated. It did this time and a bunch of nuts decided it means "LETHAL FORCE AGAINST CITIZENS!!" and it is becoming a story that is not based in any kind of factual ideas.  I get that people hate Biden and hate Harris (and hate Trump) but don't fall for every single idiotic story that gets thrown out there just cause it fits the narrative you want to project. 

 

So when/if Trump asks if they can shoot rioters, the answer should have been yes we can.   It is not Trump who is creating the police state.  Trump is the only one talking a out reigning this power in. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Strike said:

I read up to the parts where the people supposedly at the meeting where Trump yelled about the 60k are "anonymous" and then where people who WERE at the meeting and were not anonymous said he never said that.   That and the timing of this article is enough to convince me it's just a hit piece, one of the "October Surprises" we've been expecting. 

This.  I think we can see the media ramping up the propaganda right now, throwing as much mud at Trump as they can muster.  I am not impressed.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, RLLD said:

This.  I think we can see the media ramping up the propaganda right now, throwing as much mud at Trump as they can muster.  I am not impressed.

Yup. It's a last, desperate gasp.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RLLD said:

This.  I think we can see the media ramping up the propaganda right now, throwing as much mud at Trump as they can muster.  I am not impressed.

Permanent Washington going into panic mode.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

You’re right. Trump didn’t know about Hitler. John Kelly had to inform him.  Got it. 

You nailed it. Weird trump was hitler too before Kelly told him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, jonmx said:

So when/if Trump asks if they can shoot rioters, the answer should have been yes we can.   It is not Trump who is creating the police state.  Trump is the only one talking a out reigning this power in. 

1.) The language got updated in 2020 but it wasn't talked about because there were no crazy people picking up the story and promoting it.

2.) He will use the power the same way he is perceiving it to be used against him. 

3.) Stop believing the lies of these online influencers and promoters. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, lickin_starfish said:

Bill Gates' wife divorced him because he abused kids on Epstein Island.

Or she knew and wanted to split the fortune in case something happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, jonmx said:

So when/if Trump asks if they can shoot rioters, the answer should have been yes we can.   It is not Trump who is creating the police state.  Trump is the only one talking a out reigning this power in. 

Trump said last week that he wants to use the military against us citizens that disagree with him.  Is that not a police state?

Keep bootlicking

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Frozenbeernuts said:

Or she knew and wanted to split the fortune in case something happened.

The only person with any connection to Epstein in this race is Trump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Strike said:

I read up to the parts where the people supposedly at the meeting where Trump yelled about the 60k are "anonymous" and then where people who WERE at the meeting and were not anonymous said he never said that.   That and the timing of this article is enough to convince me it's just a hit piece, one of the "October Surprises" we've been expecting. 

TBF- The Atlantic in the piece is providing both sides of the story and is offering confirmations and denials of the story from various parties. That's what a journalist should do.

Would it surprise me if Trump said it? No. 

Do I think he said it? I certainly hope not but he has said some bad things about people in service before- not even from anonymous sources, from his own mouth. So it's within the realm of possibility that he did say it.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, TrailGuy said:

This is your line?  You will only believe what he said with audio evidence directly from trump?  To knowledge doesn't exist but even if it did I'm sure you would just call it AI.

Funny you have no problem believing random garbage on twitter but respected veterans who all served under trump all day the same thing, nah never happened.

"If there is not an audio tape of Trump saying it, then it didn't happen"

You can't make this stuff up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

TBF- The Atlantic in the piece is providing both sides of the story and is offering confirmations and denials of the story from various parties. That's what a journalist should do.

Would it surprise me if Trump said it? No. 

Do I think he said it? I certainly hope not but he has said some bad things about people in service before- not even from anonymous sources, from his own mouth. So it's within the realm of possibility that he did say it.

Apparently you didn't read the statement from the girl's sister who thanked Trump for all the supporr he gave her family and said she voted for him yesterday. .You aren't "being fair.". You're pretending to be fair.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Strike said:

I read up to the parts where the people supposedly at the meeting where Trump yelled about the 60k are "anonymous" and then where people who WERE at the meeting and were not anonymous said he never said that.   That and the timing of this article is enough to convince me it's just a hit piece, one of the "October Surprises" we've been expecting. 

:pointstosky:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Strike said:

Apparently you didn't read the statement from the girl's sister who thanked Trump for all the supporr he gave her family and said she voted for him yesterday. .You aren't "being fair.". You're pretending to be fair.

She would fall under the part of the story that is offering denials? Did you skip that part of my post?

Also, I would assume Trump wouldn't have said the comment about what it costs to bury a Mexican in front of the family. 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump has frequently voiced his disdain for those who serve in the military and for their devotion to duty, honor, and sacrifice. Former generals who have worked for Trump say that the sole military virtue he prizes is obedience. As his presidency drew to a close, and in the years since, he has become more and more interested in the advantages of dictatorship, and the absolute control over the military that he believes it would deliver. “I need the kind of generals that Hitler had,” Trump said in a private conversation in the White House, according to two people who heard him say this.

💥

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, TrailGuy said:

Trump said last week that he wants to use the military against us citizens that disagree with him.  Is that not a police state?

Keep bootlicking

That is not what he said you fuking Moron.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, jonmx said:

That is not what he said you fuking Moron.  

Watch these :33 and then apologize for being wrong.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said:

1.) The language got updated in 2020 but it wasn't talked about because there were no crazy people picking up the story and promoting it.

2.) He will use the power the same way he is perceiving it to be used against him. 

3.) Stop believing the lies of these online influencers and promoters. 

 

The story should be picked up and promoted.  The federal government was not intended to have all these police powers over citizens.  The deep state keeps expanding their power in ways that are unchecked and have no accountability.  It does not matter who is in power.  They get an extreme excuse to expand power, then they apply it to ordinary citizens instead of the mob bosses, drug cartel, terrorists it was designed for.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jonmx said:

 

The story should be picked up and promoted.  The federal government was not intended to have all these police powers over citizens.  The deep state keeps expanding their power in ways that are unchecked and have no accountability.  It does not matter who is in power.  They get an extreme excuse to expand power, then they apply it to ordinary citizens instead of mob bosses, drug cartel, terrorists.  

We should not believe idiots on Twitter and youTube just because they align politically. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sean Mooney said:

We should not believe idiots on Twitter and youTube just because they align politically. 

The essence of the story is true though and covered up by the deep state media.  Yes the little guy reporting something may not get the story exact, but that doesn't make the truth less disturbing.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jonmx said:

The essence of the story is true though and covered up by the deep state media.  Yes the little guy reporting something may not get the story exact, but that doesn't make the truth less disturbing.  

It does if they are distorting the actual content and details surrounding the act in order to influence people to their way of thinking. And because of how politicians have repeatedly hammered this idea that the media can't be trusted there are more people than should be buying what TitoComrade is selling.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×