jonmx 2,424 Posted November 9, 2024 56 minutes ago, squistion said: I think you need to take a break, jon. You predicted right and won the election. You should be celebrating instead of seething with anger about a few unauthorized FEMA workers with their own agenda. Chill for a day or too. Eff you moron. It is illustrative of what is wrong inside the belly of our executive branch and why it is so important to de-fang the beast and get it back to working for the citizens and not the elitist bastards, idiots like you worship. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reality 3,100 Posted November 9, 2024 Lol, just finished reading this thread. So predictable. Same 2 or 3 clowns playing semantics. Worthless individuals, I have no idea why anybody ever responds to them. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 1,954 Posted November 9, 2024 38 minutes ago, jonmx said: Eff you moron. It is illustrative of what is wrong inside the belly of our executive branch and why it is so important to de-fang the beast and get it back to working for the citizens and not the elitist bastards, idiots like you worship. No matter who runs a federal agency there will always be some rogue employees. This is nothing to get apopletic about. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 2,624 Posted November 9, 2024 22 minutes ago, Reality said: Lol, just finished reading this thread. So predictable. Same 2 or 3 clowns playing semantics. Worthless individuals, I have no idea why anybody ever responds to them. I agreed she should face criminal charges. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrahmaBulls 628 Posted November 9, 2024 1 minute ago, squistion said: No matter who runs a federal agency there will always be some rogue employees. This is nothing to get apopletic about. Like the rogue Minnesota cop that did a Kaepernick on Floyd's neck? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 1,954 Posted November 9, 2024 6 minutes ago, TimHauck said: I agreed she should face criminal charges. Yes, but I am not sure what exactly she could be charged with...what is exact crime here? Non-performance of her duties? Negligence of some sort? Infliction of emotional distress on those who were unable to sign up for FEMA relief? There is probably something they can come up with, but offhand I am not sure what it is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lickin_starfish 1,893 Posted November 9, 2024 4 minutes ago, squistion said: Yes, but I am not sure what exactly she could be charged with...what is exact crime here? Non-performance of her duties? Negligence of some sort? Infliction of emotional distress on those who were unable to sign up for FEMA relief? There is probably something they can come up with, but offhand I am not sure what it is. I'd go with crimes against humanity. Quick trial, severe punishment. The whole process posted on the major news networks. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,949 Posted November 9, 2024 1 hour ago, squistion said: Yes, but I am not sure what exactly she could be charged with...what is exact crime here? Non-performance of her duties? Negligence of some sort? Infliction of emotional distress on those who were unable to sign up for FEMA relief? There is probably something they can come up with, but offhand I am not sure what it is. Official misconduct. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,214 Posted November 9, 2024 And she's fired: https://twitter.com/FEMA_Deanne/status/1855322116960170093?ref_src=twsrc^tfw Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,567 Posted November 9, 2024 She opened up FEMA to serious litigation through her actions. I'm surprised she wasn't terminated within 15 minutes of her actions coming to light. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,949 Posted November 9, 2024 I don’t trust WOC in positions of authority anymore. Unless they are conservatives. The leftist ones have shown time and again they have an agenda. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,567 Posted November 9, 2024 10 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: I don’t trust WOC in positions of authority anymore. Unless they are conservatives. The leftist ones have shown time and again they have an agenda. They put a woman of color in charge of the department I'm currently in about 10 years ago. She would only hire women as leaders. And this is engineering where 75% of the workforce is male. Well, the result of that was all the qualified men found other jobs since they saw there was no avenue for advancement. The business tanked because of brain drain, and she personally had a hand in us losing market share of our biggest products by essentially having us submit flawed proposals. She got ran off as profit went in the tank, and we're still trying to recover from the damage she did and she hasn't even been around for 7 years. One of our first DEI initiatives... Before it was called DEI. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,567 Posted November 9, 2024 They put another unqualified person in charge of the Tomahawk missile program. Not only is that currently a disaster, but the real world ramification of it is we're probably not going to have upgraded tomahawks due to significant delays. One DEI hire set back one of the most important military capabilities we have in this country years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Death 301 Posted November 9, 2024 1 hour ago, Strike said: And she's fired: https://twitter.com/FEMA_Deanne/status/1855322116960170093?ref_src=twsrc^tfw One focking FEMA employee out of 22,000, and she got fired. Errrrrrrr therm dermocrurts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,844 Posted November 9, 2024 16 minutes ago, Death said: One focking FEMA employee out of 22,000, and she got fired. Errrrrrrr