Sean Mooney 1,937 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, Mike Honcho said: I offer your posting history to the board as proof that you don't support what you say. Buh-bye I didn't see the statement from the White House saying "Yes this text thread is real and happened but there were no war plans shared on it." I like the idea that there were two separate chats going down- one to discuss the rational for doing what they were going to do and then another to discuss the actual plans of it all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,927 Posted March 25 Just now, Sean Mooney said: I didn't see the statement from the White House saying "Yes this text thread is real and happened but there were no war plans shared on it." I like the idea that there were two separate chats going down- one to discuss the rational for doing what they were going to do and then another to discuss the actual plans of it all. Did you see one where they said there was classified material discussed? No you didn’t. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,937 Posted March 25 2 minutes ago, jonmx said: And yet no damage was done and the mission went off successfully. The whole purpose of classifying information is to protect information which could cause harm. This information did not cause any harm. https://i1.sndcdn.com/artworks-000086594659-lwpm2h-t500x500.jpg 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted March 25 4 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: You work for the federal government? Just to circle back then: How commonly? How many times has it been used? What other things has it been used for? Was it used under Biden or Trump's first term? Please provide evidence and links that show how often it is used. I did for some years. I can't say how common but when I was in the most sensitive location I was told to use signal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jonmx 2,424 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: https://i1.sndcdn.com/artworks-000086594659-lwpm2h-t500x500.jpg I sincerely don't give a fok what an actual retard authoritarian bootlicker posts. I have more respect for dogsh1t on the bottom of my shoe than I do for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,927 Posted March 25 White House released a statement saying no classified material was on the text thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,124 Posted March 25 12 minutes ago, Mike Honcho said: I offer your posting history to the board as proof that you don't support what you say. Buh-bye Demands links? Doesn’t provide them. Says “XMas” is disrespectful. Spends the holiday swordfighting. Calls Geeks low T. Can’t get it up w/out Viagra. Etc. It’s a pattern. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,927 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, MDC said: Demands links? Doesn’t provide them. Says “XMas” is disrespectful. Spends the holiday swordfighting. Calls Geeks low T. Can’t get it up w/out Viagra. Etc. It’s a pattern. This is the guy tyat starts a thread that asks about butt sex and kids. Proceeds to ask another poster if he is going to teach his daughter how to go down. Talk about glass houses. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,896 Posted March 25 1 minute ago, Hardcore troubadour said: This is the guy tyat starts a thread that asks about butt sex and kids. Proceeds to ask another poster if he is going to teach his daughter how to go down. Talk about glass houses. Last wording again. Sheeesh! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 378 Posted March 25 11 minutes ago, jonmx said: I did for some years. I can't say how common but when I was in the most sensitive location I was told to use signal. Signal isn’t an authorized medium for TS/SCI, period, & this discussion was above even that level. This was SCIF material no matter how you slice it. But it gets worse, Witkoff was in Moscow while doing this. And they discuss a meeting at the president’s country club, also completely reckless. And people were on the ‘chat’ who had no business in the discussion, not just Goldberg. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,937 Posted March 25 16 minutes ago, jonmx said: I sincerely don't give a fok what an actual retard authoritarian bootlicker posts. I have more respect for dogsh1t on the bottom of my shoe than I do for you. Long as you don't lick the dogsh!t...that might not taste great. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,937 Posted March 25 17 minutes ago, jonmx said: I did for some years. I can't say how common but when I was in the most sensitive location I was told to use signal. So it's commonly used but you don't know how common......cool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,896 Posted March 25 It’s like the same scripts from Hilary’s emails were mailed out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,357 Posted March 25 Leave it to the blue hair effeminates to get worked up over a foking text message. News Flash: Reporter used to getting leaked information seriously outraged when it happens by accident. Bunch of women posters here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 378 Posted March 25 2 minutes ago, HB Localboy said: Fake news liars! The National Security Counsel & White House counsel confirmed it after it happened. & for once I’ll say it would’ve been better if they’d denied it, but they couldn’t even lie right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HotRod 69 Posted March 25 23 minutes ago, jonmx said: And yet no damage was done and the mission went off successfully. The whole purpose of classifying information is to protect information which could cause harm. This information did not cause any harm. If this information fell into the wrong plans it could have caused harm. That's why it's classified and that's why we don't use signal on personal devices to transmit this type of information. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,937 Posted March 25 It's amusing to see the usual suspects in here doing gymnastics to try and make excuses for their leader's team. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,927 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, Sean Mooney said: It's amusing to see the usual suspects in here doing gymnastics to try and make excuses for their leader's team. More amusing watching you claim that things happened that didn’t. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,896 Posted March 25 I keep getting these spam texts from Three Sheets Pete…You up? Should we bomb Gaza? Text 1 for YES Enough pal! 