Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Maximum Overkill

Trump is ‘100% serious’ about acquiring Greenland, Panama Canal, say sources close to prez-elect

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

JD Vance sabre rattling about invading Greenland again.

Do we invade Greenland or Canada first?

saber rattling
noun
  1. A flamboyant display of military power.
  2. A threat or implied threat to use military force.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Voltaire said:
saber rattling
noun
  1. A flamboyant display of military power.
  2. A threat or implied threat to use military force.

 

JD Vance blasts Denmark, says Trump 'forced to' intervene in Greenland: "Denmark is not doing its job, and isn't being a good ally. If that means we're forced to take more territorial interest in Greenland, that is what President Trump is going to do. Because he doesn't care about the Europeans"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Ron_Artest said:

JD Vance blasts Denmark, says Trump 'forced to' intervene in Greenland: "Denmark is not doing its job, and isn't being a good ally. If that means we're forced to take more territorial interest in Greenland, that is what President Trump is going to do. Because he doesn't care about the Europeans"

https://www.google.com/search?q=+"Denmark+is+not+doing+its+job%2C+and+isn't+being+a+good+ally.+If+that+means+we're+forced+to+take+more+territorial+interest+in+Greenland%2C+that+is+what+President+Trump+is+going+to+do.+Because+he+doesn't+care+about+the+Europeans"&newwindow=1&sca_esv=4ad496d1768baf99&sxsrf=AHTn8zoER4LE0eHGP9yjs2wgef0NZoGHtw%3A1742785139516&source=hp&ei=c8rgZ-mBHYfE0PEP6buW2A8&iflsig=ACkRmUkAAAAAZ-DYgwU_dHWd7FxMd5FKiojGTFuFyS70&ved=0ahUKEwiph6LJ3KGMAxUHIjQIHemdBfsQ4dUDCBo&uact=5&oq=+"Denmark+is+not+doing+its+job%2C+and+isn't+being+a+good+ally.+If+that+means+we're+forced+to+take+more+territorial+interest+in+Greenland%2C+that+is+what+President+Trump+is+going+to+do.+Because+he+doesn't+care+about+the+Europeans"&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IuEBICJEZW5tYXJrIGlzIG5vdCBkb2luZyBpdHMgam9iLCBhbmQgaXNuJ3QgYmVpbmcgYSBnb29kIGFsbHkuIElmIHRoYXQgbWVhbnMgd2UncmUgZm9yY2VkIHRvIHRha2UgbW9yZSB0ZXJyaXRvcmlhbCBpbnRlcmVzdCBpbiBHcmVlbmxhbmQsIHRoYXQgaXMgd2hhdCBQcmVzaWRlbnQgVHJ1bXAgaXMgZ29pbmcgdG8gZG8uIEJlY2F1c2UgaGUgZG9lc24ndCBjYXJlIGFib3V0IHRoZSBFdXJvcGVhbnMiSABQAFgAcAB4AJABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBA8gBAPgBAvgBAZgCAKACAJgDAJIHAKAHALIHALgHAA&sclient=gws-wiz

 

The only link that your quote led to is an age-restricted Reddit post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House Friday the US has “to have Greenland” for the sake of global security.

“We need Greenland,” the president said. “Very importantly, for international security, we have to have Greenland. It’s not a question of, you think we can do without it. We can’t.”

Trump argued control over Greenland is a matter of peace “for the entire world,” not just the United States.

“Look at it, you have warships all over the place going through right along Greenland. We’re not going to let that happen,” Trump added.

The president said he believes Denmark and the European Union understand his view of the territory’s importance, adding a warning: “And if they don’t, we’re going to have to explain it to them.”

Vice President JD Vance and second lady Usha Vance are leading a US delegation on a visit to the semiautonomous Danish territory Friday, making Vance the first vice president to visit Greenland.

“They will represent us well,” Trump said.

Remember: Greenlandic politicians have repeatedly signaled they are opposed to annexation, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has urged Trump to respect “the fundamental rules of sovereignty.”

A newspaper poll in January found that 85% of Greenlanders did not want to become part of the US, with nearly half saying Trump’s interest was a threat, Reuters reported.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said:

President Donald Trump told reporters at the White House Friday the US has “to have Greenland” for the sake of global security.

“We need Greenland,” the president said. “Very importantly, for international security, we have to have Greenland. It’s not a question of, you think we can do without it. We can’t.”

Trump argued control over Greenland is a matter of peace “for the entire world,” not just the United States.

“Look at it, you have warships all over the place going through right along Greenland. We’re not going to let that happen,” Trump added.

The president said he believes Denmark and the European Union understand his view of the territory’s importance, adding a warning: “And if they don’t, we’re going to have to explain it to them.”

Vice President JD Vance and second lady Usha Vance are leading a US delegation on a visit to the semiautonomous Danish territory Friday, making Vance the first vice president to visit Greenland.

“They will represent us well,” Trump said.

Remember: Greenlandic politicians have repeatedly signaled they are opposed to annexation, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has urged Trump to respect “the fundamental rules of sovereignty.”

A newspaper poll in January found that 85% of Greenlanders did not want to become part of the US, with nearly half saying Trump’s interest was a threat, Reuters reported.

We'll just have to take it. Who's going to stop us? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hawaii opposes acquiring Greenland as they ahve become quitye accostumed to referring to The Bid Island as being part of their archpelago.  If Greenland gets in they will have to come up with a new appelation for Hawaii. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The area of Greenland is approximately the same as the area of Alaska and California combined.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump addressed the Greenland situation during the joint session of Congress address using the words "if they wish," which at present they don't but they do now support separating from Denmark, meaning parties that support this move won a surprise election victory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vance realizes that Greenland is cold.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tebok said:

Vance realizes that Greenland is cold.

🤣

Poor Rusty. He's triggered by absolutely everything. 

TDS must really hurt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jbycho said:

Poor Rusty. He's triggered by absolutely everything. 

TDS must really hurt. 

TRANNY DERANGEMENT SYNDROME!

You have a terminal case, and there is no cure!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Tebok said:

TRANNY DERANGEMENT SYNDROME!

You have a terminal case, and there is no cure!

Poor Rusty. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, jbycho said:

Poor Rusty. 

RDS.

🤣

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

😁

https://x.com/RonFilipkowski/status/1905794975326937380

Vance flies to northern Greenland to the US military base. Spends 3 hours on the base. Flies home.

All other plans to attend events in Greenland over 3 days canceled because nobody wanted them there.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, MDC said:

Trump just says things for attention. 

Mdc just says things for attention. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Literally becoming the thing that we abhorred. 

 

I Just sit back & smh at the news now. 

 

Really feels like the ship has been hijacked and were just hanging on for dear life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Literally becoming the thing that we abhorred. 

 

I Just sit back & smh at the news now. 

 

Really feels like the ship has been hijacked and were just hanging on for dear life. 

You think you might die Hysterical Hellen?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Literally becoming the thing that we abhorred. 

 

I Just sit back & smh at the news now. 

 

Really feels like the ship has been hijacked and were just hanging on for dear life. 

Lighten up, Francis.  If Greenland IS acquired by the US, it will be thru legal means.

Although, I just think Trump is bringing this up so the left has a shiny ball to distract themselves with while the adults work on REAL issues.  :thumbsup:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, wiffleball said:

Wish Trump would go after Churches & their many tax dodges. 

Sorry they hurt you so much. 😆

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, EternalShinyAndChrome said:

Lighten up, Francis.  If Greenland IS acquired by the US, it will be thru legal means.

Although, I just think Trump is bringing this up so the left has a shiny ball to distract themselves with while the adults work on REAL issues.  :thumbsup:

Like sending our military to the most remote and inhospitable place in order to crack down on illegal crossing that occur "occasionally."

https://www.nps.gov/bibe/planyourvisit/border_travel.htm#:~:text=Drug smuggling and illegal border,and call 911 when possible.

Quote
  • Drug smuggling and illegal border crossings occasionally occur within Big Bend National Park. If you see anything that looks illegal, suspicious, or out of place, please do not stop or intervene, but note the location, time, direction of travel, and call 911 when possible.
 

Oh, and seeing as Maxipad mocked my statement about the Mexicans selling trinkets and fruit juice on this side of the border, he can now go fock himself.

Quote

Mexican Nationals may leave items for sale such as walking sticks, bracelets, and other crafts on the U.S. side of the Rio Grande. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty amazing that the highly educated leftards have no clue how vital a strong presence in the polar region will be in the years to come. Russia has already made incursions. Thankfully DJT gets it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Pretty amazing that the highly educated leftards have no clue how vital a strong presence in the polar region will be in the years to come. Russia has already made incursions. Thankfully DJT gets it. 

Warmongerer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

Pretty amazing that the highly educated leftards have no clue how vital a strong presence in the polar region will be in the years to come. Russia has already made incursions. Thankfully DJT gets it. 

You’re correct I have no clue, so hopefully you can explain it to me. Greenland is owned by Denmark which is part of NATO. Russia will never seize it because, since it is part of NATO, that would start WWIII. 
 

Why is it in our strategic interests to own it instead of Denmark, at the risk of alienating Western Europe? What exactly do we gain that we don’t have now? We currently have use of their waterways and without any fees or penalty, for both our military and merchant ships. So how would ownership benefit us? Please explain became I don’t get it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

You’re correct I have no clue.

We've been telling you this since day one. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, The Real timschochet said:

You’re correct I have no clue, so hopefully you can explain it to me. Greenland is owned by Denmark which is part of NATO. Russia will never seize it because, since it is part of NATO, that would start WWIII. 
 

Why is it in our strategic interests to own it instead of Denmark, at the risk of alienating Western Europe? What exactly do we gain that we don’t have now? We currently have use of their waterways and without any fees or penalty, for both our military and merchant ships. So how would ownership benefit us? Please explain became I don’t get it. 

I’ve stopped answering your questions. Feel free to figure it out. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/26/2024 at 7:49 PM, TimHauck said:

How many of Kamala’s in 2024 were not legit?

Probably many more but who cares? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hardcore troubadour said:

I’ve stopped answering your questions. Feel free to figure it out. 

No need. You haven’t any answers. I knew that already. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

No need. You haven’t any answers. I knew that already. 

You have to be the dumbest human alive. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, The Real timschochet said:

You’re correct I have no clue, so hopefully you can explain it to me. Greenland is owned by Denmark which is part of NATO. Russia will never seize it because, since it is part of NATO, that would start WWIII. 
 

Why is it in our strategic interests to own it instead of Denmark, at the risk of alienating Western Europe? What exactly do we gain that we don’t have now? We currently have use of their waterways and without any fees or penalty, for both our military and merchant ships. So how would ownership benefit us? Please explain became I don’t get it. 

This has not been explained AFAIK. Greenland is rich in untapped mineral deposits. No way Trump only cares about it strategically. There is money to be made. That's the only reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

I bet if we offered all the citizens of greenland their share of the money we gave Ukraine for nothing, they would be willing to listen

 

No they wouldn’t. They don’t want to be owned by us. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Fnord said:

This has not been explained AFAIK. Greenland is rich in untapped mineral deposits. No way Trump only cares about it strategically. There is money to be made. That's the only reason.

I think he thinks it would add to his legacy too. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

No they wouldn’t. They don’t want to be owned by us. 

they wouldn't just as Puerto Rico wouldn't

you telling me that offering 200k to ever single person in GL wouldn't get them to jump at that opportunity?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, RaiderHaters Revenge said:

they wouldn't just as Puerto Rico wouldn't

you telling me that offering 200k to ever single person in GL wouldn't get them to jump at that opportunity?

 

Well sure maybe if you put it that way.

Theres 57,000 people in Greenland. You sure you want to spend that? (Keep in mind that almost all of the money we spent for Ukraine went to our own defense industries.) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, The Real timschochet said:

Well sure maybe if you put it that way.

Theres 57,000 people in Greenland. You sure you want to spend that? (Keep in mind that almost all of the money we spent for Ukraine went to our own defense industries.) 

Don’t care unlike Ukraine we actually benefit from that. And spare me your “defense industries garbage”. We still fly bombers from the 40s so this whole it’s stuff we were getting rid of is nonsense. 
 

after spending trillions funding meaningless wars in the Middle East we could do something beneficial to the people of Greenland and ourselves. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×