therm dermocrurts. And yet one f@cking cop and George Floyd and the left burned the USA. So, YEAH, "therm dermocrurts". GTFO you disingenuous and lying sack of sh#t. 6 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,949 Posted November 9, 2024 40 minutes ago, nobody said: They put a woman of color in charge of the department I'm currently in about 10 years ago. She would only hire women as leaders. And this is engineering where 75% of the workforce is male. Well, the result of that was all the qualified men found other jobs since they saw there was no avenue for advancement. The business tanked because of brain drain, and she personally had a hand in us losing market share of our biggest products by essentially having us submit flawed proposals. She got ran off as profit went in the tank, and we're still trying to recover from the damage she did and she hasn't even been around for 7 years. One of our first DEI initiatives... Before it was called DEI. It’s destructive. Good riddance to it in the military I hope. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
avoiding injuries 1,511 Posted November 9, 2024 5 hours ago, Hardcore troubadour said: One cop sure caused quite the stir a few years ago. And he didn’t do anything wrong. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 2,624 Posted November 10, 2024 6 hours ago, Strike said: I posted a link to her LinkedIn page, which has since been deleted. But I got to read it before she deleted it. She was some type of reserve FEMA employee. She has another, real full time job, working for some financial services company of some sort up in Sux's area, but her LinkedIn page specifically mentions being a reserve FEMA employee. So I think she was an employee of FEMA when they need extra help such as the recent hurricanes. Hopefully her boss at her regular job gets wind of this and fires her a$$, in addition to FEMA who for whatever reason hasn't already done so. Yea I saw the LinkedIn page, that’s what I was getting at by saying she was either a volunteer or part time. She’s been confirmed as an actual employee so part time it is. So it’s a bit of a stretch IMO for people to be emphasizing the fact that she was referred to as “leadership.” Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,844 Posted November 10, 2024 4 minutes ago, TimHauck said: Yea I saw the LinkedIn page, that’s what I was getting at by saying she was either a volunteer or part time. She’s been confirmed as an actual employee so part time it is. So it’s a bit of a stretch IMO for people to be emphasizing the fact that she was referred to as “leadership.” how can she be a "part-time" supervisor? Doesn't make sense. That's a full time position. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nobody 2,567 Posted November 10, 2024 They probably flex people for surges when disasters need attention. At least I hope they aren't keeping a standing army on the payroll when nothing is going on Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,807 Posted November 10, 2024 Gee. I wonder how the defenders would react if the directive was to skip houses with a pride flag out front 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Strike 5,214 Posted November 10, 2024 Just now, supermike80 said: Gee. I wonder how the defenders would react if the directive was to skip houses with a pride flag out front Squisiton would use it as more evidence that the SCOTUS needs to give the alphabet.people their long overdue rights. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,844 Posted November 10, 2024 1 minute ago, Strike said: Squisiton would use it as more evidence that the SCOTUS needs to give the alphabet.people their long overdue rights. True story bro: https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23431297 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23431394 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23431843 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23431867 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23432772 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23432851 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 596 Posted November 10, 2024 1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: how can she be a "part-time" supervisor? Doesn't make sense. That's a full time position. Just look at who you are responding to and it will hit you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,573 Posted November 10, 2024 7 hours ago, squistion said: Yes, but I am not sure what exactly she could be charged with...what is exact crime here? Non-performance of her duties? Negligence of some sort? Infliction of emotional distress on those who were unable to sign up for FEMA relief? There is probably something they can come up with, but offhand I am not sure what it is. I dunno... NY took some mislabeling of 8 yr old payout checks to a pron star, tacked on a bogus election interference charge to turn them into felonies in the first way ever, and managed to lawfare the Republican candidate for POTUS. Simps brag about "34 felonies" like Trump is a serial killer. I'm confident that the feds can turn this person's behavior into a crime. 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
