jbycho 580 Posted January 23 1 hour ago, Horseman said: You're missing my point of why that is stupid, dumbasss. Realize who you are posting with. You get what you ask for from liberals.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,353 Posted January 23 1 hour ago, MDC said: I got your point. It’s just that your point is dumb and had nothing to do with what I said, jerkoff. Illustrating how dumb your post was has nothing to do with your post? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jbycho 580 Posted January 23 1 minute ago, Horseman said: Illustrating how dumb your post was has nothing to do with your post? He's a liberal. You have to dumb it down for them or they get lost. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,113 Posted January 23 8 minutes ago, Horseman said: Illustrating how dumb your post was has nothing to do with your post? If only you’d understood my point in the first place. I’m in a charitable mood so I’ll explain it to you: No matter what you think of climate change being real, fake, manmade vs. natural, etc. pointing to one specific day or even week over a 10-year trend is retarded. Get it now? If not I can draw you a picture. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mike Honcho 5,085 Posted January 23 37 minutes ago, MDC said: If only you’d understood my point in the first place. I’m in a charitable mood so I’ll explain it to you: No matter what you think of climate change being real, fake, manmade vs. natural, etc. pointing to one specific day or even week over a 10-year trend is retarded. Get it now? If not I can draw you a picture. You would have better luck explaining it to the cows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hawkeye21 2,380 Posted January 24 https://x.com/ChrisMartzWX/status/1882535292181352587 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
listen2me 23 1,825 Posted February 23 Ready to see a warm up here this coming week. Looking back through some pictures, I golfed March 4th last year. Well not golfed but went out and hit the ball around stayed off greens. Still have a 7 inch layer here but looks like temps are breaking a bit coming up. I always figure about April 1st is when golf courses "open" here. So have some time but I am over winter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,550 Posted February 23 2 hours ago, Reality said: Read this this morning, very sad. The NGOs clearly want a certain result based on being in the climate cult. It's hard to say how much the "scientists" share this cult status, and how much is feeling like they have little choice (e.g., if they post the wrong type of result, they won't get future funding). Probably some of both. Science! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,550 Posted February 24 Quote Free Press readers have consistently told us they want more coverage of the economy and energy. We can think of no better place to start than with the no-BS analysis from our friends at Doomberg, who run arguably the most influential finance newsletter on Substack. The Doomberg team—who writes under a pen name—offers a skeptical, shrewd, and often humorous take on energy policies around the world, explaining energy’s complex connections to technology, markets, and geopolitics. Visit Doomberg’s website. We have it on good authority that it sometimes gets quite cold in Canada during wintertime. As our Canadian readers can attest, in such brutal conditions machinery often acts a little funky. Batteries refuse to turn over, hard things become brittle, fluids freeze or gum up, and dimensions of solid materials quite literally contract. Operating an automobile in this environment can be particularly challenging for the passenger and engine alike, as both need to be warmed up before they can be expected to perform within specifications. In particularly harsh conditions, a car might require 15 to 20 minutes of idling before the engine and cabin reach comfortable conditions, and remote car starters have become incredibly popular solutions. An ironclad canon of the Church of Carbon™ is that parishioners are not allowed to have nice things, which explains the following bit of regulatory tomfoolery: In what it is calling “a bold move” to combat climate change, the City of Ottawa has introduced a strict by-law limiting residents from using remote car starters to warm up their vehicles for more than one minute before driving. The law, intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve local air quality, has sparked heated debate, especially given Ottawa’s notoriously harsh winters. The new rule allows vehicles to idle for just 60 seconds if the driver is not inside. Yes, you read that right: It is illegal in Ottawa to heat up your car in subzero weather. Further in the same article, we find an early leading candidate for quote of the year: “Every little bit counts,” said city councillor Laura Green. “We know it’s cold, but we also know that climate change is a real and urgent problem. This is about protecting our future.” https://www.thefp.com/p/everybody-freeze-climate-police?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email They further go on to describe a bill in Washington to commission a study on the carbon impact of anesthesia gases. "Church of Carbon," I love that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,797 Posted February 25 On 1/23/2025 at 3:58 PM, MDC said: If only you’d understood my point in the first place. I’m in a charitable mood so I’ll explain it to you: No matter what you think of climate change being real, fake, manmade vs. natural, etc. pointing to one specific day or even week over a 10-year trend is retarded. Get it now? If not I can draw you a picture. How far are you going to go back into Earth's history? Just far enough to fit your narrative? Or as far back as possible that science is capable of calculating? This earth has had ice ages and warming ages. Humans have roamed this earth far less than not. The climate freaks are making up stories is all this whole thing is about. They keep getting debunked, then they change the name of their fears. Global cooling mass hysteria in the 70s/80s. Global warming mass hysteria 35 years later. Then, the most recent mass hysteria. Global climate!! It's like a story of a university campus where the gays on campus want a pink triangle day. "Wear a pink triangle on your shirt to support the gay community this Friday!" No one on campus wears one. Then the next week they say, "Pink shirt Friday. Wear a pink shirt this Friday to support the gay community." A couple people who own pink shirts wear a pink shirt because that's what they were going to wear anyway. So basically, no one went out of their way to wear them. Then they got real smart. "JEANS DAY!!! This Friday wear jeans to show your support of the gay community on campus!!!" It was a resounding success for the gays that day. I guess they felt supported. No one cares. Go be gay. But don't ask me to be proud for you. Liberal: "Let's just call it 'climate'!! No one can deny that its real!! And we can whine with confidence." No one cares. Go buy an electric car. Just don't ask me to buy one. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted February 25 On 1/23/2025 at 3:58 PM, MDC said: If only you’d understood my point in the first place. I’m in a charitable mood so I’ll explain it to you: No matter what you think of climate change being real, fake, manmade vs. natural, etc. pointing to one specific day or even week over a 10-year trend is retarded. Get it now? If not I can draw you a picture. Likewise, only focusing on the last 40 years of warming and 150 years of recorded history while ignoring the rest of the earths 4,500,000,000 history is kind of retarded. Just 15,000 years ago most of Indiana was glacier covered, but has retreated and formed the great lakes. That relatively rapid change in our climate in somewhat recent history blows up the global warming alarmist position that all the changes we observe are due to man Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,797 Posted February 25 1 hour ago, jonmx said: Likewise, only focusing on the last 40 years of warming and 150 years of recorded history while ignoring the rest of the earths 4,500,000,000 history is kind of retarded. Just 15,000 years ago most of Indiana was glacier covered, but has retreated and formed the great lakes. That relatively rapid change in our climate in somewhat recent history blows up the global warming alarmist position that all the changes we observe are due to man Global cooling version. We'll either freeze to death, or burn. Depending on if we all live for another 95000 years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
supermike80 1,796 Posted February 25 4 hours ago, jonmx said: Likewise, only focusing on the last 40 years of warming and 150 years of recorded history while ignoring the rest of the earths 4,500,000,000 history is kind of retarded. Just 15,000 years ago most of Indiana was glacier covered, but has retreated and formed the great lakes. That relatively rapid change in our climate in somewhat recent history blows up the global warming alarmist position that all the changes we observe are due to man When climate alarmists get heated, I always wonder what exactly is the earth's temperature supposed to be? Yes it's increasing. And? What's the number? No one knows. So that mans to me they don't have a base to argue from. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted February 25 1 hour ago, supermike80 said: When climate alarmists get heated, I always wonder what exactly is the earth's temperature supposed to be? Yes it's increasing. And? What's the number? No one knows. So that mans to me they don't have a base to argue from. They do have a 2 degree 'tipping point' which was 100 percent pulled out of the butts of the IPCC panel purely to scare the retards. It never had one ounce of scientific rationale, it was all political. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RLLD 4,143 Posted February 25 How many years do we have left again? Can't wait for the natural rhythm of climate to make some simple shift downward so they can pretend we are facing a new ice age again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red White and Blue 81 Posted February 25 6 hours ago, jonmx said: Likewise, only focusing on the last 40 years of warming and 150 years of recorded history while ignoring the rest of the earths 4,500,000,000 history is kind of retarded. Just 15,000 years ago most of Indiana was glacier covered, but has retreated and formed the great lakes. That relatively rapid change in our climate in somewhat recent history blows up the global warming alarmist position that all the changes we observe are due to man MDC isn’t here now but I think I can speak for him. If you really think that dumping greenhouse gasses into our atmosphere has had no impact on climate, I really don’t know what to tell you. FWIW, I’m not a big climate guy because I don’t think we would do anything about it even if we could. But you’re an idiot if you don’t think manmade emissions have accelerated heating. HTH but I know it won’t. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.thumb.jpg.7718b90773cd92a1c2b5262a87243c67.jpg)