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,937 Posted March 25 Pretty bad when a reporter for The Atlantic is more respectful and careful about US war plans than the national security advisor of the US and the secretary of defense. Yes I know that almost a day later they tried to cover up and circle the wagons to deny and discredit....but normal people see that they are lying to deflect away from incompetence. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,937 Posted March 25 It's also funny when you can see all the defenses being thrown in here and then as you look online you see all those defenses are things being spun by pundits. Literally just people on here repeating what people on TV told them to say. Ironic considering the MAGA mooks insist it is only the right who gets their marching orders. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,578 Posted March 25 Another topic I am torn on, as I have no political affiliation telling me which way to feel. I lean towards Hegseth made a mistake. A potential huge mistake and got lucky this time. This is a big deal and should be dealt with appropriately. I do think the reporter could have kept his mouth shut and gone to Hegseth and told him the mistake he made Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 378 Posted March 25 Just now, edjr said: Another topic I am torn on, as I have no political affiliation telling me which way to feel. I lean towards Hegseth made a mistake. A potential huge mistake and got lucky this time. This is a big deal and should be dealt with appropriately. Political affiliation has nothing to do with it. It’s like a top executive at your office leaving a check for a million dollars on a park bench, and he says ‘Was that wrong? Should I not have done that?’ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
edjr 6,578 Posted March 25 Just now, SaintsInDome2006 said: Political affiliation has nothing to do with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 378 Posted March 25 Just now, edjr said: People react how they react. You can figure out right from wrong in your daily life all the time & I doubt you check to see what team jersey you have on when you do, I’m sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sean Mooney 1,937 Posted March 25 4 minutes ago, edjr said: Another topic I am torn on, as I have no political affiliation telling me which way to feel. I lean towards Hegseth made a mistake. A potential huge mistake and got lucky this time. This is a big deal and should be dealt with appropriately. I do think the reporter could have kept his mouth shut and gone to Hegseth and told him the mistake he made TBF- the mistake is with Michael Waltz who added the reporter to the chat without being more careful about it all. Hegseth should've been confirming the group before putting details of their plans and stuff into it all. It's also a little surprising that the reporter was there (believed to be someone else) and no one questioned why the person was not saying anything as it seems like everyone else did at some point or another. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,357 Posted March 25 Entire email server and boxes full of documents in the garage/bathroom storage vs a single foking text message. Only hysterical women care. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Horseman 2,357 Posted March 25 11 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said: People react how they react. You can figure out right from wrong in your daily life all the time & I doubt you check to see what team jersey you have on when you do, I’m sure. How many covid boosters you up to? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thegeneral 2,896 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, Horseman said: Entire email server and boxes full of documents in the garage/bathroom storage vs a single foking text message. Only hysterical women care. Heavy flow day for Rodger. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,124 Posted March 25 Did you guys read the message exchanges? Sounded like a bunch of teenaged girls. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SaintsInDome2006 378 Posted March 25 14 minutes ago, Horseman said: How many covid boosters you up to? What an eccentric non-sequitur. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,799 Posted March 25 16 minutes ago, MDC said: Did you guys read the message exchanges? Sounded like a bunch of teenaged girls. Who? You and your boyfriends? I could see that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MDC 7,124 Posted March 25 3 minutes ago, seafoam1 said: Who? You and your boyfriends? I could see that. BOYfriends! You’re killing it Peefoam! 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
seafoam1 2,799 Posted March 25 34 minutes ago, thegeneral said: Heavy flow day for Rodger. Light flow day for generalgutternuts and mdcack it seems. You both are nimble today online. You go girls. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,699 Posted March 25 Fire Hegseth and replace him with someone even more MAGA. The juice is not worth the squeeze. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hardcore troubadour 14,927 Posted March 25 Just now, Tree of Knowledge said: Fire Hegseth and replace him with someone even more MAGA. The juice is not worth the squeeze. If there was classified information on that text? Absolutely. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jerryskids 6,559 Posted March 25 13 hours ago, Tebok said: Here are some details of the attack that the Atlantic journalist knew about. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c05mvr3j3yro That article says 0 about what the reporter actually heard. Once again I can only conclude that you don't read your own links. 3 hours ago, jonmx said: Signal is an encrypted method of communication that intelligence agencies use when they are outside of secured rooms and don't have access to SIPR. It is far better than using standard text messaging, as long as you are not stupid enough to add a reporter. Thank you, I've been waiting to hear some info on Signal. Seems like this is not as unusual as people might think. My guess is "Signal!" goes the way of "unelected!" and "young engineers!" in the pile of failed fake anger phrases ginned up by the MSM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tree of Knowledge 1,699 Posted March 25 6 minutes ago, Hardcore troubadour said: If there was classified information on that text? Absolutely. Meh. He’s the biggest liability on the Dream Team Share this post Link to post Share on other sites