League Champion 1,896 Posted November 10, 2024 1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: True story bro: https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23431297 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23431394 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23431843 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23431867 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23432772 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/lgbt-lgbtq-lgbt-thread.765610/page-21#post-23432851 Great work Sir! This is why we WIN!!! THEY JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 2,624 Posted November 10, 2024 9 hours ago, jbycho said: Just look at who you are responding to and it will hit you. She was part time Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted November 10, 2024 On 11/9/2024 at 4:27 AM, mmmmm...beer said: Though pretty shitty if it's true, not necessarily illegal. All it would take is for her boss to be fine with it. Political affiliation usually isn't protected. Some States I think have it, but it's not a federal thing. Though... that almost seems like it should be. Blatant violation of the Hatch Act against using government resources for political purpose. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted November 10, 2024 Ivan was a university professor RINO, but he really summed up Squssy here: You're arguing with a person who doesn't know what he's talking about, cherry-picks out-of-date and unreliable sources to win arguments with strangers on the internet, and would sooner eat broken glass than let somebody else have the last word even after being shown that he's wrong. Don't you have better things to do, like watch paint dry? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,844 Posted November 10, 2024 1 hour ago, TimHauck said: She was part time Maybe I missed this. Where, exactly, do they say she is "part time"? I'm not sure a supervisor/team lead position is "part time". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 2,624 Posted November 10, 2024 11 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Maybe I missed this. Where, exactly, do they say she is "part time"? I'm not sure a supervisor/team lead position is "part time". She was a “reservist” according to her Linkedin https://www.fema.gov/careers/paths/reservists (bolding not mine) Due to the unpredictable nature of disasters, FEMA employs a temporary, on-call workforce, known as Reservists. Reservist work is available on an as-needed basis (it is not full-time or continuous) that link still shows they are offering sign on bonuses for it. So doesn’t seem like it was really an in-demand position. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,844 Posted November 10, 2024 4 minutes ago, TimHauck said: She was a “reservist” according to her Linkedin https://www.fema.gov/careers/paths/reservists Due to the unpredictable nature of disasters, FEMA employs a temporary, on-call workforce, known as Reservists. Reservist work is available on an as-needed basis (it is not full-time or continuous) that link still shows they were offering sign on bonuses for it. So doesn’t seem like it was really an in-demand position. Thanks for the info. So a "reservist" is someone who works full-time when called up. For example, when I was in the reserves they called us up for the first Gulf War. For the next 9 months I was full time in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait and when I went back home I went back to "part-time". It was "full-time" until it wasn't, basically. So while they are considered "temporary" or "part-time", when they are called up they are actually working full-time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,142 Posted November 10, 2024 Full-time, part-time, I am fairly certain the distinction is lost on those who did not recieve services. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TimHauck 2,624 Posted November 10, 2024 2 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: Full-time, part-time, I am fairly certain the distinction is lost on those who did not recieve services. I agree, my point was moreso in reference to people that may be suggesting that this story is evidence of a larger conspiracy or government bloat. If anything these are the types of positions they need more of (as evidenced by their apparent struggle to fill them), but unfortunately it’s not always easy to get qualified candidates for non full-time work. But you’d think you’d be able to at least find someone who doesn’t think someone that disagrees with them doesn’t deserve help after a disaster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EternalShinyAndChrome 3,844 Posted November 10, 2024 9 minutes ago, Engorgeous George said: Full-time, part-time, I am fairly certain the distinction is lost on those who did not recieve services. Exactly. It's a point made when you want to distract or pretend the issue isn't a big deal. It's really irrelevant. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 596 Posted November 10, 2024 9 minutes ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said: Exactly. It's a point made when you want to distract or pretend the issue isn't a big deal. It's really irrelevant. Yes. It tells of Tim's character. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 596 Posted November 10, 2024 I wonder if a part time federal agent went Rambo on Tim's family and wiped them out, if he would say "no big deal"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Engorgeous George 2,142 Posted November 10, 2024 2 minutes ago, jbycho said: I wonder if a part time federal agent went Rambo on Tim's family and wiped them out, if he would say "no big deal"? For a part-time Federal Agent to truely go "Rambo" Tim's family would have to draw first blood. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shadrap 220 Posted November 10, 2024 On 11/8/2024 at 7:05 PM, squistion said: If anyone thinks this is true, then I got some ocean front property in Arizona that I would like to sell you. what a clown show. I repeat: better to be silent & thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 596 Posted November 10, 2024 Just now, Engorgeous George said: For a part-time Federal Agent to truely go "Rambo" Tim's family would have to draw first blood. Well, Tim did vote for Harris. That counts as an assault on our nation. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites